 | | | | Links to recent scientific papers, web posts, upcoming events, job opportunities, podcasts, and event recordings, etc. on Carbon Dioxide Removal TechnologyJUMP TO SECTIONTOP HIGHLIGHT OF THE WEEKPuro.earth certified first European biogas BECCS carbon removal projectPuro.earth certified the world’s first bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) project from biogas production, issuing over 700 CO2 Removal Certificates (CORCs) for operations at the VEAS wastewater treatment facility in Norway developed by Inherit Carbon Solutions. Read on to unpack more updates from past week: Carbon Removal is one of the most important climate topics of our time.If you value accessible, independent coverage of CDR research, governance, experiments, and policy developments, consider subscribing to Carbon Removal Updates.Paid subscriptions directly support keeping this resource public, independent, and growing.Donate Get 20% off a group subscription COMMERCIAL NEWSCarbon to Sea Initiative awarded $225k to a cross-sector team of scientists, engineers, and industry professionals to assess integrating ocean alkalinity enhancement with municipal wastewater treatment technologies (Carbon to Sea)Puro.earth certified the world’s first BECCS project from biogas, issuing 700+ CORCs for Norway’s VEAS wastewater facility developed by Inherit Carbon Solutions (ESG News)Agreena’s soil carbon project received a BBB ex-post rating from BeZero after delivering 2.3M verified carbon units (Carbon Herald)Cemex secured a €200M grant for its SOMZERO project, designed to capture and permanently store 500,000+ tCO₂/yr at its Spanish cement plant (Global Cement)Climeworks Solutions launched a compliance-ready carbon removal service aligned with the EU CRCF, CORSIA, and Article 6.2 (Climeworks)Terraform Industries demonstrated DAC at under $200/tCO₂, using a solar calciner to capture atmospheric CO₂ and concentrate it to >99% purity in a single step at its Muroc desert test site (X)Evero applied to develop the UK’s first BECCS facility under the Greenhouse Gas Removals Business Model (The Business Desk)Super6 Carbon proposed Removal-Backed Energy Attribute Certificates linking CDR with natural gas power (The Cement Institute)Isometric open-sourced its Calculation Library for carbon removal calculations (LinkedIn)Deep Sky partnered with DACLAB to deploy the Kelvin Tower DAC system at Deep Sky Alpha in Q4 2026 (LinkedIn)CLER VERTS received its first 63 Rainbow Carbon Credits for biochar carbon removal, with 1,084 credits/yr expected from 2027 (LinkedIn)Remove Accelerator opened applications for its Europe-focused CDR accelerator, offering expert coaching, network access, and a €15k purchase agreements without taking equity (remove)Octavia Carbon joined the inaugural Climate Finance Accelerator Kenya cohort, a technical assistance program funded by the UK Government (LinkedIn)Share RESEARCH PAPERSAuthors: Kaiyu Lei; Pedro P. C. Teixeira; Christopher Just; Franz Buegger; Ingrid Kögel-Knabner; Franziska B. BuckaSynopsis: An investigation into enhanced rock weathering shows that basalt properties can strongly influence soil organic carbon dynamics beyond inorganic carbon sequestration. A six-month microcosm study found fresh basalt increased native mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) carbon loss, while naturally weathered basalt enhanced new plant-derived MAOM formation by up to 20%. The findings suggest ERW carbon assessments should account for changes in soil organic carbon to better estimate its climate mitigation potential.
Authors: Yuwan Malakar, Kerryn Brent, Talia Jeanneret, Rod McCrea, John Gardner, Andrew LentonSynopsis: This study examines stakeholder perspectives on responsible CDR deployment in Australia, comparing ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and mineral carbonation (MC). Using interviews and Q methodology, researchers find strong agreement on the importance of scientific validation, monitoring, environmental protection, fairness, and risk governance. However, differences emerge in community concerns between marine and land-based approaches, highlighting the need for adaptive, place-specific governance frameworks for emerging CDR technologies.
Authors: Nathalie Hilmi, Loua Aurel De Vince Vehi, Marina Treskova, Cécile Sabourault & Lisa LevinSynopsis: Global valuation study quantifies the economic contribution of marine ecosystems to climate regulation by developing a framework for measuring blue carbon wealth. Researchers estimate that coastal ecosystems remove around 111 million tonnes of carbon annually, worth $228.6 billion, while including open-ocean processes raises total removal value to $2.32 trillion per year. The findings highlight the major role of marine carbon sinks in global wealth accounting and reveal unequal distribution of these natural assets among countries.
Authors: Sarah Gonzalez-Coffin, Shahzeen Z. Attari, Holly Buck, Amanda R. Carrico, Yoel Inbar, Ezra Markowitz, Kaitlin T. Raimi, Jonathon P. Schuldt, Trisha Shrum & Leaf Van BovenSynopsis: Two US-based studies investigate how perceptions of naturalness influence public support for CDR and low-carbon energy technologies. Researchers find that technologies viewed as more natural are considered less risky, more beneficial, and receive greater public approval. Experimental results show that framing technologies through natural analogies can increase acceptance, particularly among people concerned about human interference with nature, while political ideology does not significantly alter the effect.
Authors: Francesco Campo, Giovanni Dolci, Mario Grosso, Phil Renforth, Mijndert van der Spek, Spyros Foteinis, Marta Manca Zeichen, Roberto Borghesi, Stefano CaseriniSynopsis: A life cycle assessment evaluates ocean liming (OL) as a carbon dioxide removal approach that can also help reduce ocean acidification. Researchers compare four process configurations using biomass or renewable electricity for lime production and different CO₂ storage pathways. The study finds net carbon removal efficiencies of 85–96%, with pH-equilibrated ocean alkalinization emerging as a promising storage option where geological storage is unavailable, while highlighting trade-offs such as land-use impacts.
Authors: Aratrika Ghose, Matthew M. Mettler, Timothy A. Barckholtz, Xiaozhou Zhang, Paul J. Dauenhauer, and Prodromos DaoutidisSynopsis: This study presents a techno-economic assessment of a biomass pyrolysis-based .CDR process that stores carbon as solid biochar. Using process simulations and cost modeling, researchers estimate a levelized removal cost of $108–$321 per tonne of CO₂ for a large-scale facility processing woody biomass. The analysis finds the approach remains competitive across different economic and operational conditions and shows potential for deployment through both modular and large centralized facilities.
Authors: Sevekari M , Brown C , Díaz-General E , Rounsevell MSynopsis: Examining afforestation and reforestation (A/R) projects across 37 countries, this review explores how carbon dioxide removal efforts intersect with justice and wellbeing. The study finds that justice considerations are often overlooked in A/R research and policy, despite significant social and ecological impacts. Researchers highlight the need for stronger institutions and context-specific approaches to ensure A/R delivers fair outcomes for marginalized communities, ecosystems, and non-human entities.
Authors: Rafael Marcé, Daniel Diaz de-Quijano, Sofía Rodríguez-Gómez, Enrique Moreno-Ostos, et al.Synopsis: A study reveals that the drying of the Aral Sea has transformed a major carbon-storing ecosystem into a significant carbon source. Using sediment analysis, CO₂ flux measurements, and satellite data, researchers estimate that exposed lake beds have released 204 ± 53 teragrams of carbon since 1960, while vegetation offset less than 1% of emissions. The findings suggest restoring the lake could prevent further carbon losses and provide climate mitigation benefits alongside ecological recovery.
Authors: Jake T. Thompson, Millie Dobson, Tim Jesper Suhrhoff, et al.Synopsis: Researchers propose an integrated approach combining phytoremediation, biochar production, and enhanced weathering to clean PFAS-contaminated farmland while delivering CDR. Modeling suggests alkaline rock amendments can accelerate PFOS removal, while pyrolyzed biomass-derived biochar can reduce contamination risks and improve carbon storage. Applied across US croplands, the strategy could remove around 11 Mt CO₂ annually, offering a lower-cost alternative to conventional remediation methods.
Authors: Oana LucaSynopsis: This study advances electro-swing DAC by designing improved quinone-based organic sorbents that capture and release CO₂ through reversible electrochemical reactions. Combining computational modeling with molecular synthesis, researchers identified structures with stronger CO₂ binding, improved redox performance, and reduced oxygen interference. The findings demonstrate a pathway toward more efficient, electricity-driven DAC systems that avoid the energy demands of conventional thermal and pressure-based capture methods.
Authors: Lukas Marx, Jennie E. Rheuban, Daniel C. McCorkle, Christopher S. Murray, Yiming Guo, Zhaohui Aleck Wang, Anna P. M. Michel, Ke Chen, Heather H. Kim & Adam V. SubhasSynopsis: Researchers introduce the Ecological Activity Index (EAI), a data-driven framework to assess potential ecosystem exposure to ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE). By combining information on chlorophyll a, zooplankton, fish larvae, endangered species, and commercial fishing activity, the index maps ecological activity and human use across the US Northeast Shelf and Slope. The framework could support OAE site selection, monitoring strategies, and environmental impact assessments.
Authors: Yifei Xu, Qiyuan Li, Bingqiao Xie, Zixin Zhang et al.Synopsis: This review examines the engineering challenges limiting large-scale adsorption-based DAC deployment, shifting attention beyond adsorbent chemistry toward system-level solutions. Researchers highlight advances in low-pressure-drop contactors, improved thermal management, strategic water handling, and integration with sectors such as buildings and agriculture. The study proposes levelized profit as a key metric for evaluating economic feasibility and accelerating DAC from laboratory development to global implementation.
Authors: Linus Engstam, Gülru Bulkan, Leandro Janke, Cecilia Sundberg, Åke NordbergSynopsis: An assessment explores biohydrogen production combined with CDR as a pathway for renewable energy generation with negative emissions. Comparing steam methane reforming, electrified reforming, and plasma methane pyrolysis, the study finds that all pathways can achieve net-negative emissions with low-carbon electricity. Solid carbon storage from plasma pyrolysis offers lower CDR costs than geological CO₂ storage, while large-scale centralized systems provide the greatest economic advantages.
Authors: Ioannis Keroglou, Rebecca CiezSynopsis: This assessment examines the environmental impacts of manufacturing solid sorbents used in DAC, highlighting the growing importance of production emissions as operational impacts decline. Using a process-based life cycle model, researchers find that polyethyleneimine-based sorbent production has higher material and energy demands than previously estimated, increasing climate, resource, and water footprints. The study emphasizes cleaner manufacturing, longer sorbent lifetimes, and stronger supply chains for gigaton-scale DAC deployment.
Authors: M. Ward, M.T. Costa, A.M. Ricart, S. Crooks, L.M. Wedding and P.I. MacreadieSynopsis: This review examines the growing role of blue carbon ecosystems—including mangroves, tidal marshes, seagrass meadows, and seaweeds—in climate mitigation and carbon markets. Researchers find that blue carbon projects remain heavily concentrated on mangroves despite broader ecosystem potential. The study estimates restoration could remove around 109 million tonnes of organic carbon annually, while highlighting challenges in monitoring, carbon accounting, and verification that must be addressed to ensure credible and durable climate benefits.
Authors: Ahmet ÇakanelSynopsis: Paper introduces Carbon-Integrity-Constrained Control (CICC), a framework designed to ensure DAC systems maintain certifiable carbon removals under strict measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) standards. Researchers show that electricity carbon intensity, operational timing, and uncertainty can create “carbon debt” that threatens removal credibility. Testing across Turkey, Germany, and US grids, the framework improves certifiable operation by dynamically restricting DAC activity to cleaner electricity periods, demonstrating that carbon integrity must be actively managed rather than assumed.
Authors: Eun-Ji Lee, Won-Gune Jeong, Ga-Been Lee, Kitae BaekSynopsis: Researchers developed a rapid chemical oxidation method to better estimate the carbon sequestration potential of biochar by measuring its unstable carbon fraction. The study optimized an oxidation process using potassium dichromate and sulfuric acid that closely matched carbon mineralized by soil microbes, showing a strong correlation with soil-based measurements. The approach could improve biochar carbon accounting by avoiding lengthy incubation experiments while identifying high-performing biochar sources.
Authors: Kopal Jain, Kapila Kumar, Shashi Kumar & Prachi NawkarkarSynopsis: This review explores synthetic biology strategies to enhance microalgae-based carbon capture by improving their natural CO₂ concentrating mechanisms and carbon fixation pathways. Researchers examine approaches such as RuBisCO overexpression, enzyme modification, and metabolic engineering to increase carbon uptake while assessing challenges for industrial scaling. The study also highlights the potential of converting microalgal biomass into biofuels, bioplastics, and other products to support carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) and a circular bioeconomy.
CDR potential from biochar and EW on PFAS-impacted farmland in the US ( Source)Global carbon sequestration by blue carbon ecosystems type (Source)THESESAuthors: Brena Ramos, FernandaSynopsis: This study develops a cost-optimization model to examine how limited foresight, technological inertia, and demand uncertainty could affect CDR deployment in Canada. The results show that delayed decision-making and inflexible technology growth can significantly increase costs and limit deployment, with blind commitments causing up to fivefold cost increases compared with ideal conditions. The study highlights the importance of adaptive planning, regular policy reviews, and diversified CDR portfolios for effective long-term deployment.
WEB POSTSThe main thing holding carbon removal back (Marginal Carbon)TÜV SÜD is a new member of the German Association for Negative Emissions (DVNE) (TÜV SÜD)How the 2026 climate tech market is shaping up so far (Latitude Media)The compelling case for carbon removal at scale (Illuminem)Building the CDR Demand Toolbox: What CDR can Borrow from Vaccines, Renewables, Silicon Valley, and More (Global ClimateTech Watch)Reflooding the Aral Sea could prevent massive CO₂ emissions (Phys.Org)EU ETS carbon removal figures ‘don’t add up’, expert warns (Gas World)The carbon removal company with nowhere to put its carbon (Carbon Pulse)Biochar sector urges EU to open carbon market to all permanent removals (Carbon Pulse)Reef Digress: Broadening the Boundaries of Human Intervention: Blind Alleys and Groundbreaking Ideas (Reef Ranch)Can we alter ocean chemistry to absorb carbon? Here are the pros and cons (The Conversation)UK’s plans for greenhouse gas removals show support for biochar, softening on int’l DAC -expert (Carbon Pulse)Carbon sequestration targets under a spotlight in Northern Ireland (Agriland)Carbon Removal Must Borrow More Than Capital to Scale (FII Institute)New, battery-like, device sucks carbon dioxide directly out of the air (Brighter)ANALYSIS: CO₂ removal firms pivot into adjacent markets (QC Intel)The UK Government’s response to the GGR Review, explained (Isometric)The EU ETS Proposal Explained (CDR.fyi)Selling Stability: The Problem with Pitching “Climate Stabilization” as a New Category of Climate Response (African Tech Futures Lab)Europe’s Carbon Removal Breakthrough: What’s Actually in the ETS Proposal (Carbonfuture)The 2026 fire season has officially begun for California forest offset projects (CarbonPlan)Mapping the Terrain: Notes from the ERW Modeling Workshop (Cascade Climate)Africa’s Rift Valley: Ideal Location for DAC Projects (PTQ Magazine)ANALYSIS: Methodology overhaul needed to scale ERW (1/2) (QC Intel)The EU’s €50bn alley-oop to BECCS projects in the Pulp & Paper industry (Fastmarkets)EN 15804 must accurately credit biochar-based permanent carbon removals (Biochar Europe)Opinion: Why Biochar Belongs In Europe’s Carbon Market (Carbon Herald)DACMA Sets the Course for Its Next Phase of Growth (DACMA)Carbon removal is graduating: it is the next major institutional investment opportunity (Counteract)Uncomfortable bedfellows: carbon removal and solar radiation management (Everything and the Carbon Sink)How a Failed Interview Sparked My Interest in CCUS and CDR (Kathure Rufina Cindy)How Drawn Carbon Helps Early-Stage ARR Projects Unlock Financing (EP Carbon)EU bashed for ‘baffling’ plans for integrating CDR credits into EU ETS (Carbon Pulse)Open ocean dominates world’s blue carbon removal value, new valuation shows (Carbon Pulse)BOOKREPORTSIETA’s Vision for the Post-2030 EU ETS (IETA)UPCOMING EVENTSJuly 2026August 2026Developing Your Message | 16 September 2026 | OnlineCommunicating Risk | 07 October 2026 | OnlineEngaging with the Media | 28 October 2026 | Online
AGU26 Annual Meeting | 7–11 December 2026 | San Francisco, CA | Abstract Submission Deadline: 05 August 2026We have curated a “Carbon Removal Events Calendar.” Explore and stay informed about upcoming events, conferences, and webinars on Carbon Dioxide Removal technology. Sync specific events / all events to your default calendar to ensure you never miss out on important CDR updates. Carbon Removal Events Calendar Add our Carbon Removal Events Calendar to your default calendar in 2 ways:Sync specific event: Click the event → menu (≡) → Share → choose your calendar → Save.Or sync all events: Menu (≡) → Preferences → iCalendar Feeds → Copy URL → Add to your calendar settings → Subscribe.JOB OPPORTUNITIES“PureFuel is a Climate, Sustainability & ESG talent specialist based in London & Dubai. Their purpose is to empower organisations to build a sustainable future by decarbonising the global economy.”
“Green Finance Institute (GFI) is an independent advisor to governments and investors. It is at the forefront of shaping how finance can be used to facilitate a real economy transition, by designing, testing, and scaling financial solutions that enable capital to flow where it can deliver the greatest impact in the real economy.”
Scientist at Puro.earth | Finland “Puro.earth is the world’s leading crediting platform for engineered carbon removal.”
“The Carbon Removal Alliance works to build a gigaton-scale carbon removal industry that is categorically good for the climate, economy, and people.”
“Skytree enables a transition to a world with cleaner Air for everyone. We do this by developing and deploying smart technology that captures atmospheric carbon dioxide, enabling its use or storage to combat climate change and aid society and businesses around the world.”
“The candidate will join TNC’s Global Carbon Markets team and provide technical expertise in carbon project design, soil carbon accounting, carbon methodologies, project evaluation, and validation processes.”
“Blue Forest is a conservation finance non-profit founded in 2015 that is focused on advancing ecosystem restoration through scientific research, financial innovation, and collaborative partnerships.”
“Removall supports companies and organizations in their climate ambitions by developing and structuring pooled or customized carbon funds, or by implementing rigorous and ambitious carbon offsetting programs.”
“Carbon Lock Tech is developing patented pyrolytic reactor technologies that convert biomass and organic waste into stable biocarbon outputs.”
“At Varhad, our mission is to restore Soil Health, produce chemical-free nutritious food, and empower farmers.”
“UNDO is tackling the greatest challenge of our time: climate change.”
“RepAir Carbon was founded in 2020 with a mission to pioneer the most sustainable carbon dioxide removal solution.”
Looking for your dream job in CDR? There are 576 jobs available *right now*: check them all out at: CDRjobs Board PODCASTS“Charm Industrial is a climate tech company that takes biomass and converts it into a heavy, carbon-rich oil that can be injected underground, transmuting and storing the greenhouse gas far from the atmosphere. They’re scaling up fast and recently announced a new $20 million debt facility with JP Morgan; the bank also agreed to buy more than 60,000 tons worth of removals from them.On this episode of Shift Key, Rob is joined by Peter Reinhardt, the CEO and cofounder of Charm. (He’s also the CEO of the trucking company Revoy, a founder of the autoimmune therapeutics company Antipode, and a board member at the electricity data company Arcadia.) They talk about what makes Charm different, how it is scaling operations as a carbon removal company, and the changing politics of climate change.”
“In this episode of The CDR Policy Scoop, Eve Tamme and Sebastian Manhart sit down with Mette Quinn, Deputy Director for Carbon Markets and Clean Mobility at the European Commission, days after Brussels published its proposal to fold carbon removals into the EU Emissions Trading System.Quinn confirms the number the sector has been debating since Friday: a commitment to buy 250 million tons of permanent, domestically produced removals through BioCCS and direct air capture, funded by auctioning matching allowances plus a top up reserve, with a review clause for 2034 if the volumes do not materialize.Eve and Sebastian press Quinn on the mechanics behind that figure, from the price gap between today’s BioCCS costs and the EU allowance price, to whether national subsidies were built into the Commission’s cost modeling, which Quinn confirms they were not. They also test the supply pipeline: Quinn’s own estimate of close to 48 million tons by 2040 sits close to Eve’s independent projection, though still short of the full 250 million target.The conversation covers how the scheme will work for project developers, including the paid on delivery model Quinn says the Commission is exploring softening through prepayment and Innovation and Modernization Fund financing, and the proposal’s heavy reliance on BioCCS while direct air capture remains less cost competitive. Quinn is candid that no other technology pathway is currently envisaged, though the Carbon Removal Certification Framework leaves room for that to change.Quinn closes by drawing a sharp line between domestic removals, where funding is committed now with a 2034 review, and international credits, where a 2033 assessment will decide whether purchases continue at all, a distinction she ties to environmental integrity and the Commission’s confidence in each pathway.”
YOUTUBE VIDEOSHow Much CO₂ Can ERW Lock Per Hectare? (Visual Breakdown) | Dirk Paessler “The video provides a visualization of carbon sequestration through enhanced rock weathering (ERW) on agricultural land:ERW Process: By spreading between 5 and 40 tons of rock dust per hectare, ERW aims to capture a few tons of CO2 annually.Visualization of Sequestration: Assuming a sequestration rate of 2 tons of CO2 per hectare per year, the volume of this gas at room temperature would form a layer approximately 10 cm thick over the entire field.Physical Scale: The actual carbon locked away equates to 546 kg of pure carbon. This amount of solid carbon, when spread across the hectare, creates a film only 24 micrometers thick, which is roughly one-quarter the diameter of a human hair.Comparison to Biomass: Mature corn fields capture roughly 7.5 tons of carbon per hectare annually through photosynthesis, which is about an order of magnitude higher than ERW.Unlike ERW, most carbon captured by biomass returns to the atmosphere through seasonal growth, harvest, and decay cycles.Measurement Challenges: The primary difficulty with ERW is the complex process of measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) required to detect such small amounts of carbon within a dynamic agricultural environment.”
Building Africa as a Global CDR Hub: Innovation & Entrepreneurship Webinar | Emerging Climate Frontiers “Building Africa as a Global Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) hub requires more than participation, it demands leadership in innovation, enterprise development, and ecosystem design. As global demand for high-quality carbon removal accelerates, new opportunities are emerging across technology development, project financing, MRV systems, and climate-aligned supply chains.”
Can Cement Be Made With 85% Less CO₂ at the Same Cost? | CURA | Bite-Size Climate Tech “Cement is responsible for roughly 8% of global CO₂ emissions. But the line that stayed with me after editing this conversation was not the number.It was Erin’s closing thought:“The next generation is already on it.”
Building an African Partnership for Responsible mCDR Research, Development, and Demonstration | Ocean Visions Carbon Buyers Breakfast: How CSOs Can Position Carbon Removal as Strategic Value? | InPlanet - Measurable. Scalable. Certified Credits “Filmed live at the National Gallery during London Climate Action Week, this panel brings together top experts from across the Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) ecosystem. Hosted by InPlanet and co-hosted alongside Carboneers and ClimeFi (with support from Isometric), the discussion explores the rapidly shifting “Beyond Carbon” paradigm. Discover how buyers can navigate evolving policy, manage long-term risk, and tap into the profound agricultural advantages of high-integrity carbon removal.”
Microwave Direct Air Capture Finally Makes Carbon Removal Affordable | Energi Media “Direct air capture (DAC) has long been criticized as too expensive and too energy intensive to scale. But Aircapture says it has found a way to dramatically reduce those costs.In this interview, Aircapture CEO Matt Atwood explains how the company’s patented Lightswing™ technology uses microwave energy instead of conventional thermal regeneration to release captured CO₂, reducing both energy use and capital costs while making modular direct air capture commercially viable.”
Utilizing Desalination Brine for CO2 Removal | Innovation Driven Water Sustainability “Explores innovative approaches to leveraging desalination brine as a resource for carbon dioxide (CO2) removal, addressing two critical environmental challenges simultaneously: freshwater scarcity and climate change.”
Carbon Credits vs Carbon Offsets: Everything You Need to Know | The Waste Not Spot “In Part 1 of our two-part series, the Millennials GoneCircular team breaks down one of sustainability’s most debated topics: carboncredits and carbon offsets.Join Caitlyn, Said, and Angelica as they explore thedifference between carbon credits and offsets, compliance vs. voluntary carbonmarkets, avoidance vs. removal credits, the origins of carbon markets under theKyoto Protocol, and the key principles behind high-quality carbon credits, includingadditionality, permanence, verification, and more.We also examine recent research questioning theeffectiveness of many carbon credits and discuss why the future is shiftingtoward high-integrity carbon removals.Whether you’re new to sustainability or work in ESG, thisepisode gives you a practical foundation for understanding one of climateaction’s most important and controversial tools.”
Literally unearthing a climate solution with Cody Finke of Brimstone | DeepSignal Studios “When it comes to carbon emissions, there’s a major culprit you might not have heard about: cement. The production of cement emits almost as much carbon dioxide as cars do - but Brimstone CEO and co-founder Cody Finke says they’ve found a way to change that.This week on How I Built This Lab, Cody explains where all that carbon dioxide is coming from, and how swapping out a key ingredient in the production of cement could take it from carbon-intensive … to carbon-negative.”
Understanding the Land Sector and Removals Guidance | 3Keel “The Land Sector and Removals (LSR) Guidance is a companion resource to the Land Sector and Removals Standard, designed to give practical details on how to account for and report GHG emissions and CO2 removals from agricultural land use and emerging CO2 removal technologies.At more than 500 pages, our experts have been going through the guidance in detail, so that we can help you understand its implications. Catherine and Megan summarise the key points and highlight where the guidance gives useful clarity to implementing the LSRS. They also dig in to where there are remaining challenges or uncertainties and zoom in on some specific case studies to illustrate use cases.”
Char Talk (July 2026): Biochar: Fueling a New Economy in the Developing World (Official Book Launch) | Minnesota Biochar Initiative “This month’s Char Talk, hosted by the Minnesota Biochar Initiative (MNBI), celebrated the launch of Biochar: Fueling a New Economy in the Developing World - Official Book Launch & Global Discussion a new book that explores the transformative potential of biochar to drive both economic development and climate action around the globe.Written by leading experts and grounded in peer-reviewed research and real-world experience, the book highlights how biochar can create opportunities that scale from individual entrepreneurs and farming communities to regional and national economies. The discussion will explore the many ways biochar can support financial resilience, livelihood development, sustainable resource management, and climate change mitigation.”
Weekly Carbon Removal Updates from 20 July - 26 July 2026 | Carbon Removal Updates Bulletin DEADLINESFollow us on:Twitter | Bluesky | LinkedIn | YouTube | Substack | Podcast 1 | Podcast 2
Support us here:Support This Newsletter Share Carbon Removal Updates Leave a comment © 2026 Carbon Removal Updates
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe 
| |
  |
|
