I think this just points at the fact that we really need to select
upcoming speaker
and topic at *each* meeting. Perhaps 2 months in advance, rather than
wait till
the last minute. Can we make it are a regular part of each meeting to
select
speaker & topic ?
-S
OK Rick, I'll take that job, but there is one stipulation; No
presentation can begin until we have two upcoming ones assigned. This
*should* take less than 5 minutes of meeting time and I suggest we start
this policy tomorrow. I'll take up the slack by presenting in either
June or July myself (unless someone else wants these), so the task is to
come up with just one topic+presenter tomorrow.
I'll post separately, but anyone with an idea for a talk or an interest
in presenting, please contact me directly:
steve-a...@roadrunner.com or steve-a...@adelphia.ne
<mailto:steve-a...@adelphia.net>
330-283-1446 (cell)
-Steve
Round table Q&A sounds great, too. An open Q&A session is
fine, but I wonder if we couldn't also do this every few meetings
on a focussed topic area ....
/ Various desktops - KDE, Gnome, Enlightenment ... .
/ Why are you still using Windows ?
/ Various licenses GPLvN, LGPL BSD , Xorg, Xfree and
their meaning.
/ Distros compared.
/ Home/SOHO networking, what are best practices ?
We still need a moderator to keep things on track.
Anyone else have ideas (either round-table or presentation
topics) ?
Presenters Needed ...
Thursday May 1, 2008: ???
Thursday June 5, 2008:
Thursday July 3, 2008:
Thursday August 7, 2008:
Thursday September 4, 2008:
Thursday October 2, 2008:
Thursday November 6, 2008:
Thursday December 4, 2008:
Since I don't speak Chinese the RedFlag Linux (a Chinese
RedHat clone) will take low priority ;^)
-S
> Rick// www.AkronLinux.org <http://www.AkronLinux.org>
> n8noq 145.17- PL123 www.w8upd.uakron.edu <http://www.w8upd.uakron.edu>
> >
I would like to see more cutting edge, motivating Linux topics..
Here are some ideas that interest me:
Industrial use of Linux (control & automation)
Linux 911 systems? Has anyone helped a town install one?
New CPU internals: 64 bit CPUs, caching, pipelining, VT / recent advancements
SMP - why it still sucks on Linux?
How to write a Linux application to make effective use of an SMP system
Licensing: How it impacts companies integrating Linux into their product
Speech recognition on Linux
Linux-based 3D CAD / FEA package (Comsol on Linux is extremely impressive!)
Movie authoring in Linux (Cinelerra?)
3D rendering (Anyone have some really cool POVRAY scenes they've done?)
Animation using Linux (Blender, scripted POVRay)
Music authoring? Anyone using MIDI on Linux?
C# on Linux (Mono project, dotGNU)
Games!! Are there any games yet? What? No GTA4 for Linux???!
If you have any experience with any of the above topics, then please STEP UP
and contribute! We don't expect an all-knowing guru on any particular topic.
Even if you know just a small amount of any of the above topics, it may be a
lot more than the rest of us know about it. Do not underestimate yourself :)
Thanks, Steve for helping out the ALUG :)
Take care,
-Chris
--
| Christopher Cole, Cole Design and Development, LLC co...@coledd.com |
| Embedded Software Development and Electronic Design http://coledd.com |
| Stow, Ohio, USA 800-518-2154 |
-S
>
> Is there such a thing as a Linux based 9-1-1 system? I know, of
> course, there are VOIP/SIP products, some even commercial. What I
> suspect is that cities would be reluctant to sign a contract for a
> system including open source components becuase there is no party to
> sue if the open source component, say the under-lying operating
> system, breaks. That's an interesting thing to ponder. The open
> source makes code review possible and you can look deeper than you can
> look if you are just writing do an API specification as you would with
> Windows.
>
This is precisely why companies like Red Hat and Novell exist. Yes,
anyone can download a debian disk and roll their own Asterisk box.
If I buy from Red Hat, and get a support contract on Asterisk from
Digium I've got all sorts of sue-worthy targets. I'm going to buy
hardware from a vendor like Dell with a support contract attached for
the same reason.
Open source and commercial are definitely not separate concepts. One
of the really fantastic things happening these days is the amazing
amount of large corporate entities rolling open source applications
into their stacks and selling support on them. IBM is a great
example of this.