Half of Irish Homeowners Join Boycott of New Property Tax
By Douglas Dalby
4/2/12
While there has been brief mention of Ireland in the news, it is a country that is often overshadowed by news of revolutions, revolts and protests in the Middle East. So I found it quite interesting and attention-attracting that more than half of Irish homeowners have started a small-scale revolution of their own when more than half of homeowners failed to pay a $133 tax for their property. The article reveals that it isn’t a matter of financial hardships, many can afford to pay, but are choosing not to in protest of this latest austerity measure, which precedes many others that are supposed to be passed in the coming years to help regenerate Ireland’s economy. And while the Irish government has recently increased the punishment fines for not complying with this new tax, I think it will be interesting to see how Ireland handles these new budget-cutting measures, especially considering such a large amount of people have already refused to accept this one, and consider this rebellion a victory.
Near Stirling Castle and Edinburgh, a Robert the Bruce statue is reminiscent of the crucial Battle of the Bannockburn for Scotland. In 1314, the Scottish king found a strong military victory and most importantly, independence in this battle long ago that separated England and Scotland. However, today Scotland is part of Great Britain since late agreements. And now, I found it interesting that Scotland’s age-old issue of independence is finding its way into politics again. As First Minister Salmond of Scotland anticipates a referendum in 2014, Britain’s Prime Minister Cameron is also involved, but is not necessarily completely for the nation’s independence yet. Salmond is from Scotland’s national party and since 2011 elections, seems to have garnered nationalist spirit from the people. Given this, it was interesting how many surrounding issues there were to consider, even the age limits for voting. There is the question of if Scotland is to remain in the UK, how “losing Scotland” would affect Cameron’s own elections, how the people of Scotland feel about their position, and all the political talk among government officials. However, if the vote is in favor of Scottish independence, their withdrawal could potentially affect unity in that region of Europe, and it would be interesting to see how other countries would react.
Tuna Again? In Fault-Finding England, It’s a Cause for Divorce
April 7, 2012
This personal interest article exposes one of the funnier problems citizens in Britain are faced with. Their wives are trying to manipulate them by serving their least favorite dish, tuna casserole, on purpose. These “monumental” problems are enough to spark a divorce within couples. Britain has five categories in which you may file for divorce and one is called “unreasonable behavior.” This is the problematic category lawyers and judges are facing and causes them to be in favor of establishing a “no-fault divorce.”
In my opinion, this is one of the more amusing personal interest stories the NY Times has published. However, it is an increasing problem that I find to be completely avoidable. Even in the US divorce rates are higher than they should be. In my opinion, only a slim amount of couples should have to endure this heartbreak. It is absolutely unheard of that couples in Britain are consumed by such small events. In areas of the world, women are not allowed to divorce their husbands even if they have reasonable cause. A no-fault divorce is necessary in their society. When the government gives the option of divorcing your spouse for “unreasonable behavior” you are sending the message that it is ok to get a divorce over things you do not agree upon. Many people in that country, I’m sure, do not take is as literally as the examples given in this article. Although, the government is inviting them to come up with ways to divorce their spouse, and this gives the impression that divorce is not such a bad thing. This no-fault divorce law is a necessity in Britain because it forces people to fix their problems instead of running away from them.
This article is about a poem writen by Germany's most famous living
writer, Gunter Grass, who managed to serious offend the state of
Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu. Now there is a huge debate in the world
concerning the views this man put out there. The funny thing is,
Gunter Grass was simply expressing how he felt about Netanyahu's
government policies. Unfortunately, he went a little too far and said
straight out that Israel was the biggest threat to world peace so
Netanyahu has retaliated by calling him a Nazi. Honestly, I think
Israel is taking this a little too hard but at the same time I agree
that while the poem was harsh, it did need to be said.