To be honest I didn't check, i was
more concerned with a client being able to continue trading with
the hundred odd passwords they had saved to access all their
online services and such necessary for accounting suppliers and
such. But given that copying the entire folder will also copy the
extensions folder the chances are good they will copy too, but
they might lose any custom settings.
Also, i trust in built password
managers more than 3rd parties, they can be protected with a
password, encoded and such, and being in a public browser means if
anything shady happens they will /immediately/ be called out on
it. It also means as in the case of a crashed computer, you can
recover your logins and bookmarks.
Unlike norton/vet/3rd party password
managers that often charge you money for a subscription as part of
a larger "security software" suite and hold your saved passwords
for ransom until you renew.
Or other 3rd party password managers that all suffer from the same
two issues:
1: So far everyone I know of has
eventually had their servers hacked if it stores them online -
even if they have not they are high value targets and people keep
trying until they do.
2: If your computer crashes and you
cannot recall the manager you used, or it was an older version or
the file if recovered requires a password you cannot recall, you
lose all your passwords.
As for my derogatory phrase. Can you
think of a better expletive to describe why some foolish person
would think making a change that effectively WHEN their device
fails (and they all eventually do) cuts someone off from their
entire online existence on purpose is in any way ever a good
idea?
Also this mailing list pre-dates political correct absurdity.
Welcome to the grumpy old "people" club :P