I also documented the stakeholders that are implicit in some of their descriptions.
I discovered why my XForm was finding a couple of the elements invalid, where I did not see the red Xs before due to all of the extra, empty stakeholder elements. Under
Performance Indicator 2.1.2, "th" was appended to the 5 and the 9 in the Rank column. I removed those characters and was then able to save the file using the XForm to apply the stylesheet.
If I were to take the time to name that Performance Indicator, I'd call it "Exports".
Since the numbers appear in the <NumberOfUnits> elements, it is redundant to include them in the <Description> elements as well. It wouldn't take too much extra effort to manually remove them, particularly if I were also taking the time to name the Performance Indicators. However, it would be better if you could automate that part of the process.
I also noticed that a bunch of the Partner stakeholders are named the same but with different Role Descriptions. Having checked the spreadsheet, I see that is because you captured the data in the Type of Partner Entity column instead of the Name of Partner entity column. Hopefully, that won't take too much effort to correct. It would also be good to include the Type of Partner Entity data in the Stakeholder Description field, but depending upon how much effort it may require, it is not essential since I don't think it adds much value.
From my perspective, we're getting pretty close to having something worth showing. I'll take a look at a few more of the files to see how they shape up. In addition to correcting the partner Stakeholder Names, I'll look forward to learning if you think there is more that you can do with them without too much more effort before I start naming all of the goals and objectives and we begin to publicize our joint effort.