hw4 q4

11 views
Skip to first unread message

karlm...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 10, 2010, 10:25:59 PM3/10/10
to 10702-S10 CMU Statistical Machine Learning
In q4, the last letter "j" in the formula in line 2 should be a
capital "J", right?

karlm...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 10, 2010, 11:06:16 PM3/10/10
to 10702-S10 CMU Statistical Machine Learning
I checked Mease and Wyner's paper Boosted Classification Trees and
Class Probability/Quantile Estimation.
In that paper, the formula on page 13 seems different from the one in
hw4. But their formula makes more sense to me. I guess there are still
some typo in hw4.

On Mar 10, 10:25 pm, "karlmzh...@gmail.com" <karlmzh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Larry Wasserman

unread,
Mar 11, 2010, 9:32:07 AM3/11/10
to 10702-s10-cmu-statist...@googlegroups.com
yes
there is a typo there
--
Larry Wasserman
Professor, Department of Statistics
Carnegie Mellon University
la...@stat.cmu.edu
www.stat.cmu.edu/~larry

Robert Fisher

unread,
Mar 18, 2010, 6:53:22 PM3/18/10
to 10702-s10-cmu-statist...@googlegroups.com
I think that the paper the question is referring to is actually "Evidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting", and it gives some motivation for the model there.
-Robert
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages