Matthew Beckler
unread,Apr 24, 2013, 3:19:55 PM4/24/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Shawn Blanton, Lance Christian, Kyle Verma, 18340...@googlegroups.com
Hi Lance, thanks for the email.
You are correct in that each output of the check node will have the same
minimum magnitude. However, you are not quite correct in saying "the
sign would be the XOR of all the sign bits".
Remember that the overall check node function is that the XOR of all
sign bits is equal to zero. If we write this as an equation, we would have:
X1 ^ X2 ^ X3 ... ^ XN = 0
We can rearrange this equation as such:
X2 ^ X3 ... ^ XN = X1
This shows us how we can compute the correct output sign for each value
(for this example, for X1). So yes, your friend is correct, each output
should have a sign that is dependent on the XOR of the other nodes' sign
bits.
Good luck!
-Matthew