Damn kadaitcha man
richard
replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
Kadaitcha Man
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
<cue violins>
--
Ubuntu 9.04 (2.6.28-15)
Lionel Leather Looer
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
Oh dear, Rick the K man has found Jesus and you should show
more compassion.
Rick has many issues, primarily he is Australian and "ethnic".
He is overweight and aged with one leg shorter than the other.
His only online friend wears leather corsets, and is a male.
Rick did get into a RL relationship with a female from the
States he met on usenet. She did fly out to Oz, and they seemed
meant for one another when they went wallaby baiting etc.
But she flew back to the states and married another and still
posts to usenet using her married name which hurts Rick.
Rick is isolated and his neighbors ignore him. He fell out
with everyone on databasix and there was legal issues and loss
of internet connection etc.
But now he has found the lord, and his mission is to use the
web to spread the word and make redemption available to imbecilic
kooks such as desk rabbit and ���hw��f.
Salvation can be yours richard, if only you follow Ricks preaching.
Rick the Kadaitcha Man has newsgroups you can subscribe to:
alt.bonehead.rick.mather.no.pecker.colostomy.australia
alt.fuckwit.kadaitcha-man
alt.rick.mather.dickhead.eldersile.nsw.australia
Jesus loves you.
philo
> richard wrote:
>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>>
ewsgroups you can subscribe to:
> alt.bonehead.rick.mather.no.pecker.colostomy.australia
> alt.fuckwit.kadaitcha-man
> alt.rick.mather.dickhead.eldersile.nsw.australia
>
> Jesus loves you.
Problem is
though Jesus might have paid for my sins
he didn't pay the taxes.
Oh well, I should not really complain though.
~BD~
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
WORDS TO LIVE BY #2: USENET AS ANARCHY
Anarchy means having to put up with things that really piss you off.
--
Unknown
Ref: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/#ixzz0Sx5CIrqJ
OldGringo38
Two Cents To The richard Post:
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
--
Old Gringo
Just West Of Nowhere
Enjoy Life And Live It To Its Fullest
http://www.NuBoy-Industries.com
Falco
> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
> Two Cents To The richard Post:
>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his
>> damn replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
> Now then, what's the bad news?
Religion and god!
§ñühwø£f
> Lionel Leather Looer wrote:
>> richard wrote:
>>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>>>
> <snip>
>
> ewsgroups you can subscribe to:
>> alt.bonehead.rick.mather.no.pecker.colostomy.australia
>> alt.fuckwit.kadaitcha-man
>> alt.rick.mather.dickhead.eldersile.nsw.australia
>>
>> Jesus loves you.
>
>
> Problem is
>
> though Jesus might have paid for my sins
>
> he didn't pay the taxes.
>
The IRS is after Jesus...
>
> Oh well, I should not really complain though.
They're after you too, sure.
^_^
--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
http://ltsaloon.org
http://www.ramusa.org/
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/
richard
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:43:07 -0600, richard <mem...@newsguy.com>wrote:
>
>>That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>>replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
>
> The same can be said about you, hypocrite.
Oh? And where exactly can you see ANY of my posts being crossposted to AUK?
That was not initiated by me.
I rarely post to more than one group.
OldGringo38
the full potential of his mind. And then lets say that Religion is
preventing man for doing just that.
philo
> On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:52:47 -0500, philo pinched out a steaming pile of:
>
>> Lionel Leather Looer wrote:
>>> richard wrote:
>>>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> ewsgroups you can subscribe to:
>>> alt.bonehead.rick.mather.no.pecker.colostomy.australia
>>> alt.fuckwit.kadaitcha-man
>>> alt.rick.mather.dickhead.eldersile.nsw.australia
>>>
>>> Jesus loves you.
>>
>> Problem is
>>
>> though Jesus might have paid for my sins
>>
>> he didn't pay the taxes.
>>
> The IRS is after Jesus...
>> Oh well, I should not really complain though.
>
> They're after you too, sure.
>
> ^_^
>
The IRS is not after me
at least three times I've filled out my taxes wrong
and gotten a letter from the IRS that they owe me add'l money
I'm on their "dumb and honest " list
I'd sure it's a pretty small one
Mara
>On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:43:07 -0600, richard <mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>>That total shit for brains
>
>Pot, kettle.
>
>>just has to infestate the group
>
>Pot, kettle.
>
>>with his damn replies
>
>Pot, kettle.
>
>>What a fucked up dickhead.
>
>Pot, kettle.
>
>You seemed to like him what, last week?
>
>What happened?
He saw something shiny?
--
Q. Does Usenet help stamp out ignorance?
A. That depends on whether by `stamp out' you mean `eliminate'
or `reproduce rapidly in great quantity.'
-- Dr. Roger M. Firestone
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> got double secret
probation for writing:
>On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:43:07 -0600, richard wrote:
>
>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
>
><cue violins>
Given the current water crisis, stoopids crying would be a good thing,
for his fellow plants.
§ñühwø£f
The honest list is small.
The dumb list is big.
thund3rstruck
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
You need a tampon?
NOI
Kadaitcha Man
> richard wrote:
> You need a tampon?
He needs two, one for each ear.
--
Ubuntu 9.04 (2.6.28-15)
Bucky Breeder
$kan$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
> Two Cents To The Falco Post:
>> OldGringo38 wrote:
>>> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
>>> Two Cents To The richard Post:
>>>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his
>>>> damn replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
>>> Now then, what's the bad news?
>>
>> Religion and god!
>>
>>
> Lets just say it takes a belief in a God for man to be able to use
> the full potential of his mind. And then lets say that Religion is
> preventing man for doing just that.
Let's just add that an "accurate knowledge" of God,
by whatever name you denote Him, is essential to
utilizing the full benefit of God's omniscience
and His omnipresence.
For what good is a bicycle if you don't know how?
--
I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; ; and *NO*, that is NOT
a Jedi light-sabre in my pocket; and yet, I'm NOT
particularly happy to see you; furthermore, I'm in the
Gnatzi SPNAKIN' Behnezz... and behnezz is *a-boomin'*!
Repent! The end is near.... So, smoke 'em if you got 'em.
OldGringo38
> OldGringo38 <NoE...@ThisOldHouse.Con> deflatulated this with news:haak2j
> $kan$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
>> Two Cents To The Falco Post:
>>> OldGringo38 wrote:
>>>> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My
>>>> Two Cents To The richard Post:
>>>>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his
>>>>> damn replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
>>>> Now then, what's the bad news?
>>> Religion and god!
>>>
>>>
>> Lets just say it takes a belief in a God for man to be able to use
>> the full potential of his mind. And then lets say that Religion is
>> preventing man for doing just that.
>
> Let's just add that an "accurate knowledge" of God,
> by whatever name you denote Him, is essential to
> utilizing the full benefit of God's omniscience
> and His omnipresence.
>
> For what good is a bicycle if you don't know how?
>
Bucky Breeder
$fub$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
"Government" [that] "works"? (o;
OldGringo38
that wasn't quite right or up to par, one would say "good enough for
government work" <g>
Lionel Jihad
>
Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were
referenced in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Lionel Jihad <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
> Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were
> referenced in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
There are no agreements because a) we do not have any contact with each
other, and b) he has a documented history of not being good for his word.
Still, I do find it a bit irritating to be dragged into threads about him.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
The right to be heard does not automatically include
the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
Aardvark
> In news:hadei3$p8l$1...@aioe.org,
> Lionel Jihad <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
>
>> Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were referenced
>> in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
>
> There are no agreements because a) we do not have any contact with each
> other, and b) he has a documented history of not being good for his
> word.
>
> Still, I do find it a bit irritating to be dragged into threads about
> him.
As good ol' Oscar said, there's only one thing worse than being talked
about, and that's *not* being talked about.
FYI.
HTH.
HAND.
--
Elmo McElroy: If I wanted cuisine, I'd have gone to Paris
Felix DeSouza: You can still go to France. It's full of pricks. They hate
Yanks too. Do you fancy a bite, or what?
Elmo Mc Elroy: Yeah, all right.
Iconic misogynist Lionel
> Lionel Jihad <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
>
>> Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were
>> referenced in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
>
> There are no agreements because a) we do not have any contact with each
> other, and b) he has a documented history of not being good for his word.
>
> Still, I do find it a bit irritating to be dragged into threads about him.
>
Who was talking about you? I meant the other one
and she hasn't responded to this thread, so has
yet to confirm she has read the thread.
But thanks for reading.
It was a chore getting big boy Rick disconnected,
but it can be done again.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Iconic misogynist Lionel <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> In news:hadei3$p8l$1...@aioe.org,
>> Lionel Jihad <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
>>
>>> Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were
>>> referenced in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
>>
>> There are no agreements because a) we do not have any contact with
>> each other, and b) he has a documented history of not being good for
>> his word. Still, I do find it a bit irritating to be dragged into threads
>> about him.
>
> Who was talking about you? I meant the other one
> and she hasn't responded to this thread, so has
> yet to confirm she has read the thread.
> But thanks for reading.
Someone has to.
> It was a chore getting big boy Rick disconnected,
> but it can be done again.
It's a worthy cause, but I deem your chances slim. (He was never gone,
anyway; he was just posting under several other aliases.)
Caulfield Man
> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
:) This has managed to drag in just about all the regulars. Well done!
To all those here for tech support, well gee that sucks doesn't it?
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
This is not a tech support group, so I guess they should've expected it.
XS11E
> This is not a tech support group
How would you describe the group?
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>
>> This is not a tech support group
>
> How would you describe the group?
Not to put too fine a point on it, a fucking free-for-all.
OldGringo38
> In news:Xns9C9CB0513CE...@127.0.0.1,
> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>>> This is not a tech support group
>> How would you describe the group?
>
> Not to put too fine a point on it, a fucking free-for-all.
>
XS11E
> In news:Xns9C9CB0513CE...@127.0.0.1,
> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>>> This is not a tech support group
>>
>> How would you describe the group?
>
> Not to put too fine a point on it, a fucking free-for-all.
So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a long way
toward civilizing it.
I should point out the name of the group might mislead some? ;-)
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>
>> In news:Xns9C9CB0513CE...@127.0.0.1,
>> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is not a tech support group
>>>
>>> How would you describe the group?
>>
>> Not to put too fine a point on it, a fucking free-for-all.
>
> So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a long
> way toward civilizing it.
Civilized? Usenet? Please.
> I should point out the name of the group might mislead some? ;-)
I think it goes without saying. Of course, it's interesting to watch some
folks rail about it.
Iconic misogynist Lionel
> In news:hafod8$frh$1...@aioe.org,
> Iconic misogynist Lionel <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>> In news:hadei3$p8l$1...@aioe.org,
>>> Lionel Jihad <sharia....@packet.shooting> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rick, you made an agreement with her that if you both were
>>>> referenced in a thread that you wouldn't respond in that thread.
>>> There are no agreements because a) we do not have any contact with
>>> each other, and b) he has a documented history of not being good for
>>> his word. Still, I do find it a bit irritating to be dragged into threads
>>> about him.
>> Who was talking about you? I meant the other one
> Now that would be hilarious.
Yes thats her, I didn't think you knew about hilarious?
>> and she hasn't responded to this thread, so has
>> yet to confirm she has read the thread.
>> But thanks for reading.
>
> Someone has to.
You find me compelling.
>
>> It was a chore getting big boy Rick disconnected,
>> but it can be done again.
>
> It's a worthy cause, but I deem your chances slim. (He was never gone,
> anyway; he was just posting under several other aliases.)
No he wasn't, name one of the aliases you think he was using.
>
XS11E
> In news:Xns9C9CD04B389...@127.0.0.1,
> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>> So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a
>> long way toward civilizing it.
>
> Civilized? Usenet? Please.
You'd be amazed at just how civilized a group, even this one, can be
with the removal of just a small percent of the posters and threads.
The Usenet Improvement Project (see signature) helps a great deal by
eliminating most of the spam...
XS11E
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:54:34 -0700, XS11E
> <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com>wrote:
>
>>"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In news:Xns9C9CD04B389...@127.0.0.1,
>>> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a
>>>> long way toward civilizing it.
>>>
>>> Civilized? Usenet? Please.
>>
>>You'd be amazed at just how civilized a group, even this one, can
>>be with the removal of just a small percent of the posters and
>>threads.
>
> Ok already you've mentioned scoring and filters several times.
> Time to shut the fuck up about it already Sheeesh!
No.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
> Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:54:34 -0700, XS11E
>> <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In news:Xns9C9CD04B389...@127.0.0.1,
>>>> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a
>>>>> long way toward civilizing it.
>>>>
>>>> Civilized? Usenet? Please.
>>>
>>> You'd be amazed at just how civilized a group, even this one, can
>>> be with the removal of just a small percent of the posters and
>>> threads.
>>
>> Ok already you've mentioned scoring and filters several times.
>> Time to shut the fuck up about it already Sheeesh!
>
> No.
I see our discussion has attracted the attention of an uncivilized lout. :)
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
I didn't write them down for future reference, but if it really matters, I
can go back through some old posts and find him. As soon as I'm finished
with a rather burdersome project I have taken on. Remind me.
XS11E
> In news:Xns9C9D5EC362C...@127.0.0.1,
> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>> Ok already you've mentioned scoring and filters several times.
>>> Time to shut the fuck up about it already Sheeesh!
>>
>> No.
>
> I see our discussion has attracted the attention of an uncivilized
> lout. :)
He shows up from time to time to demonstrate his vocabulary skills.
Notice he uses 'several times' when he means 'once'?
He's usually more entertaining so he's escaped my bozo bin.... so
far.
Anyway, this thread has about played itself out (ever since
richards's original post actually!) ;-)
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:52:04 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>
>> In news:Xns9C9D5EC362C...@127.0.0.1,
>> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:54:34 -0700, XS11E
>>>> <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In news:Xns9C9CD04B389...@127.0.0.1,
>>>>>> XS11E <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I've noticed but a newsreader with scoring abilities goes a
>>>>>>> long way toward civilizing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Civilized? Usenet? Please.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd be amazed at just how civilized a group, even this one, can
>>>>> be with the removal of just a small percent of the posters and
>>>>> threads.
>>>>
>>>> Ok already you've mentioned scoring and filters several times.
>>>> Time to shut the fuck up about it already Sheeesh!
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> I see our discussion has attracted the attention of an uncivilized
>> lout. :)
>
> lawsuit.
Well, well, well...look what the cat dragged in. :)
Apparently you haven't been paying attention because I posted about the
lawsuit in this group, along with a link to a synopsis of the case from:
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/novins-v-cannon-lawsuit
Now please feel free to crawl back into your hole.
Respondant
<much snippage>
>
> http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/novins-v-cannon-lawsuit
Which is precisely how I predicted it would turn out.
He knew from jump street he didn't have a chance of prevailing.
As I stated *months* ago, IMO his objective was never to win the suit, but
to inconvenience the defendents and cost them a few bucks in the bargain.
Which, evidently, he did.
Whether or not that comes back to bite him in the ass in the form of
countersuit(s) remains to be seen I suppose.
Bill
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Respondant <Respo...@nonemail.not> wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
> <much snippage>
>>
>> http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/novins-v-cannon-lawsuit
>
> Which is precisely how I predicted it would turn out.
Actually, it's not over. It was dismissed against two defendants for
plaintiff's failure to answer interrogatories.
It can be reinstated against those defendants within 60 days from the date
of the order, if the fee is paid and the interrogatories are answered. The
action is ongoing as to the remaining defendants.
> He knew from jump street he didn't have a chance of prevailing.
That's still up in the air.
> As I stated *months* ago, IMO his objective was never to win the
> suit, but to inconvenience the defendents and cost them a few bucks
> in the bargain. Which, evidently, he did.
It's not over until the fat lady sings.
> Whether or not that comes back to bite him in the ass in the form of
> countersuit(s) remains to be seen I suppose.
There seems to be widespread misunderstanding of a basic concept. Over in
auk, for example, Aratzio tried to edify us all as to the difference between
a "counter suit" and a "counterclaim." Perhaps this will help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterclaim
Respondant
Interesting. Obviously I've no legal background whatsoever so perhaps you
can enlighten me? Assuming the plaintiff has any interest in following
through with the case ... Why would he fail to answer the interrogatories in
a timely fashion? Is there some tactical reason for the inaction? I
understand "Dismissed Without Prejudice" means it can be re-opened. Is
there always a 60 day limit on that, or does it depend on the *type* of
case, jurisdiction, etc.?
Bill
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Probably not.
> Assuming the plaintiff has any
> interest in following through with the case ... Why would he fail to
> answer the interrogatories in a timely fashion?
I prepared many motions to compel and motions to dismiss in the years I
worked in law offices. This is SOP.
> Is there some
> tactical reason for the inaction?
Time management, maybe. And too, interrogatories are a nuisance from a
practical point of view, so one might as well make the other side work for
them. IOW, as I said, it's SOP.
> I understand "Dismissed Without
> Prejudice" means it can be re-opened. Is there always a 60 day limit
> on that, or does it depend on the *type* of case, jurisdiction, etc.?
60 days is 60 days in Law Division. I don't know what the rules are
elsewhere.
It really doesn't matter, though, because the case has only been dismissed
as to two defendants. It's still active as to the other served defendants.
That makes all the crowing not only premature but stupid.
Respondant
I haven't seen anybody crowing, but now that I reread the (case) link I get
what you mean about it only being dismissed as far as Canon and Osterwald
are concerned.
Regardless what you may believe, I've got no dog in this fight. Never have.
I'll stand by my original call. IMO, it's gone about as far is it's going
to. While it may go a little further, I don't expect it will ever see the
light of day in downtown TR. Too bad. I coulda made popcorn and been there
within 5 minutes. :-)
Bill
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
In auk.
> but now that I reread the (case) link
> I get what you mean about it only being dismissed as far as Canon and
> Osterwald are concerned.
Yep.
> Regardless what you may believe, I've got no dog in this fight.
I know.
> Never have. I'll stand by my original call. IMO, it's gone about as
> far is it's going to.
Not quite.
> While it may go a little further, I don't
> expect it will ever see the light of day in downtown TR. Too bad. I
> coulda made popcorn and been there within 5 minutes. :-)
Well, don't cross popcorn off your grocery list yet.
Respondant
I don't pay much attention to AUK anymore. Nor Usenet as a whole these
days. Now that my daughter's off to college I spend most of my time looking
for a job. It's tough out there.
>> but now that I reread the (case) link
>> I get what you mean about it only being dismissed as far as Canon and
>> Osterwald are concerned.
>
> Yep.
>
>> Regardless what you may believe, I've got no dog in this fight.
>
> I know.
>
>> Never have. I'll stand by my original call. IMO, it's gone about as
>> far is it's going to.
>
> Not quite.
>
>> While it may go a little further, I don't
>> expect it will ever see the light of day in downtown TR. Too bad. I
>> coulda made popcorn and been there within 5 minutes. :-)
>
> Well, don't cross popcorn off your grocery list yet.
I always have popcorn and beer in the house, so no worries there.
My money is still on my original call, though.
Bill
Respondant
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:54 -0400, "Respondant"
> <Respo...@nonemail.not>wrote:
>
>>I don't pay much attention to AUK anymore. Nor Usenet as a whole
>
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
> <spits coffee through nose>
By my count I've made about a dozen (that means 12, Meat) posts since
August.
Don't you *ever* tire of acting the fool?
Bill
Desk Rabbit
> richard wrote:
>> That total shit for brains just has to infestate the group with his damn
>> replies from other groups. What a fucked up dickhead.
>
> more compassion.
> Rick has many issues, primarily he is Australian and "ethnic".
> He is overweight and aged with one leg shorter than the other.
> His only online friend wears leather corsets, and is a male.
> Rick did get into a RL relationship with a female from the
> States he met on usenet. She did fly out to Oz, and they seemed
> meant for one another when they went wallaby baiting etc.
> But she flew back to the states and married another and still
> posts to usenet using her married name which hurts Rick.
> Rick is isolated and his neighbors ignore him. He fell out
> with everyone on databasix and there was legal issues and loss
> of internet connection etc.
> But now he has found the lord, and his mission is to use the
> web to spread the word and make redemption available to imbecilic
> kooks such as desk rabbit and ���hw��f.
Wow what an illustrious group you have put little me into! Thanks!
XS11E
> Lionel Leather Looer wrote:
>> But now he has found the lord, and his mission is to use the
>> web to spread the word and make redemption available to imbecilic
>> kooks such as desk rabbit and ���hw��f.
> Wow what an illustrious group you have put little me into! Thanks!
Hate to burst your bubble of illustriousness but you don't belong in
that group, you're not in my kill file. Sorry. ;-)
Desk Rabbit
> Desk Rabbit <m...@example.com> wrote:
>
>> Lionel Leather Looer wrote:
>>> But now he has found the lord, and his mission is to use the
>>> web to spread the word and make redemption available to imbecilic
>>> kooks such as desk rabbit and ���hw��f.
>
>> Wow what an illustrious group you have put little me into! Thanks!
>
> Hate to burst your bubble of illustriousness but you don't belong in
> that group, you're not in my kill file. Sorry. ;-)
>
>