This article is about Putin's public comments on the rampant
protesting that currently surrounds him and his party. He seems to
have no problem udermining the protesters, making their cause seem
completely foolish. His
willingness to do so truly shocks me. It shows the shocking amount of
arrogance that Putin has regarding his political endeavors. Any true
democratic leader would do their best to address the protesters and
listen to their cause, while Putin simply sits back and laughs at the
fact that the symbol of their movement resembles a condom. Even many
corrupt leaders would pretend the protests aren't happening and try to
win back the support of their people. Putin, however, has the gall to
openly bash the protesters and (ridiculously) accuse them of being
paid agents. His words further prove his unwillingness to govern with
a true democratic system in which the needs of the people are heard,
and not mocked.
On Dec 12, 10:12 am, "Ken Sklar (Radnor High School)"
American Defense Secretary Panetta was the first US defense secretary
to arrive in Tripoli on Saturday. His aim was to monitor the current
postrevolutionary situation in Libya, alongside Prime Minister Keeb of
Libya. He assured US support of their security and the new government.
With militias asked to leave, after having lingered for too long in
the nation, there remains much conflict. While in Libya, Panetta also
stopped by a cemetery to honor US sailors who died in 1804 sailing the
Intrepid in Tripoli. The generally good condition of the cemetery
spoke well to Panetta, showing somewhat mutual respect among the US
and Libya for having kept it in tact amid much violence. Panetta’s
visit in Libya showed how far the US and Libya have come together,
having overcame the tyrannous regime of Qaddafi with NATO force. The
calm meeting showed the capability for the officials of two very
different nations to take a second to talk diplomatically and
appreciate each other. Hopefully the fusion of US and Libyan efforts
may create a fair, stable government and rid most of the excess
violence left.
On Dec 12, 10:12 am, "Ken Sklar (Radnor High School)"
<kenneth.sk...@rtsd.org> wrote:
This article is an update on the conflicts in Syria. According to the
U.N., death tolls from the ongoing clashes between the Syrian people
and Assad's military have reached 5,000 and are continuing to rise.
The calculation came after local Syrian elections, which had very few
participants due to the country's conflict (90% abstained from
voting). Many didn't think elections were beneficial at this time. The
only thing to come of the elections are some statistics regarding the
last several months of turmoil. Nearly 14k people have been arrested,
in addition to the 5,000 who are dead. This number has dramatically
increased from the 2,000 dead in August- showing that the conflict is
not getting better, but worse.
On Dec 12, 10:12 am, "Ken Sklar (Radnor High School)"
<kenneth.sk...@rtsd.org> wrote:
Leader Denies Use of Violence as Violent Crackdown Persists
David D. Kirkpatrick
After the takedown of Hosni Mubarak, Egyptians were hopeful that they
would have a democracy. But with the recent news of violent
crackdowns on protestors this brings irony to the whole situation.
The people of Egypt revolted only to lay the way for a newly formed
dictatorship. As protestors were being violently and mercilessly beat
in the streets by military personnel the military leader denied
accusations of it despite video evidence. This video evidence I
witnessed when I went on Youtube and found the video on the homepage,
it showed crowds of military personnel relentlessly beating people
with no defenses. This made me truly angered at the military of
government of Egypt and a supporter of the protestors. However this
support of the protesters clashed with my thoughts if a true democracy
succeeded in Egypt and how it would affect the national security of
the United States.
One article that I found interesting was the article about a man in
Belgium, who had already had many run-ins with the law, killing
several people at a bus station and then after this, killing himself.
I thought this was a really sad article and this was one that touched
me more than others. Especially in a country like Belgium, I feel like
we don't hear as much about these incidents compared to other more
corrupt countries, such as countries in the Arab Springs so this is
why I thought this was especially sad. I empathized with these people
and the clear description of the article really helped me to imagine
and feel for the mood and devastation. Also, this week, I read another
article about a man killing himself after shooting many so I just
found it saddening and interesting to compare the two articles. This
specific article shows how things in Belgium might be slowly degrading
and becoming more corrupt with the unstable economy so I am interested
to see what happens in Belgiums future and if the people of Belgium
are getting fearful.
I'm sorry this is late!!!!
On Dec 12, 10:12 am, "Ken Sklar (Radnor High School)"
<kenneth.sk...@rtsd.org> wrote:
When Michael Somare, Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea, left the
country to undergo heart surgery and never returned from the hospital
in good enough condition to retake his post, Parliament held
elections to fill the "vacancy" in the Prime Minister position.
Michael Somare, being widely unpopular, was replaced via the
parliament's vote by Mr. O'Niell an opposition leader. However, in
september Mr. Somare returned and began to demand that he be granted
his position back. Last Monday Papua New Guinea's parliament, the same
one that sponsored the vote in the first place, announced that Somare
was actually still Prime Minister. Mr. O'Niell refused to abide by
their ruling will not step down. In recent developments around the
Arab world some world leaders have refused to step down despite the
people's requests, then demands, and then war cries. However, Mr.
O'Niell has the support of his people and is the more popular party.
The issue calls into question how important it is to honor the
country's legal standing or the desire of its people. Perhaps which
the way in which the police respond will be a representation over how
much control the government has vs how much popular opinion does. The
article references a blogger called Tavurvur who says, "PNG's
political sandwich: a popular illegitimate Government versus a
despised legitimate government."
I doubt that Somare or O'Niell will be swayed to give up their bid for
Prime Ministership simply by the rulings of parliament or by the legal
interpretation of the constitution. I think that in a situation here
in a democracy where the government is in gridlock all the power
trickles down to the people, who's support is more important than any
legal basis- and in that regard Mr. O'Niell has already
won.