The Economist debate series. European holidays. Rebuttals

0 views
Skip to first unread message

The Economist

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 3:12:08 PM12/24/09
to 3xc...@civisurrection.info
The Economist online

European holidays

Motion: "This house believes that Europeans would be better off with fewer holidays and higher incomes"

Enter this debate

Do Europeans take too many holidays?

Live dates: December 22nd - 31st

Current round: Rebuttals

Dear Reader,

Thankfully, in our debate on vacation time, neither of our speakers sees the holiday season as an excuse for slacking. Today they have posted their rebuttals. But have you had your say yet?

Moderator's comments
Robert Gordon, for the pro team, spares no effort in trying to demolish objections to the proposal that Europe takes too much time off. Are Europeans healthier and happier because of their long holidays, as his opponent argues? The evidence suggests no such link, says Professor Gordon. For his part, John de Graaf, arguing against the motion, strives hard to bulldoze Professor Gordon's case. Money isn't everything and it is not much use if you have no time off to enjoy it, he says.

Who's right? Join in and vote now.

Pro: Robert Gordon
"Longer vacation time has nothing to do with health outcomes in general and life expectancy in particular." Read more

Con: John de Graaf
"To be rich in time and relationships, health, public life, access to art, and conversation is hardly to be poor." Read more

Have our contestants' efforts convinced you one way or the other? Please cast your vote now. You can also debate the issue with friends on our Facebook page and follow updates on Twitter.

John O'Sullivan
Debate Moderator
Economics Correspondent
The Economist

Name Surname Moderator Block Moderator
John O'Sullivan
Economics Correspondent, The Economist
Name Surname Moderator Block Defending the motion
Robert J. Gordon
Professor, Social Sciences, Northwestern University
Name Surname Moderator Block Opposing the motion
John de Graaf
Executive director, Take Back Your Time
Current voting
Pro
18%
  Con
82%
 
Debate Schedule
December 24th
Rebuttal arguments
December 24th
Post from Daniel S. Hamermesh, Professor, University of Texas
December 28th
Post from Pierre Cahuc, Professor, Ecole Polytechnique
December 29th
Closing arguments
December 31st
Winner announcement

Customer Service

To change your subscription settings or to unsubscribe please click here, (you may need to log in) and select the newsletters you wish to unsubscribe from.

As a registered user of The Economist online, you can sign up for additional newsletters or change your e-mail address by amending your details.

Questions? Comments? Use this form to contact The Economist online staff. Replies to this e-mail will not reach us.

GO TO THE ECONOMIST ONLINE
© Copyright The Economist Newspaper Limited 2009. All rights reserved.
Registered address: 25 St James's Street, London, SW1A 1HG
An Economist Group business
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

The Economist Newspaper Limited
Registered in England and Wales. No.236383
VAT No: GB 340 436 876
Registered Office: 25 St James's Street, London, SW1A 1HG

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages