‘Dangerous data’ part 4: Sobells decisively crack the abstinence consensus. An Effectiveness Bank hot topic

[Editors]

 

Home | Research archive | Subject search | Text search | Key treatment studies | Hot topic reviews | Contact

View this message as a web page
Hot topic
‘Dangerous data’ part 4: Sobells decisively crack the abstinence consensus
Linda and Mark Sobell Fourth weekly instalment of the series on controlled drinking as a treatment goal. Published in 1973, hard-to-explain-away results from the solidity of a randomised trial showed successful treatment of US patients need not conform to abstinence-only orthodoxy. Mark and Linda Sobell paid for their findings with decades of challenges to their integrity. Go straight to part 4 by clicking the button below.
View part 4
All hot topics – essays on important and controversial issues. Share your discovery of the Effectiveness Bank by sending an email to your colleagues.
Join the Effectiveness Bank mailing list for matrix and other updates.
Sent via a third-party mailing list by the Drug and Alcohol Findings Effectiveness Bank to alert you to site updates and UK-relevant evaluations of drug/alcohol interventions. Findings is supported by the Society for the Study of Addiction and Alcohol Change UK and advised by the National Addiction Centre.

Virus-free. www.avast.com