Dayton,
I was under impression that if primary amqp goes down system will switch to secondary. I think I tested it while ago and it worked.
I may be wrong with current release.
Arek
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "2600hz-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "2600hz-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
I think, Dayton is correct. Kamailio conf file just suggests to set IP address of amqp server. But... What will be if amqp will go down? The only idea I got currently - 2nd kamailio server should use 2nd amqp server.Btw, there is one more question here.Why kazoo looking for amqp server only locally? I can set some external IP in kz zones file but it is ignored. It means that amqp node should be with kazoo node everytimes.
16 Май 2017 г. 5:10 пользователь "Arek Fryz" <ar...@remacenterprises.com> написал:
Dayton,
I was under impression that if primary amqp goes down system will switch to secondary. I think I tested it while ago and it worked.
I may be wrong with current release.
Arek
On Mon, May 15, 2017, 7:59 PM Dayton Turner <day...@voxter.ca> wrote:
Hi list,--
I'm interested in doing some AMQP clustering within our zones, specifically to be able to sustain individual node restarts without taking amqp offline completely (rolling restarts, basically).
I see in Kamailio's config comments that there are suggestions about ensuring that the BLF queues are marked with the proper ha-mode policy, I dont know if these are the only queues that require ha-mode declarations, or if any others do as well? (If so, which ones?)
Having never successfully clustered RabbitMQ with Kazoo in the past, I'm unsure if this is a resiliency solution, or if its a "if amqp1 has problems, now amqp2 does too" sort of thing..
Would love to hear feedback from others who have experimented with this! This is currently the last "single point of failure" that has the ability to impact the entire cluster if its impacted..
:)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "2600hz-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "2600hz-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "2600hz-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 2600hz-dev+...@googlegroups.com.