File of Kayo as attac

3 views
Skip to first unread message

kayo

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 7:31:14 AM10/14/10
to Biocosmology
Dear all

I appreciate for warm message by Mr.Andrei andDr.Konstantin from my
heart

I uploaded my presentation in Bio cosmology seminar of Russia as
attached file at now.

If you can send your presentation in Bio cosmology seminar 1th of
Russia would you please upload on this website?

I will upload my presentation in Stockholm after seminar of Russia at
next week.

Best wishes
Kayo Uejima


Konstantin

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 1:45:19 PM10/14/10
to Biocosmology
Dear Kayo and all,
This is a good thing - we encourage every participant of the Seminar
to upload their presentations to our Discussion forum.
My first question to Kayo: Does your "symbiotic integration" include
the integration of the two contrary cosmological world-viewing poles:
Plato's vision of the world as the vision of Chaos and the opposite
Aristotle's vision of the world as the vision of Expedient
(Teleological) Cosmos?
Konstantin

kayo

unread,
Oct 15, 2010, 3:51:49 PM10/15/10
to Biocosmology
Dear all and Dr.Konstantin

I appreciate for your question very much.
I try symbiotic integration of two poles of Plato and Aristotle.
I describe symbiotic integration in diagrams of Nous-Self concept.
I uploaded 2 sheets in this web-sight.

You can observe boundless zone. The upper holons than boundless zone
are adapted to functional world of Aristotle. Meanwhile, the lower
holons than boundless zone are adapted to Idea world of Plato.

Certainly, I try to show framework of symbiotic integration of two
worldview concerning each cosmos by utilizing this boundless zone as
Nous Self process.

Best wishes
Kayo Uejima
> > Kayo Uejima- 引用テキストを表示しない -
>
> - 引用テキストを表示 -

Konstantin

unread,
Oct 16, 2010, 12:44:04 PM10/16/10
to Biocosmology
Dear Kayo - this is your good message and its presentation!
My inquiry is: Two poles cannot exist by themselves - without an
integrative (neutral, integral) basis, which is simultaneously the
intermediate foundation for the transition from the influence
(domination) of one pole to the influence (domination) of the other
pole; - i.e. one more autonomous life sphere is always needed. Do you
have such a prototype in your grand scheme and conception?
My best,
K.

Konstantin

unread,
Oct 17, 2010, 2:02:26 PM10/17/10
to Biocosmology, anjello jothirajan
Dear Colleagues,
This weekend, we have started the discussion with Dr Jothi Rajan –
about the interrelations of modern Bioethics with Biocosmology.
To my strong conviction, a true (natural) essence of modern Bioethics
is exactly the realization of a Third (Integral) sociocultural basis
and development. Hence, the main task of a modern bioethics is the
integration (in a harmonious form) of the means that relate to both
poles – Plato’s (AntiCosmist) and Aristotle’s (RealCosmist). However,
and this is the central failure of modern bioethics – it suffers from
a kind of “cosmological insufficiency”, for, it is able to consider
and relate with only one (Plato’s) pole, but is unable to comprehend
the other (Aristotle’s) pole. Therefore, it is unable to realize
effectively its goals in principle.
Would appreciate your comments,
K.Khroutski

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages