HW Q4.3 confusion about involving only (x_i,x_i+1) terms

[Yitong Zhou]

for involving only (x_i,x_{i+1}) terms, is that actually we are looking for a recursive function in the format like x_{i+1}=a*x_{i}, this kind of format? If so, actually I am decomposing the p(x_{i+1}) instead of p(x) ?

Regards,

Yitong Zhou

[Junier Oliva]

Not really sure what you mean, but take the text to mean that the final answer wont have terms that are of higher order than one; i.e. involving at most (x_i,x_{i+1}).

Best,

Junier

--
http://alex.smola.org/teaching/cmu2013-10-701 (course website)
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZSO_6-bSqHQmMKwWVvYwKreGu4b4kMU9 (YouTube playlist)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "10-701 Spring 2013 CMU" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 10-701-spring-201...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to 10-701-spri...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[milad memarzadeh]

Hi Junier,

I guess the confusion is about that we will have a term that depends on initial belief.  

Thanks,

Milad

--
Milad Memarzadeh, M.Sc.
Doctoral Candidate, Advanced Infrastructure Systems
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University