Lawsuit seeking SRM / CDR

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Lockley

unread,
Jun 10, 2019, 4:59:06 PM6/10/19
to geoengineering, CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com <CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com>
In new federal case Komor v. US, AZ plaintiff suing government over climate change, seeking emergency relief via carbon removal to 350 ppm by mid-2030s ("climate deadline"), possibly solar geoengineering

20190529_docket-419-cv-00293_complaint.pdf

Julio Friedmann

unread,
Jun 10, 2019, 5:31:40 PM6/10/19
to Andrew Lockley, geoengineering, CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com <CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com>
Anyone have the Appendix on Ocean Assisted Carbon Capture & Reflection?

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:59 PM Andrew Lockley <andrew....@gmail.com> wrote:
In new federal case Komor v. US, AZ plaintiff suing government over climate change, seeking emergency relief via carbon removal to 350 ppm by mid-2030s ("climate deadline"), possibly solar geoengineering

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to CarbonDioxideRem...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to CarbonDiox...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/CarbonDioxideRemoval.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/CAJ3C-04X2sqg6%2BP9rk1gvGXuP_R4tONf6NwT-cRbQqm-DxtBtQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Greg Rau

unread,
Jun 10, 2019, 6:20:14 PM6/10/19
to geoengineering, CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com <CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com>, Andrew Lockley
Quoting: "As do the Plaintiffs in Juliana v. USA, the current Plaintiff asserts that through its policies and actions the US Government has ignored its regulatory responsibilities and allowed and encouraged a global warming situation dangerous to the life and liberty of all US Citizens. The current action, however, takes into account new understanding that (1) Mitigation and emissions reductions, while possibly effective in the middle of the past century, are no longer viable relief - that only active atmospheric carbon removal can hope to address our grievances and (2) Emergency Relief is needed to initiate atmospheric carbon removal long before the climate deadline in the mid-2030's."

GR Crime (and remedy) of the millenium? Perhaps the government will use the "freedom molecules" defense. 

On Monday, June 10, 2019, 1:59:52 PM PDT, Andrew Lockley <andrew....@gmail.com> wrote:


In new federal case Komor v. US, AZ plaintiff suing government over climate change, seeking emergency relief via carbon removal to 350 ppm by mid-2030s ("climate deadline"), possibly solar geoengineering

--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages