Re: Just received this email
Aardvark
>
>>
>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>> news:hhg12t$cbs$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:13:17 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>>
>>>> He is a mulatto. And not a particularly intelligent one at that.
>>>
>>>
>>> You're a racist asshole.
>>>
>>>> SNIP
>>>
>>> Hey! Great skills at copying and pasting!
>>>
> You are the typically stupid Irish that brought race into the
> discussion.
Often prone to generalisation and racial stereotyping, you fucking
hypocrite?
Your president isn't white. Get over it and quit taking your anger at the
fact out on others.
Fuckwit.
--
Las autoridades sanitarias advierten:
Fumar perjudica gravemente su salud
y la de los que están a su alrededor
Ferd.Berfle
mental illness?
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:hhg53h$c18$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
> y la de los que est�n a su alrededor
Aardvark
> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in many
parts of the world.
> Is irish a race or
> a mental illness?
It's whiskey, sto0pid.
--
Las autoridades sanitarias advierten:
Fumar perjudica gravemente su salud
y la de los que están a su alrededor
ShapeShifter
.Regal
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Aardvark
> You seem to dislike white folks.
I think every home should have one.
> Are you black Irish?
Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
ancestry. Google is your friend.
Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
Aardvark
> You seem to dislike white folks.
I think every home should have one.
> Are you black Irish?
Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
ancestry. Google is your friend.
Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
Aardvark
>
>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>> news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org... On Wed, 30 Dec 2009
>> 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>
>>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
>>
>> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in many
>> parts of the world.
>>
>>> Is irish a race or
>>> a mental illness?
>>
>> It's whiskey, sto0pid.
> Only to those of you who swoon over murders.
>
Nice non sequitur.
§nühw¤£f
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:19:20 -0500, .Regal wrote:
>>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>> news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org... On Wed, 30 Dec 2009
>>> 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
>>> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in many
>>> parts of the world.
>>>
>>>> Is irish a race or
>>>> a mental illness?
>>> It's whiskey, sto0pid.
>
>> Only to those of you who swoon over murders.
>>
>
> Nice non sequitur.
>
>
^_^
--
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/22-10
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:19:20 -0500, .Regal wrote:
>>>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>>> news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org... On Wed, 30 Dec 2009
>>>> 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
>>>> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in
>>>> many parts of the world.
>>>>
>>>>> Is irish a race or
>>>>> a mental illness?
>>>> It's whiskey, sto0pid.
>>
>>> Only to those of you who swoon over murders.
>>>
>>>
>> Nice non sequitur.
>>
>>
> You have such interesting friends.
>
> ^_^
You can have 'em. Cheap.
BTW A show will be on Sky 1 TV next Sunday at 9PM GMT, Ross Kemp, Both
Sides, Gaza. If you can't get to watch it for any reason, I can sort you
out a copy.
Ever heard of Ross Kemp? Take a look at his Wiki. I have both the 2008 and
2009 series of his programmes made in Afghanistan and can upload them
somewhere if you'd like to watch for you to get a taste of what he's about.
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:19:20 -0500, .Regal wrote:
>>>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>>> news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org... On Wed, 30 Dec 2009
>>>> 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
>>>> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in
>>>> many parts of the world.
>>>>
>>>>> Is irish a race or
>>>>> a mental illness?
>>>> It's whiskey, sto0pid.
>>
>>> Only to those of you who swoon over murders.
>>>
>>>
>> Nice non sequitur.
>>
>>
> You have such interesting friends.
>
> ^_^
You can have 'em. Cheap.
BTW A show will be on Sky 1 TV next Sunday at 9PM GMT, Ross Kemp, Both
Sides, Gaza. If you can't get to watch it for any reason, I can sort you
out a copy.
Ever heard of Ross Kemp? Take a look at his Wiki. I have both the 2008 and
2009 series of his programmes made in Afghanistan and can upload them
somewhere if you'd like to watch for you to get a taste of what he's about.
--
§nühw¤£f
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:22:24 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:19:20 -0500, .Regal wrote:
>>>>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hhg67q$6ie$1...@news.eternal-september.org... On Wed, 30 Dec 2009
>>>>> 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
>>>>> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in
>>>>> many parts of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is irish a race or
>>>>>> a mental illness?
>>>>> It's whiskey, sto0pid.
>>>> Only to those of you who swoon over murders.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>
>>>
>> You have such interesting friends.
>>
>> ^_^
>
> You can have 'em. Cheap.
>
> BTW A show will be on Sky 1 TV next Sunday at 9PM GMT, Ross Kemp, Both
> Sides, Gaza. If you can't get to watch it for any reason, I can sort you
> out a copy.
>
> Ever heard of Ross Kemp? Take a look at his Wiki. I have both the 2008 and
> 2009 series of his programmes made in Afghanistan and can upload them
> somewhere if you'd like to watch for you to get a taste of what he's about.
>
Heres the eyewitness accounts of there being "some well dressed man with
a video camera" taping the airline incident from start to finish.
And some bit about a handler for the lil jihaadi as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAtK7FFDukQ
Aardvark
I think you'll be interested, mate.
> Heres the eyewitness accounts of there being "some well dressed man with
> a video camera" taping the airline incident from start to finish.
> And some bit about a handler for the lil jihaadi as well.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAtK7FFDukQ
Cheers, mate.
Buffalo
�n�hw��f wrote:
[snip]
> I'll have a gander at it.
> Heres the eyewitness accounts of there being "some well dressed man
> with a video camera" taping the airline incident from start to
> finish.
> And some bit about a handler for the lil jihaadi as well.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAtK7FFDukQ
Good link!
Thanks,
Buffalo
-AR15-
a simple question.
Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
@news.eternal-september.org:
.Regal
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:hhkog3$cte$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:32:57 -0800, Eagle wrote:
> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:hhjia7$obt$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:13:07 -0600, Jenn wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:11:26 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I'm beginning to understand your posting style, SN. It's not that
>>>>> you have a confrontational personality, it's just your way of
>>>>> extracting a persons POV.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You owe me a new keyboard and monitor, you bugger. I just splurfed
>>>> white wine all over the place.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ROFLOL haaaaaaahahaaah
>>
>> < http://yfrog.com/5c10291124j >
>>
> Alright...who is the pic of?
That, my dear chap, is yours truly.
My eleven-year-old son took the picture just before I went out last night.
It seems I posted it here last night, although I can't remember doing it,
nor can I imagine why I did it.
Must've been a good night :-)
Aardvark
>
> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
> @news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>
>>> You seem to dislike white folks.
>>
>> I think every home should have one.
>>
>>> Are you black Irish?
>>
>> Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
>> ancestry. Google is your friend.
>>
>> Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
>>
>>
>>
> Seems you are clueless on how to answer a simple question.
>
Me? Clueless? Who's the one who thought that the phrase 'black Irish'
somehow referred to African ancestry?
You would appear to be hopelessly pig-shit thick.
Shifter
§nühw¤£f
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:41:59 +0100, -AR15- wrote:
>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> You seem to dislike white folks.
>>> I think every home should have one.
>>>
>>>> Are you black Irish?
>>> Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
>>> ancestry. Google is your friend.
>>>
>>> Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>> Seems you are clueless on how to answer a simple question.
>>
>
>
> Me? Clueless? Who's the one who thought that the phrase 'black Irish'
> somehow referred to African ancestry?
>
> You would appear to be hopelessly pig-shit thick.
>
>
new "anti-blashphemy" law now.
Now thats fucking *thick*.
Aardvark
>
> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:hhnoju$l59$4...@news.eternal-september.org... On Sat, 02 Jan 2010
> 13:41:59 +0100, -AR15- wrote:
>>
>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> You seem to dislike white folks.
>>>
>>> I think every home should have one.
>>>
>>>> Are you black Irish?
>>>
>>> Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
>>> ancestry. Google is your friend.
>>>
>>> Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Seems you are clueless on how to answer a simple question.
>>
>>
>
> Me? Clueless? Who's the one who thought that the phrase 'black Irish'
> somehow referred to African ancestry?
>
> You would appear to be hopelessly pig-shit thick.
> Why would you think it does not?
>
I *know* that it doesn't.
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:41:59 +0100, -AR15- wrote:
>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You seem to dislike white folks.
>>>> I think every home should have one.
>>>>
>>>>> Are you black Irish?
>>>> Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
>>>> ancestry. Google is your friend.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Seems you are clueless on how to answer a simple question.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Me? Clueless? Who's the one who thought that the phrase 'black Irish'
>> somehow referred to African ancestry?
>>
>> You would appear to be hopelessly pig-shit thick.
>>
>>
> If you're looking for THICK look no further than the Irish. They have
> some new "anti-blashphemy" law now.
> Now thats fucking *thick*.
Well, that's the kind of stupidity you'll get in a country where Church
and State are so closely intertwined.
No better than some fundamentalist Islamic countries.
BTW mate, have you got a link to it? I could do with a laugh.
§nühw¤£f
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:17:12 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:41:59 +0100, -AR15- wrote:
>>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in news:hhg9ov$l5n$1
>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You seem to dislike white folks.
>>>>> I think every home should have one.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you black Irish?
>>>>> Hint: The adjective phrase 'Black Irish' does *not* refer to African
>>>>> ancestry. Google is your friend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, even yours, sto0pid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Seems you are clueless on how to answer a simple question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Me? Clueless? Who's the one who thought that the phrase 'black Irish'
>>> somehow referred to African ancestry?
>>>
>>> You would appear to be hopelessly pig-shit thick.
>>>
>>>
>> If you're looking for THICK look no further than the Irish. They have
>> some new "anti-blashphemy" law now.
>> Now thats fucking *thick*.
>
> Well, that's the kind of stupidity you'll get in a country where Church
> and State are so closely intertwined.
>
> No better than some fundamentalist Islamic countries.
>
> BTW mate, have you got a link to it? I could do with a laugh.
>
>
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/08/ireland_blashpemy/
Its being challenged:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437460.stm
thank fucking god for atheists...
NormanM
> You seem to dislike white folks. Are you black Irish?
Only if a Chavez, or Hidalgo, or the like, is in his ancestry.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
NormanM
> Why would you think it does not?
Because it does not.
Hint: Major event of 1588. Atlantic Ocean.
NormanM
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:16:11 -0500, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
>> Had no use for the drunken irish slob kennedy either.
> Probably because, like President Obama, he was liked and admired in many
> parts of the world.
Just because you think so highly of "The Obamessiah", doesn't mean that I
have to. He is just another Chicago ward heeler.
Shifter
(William Regal)
"~BD~" <Boate...@theobvious.hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ENidnUf6UbEDAN3W...@bt.com...
On 03/01/2010 13:02, Jimz1935 wrote:
Maybe you are being too judgemental, Jim.
I have you in my 'good guy' category. :)
I have the 'real' Aardvark in my 'good guy' category too.
Perhaps you should shake hands with him and move on? What do you say?
I feel responsible ...... it was me who brought him here! ;)
--
Dave (Sometimes man stumbles over the truth ...... Sir Winston Churchill)
Aardvark
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>
>> You seem to dislike white folks. Are you black Irish?
>
> Only if a Chavez, or Hidalgo, or the like, is in his ancestry.
More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm blond
haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the sun.
You are aware, of course, that the Vikings settled in parts of Ireland
over a thousand years ago?
~BD~
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:48:31 -0800, NormanM wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:09:12 -0500, ShapeShifter wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You seem to dislike white folks. Are you black Irish?
>>>
>> Only if a Chavez, or Hidalgo, or the like, is in his ancestry.
>>
> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm blond
> haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the sun.
>
> You are aware, of course, that the Vikings settled in parts of Ireland
> over a thousand years ago?
>
>
Hair? You got *hair*? ;)
LoÏc de Hondenzak
news:hhq8sq$lfv$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm blond
> haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the sun.
>
> OH SHIT! The onset of puberty is here! My breasts are developing!
*COUGH*
Aardvark
Is it time?
Zwi van der Handelaar In Tweedehands Vogelmest
news:hhs018$t75$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:31:14 +0100, LoÏc de Hondenzak wrote:
>
>> Some dopey flimflam named Aardvark drooled in
>> news:hhq8sq$lfv$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>
>>> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm blond
>>> haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the sun.
>>>
>>> OH SHIT! The onset of puberty is here! My breasts are developing!
>>
>>
>> *COUGH*
>
>
> Is it time?
No, but, as you can see, getting there.
> I love my meat tender and flesh.
Thanks for sharing.
Aardvark
Threading problems or is this deliberate?
>> I love my meat tender and flesh.
>
> Thanks for sharing.
I'm looking forward to you returning the favour.
:-)
Jaap ten Doedelzak
news:hhsu4h$dth$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:02:54 +0100, Zwi van der Handelaar In Tweedehands
> Vogelmest wrote:
>
>> Some whoreson nincompoop named Aardvark wrote in
>> news:hhs018$t75$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:31:14 +0100, LoÏc de Hondenzak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some dopey flimflam named Aardvark drooled in
>>>> news:hhq8sq$lfv$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm
>>>>> blond haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the
>>>>> sun.
>>>>>
>>>>> OH SHIT! The onset of puberty is here! My breasts are developing!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *COUGH*
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it time?
>>
>> No, but, as you can see, getting there.
>>
>>
> Threading problems or is this deliberate?
Is what deliberate? What threading problem?
>>> I love my meat tender and flesh.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>
> I've been suffering from an annoying haemmorrhoid for the past 8
> years now. The problem runs in my family and I also wasn't getting
> enough fiber in my diet 8 years ago. I let it get too big before I
> finally, 2 or 3 years ago, had it cut out. It was the size of a fist!
> :-)
Weirdo.
--
A test sig
Aardvark
> Some ignominious fungus named Aardvark wrote in
> news:hhsu4h$dth$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:02:54 +0100, Zwi van der Handelaar In
>> Tweedehands Vogelmest wrote:
>>
>>> Some whoreson nincompoop named Aardvark wrote in
>>> news:hhs018$t75$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:31:14 +0100, LoÏc de Hondenzak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some dopey flimflam named Aardvark drooled in
>>>>> news:hhq8sq$lfv$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm
>>>>>> blond haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in the
>>>>>> sun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OH SHIT! The onset of puberty is here! My breasts are developing!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *COUGH*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it time?
>>>
>>> No, but, as you can see, getting there.
>>>
>>>
>> Threading problems or is this deliberate?
>
> Is what deliberate? What threading problem?
>
Must be my reader's settings, then: different nym, different thread starts
with a Re: subject line. Normally a different nym posting in the same
thread is added to that thread, in the same cascade. I'll check how it
threads in my reader in 24hshd.
>>>> I love my meat tender and flesh.
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>> I've been suffering from an annoying haemmorrhoid for the past 8 years
>> now. The problem runs in my family and I also wasn't getting enough
>> fiber in my diet 8 years ago. I let it get too big before I finally, 2
>> or 3 years ago, had it cut out. It was the size of a fist! :-)
>
> Weirdo.
Looking good.
Aardvark
>> Is what deliberate? What threading problem?
>>
>>
> Must be my reader's settings, then: different nym, different thread
> starts with a Re: subject line. Normally a different nym posting in the
> same thread is added to that thread, in the same cascade. I'll check how
> it threads in my reader in 24hshd.
Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
week. Something not in the headers that should be?
I'll check in another reader.
Kadaitcha Man
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:01:38 +0100, Jaap ten Doedelzak wrote:
>
>> Some ignominious fungus named Aardvark wrote in
>> news:hhsu4h$dth$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:02:54 +0100, Zwi van der Handelaar In
>>> Tweedehands Vogelmest wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some whoreson nincompoop named Aardvark wrote in
>>>> news:hhs018$t75$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:31:14 +0100, LoÏc de Hondenzak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some dopey flimflam named Aardvark drooled in
>>>>>> news:hhq8sq$lfv$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More likely an Olafsson, or Gustavsson or something similar. I'm
>>>>>>> blond haired, blue eyed, pale complexion. I burn very easily in
>>>>>>> the sun.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OH SHIT! The onset of puberty is here! My breasts are developing!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *COUGH*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it time?
>>>>
>>>> No, but, as you can see, getting there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Threading problems or is this deliberate?
>>
>> Is what deliberate? What threading problem?
>>
>>
> Must be my reader's settings, then: different nym, different thread
> starts with a Re: subject line. Normally a different nym posting in the
> same thread is added to that thread, in the same cascade. I'll check how
> it threads in my reader in 24hshd.
>
>>>>> I love my meat tender and flesh.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for sharing.
>>>
>>> I've been suffering from an annoying haemmorrhoid for the past 8 years
>>> now. The problem runs in my family and I also wasn't getting enough
>>> fiber in my diet 8 years ago. I let it get too big before I finally, 2
>>> or 3 years ago, had it cut out. It was the size of a fist! :-)
>>
>> Weirdo.
>
> I'm not a flower!
Some things should be made public. That's one of them.
--
Test signature
Kadaitcha Man
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:24:26 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
>
>
>>> Is what deliberate? What threading problem?
>>>
>>>
>> Must be my reader's settings, then: different nym, different thread
>> starts with a Re: subject line. Normally a different nym posting in the
>> same thread is added to that thread, in the same cascade. I'll check
>> how it threads in my reader in 24hshd.
>
> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>
> I'll check in another reader.
No need. The References header is missing.
> The name Pavlov rings a bell.
Really?
--
Test signature
Kadaitcha Man
> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>
> I'll check in another reader.
It should now be fix0red.
> Why do we say something is 'out of whack'. What's a 'whack'?
I'll ignore that.
--
Test signature
Aardvark
> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>
>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>
>> I'll check in another reader.
>
> It should now be fix0red.
>
Good.
>> Why do we say something is 'out of whack'. What's a 'whack'?
>
> I'll ignore that.
Pussy.
Kadaitcha Man
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:39:16 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>>
>>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>>
>>> I'll check in another reader.
>>
>> It should now be fix0red.
>>
>>
> Good.
>
>>> Why do we say something is 'out of whack'. What's a 'whack'?
>>
>> I'll ignore that.
>
>
> Pussy?
Yes, please.
--
Test signature
Aardvark
> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>
>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>
>> I'll check in another reader.
>
> It should now be fix0red.
>
Funny. I just checked it all with TBird and everything in all the threads,
I mean everything, was threaded correctly. No breaks or new threads.
Must be the way Pan threads or something.
>> Why do we say something is 'out of whack'. What's a 'whack'?
>
> I'll ignore that.
--
Eagle
"Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
news:x7r41z$06e$0...@dazed-blonde-twat-peddler.biz.nicaragua...
I checked your posting properties, and read this line;
Message-ID: <x7r41z$06e$0...@dazed-blonde-twat-peddler.biz.nicaragua>
"blonde-twat-peddler"?
~BD~
> Why do we say something is 'out of whack'. What's a 'whack'?
>
Well - maybe he didn't ...... ;)
For the record:
Whack started life in the eighteenth century. It was probably an
imitative noise, or perhaps derived from the older thwack, also
imitative. The adjective wacky, for somebody or something that is odd,
crazy or peculiar (nowadays in a mildly funny way), may come from whack,
in that somebody who was crazy behaved as though he had been hit about
the head.
The noun developed a number of subsidiary senses. At one time, it could
mean a share in a distribution, a portion; this sense was originally
thieves’ cant — Francis Grose, in his Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue of
1785, has “Whack, a share of a booty obtained by fraud” (could physical
violence have been involved in some cases?). British English has a
couple of phrases that retain that sense. One is pay one’s whack, to pay
one’s agreed contribution to shared expenses. Another is top whack, or
full whack, for the maximum price or rate for something (“if you go to
that shop, you’ll pay top whack”).
There are some other old figurative senses, including a bargain or
agreement (which evolved out of the idea of a share), and an attempt at
doing something (“I’ll take a whack at that job”). These are mostly
American, and it was in the US that the sense you refer to first
appeared, in the latter part of the nineteenth century. There seems to
have been a phrase in fine whack during that century, meaning that
something was in good condition or excellent fettle. (It appears in a
letter by John Hay, President Lincoln’s amanuensis, dated August 1863,
which describes the President: “The Tycoon is in fine whack. I have
rarely seen him more serene and busy. He is managing this war, the
draft, foreign relations, and planning a reconstruction of the Union,
all at once”.) It doesn’t often turn up in writing, though, so there’s
some doubt how widespread it was.
To be out of whack would then have meant the opposite — that something
wasn’t on top form or working well. It was first applied to people with
ailments (“My back is out of whack”). In the early years of the
twentieth century it started to refer to mechanisms. It might be that
the sense was influenced by the idea that faulty mechanisms responded to
a quick thwack.
Ref: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-out2.htm
§nühw¤£f
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:39:16 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>>
>>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>>
>>> I'll check in another reader.
>> It should now be fix0red.
>>
>
> Funny. I just checked it all with TBird and everything in all the threads,
> I mean everything, was threaded correctly. No breaks or new threads.
>
> Must be the way Pan threads or something.
>
--
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:39:16 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>
>>> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>>>
>>>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>>>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>>>
>>>> I'll check in another reader.
>>> It should now be fix0red.
>>>
>>>
>> Funny. I just checked it all with TBird and everything in all the
>> threads, I mean everything, was threaded correctly. No breaks or new
>> threads.
>>
>> Must be the way Pan threads or something.
>>
> Try choosing the Sort-On setting? Set to sort on subject?
I'll take a look at my config. If you know what he's doing you'll know why
I thought there was a chance the trouble was at his end.
:-)
Aardvark
Don't ask :-)
§nühw¤£f
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:40:40 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:39:16 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some motherlike heartrot named Aardvark stewed:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep. New nym, new thread. I first noticed it in the test threads last
>>>>> week. Something not in the headers that should be?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll check in another reader.
>>>> It should now be fix0red.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Funny. I just checked it all with TBird and everything in all the
>>> threads, I mean everything, was threaded correctly. No breaks or new
>>> threads.
>>>
>>> Must be the way Pan threads or something.
>>>
>> Try choosing the Sort-On setting? Set to sort on subject?
>
> I'll take a look at my config. If you know what he's doing you'll know why
> I thought there was a chance the trouble was at his end.
>
> :-)
>
the icon that looks like a funnel brings up a thingy where you can make
it sort poasts how you want...maybe...
^_^