EXCERPTS:
The UPA government's decision to allow field trials in GM food crops
may have human and economic costs.
[image caption: HARVESTING COTTON IN Coimbatore. Bt Cotton seeds
released by multinational companies this year failed to give increased
yields. In Andhra Pradesh, a large number of cattle and sheep reportedly died
after eating Bt
Cotton stalks and leaves.]
According to the CFGMFI, these decisions have far-reaching implications
for agriculture and health . This is especially so giventhe contentious
results that experiments with Bt cotton have produced in Andhra
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. The CFGMFI leadership
pointed out that negative consequences were all the more likely because the
GEAC had said that the Bt gene being used for the brinjal trials was
the same as the one used in Bt cotton.
.... reports from the States in which Bt cotton was introduced have indicated that the tests against effects on human health were not as foolproof as claimed by
the company. Most farmers and farm workers in different States have
experienced longstanding allergies of different kinds. More recently,
reports from Andhra Pradesh indicated a rise in sheep mortality after
grazing on Bt cotton. According to the CFGMFI, some scientific
investigations have even pointed to a clear correlation between exposure to Bt
Cotton and the adverse health conditions seen among farmers.
The CFGMFI asserts that studies have established that the Bt gene is a
known toxin that affects human and livestock health adversely. A note
submitted by the organisation to Union Minister for Health and Family
Welfare Anbumani Ramdoss states: "Published, peer-reviewed papers by
scientists demonstrate that recombinant Cry1Ac protoxin in the Bt gene is a
powerful immunogen and when fed to mice, induced antibody responses
similar to those obtained with the cholera toxin. Research shows that
Cry1Ac actively binds to the inner surface of the mouse's small intestine.
This contests the often-heard argument that Cry proteins do not affect
mammals since they supposedly do not have receptors that bind the
truncated toxin in the gut."
Given these
results, the CFGMFI points out, the consequences of trials
with a food crop, indeed a vegetable crop that will be consumed
directly, are unimaginable. The coalition argues that that introduction of the
Bt gene in the food crop sector has the potential consequence of
genetic manipulation. However, the position of the Ministry of Environment,
as expressed by GEAC, is that the bio-safety package has been completed
for brinjal and there are no reasons to stop large-scale field trials.
Apart from health concerns, the commercial dimensions of the exercise
are also being questioned. There is a widespread perception, shared even
by some State Agriculture Ministers belonging to the Congress, that the
manner in which GM seeds are promoted is beneficial only to private
companies, particularly big multinational corporations like Monsanto. Even as such calls go out, the Manmohan Singh-led UPA
Ministry has
opened up new areas for Monsanto. The Left parties referred to this trend
in a note submitted at the UPA-Left Coordination Committee meeting on
June 15. The note pointed out that "the Seeds Bill piloted by the
Ministry of Agriculture seeks to subvert the seed rights of farmers and
facilitate monopolisation of the seed business in the hands of the
multinational seed companies. The Indo-U.S. Knowledge Initiative on Agricultural
Research and Education ... has not only empowered Wal-Mart and Monsanto
to dictate the agenda of agricultural research in India but also
ensured that such research will be largely funded by the U.S.-based
multinationals and therefore tied to the stringent intellectual property regime
of the U.S."
2.Biotech brinjal
FRONTLINE Volume 23 - Issue 12: Jun. 17-30, 2006
INDIA'S NATIONAL MAGAZINE
from the publishers of THE HINDU
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/stories/20060630004902400.htm