o
unread,Sep 13, 2008, 9:39:11 AM9/13/08Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 101online
outline of e1 readings and student's e1.1, e1.2, and e1.3 assignments
e1.1: Hanson v Murphy
Hanson
topic: Murphy's Are we Rome?
+
opinion: is wrong because
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
Murphy
topic:
+
opinion:
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
student's e1.1
¶1: thesis statement and summary of argument
topic: Hanson's/Murphy's thesis
+
opinion: is wrong because [summary of reasons 1, 2, 3 in ¶2 below],
and what's more correct/practical/useful on the topic is [student's
opinion—explained in detail in ¶3]
¶2: point by point refutation
reason 1: Hanson/Murphy claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 2: Hanson/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 3: Hanson/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
¶3: support for alternate
reason 1: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 2: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 3: student's alternate opinion is also supported by [author,
title, date] because…
- - - - - - - - - -
e1.2: Dreher v Murphy
Dreher
topic: Murphy's Are we Rome?
+
opinion: is wrong because
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
Murphy
topic:
+
opinion:
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
student's e1.2
¶1: thesis statement and summary of argument
topic: Dreher's/Murphy's thesis
+
opinion: is wrong because [summary of reasons 1, 2, 3 in ¶2 below],
and what's more correct/practical/useful on the topic is [student's
opinion—explained in detail in ¶3]
¶2: point by point refutation
reason 1: Dreher/Murphy claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 2: Dreher/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 3: Dreher/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
¶3: support for alternate
reason 1: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 2: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 3: student's alternate opinion is also supported by [author,
title, date] because…
----- ----- -----
e1.3: Weigel v Murphy
Weigel
topic: Murphy's Are we Rome?
+
opinion: is wrong because
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
Murphy
topic:
+
opinion:
reason 1:
reason 2:
reason 3:
----- ----- -----
student's e1.3
¶1: thesis statement and summary of argument
topic: Weigel's/Murphy's thesis
+
opinion: is wrong because [summary of reasons 1, 2, 3 in ¶2 below],
and what's more correct/practical/useful on the topic is [student's
opinion—explained in detail in ¶3]
¶2: point by point refutation
reason 1: Weigel/Murphy claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 2: Weigel/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
reason 3: Weigel/Murphy also claims, "[brief quote]," but that's wrong
because…
¶3: support for alternate
reason 1: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 2: student's alternate opinion is more correct/practical/useful
on the topic because…
reason 3: student's alternate opinion is also supported by [author,
title, date] because…
----- ----- -----