Quoting: "As do the Plaintiffs in Juliana v. USA, the current Plaintiff asserts that through its policies and actions the US Government has ignored its regulatory responsibilities and allowed and encouraged a global warming situation dangerous to the life and liberty of all US Citizens. The current action, however, takes into account new understanding that (1) Mitigation and emissions reductions, while possibly effective in the middle of the past century, are no longer viable relief - that only active atmospheric carbon removal can hope to address our grievances and (2) Emergency Relief is needed to initiate atmospheric carbon removal long before the climate deadline in the mid-2030's."
GR Crime (and remedy) of the millenium? Perhaps the government will use the "freedom molecules" defense.