20 Years After 9/11, We're Still Morons
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Bill Totten
Sep 12, 2021, 3:08:16 AM9/12/21
to Totten Bill Weblog@Google
20 Years After 9/11, We're Still Morons
by Ted Rall
https://www.unz.com (September 10 2021)
If crisis creates opportunity, we couldn't possibly have squandered the possibilities presented by 9/11 more spectacularly. We certainly couldn't have failed its tests more completely. Twenty years after 9/11, it is clear that the United States is ruled by idiots and that we, the people are complicit with their moronic behavior.
"We had to do something". That was, and remains, the generic explanation for what we did in response to 9/11: invading Afghanistan and Iraq, directing the CIA to covertly overthrow the governments of Haiti, Venezuela, Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, and a bunch of other countries, lamely legalizing torture, kidnapping via extraordinary rendition to Guantanamo and other concentration camps, building a drone armada and sparking a drone arms race.
Acting purely on speculation, news media was reporting as early as the afternoon of September 11 that al-Qaida was responsible. That same day, Vice President Dick Cheney argued for invading Iraq. We began bombing Afghanistan on October 7, less than a month later, without evidence that Afghanistan was guilty. A week later, the Taliban offered to turn over Osama bin Laden; Bush refused. Before you act, you think. We didn't.
What should we have done ... after giving it a good think?
A smart people led by a good president would have had three priorities: Bring the perpetrators to justice, punish any nation-states that were involved, and reduce the chances of future terrorist attacks.
The 19 hijackers were suicides, but plotters such as al-Qaida's Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who lived in Pakistan, were not. Since we have an extradition treaty with Pakistan, we could have asked Pakistani authorities to arrest him and send him to face trial in the US or at the international war crimes tribunal at The Hague. Instead, we kidnapped him to CIA "dark sites", including Guantanamo, and subjected him to waterboarding 183 times. Because of this and other torture, as well as his illegal detention in violation of habeas corpus, Mohammed can't face trial in a real, that is civilian, court. Not only will 9/11 families never see justice carried out, but we've managed to turn Mohammed into a victim, just as he wanted.
The Inter-Services Intelligence agency, Pakistan's CIA, financed and provided intelligence to al-Qaida. Pakistan harbored bin Laden. Pakistan played host to hundreds of al-Qaida training camps. Pakistanis I talked to after 9/11 were shocked that the US didn't attack their country, instead giving its Taliban-aligned dictator General Pervez Musharraf billions in military and financial aid.
Evidence linking top Saudi Arabian officials to 9/11 has been scarce. But 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, several are reported to have met with midlevel Saudi intelligence agents before the attacks and, most notably, Saudi Arabia exports its radical brand of Sunni Islam, Wahhabism, all over the world. The Taliban and al-Qaida initially recruited many of their members from Wahhabi madrassas financed by the Saudis in Pakistan and Central Asia.
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51C-TCa6V-L.jpg
We should have treated 9/11 for what it was - a crime. Police officers, not soldiers, should have tracked down the perpetrators. They should have been given lawyers, not torture. They should have faced fair trials. But if we had to go the military route, we should have invaded Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the two countries responsible, not Afghanistan and Iraq, two countries that had nothing to do with it. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were, and remain, far more dangerous to their neighbors than Afghanistan or Iraq.
Occupying Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of Islamic extremism and global terrorism, would have done a lot to reduce the threat of another 9/11. But the most effective way to make us less of a target is to make the rest of the world look upon us with favor. Some people will always hate us; that's inevitable. Our goal should be to reduce their number to as close to zero as humanly possible.
We can't eliminate anti-Americanism by killing its adherents. We've been trying to do that for 20 years using drones and missile strikes. All we've accomplished is killing a lot of innocent people and making the rest of the world look at us with disgust and contempt. You kill anti-Americanism by treating people everywhere with respect and kindness. That includes those we suspect of doing us harm.
Unfortunately for us and the world, we learned nothing from 9/11. Not even losing Afghanistan back to the Taliban in the most humiliating US defeat since Vietnam, having nothing to show for 20 years of war, has taught us a thing. We're still a hammer that sees everything as a nail - a blunt, stupid people whose idea of a plan is to keep indiscriminately bombing innocent civilians.
_____
Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of a new graphic novel about a journalist gone bad, The Stringer: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54578775-the-stringer.
https://www.unz.com/trall/20-years-after-9-11-were-still-morons/
TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
the appropriate link at the top or bottom of https://billtotten.wpcomstaging.com/2021/09/12/20-years-after-9-11-were-still-morons/
by Ted Rall
https://www.unz.com (September 10 2021)
If crisis creates opportunity, we couldn't possibly have squandered the possibilities presented by 9/11 more spectacularly. We certainly couldn't have failed its tests more completely. Twenty years after 9/11, it is clear that the United States is ruled by idiots and that we, the people are complicit with their moronic behavior.
"We had to do something". That was, and remains, the generic explanation for what we did in response to 9/11: invading Afghanistan and Iraq, directing the CIA to covertly overthrow the governments of Haiti, Venezuela, Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, and a bunch of other countries, lamely legalizing torture, kidnapping via extraordinary rendition to Guantanamo and other concentration camps, building a drone armada and sparking a drone arms race.
Acting purely on speculation, news media was reporting as early as the afternoon of September 11 that al-Qaida was responsible. That same day, Vice President Dick Cheney argued for invading Iraq. We began bombing Afghanistan on October 7, less than a month later, without evidence that Afghanistan was guilty. A week later, the Taliban offered to turn over Osama bin Laden; Bush refused. Before you act, you think. We didn't.
What should we have done ... after giving it a good think?
A smart people led by a good president would have had three priorities: Bring the perpetrators to justice, punish any nation-states that were involved, and reduce the chances of future terrorist attacks.
The 19 hijackers were suicides, but plotters such as al-Qaida's Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who lived in Pakistan, were not. Since we have an extradition treaty with Pakistan, we could have asked Pakistani authorities to arrest him and send him to face trial in the US or at the international war crimes tribunal at The Hague. Instead, we kidnapped him to CIA "dark sites", including Guantanamo, and subjected him to waterboarding 183 times. Because of this and other torture, as well as his illegal detention in violation of habeas corpus, Mohammed can't face trial in a real, that is civilian, court. Not only will 9/11 families never see justice carried out, but we've managed to turn Mohammed into a victim, just as he wanted.
The Inter-Services Intelligence agency, Pakistan's CIA, financed and provided intelligence to al-Qaida. Pakistan harbored bin Laden. Pakistan played host to hundreds of al-Qaida training camps. Pakistanis I talked to after 9/11 were shocked that the US didn't attack their country, instead giving its Taliban-aligned dictator General Pervez Musharraf billions in military and financial aid.
Evidence linking top Saudi Arabian officials to 9/11 has been scarce. But 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, several are reported to have met with midlevel Saudi intelligence agents before the attacks and, most notably, Saudi Arabia exports its radical brand of Sunni Islam, Wahhabism, all over the world. The Taliban and al-Qaida initially recruited many of their members from Wahhabi madrassas financed by the Saudis in Pakistan and Central Asia.
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51C-TCa6V-L.jpg
We should have treated 9/11 for what it was - a crime. Police officers, not soldiers, should have tracked down the perpetrators. They should have been given lawyers, not torture. They should have faced fair trials. But if we had to go the military route, we should have invaded Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the two countries responsible, not Afghanistan and Iraq, two countries that had nothing to do with it. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were, and remain, far more dangerous to their neighbors than Afghanistan or Iraq.
Occupying Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of Islamic extremism and global terrorism, would have done a lot to reduce the threat of another 9/11. But the most effective way to make us less of a target is to make the rest of the world look upon us with favor. Some people will always hate us; that's inevitable. Our goal should be to reduce their number to as close to zero as humanly possible.
We can't eliminate anti-Americanism by killing its adherents. We've been trying to do that for 20 years using drones and missile strikes. All we've accomplished is killing a lot of innocent people and making the rest of the world look at us with disgust and contempt. You kill anti-Americanism by treating people everywhere with respect and kindness. That includes those we suspect of doing us harm.
Unfortunately for us and the world, we learned nothing from 9/11. Not even losing Afghanistan back to the Taliban in the most humiliating US defeat since Vietnam, having nothing to show for 20 years of war, has taught us a thing. We're still a hammer that sees everything as a nail - a blunt, stupid people whose idea of a plan is to keep indiscriminately bombing innocent civilians.
_____
Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of a new graphic novel about a journalist gone bad, The Stringer: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54578775-the-stringer.
https://www.unz.com/trall/20-years-after-9-11-were-still-morons/
TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
the appropriate link at the top or bottom of https://billtotten.wpcomstaging.com/2021/09/12/20-years-after-9-11-were-still-morons/
Bill Totten
Sep 12, 2021, 3:18:40 AM9/12/21
to Totten Bill Weblog@Google
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages