On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:08:14 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:44:06 -0500, richard <
nor...@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>>An old episode shows Rick Harrison buying a sub marine.
>
> Is that different from a submarine?
>
>>The woman who brings it in puts a $25,000 price tag on it as is.
>>She settles quickly for $3,000.
>>Ok Dicky boy, what's wrong with this picture?
>>Oh but wait, an expert says the sub sold originally for $150,000.
>>Cost to restore would be around $100,000.
>>Value as is, $10,000 and old Dicky boy is higher than a kite.
>>
>>Just one problem.
>>It seems that the current owner had seen the original airing of the episode
>>and immediately called the Las Vegas Police.
>
> The current owner would be Rick Harrison.
not legally.
>
>>Dicky had to wind up returning the sub to the owner.
>>
>>So how come the History channel won't discuss the facts behind the scene
>>and continue showing the thievery?
>
> Because 1: This transpired AFTER the show was edited and aired "the
> <sic> current owner had seen the original airing..."
> 2. There's no thievery on Rick's part.
Maybe not. But the woman did not legally own the vehicle, so the sale was
not legal.
>
>>When someone comes in with a vehicle the first question should be, "What
>>paperwork do you have that shows you legally own it?"
>
> A submarine isn't a vehicle. Please tell me who the submarine would be
> registered with, dicky.
>
>>"Don't have any."
>>"Bye, have a nice day. When you have the paperwork, come see me."
>>I have as yet to see any one of them ask for proof of ownership on any
>>vehicle.
>
> There's a lot of things you don't see on the show, doesn't mean it
> doesn't happen.
>
> For someone who hates the show, you seem to watch a lot of it.
>
> PS: Read up on what hair is, dicky.
Yes you should.
Mummies may have been found with hair on them, but not standard human
skeletons. It depends on the conditions under which they were buried.