I think the roof of my building would be great, except that it is
owned
by Orthodox Jews and I doubt they would be receptive to the idea, (but
they complain about high utility costs every time they try to raise
our rent)
Also, our building is supposed to be "commercial" but all the tenants
live there
(so it may be a problem for a project that receives any outside
funding or publicity.)
But that said, it has a large (approx 50' by 200') very shallowly
pitched roof that leaks in heavy rains.
(I know because it leaks into my apartment.)
The utilities are paid in total for the whole building by the
landlord, so energy savings
would be very straightforward to calculate, and I imagine considerable
thermal benefits for
top floor tenants like myself.
The roof is accessible by two staircases on either end of the
building. There are
several "lower rooftops" on the backside of the building that could
also be done.
There are two taller loft-style buildings nearby that would have views
to the roof.
The Walworth St side of the block has a number of mysterious, lower-
roofed commercial buildings as well
and it would be great to see the whole block done. One of the
buildings is a newly
renovated alcohol treatment center with views to the rooftops in
question... I bet
the people there would benefit from some green views and be willing to
comment
on it over time.
Anyway, my building is on Spencer St. between Myrtle and Willoughby.
The backside
with lower rooftops faces the very crusty Walworth street. For
reference, this is right near
the Bed-Stuy Home Depot.
Curious if the two inital caveats are as critical as I imagine they
are... your thoughts?