Great point Sarah. There is definite benefit to switching around. There is also benefit to keeping our roles-- we are getting good at them. Some people are good typers ( and I can’t take notes on my iPhone). However, that considered, I would be totally open to rotating. These would be the roles to rotate through as I see it:
1. Technical Organizer, Call generator
2. Chair
3. Secretary
4. Begining Blessing
5. Ending Blessing
6. (feels like there should be a sixth!) Harmonizer?
Great point. Do you guys like the Talking Circle concept that I introduced a while ago? At the bottom of the agenda there is a list of our names. We can use this as the order of speaking. For each discussion we can do a round on this order. We can end our speaking by saying “Harmony”. The other person then knows it is their turn. They can just say “Pass. Harmony” if they wish. The Chair won’t have to intervene then and it can go smooth and fast.
The Quakers make all their decisions only with full unanimous accord. I feel this is a very evolved and Oneness way to proceed. However, having 5/6 would also be good. That way Quorom could be 5/6 too.
Great point. I will add that to the Agenda template we have evolved. It can be part of the ritual our meetings are evolving into.
Yes. If we endorse the Talking Circle concept, this will help much. But that is just technical... we need to evolve our principles to truly address this. Perhaps, we can add a link to the top of each meeting agenda that links to our principles doc. It can read “This meeting is guided by our shared principles of co-creative Oneness”