So, Bell was wrong according to 9+ journals

[Fred Diether]

With Richard leaving, we have one down how many more to go?  Are some of you really going to keep thinking Bell was right?  LOL!

[Mark Hadley]

Bell is right.

The interesting thing about BI is what it tells us about quantum theory.

If the forum offers anything in that respect I'll stay.

You are an idiot, every time you suggest a problem with Bell's Inequalities or CHSH you are shown clearly that you are wrong and also that your understanding is poor even for a high school student. 

Mark

On Wed, 3 Dec 2025, 22:28 Fred Diether, <fredi...@gmail.com> wrote:

With Richard leaving, we have one down how many more to go?  Are some of you really going to keep thinking Bell was right?  LOL!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/78a45356-194d-4be0-828d-f00e88cf4d23n%40googlegroups.com.

[Fred Diether]

Oh dear, Mark is still in dense mode and totally completely clueless.  I guess you think the people at the journals are idiots also?  What does that make you?  LOL!

Richard is doing the right thing; get out while you can.

[Fred Diether]

I meant to say, Richard is getting out while the gettin' is good.

The inequalities are broken physics, there are several classical models that predict the same as QM for EPR-Bohm and QM is actually local for EPR-Bohm.  Sorry guys, but Bell was flat out wrong.