> The only thing im not sure about
> is the facility for submitting contributions to COAL. I think I would
> want them to go to the COAL website directly for this.
OK. I figured the mechanism would just be an extra way of utilizing
whatever interface you provided on your website. As I said this is of
much lesser importantce in my mind than any of the other stuff.
I have also been thinking, since folks may/will want to include their
on proprietary libraries in their copy of COAL providing some
funcitionality to easilly update their local coal xml configuration
file to reflect their local additions.
perhaps this could be done by scanning the package path for files,
determining which ones aren't listed and then prompting the user for
confirmation that the found components should be added to the config
xml file. At the same time as the confirmation the user could be
prompted for the components version number (which I belive Ryan told
me is tracked) the version numbers at this step could be defaulted to
1 (or whatever the initial version number used by COAL is).
I figure the easier it is to use COAL in all aspects, the better it will be.
It already appears exceptionally easy to use a COAL component that is
in place. So now what I basically want to do is make it easy for
someone to administer their COAL installation.
--
bill.ra...@gmail.com
http://blog.rawlinson.us
If you want Gmail - just ask.