Coordinator |
Parjanya Shukla |
Room No-G307 Hall-5, IIT Kanpur |
first of all i dont know why the moderators dont agree that the
rule has been violated or simply manipulated. secondly are the
reportors so strong that they have the power in them so that on their
request admin team can violate or manipulate the rule? i am contantly
repeating after these media reports, i think this rule should be
removed or else action should be taken against the members whos name
appears, no matter if the person is founder or a part of central team
or any other member.
i would also like to show everyone my personal conversation with
gopal regarding this rule
Gopal Krishna: if only BM's name come, then no problem, but if u have
time at least take permission on phone also from admin team
boywonderamit: and wat iff the journalist print it without our consent
boywonderamit: we cant have control over him
Gopal Krishna: then it is a problem only: because rules r rules: at
least names must not be used.
boywonderamit: ok then if ur on a ground work and a journalist prints
ur name without ur consent then u will be debarred??
Gopal Krishna: bye then; has some journalist published about BM in
Mumbai. yes, one will be debarred, that's why it is duty of each member
to request journalist citing this rule: no one will be so cruel to turh
down this simple request
as far as i see gopal point of view earlier when the rule was created
was different than as of now. so i guess the admin team will take
appropriate and unbiased decission on this point.
and i would also like to say that gopal is not the only one whos name
has appeared in the india today article. its not just Gopal but also
Divya Cherala(admin team) whos name has appeared in the article. so
admin team plz think about this too.
regards
amit hargude
regards
amit hargude
==============
From: Moderator BhartUdayMission < moder...@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 31, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: regarding your query
To: subhash...@yahoo.com
Dear Subhashji,
This is in regard to your queries.
1. Like it has been written on the website, the choice of not paying
dowry lies in the hands of each member of BM. It is a guiding
principle. All full time members of BM will assure you that no dowry
will be taken by them.
2. As regards to the surname, it is optional and is again up to each
member. As an example, my own name is Cherala Divyashri Rao but I don't
use the Rao in my name. Similarly, a lot of members have taken this
choice.
I request you once again not to carry the names of any of the members
involved as it is against our policies.
Thanks and regards,
Moderators
==========================
As you can see, I did not know that he would print this in his article.
I told Gopal and Rishikesh about this immediately. I could not get
through to Gyan.
Also, the management team(with one member from all the teams) will
decide on our draft media policy. As was repeatedly stated, the only
thing that moderators made a rule about was that they have to be
contacted about media approaching. This rule was followed.
I am sorry if any of you feel that this was done for "personal glory"
as one of you has put it. You should understand that we had repeatedly
asked the reporter(including in my correspondence with him) that names
should not be mentioned.
I would like to reiterate that the ONLY rule was about informing
moderators about media. Gopal is not on the Admin team and he was
voicing his own opinion about media, just as all of you have voiced
yours.
The rule that had been made is clear and still stands.
A complete media policy will be formed with all the management group
members.
This will be my last mail regarding this issue.
Regards,
Divya
regards
amit hargude
I can see the group discussing an issue on the appearance of a group
members name in print. I am new here + haven't followed that thread and
hence I have *NO OPINION* on that discussion (of name in print )
However the original point, NOT TAKING DOWRY caught my eye when I saw a
post by Divya dated Feb 16th 2006
That seems to be a laudable cause. I've copied that portion below.
Where can I find reference to *NOT TAKING dowry* - a principle of BM ?
Is it on some website ? are members signatories to it ?
Any pointers / guidance would be most appreciated ..
regards
Vinayak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Dear Subhashji,
This is in regard to your queries.
1. Like it has been written on the website, the choice of
not paying dowry lies in the hands of each member of BM. It
is a guiding principle. All full time members of BM will
assure you that no dowry will be taken by them.
[.........]
Thanks and regards,
Moderators