- Eliminating a stubborn line on one of my prints - 11 Updates
- BambuLab H2D PRO - 6 Updates
- Wood Filled PLA and Striations... - 2 Updates
- New MakerTech toolchanger kickstarter.. Uh Oh for the Prusa XL - 2 Updates
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 04:14PM -0500
Hi, it’s me again! 😀
I continue to push my boundaries and have run into yet another problem. I’m
trying to print this vase (Elegoo PETG-GF, Elegoo Slicer) and I
consistently get a visible line towards the bottom of the print:
https://www.printables.com/model/1105898-sand-palms-vase
[image: Vase.jpg]
When I look at the Line Type, Speed, Temperature, and Flow Rate views,
everything looks normal:
[image: Vase - Line Type.jpg]
[image: image.png]
However, when I look at the Fan Speed and Layer Time views, the line
becomes visible:
[image: Vase - Fan Speed.jpg]
Taking a closer look at the offending layers, I can see this coincides with
the internal bridging that support the inside of the vase:
[image: Vase - Fan Speed 1.jpg]
If you look closely at the Fan Speed view, you can see that the speed drops
on the external walls for the offending layers. You can also see that those
walls are not used for inside bridging purposes:
[image: Vase - Fan Speed 2.jpg]
Now I understand why layer time shoots up, but I don’t understand what is
going on with the fan speed. The fan speed hovers around 40% for most of
the print but it drops down to the 10% range for the outer wall on the
layers where the internal bridging occurs.
*Why isn’t the fan speed for the outer wall consistent with the other
layers?*
I haven’t quite mastered OrcaSlicer’s fan settings. I don’t find them
intuitive. Here’s my current settings for reference:
[image: Vase - Settings.jpg]
Thanks,
Bryan
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 03:42PM -0700
The fan speed for the outer walls isnt consistent with the other layers
because the slicer takes into consideration for the entire layer.
When your layer time takes longer than 30 seconds, the fan speed is set to
be no more than 20% for that entire layer. The algorithm is thinking the
layer is already taking a long time to complete and therefore cooling down
on its own, and so doesnt need additional cooling.... in this instance its
taking too long! and cooling too much!
Have you ever had a print pause for a period of time, whether thats a
filament run out, or power outage, or blocked nozzle? Usually, even with a
heated build plate, when you resume you will always have the dreaded ring
where the plastic has cooled and shrunk enough from thermal contraction
that there is a slight mismatch as the new layer goes down. It feels like
thats essentially whats happening here?
The bridging could be causing a problem, whereby the settings are
configured to slow down while it bridges - but even if you turned cooling
and slow down off for bridging, you may still well see the ring appear when
it completes the top layers of the base, because of the amount of time that
takes to complete that as well.
This is my take on whats going on here anyway - others might have some
other suggestions
Depending on how fussed you are about the inside bottom of the vase being
smooth - you could try adding a modifier cylinder that turns Top shells to
0, which will allow the actual top lip of the vase to be finished nicely,
while keeping the top surface of the base just as infil and therefore
restricting/minimising the layer time.
I've used Bambu Studio but seeing as Orca Slicer is essentially a carbon
copy of that - I imagine the method is the same.
[image: Screenshot 2025-08-11 233559.png]
[image: Screenshot 2025-08-11 233626.png]
It might be worth just doing a test print of the section you're having
trouble with to save filament and time (drop the model below the surface of
the buildplate a good 10-15 layers before the artifact appears and see what
happens.)
On Monday, August 11, 2025 at 10:14:53 PM UTC+1 Bryan Murphy wrote:
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 08:28PM -0500
I think that makes sense. I had how the thresholds worked backwards in my
head. If I change both speeds to 60% the fan speed is locked in across the
whole print except for overhangs and bridging which ramp up to 100%.
I'm going to try a quick test print to see what happens. If this gets rid
of the line I'll print the whole thing tonight.
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 06:43PM -0700
If you're printing glass fiber PET then you ought to be using less fan to
minimise warpage and shrinkage.
I would set your max/min to 20% and turn off 100% fan on overhangs.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 2:28:47 AM UTC+1 Bryan Murphy wrote:
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 08:47PM -0500
Thanks! I'll keep that in mind for future iterations. I already kicked
off the print with the current settings. I like the quality of the test
prints well enough with the current settings, at least for the vase it
gives it a nice rough but not too rough texture.
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 06:50PM -0700
It's certainly some heavy duty filament you got running there for an
ornamental object :) but if it gives off the effect you're after then worth
it :)
On Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 2:47:34 AM UTC+1 Bryan Murphy wrote:
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 06:51PM -0700
I wonder if you could get the same or similar effect with a white stone
pla, or white marble pla with fuzzy skin on. Would be interesting to know.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 2:50:06 AM UTC+1 Sophie wrote:
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 08:58PM -0500
Probably! It's all experimentation right now: what can I do with the new
printer that I couldn't do with the old one. The Elegoo PETG-GF was less
than $20. I'm definitely being a bit more judicious with the more
expensive higher quality filaments. My roll of Polymaker
Fiberoligy PETG-CF is quite a bit more expensive so I'm saving that one
for more purposeful prints.
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 09:27PM -0500
No luck. Same outcome. I'm going to take a break from this problem
tonight. Maybe I'll try again tomorrow with less cooling or maybe it's
time to accept that PETG isn't going to give me the
price+quality+characteristics I'm searching for.
Sean <sean...@gmail.com>: Aug 12 06:40AM -0700
Hey Bryan,
Sorry to get slightly off topic, but I believe you and I are the only
Centauri Carbon owners in the group and I thought you might find this video
helpful. This fellow has some suggestions that seem to help overall print
quality quite a bit for the ECC. Or at least seemingly in the examples he's
showing. I'm definitely going to look into implementing these strategies in
my printing processes.
https://youtu.be/mxjMyfFBUZ0?si=D8-3pCNBqeIpGihM
On Monday, August 11, 2025 at 10:28:10 PM UTC-4 Bryan Murphy wrote:
Bryan Murphy <bmurp...@gmail.com>: Aug 12 11:18AM -0500
This is great and I love this guy's content. Thanks!
Bryan Eckert <bigyel...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 01:08PM -0700
This got leaked by a 3rd party, and Bambu has it up on their website now.
Some notables -
Ethernet port (we'll be getting one due to that)
350C Tungsten Carbide nozzles
1000 mm/s max toolhead speed
40mm3/s max flow
New cooling fan on toolhead front for better hotend cooling
No laser or cutter version, but can upgrade to use those
$3800 (leaked price, not on Bambu's site)
https://bambulab.com/en-us/h2d-pro
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 01:16PM -0700
So they're basically doing what they did with the X1C when shortly after
they released the X1E?
On Monday, August 11, 2025 at 9:08:43 PM UTC+1 Bryan Eckert wrote:
Bryan Eckert <bigyel...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 04:25PM -0400
Looks like it
Kurt The 3D Printer GUY!! <vr...@optonline.net>: Aug 11 04:18PM -0700
Sophie - am not sure what is your reference? Yeah - I know X1E was like the
high temp version of the X1C.
And - Bryan - what is so special? Hot end of Tungsten - can go Hotter?
Is it also a Speed increase for this Pro version??
I'm truly Curious!
On Monday, August 11, 2025 at 4:16:44 PM UTC-4 Sophie wrote:
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 04:29PM -0700
The X1E was the ethernet version of the x1c
On Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 12:18:01 AM UTC+1 Kurt The 3D Printer GUY!!
wrote:
Bryan Eckert <bigyel...@gmail.com>: Aug 12 11:26AM -0400
The main difference is the addition of an Ethernet port for direct printing
and bypassing the cloud service, which is a huge issue for a lot of
companies (like mine who have a lot of NDA's to worry about).
As it is, we copy files over manually to the H2D.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 7:18 PM Kurt The 3D Printer GUY!! <
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 01:25PM -0700
Do you recall if there were any interesting you tube vids or websites that
show what you experimented with?
At first glance I found this Video
<https://youtu.be/ZgLXkDxkuQM?si=vYTKEtccfyeLuieJ> but it looks sketchy as
feck, essentially burning the PLA as it goes down... and whilst I have no
doubt that my H2D could handle that, I don't *really *want to be exposing
my nozzle etc so willingly to burning molten PLA/wood.
On Sunday, August 10, 2025 at 11:15:53 PM UTC+1 david merten wrote:
david merten <davidme...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 04:47PM -0500
No video's that I know of. I think I took some pictures of parts I made,
will try to find them. It has been several years since I played with it.
David
Sophie <smhe...@gmail.com>: Aug 11 01:43PM -0700
I have one of these (300) Bryan - and so does Vance (and maybe one other
user on this forum)
Its been an *interesting *ride. I've been following the others building
theirs as I built mine slightly after (I was delayed in building it after
my old man had a stroke last year), and it basically came to a bit of a
stand still for a while due to the Eddy probe just not doing as it should.
I have a pal in the US as well also been building his, and actually hes
pretty good in the coding department and hes actually been requesting pulls
on the Github where he's sussed the problems out and fixed them for
Makertech. He's still having problems with his though. Prints beautifully
with one head, but getting all three heads working together has been a bit
of a challenge.
In the beginning Makertech were pretty good - responsive, eager to fix
problems, engaging with the community, and reactive to responding to part
replacement requests...but since the Proforge 5 has been announced (and
slightly before then) you could tell that their minimal resource had been
pulled away to go deliver the next new thing.
I think Vance went on a bit of a hiatus from building his, to take a break
from the frustrations, and not sure if he got back to it. I took a break
too from mine, I'm very much more a mechanical engineer than a software
debugging one, so I have my limitations when it comes to firmware problems.
I'm hoping to dedicate some serious time back to it at the end of this
month though since there have been a couple of fixes/workarounds
implemented now (mainly by the community).
When we saw the Proforge 5 come out on kickstarter we just kinda thought
"hey! come fix the 300 before you start on a new adventure!" So I'm not
entirely sure what the 5 will bring and whether it means fresh fixes for
the 300 as they improve the 5 or whether the new toy will take their
attentions away from the problems of the 300. From the chats that go on in
the discord it seems even people with the Proforge 4.2 also get their fair
share of problems too. Its a shame because it had such promise - I'm hoping
the fact that its completely open source will mean over time things will
get better, but it just needs the community base to build a bit more.
Once things have been fixed and it works the dream it could - I'll be sure
to come back and paint the printer in glorious colours - but for now - it's
been a journey!
We'll see.
On Tuesday, July 29, 2025 at 3:17:58 PM UTC+1 Bryan Eckert wrote:
Gary Tolley - Grogyan <gro...@gmail.com>: Aug 12 09:03AM +1200
This has my attention.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to 3d-printing-tips--...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "3D Printing Tips and Tricks" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 3d-printing-tips--...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/3d-printing-tips--tricks/e8086d88-d272-4c94-9b3d-eb33bbb485e8n%40googlegroups.com.