I am really happy to hear you are doing better Sarah!
Team, Sarah's had a fever all week everybody. :-( She's still got a cough-- so let's send her some good vibes for her recovery. There's lots of rain and wetness here in the Philipines right now so keeping away from colds is a challenge.
Sarah, thank YOU for sending us your good vibes with your Principles insight!
Your insights and suggestions are so valuable-- especially as we navigate new territory and ideas that we are passionate about.
Your procedural principle suggestions are so important. I would like to comment on them here-- if everyone else comments we can probably come up with some basic Procedural principles to guide us in the next meeting.
1. Round Robin of Roles -
Does it only have to be me and yorlene to switch in the documentation
job? Can we also have a roundrobin of roles in charing, coordinating,
blessings, etc?
Great point Sarah. There is definite benefit to switching
around. There is also benefit to keeping our roles-- we are getting
good at them. Some people are good typers ( and I can’t take notes on
my iPhone). However, that considered, I would be totally open to
rotating. These would be the roles to rotate through as I see it:
1. Technical Organizer,
Call generator
2. Chair
3. Secretary
4. Begining Blessing
5. Ending Blessing
6. (feels like there
should be a sixth!) Harmonizer?
2. Guidelines in
listening, sharing, speaking, commenting. I feel sometimes - we
interrupt each other without intending to but it affects the flow of the
conversation....it really did last time... I felt it.
Great point. Do you
guys like the Talking Circle concept that I introduced a while ago? At
the bottom of the agenda there is a list of our names. We can use this
as the order of speaking. For each discussion we can do a round on this
order. We can end our speaking by saying “Harmony”. The
other person then knows it is their turn. They can just say “Pass.
Harmony” if they wish. The Chair won’t have to intervene then and it
can go smooth and fast.
3. What is our quorum?
4. How do we decide?
Voting? In board meetings, we move for a decision, and someone seconds
it. I mean it doesn't have to be too formal... we can decide on how it
should be.
The Quakers make all
their decisions only with full unanimous accord. I feel this is a very evolved
and Oneness way to proceed. However, having 5/6 would also be good.
That way Quorom could be 5/6 too.
5. Approval of agenda by everyone before the
meeting
Great point. I will
add that to the Agenda template we have evolved. It can be part of the
ritual our meetings are evolving into.
6. Creating a safe space for each other
to speak
Yes. If we endorse
the Talking Circle concept, this will help much. But that is just
technical... we need to evolve our principles to truly address this.
Perhaps, we can add a link to the top of each meeting agenda that links
to our principles doc. It can read “This meeting is guided by our
shared principles of co-creative Oneness”
What does everyone else think?
Russell
--
. . . . . . . . . .
Russell Maier | Artist
Currently: Sagada, Philippines
Cell:
+63.999.455.84721journey Blog:
www.russs.net
Project:
www.1mandala.orgSkype: russs95