Need guidance on poor SWAT-CUP calibration results (FLOW_OUT – Monthly)

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Malik Waseem Iqbal khokhar

unread,
Feb 20, 2026, 12:03:43 PM (21 hours ago) Feb 20
to ArcSWAT

Dear All,

I am working on hydrological modeling of the Neelum Watershed (Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan) using SWAT 2012 with SWAT-CUP (SUFI-2) for calibration.

I am calibrating monthly streamflow (FLOW_OUT) at reach 22 (outlet) for the period 1987–2004. However, my calibration results are not satisfactory.

Current statistics (Best Simulation):

  • NS = -0.44

  • R² = 0.32

  • P-factor = 0.11

  • R-factor = 0.00

  • PBIAS = 68.2

  • KGE = -0.23

  • RSR = 1.20

Mean simulated flow = 102.68
Mean observed flow = 322.75

The model is severely underestimating discharge.

I have already:

  • Checked observed data format (monthly, no missing values)

  • Confirmed correct outlet reach number

  • Adjusted basic flow-related parameters (CN2, ALPHA_BF, GW_DELAY, GWQMN, CH_N2, CH_K2)

  • Increased number of simulations

Still, results are not improving significantly.

Could anyone please guide:

  1. Which parameters should be prioritized for mountainous snow-fed basins?

  2. Should I first perform sensitivity analysis separately?

  3. Any specific recommendations for snowmelt-related parameters (SMFMX, SMFMN, SFTMP, SMTMP, etc.)?

Any guidance would be highly appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages