Delays in accessing Internet
jacques dupuy
Since about 3 weeks, I cannot connect to internet and I receive the message
: "Too much delay in receiving answer from server XXXX.XX "
I have a Dell Dimension 4550, Windows XP SP2 and a US Robbotics 56K RTC
Fax/modem. The problem is the same by using Internet Explorer or Firefox
(last versions)
THanks in advance for your hlp.
JD
--
Valdez is coming.
Call your Internet service provider because the problem is on their end.
Mike Easter
> Since about 3 weeks, I cannot connect to internet and I receive the
> message
>> "Too much delay in receiving answer from server XXXX.XX "
> I have a Dell Dimension 4550, Windows XP SP2 and a US Robbotics 56K
RTC
> Fax/modem. The problem is the same by using Internet Explorer or
Firefox
> (last versions)
Can you hear the modem transacting?
I don't know how it works for .fr telephone dialup service, but the
typical US dialup sequence that I've listened to in the past was -1- my
modem dials -2- the other modem answers -3- my configuration provides my
user/pass to the receiving modem -4- the other modem gives me access to
the internet
You are currently connected via .fr proxad dialup. Is that the service
you are connectivity troubleshooting?
MS has a troubleshooting page for XP http://snipr.com/tyg1n
Troubleshooting network and dial-up connections
--
Mike Easter
Tony
--
>>> _
>>> /'_/)
>>> ,/_ /
>>> / /
>>> /'_'/' '/'__'7,
>>> /'/ / / /" /_\
>>> ('( ' Up /' ')
>>> \ Yours /
>>> '\' FROG _.7'
>>> \ (
>>> \ \
jacques dupuy wrote:
--
The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG
Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city
Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know proper
manners
Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs but got fired the first day on
the job for potty mouth,
Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!
El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar
Master Juba was a black man imitating a white man imitating a black man
Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions beyond
the realm of understandability
Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday
floffy
<god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, dislup is not very fast , could be the problem
now web site need hight speed to get thier infomation
--
Posted via : news.mccarragher.com
We remove Bad spam/sex/ads/other
chuckcar
news:4b40dd80$0$2866$426a...@news.free.fr:
Does the modem make noise when you're dialing? How long after it's
finished dialing do you hear the "static"? Make sure that you have no
splitters in the line and you use less than 10' from the modem to the
wall jack.
--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
Zu Arsschlaark!
>
> jacques dupuy wrote:
>
>> Hello !
>>
>> Since about 3 weeks, I cannot connect to internet and I receive the
>> message
>> : "Too much delay in receiving answer from server XXXX.XX "
>> I have a Dell Dimension 4550, Windows XP SP2 and a US Robbotics 56K RTC
>> Fax/modem. The problem is the same by using Internet Explorer or Firefox
>> (last versions)
>> THanks in advance for your hlp.
>>
>> JD
>> --
"Tony" <To...@TheDeli.Sandwich> wrote in message
news:4B410A65...@TheDeli.Sandwich...
> This newsgroup is only for english speaking people.
>
> --
>>>> _
>>>> /'_/)
>>>> ,/_ /
>>>> / /
>>>> /'_'/' '/'__'7,
>>>> /'/ / / /" /_\
>>>> ('( ' Up /' ')
>>>> \ Yours /
>>>> '\' FROG _.7'
>>>> \ (
>>>> \ \
>
>
He wrote in English? Whats the problem ...
(Quel encule, alors!)
rf
"chuckcar" <ch...@nil.car> wrote in message
news:Xns9CF5E1F...@127.0.0.1...
> wall jack.
What bloody bullshit. What do you think lives *behind* that wall jack? A
bunch of kilometres of wire back to the exchange. What bloody difference
would ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra make?
Talking out of your arse again chuckup?
Vastert de Klootjebijter
news:rch0n.66778$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
chucktard's response is pathetic, however your question is even more-so.
The flexible phone line has a higher resistance than the copper phone
cable, hence the signal loss is greater.
Now. to answer your question:
> What bloody difference ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra
> make
A fucking lot.
And You, Mike Easter, "floffy" the spamtard, Evan the Pratt and
chucktard, are too fucking stupid to tell the OP to contact their ISP.
Look on the bright side, tarlet. You're in good company.
--
A test sig
rf
"Vastert de Klootjebijter"
<deranged...@alt.binaries.erotica.multimedia.seedy.ne'er-do-well> wrote
in message news:C2145A97...@waxy-faced-dainty-dominie.net.monaco...
> Some fucked-up whey-face named rf wrote in
> news:rch0n.66778$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
>> "chuckcar" <ch...@nil.car> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9CF5E1F...@127.0.0.1...
>>> "jacques dupuy" <jcad...@club-internet.fr> wrote in
>>> news:4b40dd80$0$2866$426a...@news.free.fr:
>>>
>>> and you use less than 10' from the modem to the wall jack.
>>
>> What bloody bullshit. What do you think lives *behind* that wall jack? A
>> bunch of kilometres of wire back to the exchange. What bloody difference
>> would ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra make?
>>
>> Talking out of your arse again chuckup?
>
> chucktard's response is pathetic, however your question is even more-so.
>
> The flexible phone line
Which is copper.
> has a higher resistance than the copper phone
> cable, hence the signal loss is greater.
>
> Now. to answer your question:
>
>> What bloody difference ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra
>> make
>
> A fucking lot.
Quote some figures. Now much difference in resistance? Do some sums.
Here, I'll do some for you:
Let's the difference in resistance is a whopping whole order of magnitude
(highly unlikely). Let's say the "copper phone cable" is .01 ohms per metre
and my flexible cable is .1 ohms per metre.
Hmmm. I am ten kilometres from the exchange, that is 10,000 metres, so the
resistance of the "copper phone cable" is .01 x 10,000 = 100 ohms.
Now, the ten feet (three metres) chukup insists is the maximum from the wall
to the modem has a resistance of .1 x 3 = .2 ohms. A negligable increase.
Lets use my overboard figure of three hundred feet (100 metres). My 100
metre peice of flexible cord has a resistance of .1 / 100 = 10 ohms. A
whopping ten percent of the resitance of the "copper phone cable" from the
wall to the exchange.
I would not think that 10% is "a fucking lot".
You, like chuckup, obviously don't know very much about electricity in
general, or resistance in particular.
> And You, Mike Easter, "floffy" the spamtard, Evan the Pratt and
> chucktard, are too fucking stupid to tell the OP to contact their ISP.
Three or four people have *already* told the OP to contact their ISP. The
question has been answered. This is a discussion about the stupidity of
chuckup.
Gerlach van den Snotterkuiken
news:MXh0n.66789$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> "Vastert de Klootjebijter"
> <deranged...@alt.binaries.erotica.multimedia.seedy.ne'er-do-well>
> wrote in message
> news:C2145A97...@waxy-faced-dainty-dominie.net.monaco...
>> Some fucked-up whey-face named rf wrote in
>> news:rch0n.66778$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>>
>>> "chuckcar" <ch...@nil.car> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9CF5E1F...@127.0.0.1...
>>>> "jacques dupuy" <jcad...@club-internet.fr> wrote in
>>>> news:4b40dd80$0$2866$426a...@news.free.fr:
>>>>
>>>> and you use less than 10' from the modem to the wall jack.
>>>
>>> What bloody bullshit. What do you think lives *behind* that wall jack?
>>> A bunch of kilometres of wire back to the exchange. What bloody
>>> difference would ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra make?
>>>
>>> Talking out of your arse again chuckup?
>>
>> chucktard's response is pathetic, however your question is even
>> more-so.
>>
>> The flexible phone line
>
> Which is copper.
No shit, Shylock?
>> has a higher resistance than the copper phone cable, hence the signal
>> loss is greater.
>>
>> Now. to answer your question:
>>
>>> What bloody difference ten or twenty or even three hundred feet extra
>>> make
>>
>> A fucking lot.
>
> Quote some figures. Now much difference in resistance? Do some sums.
>
> Here, I'll do some for you:
>
> Let's the difference
You can't even get the language right. Why the fuck should anyone trust
your bullshit pseudo sums?
> I would not think
Only because you have no brain with which to do such a thing.
> You, like chuck<BITCHSLAP>
Get your own lines, lamer.
--
A test sig
Ambrosius Driedubbel Overgehaalde Schoft
news:MXh0n.66789$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
PS:
> This is a discussion about the stupidity
> of chuckup.
I'm making it a discussion of yours.
HTH
--
A test sig
Tony
these english speaking newsgroups.
"Zu Arsschlaark!" wrote:
--
Tony
There's been some questions and confusion in a previous post in regards to
why you "hard boot" (or "power drains" as chuck likes to call it) your DSL
modem. I'm compiling a website for these NG's to cut down on the utter
bullshit that's been posted in here by some posters (*caugh* chuck). So
lets clear out the bullshit and get back to business. This took me 30 mins
to compile and write. This is for those who wanted to know exactly why you
turn your modem on and off, and why this works.
Power cycling your modem or hard booting your modem, by completely
unplugging it for about 30 - 40 seconds then turn it back on again, can
fix
some internet connection problems. Here is a more in-depth response to
this
issue as to why this is done.
This clears out your modems buffers which can get over filled due to
Packet
Loss; and this intern can cause your modem to loose sync with the
connection. This is the most common problem that causes loss of sync with
your connection and power cycling your modem is used to re-sync it.
However
this is a quick fix to this problem. In most cases this can be prevented
by
having the appropriate network tweaks and settings in place, which is
something that the tech turnips at Sympatico should be informing us on.
Supportive Research:
http://www.dslreports.com/speed - Explains Packet Loss and other speed
related issues, plus links to tweaks page. For those of you who notice a
decrease in speed during certain times of the day, might want to check out
Enemy #3 on this page.
http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,111644,pg,2,00.asp# -
Excellent
Article.
http://cable-dsl.home.att.net/ - Listed in PC World Article
After you have ruled out all possibly for connection problems i.e..
Routers,
adware, viruses, browser cache etc..and if after you are still having Sync
Problems with the tweaks you have done, visit section 5.3 : Sync Problems
on
the following site:
http://www.docmirror.net/en/linux/howto/networking/DSL-HOWTO/tuning.html
--
Steve
chuckcar wrote:
--
wisdomkiller & pain
Hmm, let's see ... you obviously could connect this time, for the nntp
protocol. Which server ... ah the headers:
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Jan 2010 19:10:09 MET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.147.9.149 which, according to whois, belongs to
proxad as well.
So, unless there are really too manx "XX" in the name of the unknown
server you want to reach using a unknown protocol/port, you may concact
... guess sup...@proxad.net, or the hotline phone?
Of course, if there are really that much "XX" in the server name, it might
have been blocked inadvertently by your ISPs p0rn-filter :)