Threats and Killings Striking Fear Among Young Iraqis, Including Gays
Published: March 11, 2012
This article explained how there have been numerous “emo killings” that have recently spiked in numbers. Young Iraqi men who dress in tight, Western-fitting, clothing have been the targets here. They are associated with being gay, and have been beaten to death with concrete blocks. The article also mentioned how the government is not fit in protecting some of its most vulnerable citizens let alone hosting the meeting for Arab diplomats in late March.
Now matter how many times it is reported on in the news, it still alarms me that people would discriminate against gays. It is an indication that Iraq has not progressed very much in its protection of citizens, and, most likely, doesn’t mind too much that gay people are being eliminated. The religious people who live in Iraq have made it clear that they do not accept gays within their culture. It has come to the point where many families don’t claim the bodies at the morgue because they are either afraid of ashamed of their child. How does the government plan on progressing when their people do not feel they are being protected? This exposes how the government is lacking in this area and they need to do a better job with protecting their people’s rights as individuals. It also shows how Western culture is not accepted. These men were assumed to be gay because they wore Western clothes. This shows how they associate us to a great extent by the clothes we wear. I find this interesting and, now that I think about it, not surprising because we stereotype Muslims in our country that wear their tradition dress. Overall, I believe that the global community needs to stop their biases against other cultures clothing and recognizes the rights of gays.
Kim Myung-ho, a professor and writer against the South Korean judicial system, wrote the book, “Judges, Who Do You Think You Are?”, and has inspired the popular movie, “Unbowed”, which portrays his activism. Although deemed a “terrorist” by some other writers and bloggers, many citizens see him as a Robin Hood, in the way his signature “crossbow” is his strong beliefs in changing the corrupt and untrustworthy system. Especially judges, are expectedly making unfair rulings and their qualifications are questioned. Since Kim’s imprisonment in 2007 at the hands of one of the many unfair judges, he is continuing to fight for justice in the justice system.
Although often there seem to be endless corrupt leaders of
unstable regimes, the unjust justice systems in South Korea are simply
contradictory. As they are meant to present a fair chance and case for
criminals or victims, wrongful use of power by judges can topple any form of
this opportunity for the people. It is unfortunate 82 percent of people
involved in cases did not have lawyers, mainly because of the expense. This
makes judicial officials’ economic abuses like embezzlement or tax evasion,
even more unfair. It was really interesting how Kim’s story has emerged from
the court and now the media, his book and a movie. It is apparent his activism
has reached many, if not become a phenomenon if it had reached the cinema.
Since the judicial system is able to represent the people by allowing them to
make decisions, power is a prominent issue, but change seems to be imminent as
many dissidents and activists are emerging against unjust institutions in the
government, just as Kim Myung-ho continues to lead his cause.
This article discussed some of the intelligence struggles America
faces when dealing with Iran. In 2003, America came to the conclusion
Iran wasn't pursuing nuclear weapons. But, intercepted intelligence
put that into question 2 years ago. The United States really struggles
with its intelligence to draw information out of Iran. This is
generally due to a lack of intelligence in the country. The article
calls Iran a far greater security challenge then North Korea, which is
interesting because one would believe America would have literally
zero influence in the tightly run propaganda haven. However, American
intelligence simply can't be sure if Iran is aggressively developing a
nuclear weapon. In my opinion, this issue if kind of maddening as an
Obama supporter. Many Republicans push and prod the Obama
administration to taking more extreme and violent approaches to Iran.
They do this for purely political reasons and to seem somehow more
more pro-Israel, where the truth is Obama is just using patience to
address a very diffiicult situation.
Furthermore, intelligence blunders have created a great lack of on the
ground spies. That leads to the United States being in a partnership
with Israel for information, the Israelis tend to work with the
Mujaheeden in Iran and Kurd group in Iraq. While, important sources
it's unclear how trustworty these sources are. Also, it's a struggle
because without great inside sources the US is very dependent on
technology like drones, and small sensors in Iranian land. Iran is
smart, because their nuclear intelligence and discussions are run in a
careful, tight-knit group this makes finding information a struggle.
Thus, any move against Iran must be heavily calculated by the
Americans.