I bought the Soma Grand Randonneur because the '84 Trek 610 that I had converted to 650B service had minimal clearance for Grand Bois Hetre tires -- about a mm on each side at the chainstays. That's fine for a bike that I bought to test whether I like 650B and low trail, but now that I've ridden it for a couple of years and know I like it, I decided it's time to buy a frame designed for that style of riding. So I bought a Grand Randonneur from Mike Kone at Boulder Bikes.
The frame arrived nicely packed. It's a pretty cream color with green highlights. I think it's a very nice looking frame. The TIG welds are not as excellent as on my Gunnar Sport, but they're perfectly fine. The Tange Prestige tubing makes a nice "ting" when you tap it with your fingernail. The main tubes are comparable to the all-Reynolds-531 tubes in the 610. But the stays and fork on the Soma are beefier than the same tubes on the 610. I'm not wild about the looks of the seat tube extension, but I rarely look there while riding, so it probably won't make much difference. I didn't actually weigh the frame before building it, but built-up and with comparable parts to my other frames (610, Gunnar Sport, and Rivendell Rambouillet), it is the lightest of the bunch, but only by a few grams.
Almost all parts were then transferred from the 610. But I left the 610 with it's Stronglight roller-bearing headset so I might later decide to transfer that if shimmy proves an issue. Build (from the 610 except as noted "new"): Shimano 105 rear hub; Schmidt dynamohub; Velocity Synergy rims; DT DB spokes; Sugino XD600; SRam 11/34 cassette; Deore XT rear derailleur; a front derailleur pulled from my old 86 MTB; Dura-Ace 9-speed downtube shifters; Velo Orange Grand Bois bottom bracket (new), seatpost, handlebar, fenders; Ritchey headset (new); Nitto Technomic stem; Tektro CR720 cantilever brakes (new); Tektro R341 levers; Crank Bros Quattro pedals; Selle Anatomica saddle; Carradice Lowsaddle Longflap saddlebag (for carrying bulky winter gear); Nitto Campee front rack (not installed in photo). Since the Campee wasn't installed, I used my old Lone Peak Altra H-100 handlebar bag, which rides a little higher than my Gilles Berthoud 28 bag.
After a couple of bike commutes to get the fit dialed in, I went for a ride on a 200km from Woodbine, MD through Gettysburg, PA to Dillsburg, PA (see
http://ridewithgps.com/trips/2035531). It's a moderately tough ride, about 8500 feet of climbing, mostly rolling, none of it big climbs. On the flats, the ride of the Soma felt about the same as the ride of the 610 and my Gunnar Sport (which has also been converted to 650B). All three frames absorb road shock nicely--what little road shock that gets passed through by Hetre's. Where the Soma stood out is on climbs, where it felt like more of my effort translated to moving up the hill. I'm guessing this is because of the rear triangle is stiffer than either the 610 or the Gunnar Sport. On the other hand, when I switched the lights on at dusk, there is slightly more dynamo vibration getting passed up to the handlebars. It's only a little more noticeable than the 610 or the Gunnar Sport (with A Homer Hilsen fork). And because the big, Hetre tires don't transmit much road shock
anyway, the slightly-stiffer fork on the Soma doesn't affect road vibrations noticeably. The low-trail steering feels the same as on my Gunnar Sport, which has an A Homer Hilsen fork raked to about 62mm. When you stand up on a hill, the bike keeps its line and stays under you, instead of feeling more squirrely. I didn't notice any shimmy worthy of mention. On a hill where I was going slowly and pushing hard, I tried taking my hands off the bars and got a little front end vibration. On the flat, going a little faster, I could take my hands off the bars with no problem.
Frankly, I'm not sure that I'm enough of an aficionado of bikes to know whether the bike "planes" or not. At the end of a long ride, when your legs are thrashed, nothing much seems to plane. So ... to the extent that the 610 and Gunnar plane, then so does the Grand Randonneur, maybe even a little better. My ride time on Woodbine-Dillsburg-Woodbine was about half an hour less than expected, so I was moving along well, which might usually mean I was riding closer to the limit. Nonetheless, I didn't feel as much leg fatigue as usual when I hit the final 15 miles of the ride, which have a notorious sequence of very hilly roads: Buffalo, Roop, and Waterville. So ... all in all, my first look was very pleasant and I'm pleased with the Grand Randonneur.