Odd Google Logo Today???
Les Stewart
enigmatic page. Any ideas?
Duncan Stotta
fieldmouse, and bathhouse and brothel keeper, fabricated:
> What's with the Google logo today? Clicking on it leads to a rather
> enigmatic page. Any ideas?
Holiday doodles, that's all. Nothing to be afraid of, you stupid great cunt.
why?
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:53:37 -0600, Les Stewart wrote:
It's not odd.
>What's with the Google logo today? Clicking on it leads to a rather
>enigmatic page. Any ideas?
Too lazy to find the answer yourself? Even in 24HSHD this has been
answered before.
Well at least you clicked and looked instead of just asking. But it
didn't get any better.
You don't Google enough.
www.google.com , search for google logo , it's that easy, you have both
words in your subject and message body.
Google Holiday Logos
Holiday Logos and Events -- Google style! We have a variety of logos
commemorating holidays and events. We've put them in this online museum
for your ...
www.google.com/intl/en/holidaylogos.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.google.com ]
Me
Mitch
<fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote:
That's NOT what he asked, and since Google does not describe what
happens with the logo, it is reasonable to ask in a discussion group.
Sometimes people want to discuss things!
I hope you don't respond this way when people bring up any topic in
public, too. ("How about that politician?" "Lazy bum, didn't you Google
it? Results of 198,024,465, .001 second.)
;)
It isn't just a Holiday title graphic.
Mike Easter
> What's with the Google logo today? Clicking on it leads to a rather
> enigmatic page. Any ideas?
What exactly is the depiction of the modified 'g' on the ?canvas? that
the mouse is behind?
I changed my mind from the closeup^1 - disregard canvas-- that looks
like the mouse's R hand on the L side of the 'g object' which might have
a hole thru' it and maybe that is the mouse's L hand reaching thru' the
'g hole object' -- but what are the 3 dimensional characteristics of the
g object? and the mouse with respect to it? and the interior of the g
object? what is that squarish shadow around/behind the mosue?
^1 http://tinypic.com/iyd1yt.gif
You are supposed to use that #1 clue to guess at #2.
http://www.google.com/doodle10.html
--
Mike Easter
Trax
Don't you just hate Google job applications :)
--
Sightsee from space
http://tinyurl.com/djrdl
pcbutts1
--
The best live web video on the internet http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm
NEW Embedded system W/Linux. We now sell DVR cards.
See it all at http://www.seedsv.com/products.htm
Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com
"Mike Easter" <Mi...@ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:43aa1b55$0$80217$892e...@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
Mike Easter
> Twas the night before Christmas?
Sounds good. So then #2 should be some stockings hung by the chimney.
With care.
But I think we're going to run out of days before we run out of
[potential] 'depictions' or doodles.
--
Mike Easter
Mike Easter
So, how about google is the timid little mouse peeking out who doesn't
know if its doodle series should depict Christmas as a Christian holy
day, a capitalistic Santa Claus economy-stimulating buying scene, a
non-denominational non-religious 'pagan' winter solstice celebratory
season, or something else?
--
Mike Easter
Plato
>
> What's with the Google logo today? Clicking on it leads to a rather
> enigmatic page. Any ideas?
Google is a most excellent company to work for. If you have the right
personality, one can get hired for $125,000/yr right out of college.
why?
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:16:08 GMT, Mitch wrote:
>In article <fpsjq15td3b1u0sgg...@4ax.com>, why?
><fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:53:37 -0600, Les Stewart wrote:
>>
>> It's not odd.
>>
>> >What's with the Google logo today? Clicking on it leads to a rather
>> >enigmatic page. Any ideas?
>>
>> Too lazy to find the answer yourself? Even in 24HSHD this has been
>> answered before.
>>
>> Well at least you clicked and looked instead of just asking. But it
>> didn't get any better.
>>
>> You don't Google enough.
>>
>> www.google.com , search for google logo , it's that easy, you have both
>> words in your subject and message body.
>>
>> Google Holiday Logos
>> Holiday Logos and Events -- Google style! We have a variety of logos
>> commemorating holidays and events. We've put them in this online museum
>> for your ...
>> www.google.com/intl/en/holidaylogos.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
>> [ More results from www.google.com ]
>
>That's NOT what he asked, and since Google does not describe what
It was, clicking on the logo (the OP did that) it says happy holidays in
9 languages isn't enough of a clue.
>happens with the logo, it is reasonable to ask in a discussion group.
Didn't say it was unreasonable, just lazy. Now you mention it , it is as
well.
>Sometimes people want to discuss things!
Who cares!
>I hope you don't respond this way when people bring up any topic in
Oh shut up already, needed something to moan about ddi you.
>public, too. ("How about that politician?" "Lazy bum, didn't you Google
>it? Results of 198,024,465, .001 second.)
>;)
>It isn't just a Holiday title graphic.
You are right there, going by the text on the page it's a "Google
Holiday Doodle", the page title is <title>Google Holiday Logos</title>,
so maybe the use of 'graphic' isn't correct.
Me
Mike Easter
> I changed my mind from the closeup^1 - disregard canvas-- that looks
> like the mouse's R hand on the L side of the 'g object' which might
> have a hole thru' it and maybe that is the mouse's L hand reaching
> thru' the 'g hole object' -- but what are the 3 dimensional
> characteristics of the g object? and the mouse with respect to it?
> and the interior of the g object? what is that squarish shadow
> around/behind the mosue?
Well, now that clue 2 has arrived we can 'see' the dimensionality of the
'g object' mouse door, since it was left ajar for the 2nd frame.
http://www.google.com/doodle10.html
The squarish shadow mentioned is/was the darkness of the open mousedoor.
The 'dimensions' of the g object door were hard for the artist to depict
in frame1 because the door with the g 'cutout' is actually a physically
impossible solid because of the lack of support for the impossibly
'suspended' g circle in the door. No wonder the eye/brain perception of
that was 'rebelling' at seeing the concept for the first frame that I
enlarged here....
> ^1 http://tinypic.com/iyd1yt.gif
The second frame has some minor dimension difficulties dealing the cat's
relationship with being behind the google wall and passing thru' the
google letters similar to the way the g object letter passes thru' the
door's dimension as if the letter were a different solid from the door.
The mind's eye 'grapples' with the question of whether a google letter
is 'real' or empty space -- like a light hologram. Since the cat and
mouse are going to be plugging in some holiday/Christmas lights, clearly
the google letters are going to be lighting up eventually, and changing
their dimensionality again in that way, holographically.
--
Mike Easter
kdi...@gmail.com
masses to the left?) Makes sense with all of the happy holiday messages
in different languages on the "hint page"... Perhaps connecting the
Americas (the red and yellow O's) to Europe/Asia? (the green and red
L and E)... What do you all think?
19th century nuthouses
You can't complain about Google, the alien society plugging colorful goog tubes
in people's asses in their UFO-s. Be-ware, Larry Page and Sergey Brin are scientologists
too, what the connection is between their two-hearted space-pirate society and
scientology is still a mystery. Though their traffic increased 30 percent this year and
their stock is a good fascist 400+, the great fascist scientologist society from
the future awaiting Terminator can shove their colorful goog tubes up their fascist asses.
19th century nuthouses
P.S. 95% of computers are infected with tracking and spywares. Google is one of the
leading marketers who, as marketers, are not very pro privacy. Recently they scanned
15 million books from public libraries, and like Napster, they distrubute copyrighted
materials. They claim they respect copyright and respond to copyright claims for
removal, but should music makers have to contact Napster themselves for removal of
copyrighted materials? See the problem with taking materials from University libraries,
and sharing them online? Most books, as music are copyrighted. The situation is the
same as with Napster, but rather than users united by the millions, Google does the
"Napstering"-sharing of public and copyrighted materials they take possession of,
online. They are pigs, fascists, as that's what fascists do: take all books in the world,
for free, and add sponsor links to the public materials. The same with usenet. They
took monopolian access of a library from universities, and sponsor the messages with
ads (sponsor links), in a way turning all posters' messages, you and I, into Formula
One cars with stickers, while providing limited privacy. Google remained the primary
private soliciter of usenet since 2001 when they purchased Deja News who began their
private soliciting business on usenet with great opposition regarding privacy at the time
in 1995. Don't forget. Sorry, my thoughts about Google.
19th century nuthouses
P.S.S. Don't wait for the terminator to appear and destroy San Francisco and Los Angeles.
write to the FTC about Google! www.ftc.gov, and stop their fascism. Anyway...
19th century nuthouses
DON'T EVER SAY THE WORD GOOGLE AGAIN!
why?
No lights this year, the cable is too short.
Me
Mike Easter
> No lights this year, the cable is too short.
How are the cat and the mouse going to solve this dilemma?
Will it involve an 'extra' dimension? Since 'dancing around' with
dimensionality illusions has been seen in the first two frames.
http://www.google.com/doodle10.html
Or, maybe they will figger out some kind of 'connectivity' extension?
--
Mike Easter
Trax
Your mouse is out, the pussy's there, but you can't get it in.....
....I've got nothing....
--
Floating Magnet
http://www.realboring.com/floating-magnet/
19th century nuthouses
Dadoishka Googlem.
Kurac, solisita te nye zye mozyemu. Solisita pozye Googlisiticz bozyemozye mozyemu ftc-niza Formulen yeden nye doishicz.
Ichita machita, harakiri ita Googay oooooooh!
Bon polyo, doisshi borottia, al fiami fairo, mangiamo contamo, oh oh con mamio, (hickup)
Hay diosito, tu dices que se vas de un te digo vida mida te lo di go vida de lo mio TIO!
Olk molk.
Sjorket fjolkett.
mukkeen mokken.
Vasten dasten.
why?
The mouse has the toolkit out, and there is a bit of yellow cable.
The hollow g is where the neon gas went?
Me
Trax
Very uneventful and disappointing finish
http://www.google.com/doodle10.html
Since Google was involved I was really expecting something
good/better.
And as you can always find a link to bolster a claim, I offer
http://digg.com/design/The_sequence_is_finished_
most thought it suck'd as well.
--
Draw lines to alter the flow
http://ishi.blog2.fc2.com/blog-entry-158.html
Mike Easter
> "Mike Easter"
>>> The squarish shadow mentioned is/was the darkness of the open
>>> mousedoor. The 'dimensions' of the g object door were hard for the
>>> artist to depict in frame1 because the door with the g 'cutout' is
>>> actually a physically impossible solid because of the lack of
>>> support for the impossibly 'suspended' g circle in the door. No
>>> wonder the eye/brain perception of that was 'rebelling' at seeing
>>> the concept for the first frame that I enlarged here....
>>>
>>>> ^1 http://tinypic.com/iyd1yt.gif
>>>
>>> The second frame has some minor dimension difficulties dealing the
>>> cat's relationship with being behind the google wall and passing
>>> thru' the google letters similar to the way the g object letter
>>> passes thru' the door's dimension as if the letter were a different
>>> solid from the door.
>>>
>>> The mind's eye 'grapples' with the question of whether a google
>>> letter is 'real' or empty space -- like a light hologram. Since
>>> the cat and mouse are going to be plugging in some
>>> holiday/Christmas lights, clearly the google letters are going to
>>> be lighting up eventually, and changing their dimensionality again
>>> in that way, holographically.
>
> Very uneventful and disappointing finish
> http://www.google.com/doodle10.html
This was my comment in another ng which was discussing it:
Mike Easter wrote:
> I found the whole series to be one of 'dimensionality treachery'.
>
> I finally decided that the visual effect of the final cel could be
> manifest if a bright light were shining at 3 dimensional colored
> reflective letters so that the 'backscatter' of the light fell on the
> white baackdrop surface -- defying logic or realism yet again compared
> to our 'traditional' perception of the way the google letters work.
Thus the 'illusion' of dimensions and light and the 'holographic' effect
pervaded in the dimensional trickery - as if the 'solidity'
[solidarity?] of the google letters were that of a holographic
lightsolid which was exhibiting 'interference' and reflectivity.
Imagine that the google letters were 'reversed' - and that their back
side facing us was resultant whitelight and their frontside facing
backwards which was 3 dimensional and a colored 'resistant' hologram
were being illuminated by the Xmas lightsource.
The result would be the reflective backscatter which would have the
'glow' of color reflected on the white 'frontspiece' - thus the white
outlined backside letters and the colored reflective backscatter 'aura'
around them.
--
Mike Easter