At 21 pounds I think the Pilot is the lightest 650B conversion I've done. I
could get that number down a little more with a few part substitutions. It
has a heavy stem, bar and saddle, a 36 spoke Synergy wheelset, and a 30
speed Shimano 105 triple crank drivetrain. Lighter cockpit components, a 28
hole A23 wheelset, a SRAM Rival compact drivetrain, and fender removal might
get it close to 19 pounds.
It's hard to say which rides the best. Seriously, whenever I take one out
for a refresher ride, I think: "Wow, this is really nice, I need to ride
this one more often!" ;-)
I will say one thing in general. They all ride like they always rode, only
now with a 650B flavor. They're all smoother, and more comfortable. The
handling isn't dramatically different.
The vintage steel bikes generally have a similar feel, although that red
Japanese Raleigh Super Course has steep angles and a lot of fork rake which
makes it feel like a very quick handling bike. The 38mm tires add a little
p-trail, and it handles better than it did on narrower 700C tires.
The modern bikes are the most dramatic, especially the Trek Pilot and the
Motobecane Outlaw disc brake bike. The frames feel stiff, but they ride
great on 650B. The Trek 1200c, the Pacer with the Bontrager fork, and the
Soma Speedster are similar in that regard. The 1-1/8" threadless front ends
feel very direct - there's no stem flex at all, they're rock solid and it's
a good feeling of steering control.
This recent Lemond conversion is somewhere in the middle of the mix. The
frame is relatively stiff for steel, but the front end isn't quite as direct
as the 1-1/8 threadless setups on the newer technology bikes.
Subtle differences here and there... They're all good, and I ride whatever
the mood dictates.
Ed.