Britain to push for global climate deal by 2008

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pastor Dale Morgan

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 3:25:38 PM10/31/06
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
*Perilous Times and Global Warming

Britain to push for global climate deal by 2008*


Larry Elliott and Patrick Wintour
Tuesday October 31, 2006
The Guardian

The UK is to use the warnings of irreversible climate change and the
biggest economic slump since the 1930s, outlined in yesterday's Stern
review, to press for a new global deal to curb carbon emissions.

The government is urgently pushing ahead on the issue because the
existing Kyoto protocol runs out in 2012, and there is no binding
agreement to extend it. Downing Street is seeking the outline of a
package with the G8 industrial nations and five leading developing
countries by next year, or 2008 at the latest.

Tony Blair will lobby the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, to put the
need for international cooperation on climate change at the heart of
Germany's G8 presidency when it begins in January.

In a clear sign that the issue unites No 10 and the Treasury, Gordon
Brown will also be pushing for a radical rethink of the United Nations
and the World Bank which, he believes, are not equipped to oversee a
carbon trading scheme, including the principles on which carbon emission
allocations would be handed out to individual countries.

Downing Street sources said the prime minister wanted a framework that
included a target for stabilising CO2 emissions, a global scheme to cap
and trade carbon emissions, a global investment fund for new green
technologies and action to stop deforestation. The agreement would
include three countries that were not part of Kyoto - the United States,
China and India.

Launching the review into the economics of climate change by the
Treasury economist Sir Nicholas Stern, the prime minister said: "Without
radical measures to reduce carbon emissions within the next 10-15 years,
there is compelling evidence to suggest we might lose the chance to
control temperature rises."

The review said a "business as usual" model could result in temperatures
rising by 5C above pre-industrial levels, leading to a cut of 5-20% in
global living standards.

Mr Brown, who shared a platform with Mr Blair at yesterday's launch,
said it was no longer enough for economic policy to be based around
growth and full employment. "In the 21st century, our new objectives
will be threefold: growth, full employment and environmental care."

Both prime minister and chancellor accepted that green taxes would have
to form part of the solution to global warming. Treasury sources said
tackling the threat of climate change would form the centrepiece of a
Brown premiership and that the chancellor was preparing to reject
recommendations from the imminent Eddington review on transport if, as
expected, it proposes widescale roadbuilding and aviation growth. The
review is due to be published before next month's pre-budget report and
is seen inside government as a test of the government's green credentials.

The Treasury is also sending Sir Nicholas on a tour of China, India, the
US and Australia to set out British thinking and press home the central
thesis of his review - that it will cost the world far more later if it
does not spend money now to avert climate change.

In an attempt to shore up the government's domestic record on climate
change, the environment secretary, David Miliband, rushed out a Commons
statement promising that the government will legislate in the next
parliamentary session to put into statute a long-term goal of reducing
CO2 emissions by 60% by 2050. Interim, but not the annualised targets
sought by the opposition and some Labour backbenchers, will be set.

The bill will also set out an independent body - the carbon committee -
to work with the government to reduce emissions. The committee is
expected to be modelled on the monetary policy committee of the Bank of
England. The bill will also create enabling powers to put in place the
new emissions reduction measures needed to achieve these goals.

But, reflecting the speed with which the government has backed the
principle of the bill, ministerial sources were unable to say what
sanctions would be imposed on the British government or industry if
targets were not met.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages