enjoy this pictures ...

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mart.

unread,
Sep 16, 2007, 7:09:15 AM9/16/07
to Black & White Photography

film orwo np 22 125 iso, expire date 1992 .... :-)


http://swnatur.blogspot.com/2007_09_15_archive.html

bill dobbs

unread,
Sep 16, 2007, 4:03:28 PM9/16/07
to Black--White...@googlegroups.com
Looking good Mart.  A little more contrast might bring out details better.  Closeups are hard to get, aren't they?

The following link is to a photo ezine called Double Exposure put out by Photoworkshop.com.  They have published one of my photographs.

http://www.doubleexposure.com/PTI_Dobbs.shtml



"Mart." <mart.sc...@googlemail.com> wrote:



film orwo np 22 125 iso, expire date 1992 .... :-)


http://swnatur.blogspot.com/2007_09_15_archive.html



Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

Mart.

unread,
Sep 16, 2007, 5:21:21 PM9/16/07
to Black & White Photography

thank you ... but well the problem is they are all analog photos i don
´t used a digital camera ... so it could be that the scan is´nt really
good .. i used epson perfection 2480 photo for scanning the negatives
and i think that the scanner don´t bring the conrast correctly form
the negatives to a digital picture ... yes, of course i can use adobe
photoshop but i have to learn how i can avoiding with this ...

do you know what i mean ???

On 16 Sep., 22:03, bill dobbs <dentondo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Looking good Mart. A little more contrast might bring out details better. Closeups are hard to get, aren't they?
>
> The following link is to a photo ezine called Double Exposure put out by Photoworkshop.com. They have published one of my photographs.
>
> http://www.doubleexposure.com/PTI_Dobbs.shtml
>

> "Mart." <mart.schroe...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> film orwo np 22 125 iso, expire date 1992 .... :-)
>
> http://swnatur.blogspot.com/2007_09_15_archive.html
>

> ---------------------------------

bill dobbs

unread,
Sep 19, 2007, 11:33:46 PM9/19/07
to Black--White...@googlegroups.com
I agree, Mart.  I get colour negatives scanned at the lab when they develop my film.  Their scanner is excellent and captures the image very well.  For black and white, I print 8x10 photos in my darkroom then scan them on a flatbed scanner.  The contrast usually comes out properly this way.

"Mart." <mart.sc...@googlemail.com> wrote:


thank you ... but well the problem is they are all analog photos i don
´t used a digital camera ... so it could be that the scan is´nt really
good .. i used epson perfection 2480 photo for scanning the negatives
and i think that the scanner don´t bring the conrast correctly form
the negatives to a digital picture ... yes, of course i can use adobe
photoshop but i have to learn how i can avoiding with this ...



do you know what i mean ???

On 16 Sep., 22:03, bill dobbs wrote:
> Looking good Mart. A little more contrast might bring out details better. Closeups are hard to get, aren't they?
>
> The following link is to a photo ezine called Double Exposure put out by Photoworkshop.com. They have published one of my photographs.
>
> http://www.doubleexposure.com/PTI_Dobbs.shtml
>
> "Mart." wrote:
>
> film orwo np 22 125 iso, expire date 1992 .... :-)
>
> http://swnatur.blogspot.com/2007_09_15_archive.html
>
> ---------------------------------
> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.



Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages