sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enChaos
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lTFKaY94DvE/eYD_liXjBQAJ
Anyone with any interest in chaos needs to get in touch. Post here or Email : casagi...@optonline.nethttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lTFKaY94DvE
SteveGGSat, 21 Oct 2017 19:23:31 UTCSweeping Revolution in Cosmology
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lAOYXutGGys/br_uFInaBQAJ
In my view, the following dialog marks the beginning of a sweeping revolution in cosmology: http://backreaction.blogspot.bg/2017/10/space-may-not-be-as-immaterial-as-we.html Sabine Hossenfelder: "Is Space-Time Fluid? We have known at least since Einstein that space and time are inseparable,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lAOYXutGGys
Pentcho ValevSat, 21 Oct 2017 16:45:43 UTCThe evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/YMnsxWVBbks/mUwmK1DaBQAJ
I wouldn't have made a big deal out of this, but I'll never let this rest because it is shit in the faces of mainstream idiots whom I hate with a passion. I piss and shit on the lot of them. These truths I reveal will constantly shame them and bring into question their dishonesty, ignorance,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YMnsxWVBbks
John GabrielSat, 21 Oct 2017 16:41:39 UTCredefine force as dQ/dt= electric current // redefine Magnetic Field to contain electric current inside itself//Chapter 4 ATOM TOTALITY
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rmz08v9XBjk/QsfSVNzXBQAJ
redefine force as dQ/dt= electric current // redefine Magnetic Field to contain electric current inside itself//Chapter 4 ATOM TOTALITY I have run into more of a problem than just redefining Force. Force is mass times acceleration, but the trouble with that is that Force in EM is better ashttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rmz08v9XBjk
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 15:56:42 UTCAre Princeton's math professors as dumb in Calculus as John Gabriel-- never able to picture Calculus in ONE DIAGRAM
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wY1ZGkEW3xQ/pw9mOAvUBQAJ
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 4:04:24 PM UTC-5, John Gabriel wrote: > > Oh you super crank. The super-idiot hiding under the name John Gabriel is just a worthless loud mouth in sci.math. He comes to sci.math about 3 years ago spouting off that he has a New Calculus. Yet after three yearshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wY1ZGkEW3xQ
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 14:46:45 UTC22) Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/VkcgfPpDO5I/cf94Tw3TBQAJ
Why cannot one single Norwegian mathematician show the Calculus in a diagram as I have shown below? None at NTNU, none at Oslo. Why? Is Norway as dumb as Konyberg in mathematics? Apparently so. Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basichttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VkcgfPpDO5I
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 14:28:35 UTC+16) Are Gottingen's Thomas Schick, Anita Schöbel as dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (proofs listed below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/al3LA_fkFuQ/j8vE0BDSBQAJ
14) Are Gottingen's Victor Pidstrygach, Gerlind Plonka-Hoch, Daniel Rudolf as dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (experiments listed below) 16) Are Gottingen's Thomas Schick, Anita Schöbel as dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (proofs listed below) On Monday, October 16, 2017https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/al3LA_fkFuQ
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 14:10:30 UTCTowards a Uniform LIGO Physics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/GYzztR66IZs/9_D4d7HIBQAJ
Nima Arkani-Hamed (06:09): "Almost all of us believe that space-time doesn't really exist, space-time is doomed and has to be replaced by some more primitive building blocks." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U47kyV4TMnE "We've known for decades that space-time is doomed," says Arkani-Hamed.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/GYzztR66IZs
Pentcho ValevSat, 21 Oct 2017 11:18:45 UTCSomething is rotten in MathStackExchange
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/D-7uNU2q2ZE/zR5_-BW_BQAJ
Yesterday Otto asked this question in MathOverflow: Define a tree T that has the same nodes as the ordinary complete infinite Binary Tree but instead of paths running through the nodes let three lamettas begin at every node of T without crossing any further nodes. For every n the set ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/D-7uNU2q2ZE
WMSat, 21 Oct 2017 08:22:42 UTCWHATS DIAGONAL(1) of { 0.555 , 0.666 , 0.543 } ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/j-WsF2j__jc/Lj25u4C-BQAJ
CREDITS Peter P . 1/2https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/j-WsF2j__jc
graham...@gmail.comSat, 21 Oct 2017 08:12:01 UTCmapping a eclipse with a gnuplot
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/f7_GbctbI2g/UrGIj4m2BQAJ
how does one express the equation such as x**2 - y**2 = 2 in gnuplot?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/f7_GbctbI2g
Popping madSat, 21 Oct 2017 05:46:03 UTCa more dynamic and fully-featured forum: The Universal Dungeon
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mqQUo8u7skU/x5MmwDasBQAJ
http://www.universaldungeon.org/forum/index.php Our math section: http://www.universaldungeon.org/forum/index.php?board=2.0 Enjoy!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mqQUo8u7skU
at1with0Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:36:52 UTC-Are Princeton's June Huh, Mihaela Ignatova, Alexandru Ionescu as dumb as John Gabriel not knowing Calculus requires a diagram (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vkTvful1EVs/ytSGEH2rBQAJ
Are Princeton's June Huh, Mihaela Ignatova, Alexandru Ionescu as dumb as John Gabriel not knowing Calculus requires a diagram (see below) On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 4:04:24 PM UTC-5, John Gabriel wrote: > > > KON > > > > Konyberg is not only a failure of math, > > Oh you super crank.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vkTvful1EVs
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 02:23:34 UTC21) Is ETH Zurich's Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, Michael Struwe as dumb as Jan Burse never able to see that Calculus requires a diagram (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X70jTtwONXE/mB8ImrmqBQAJ
21) Is ETH Zurich's Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, Michael Struwe as dumb as Jan Burse never able to see that Calculus requires a diagram (see below) On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 12:59:31 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote: > My name,,,, ,,,,,,,,, > Archimedes Plutonium schrieb: > > Is Univhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X70jTtwONXE
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 21 Oct 2017 02:09:35 UTCIF DIAGONAL(1) = 6 AND DIAGONAL(2) = 4 what is the MISSING REAL ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ja3AzlgGDWg/i3IdLx2aBQAJ
D = 0.64 ... AD = 0.?? ...https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ja3AzlgGDWg
graham...@gmail.comFri, 20 Oct 2017 21:05:11 UTCBack to that ole chestnut 0 = x^n + y^n - z^n + k.x.y.z URMT 'coordinate equation'
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-ae73VgZI08/JQVy29iRBQAJ
Let's spice things up a bit for the weekend with a return to the more general 'coordinate equation' in URMT, i.e. 0 = x^n + y^n - z^n + k.x.y.z usual integer conditions apply, and this is FLT when k = 0. You will note that FLT (k=0) is scale invariant to (x,y,z), i.e. IF (and yes, I knowhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ae73VgZI08
richard millerFri, 20 Oct 2017 18:33:41 UTCIs Stockholm University's Per Martin-Lof, Erik Palmgren as dumb as Zelos Malum in basic Calculus (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ih6MXH44l2g/GDOuFr2OBQAJ
Is Univ Gothenburg's Bernt Wennberg, Aila Sarkka as dumb and stupid as Zelos Malum failure of logic On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 5:23:33 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: > >Old Math, and their "Lowest Terms Error" although don't tell them-- proved that 1/2 is irrational Re: analyzing why thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ih6MXH44l2g
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 20 Oct 2017 17:36:43 UTC+Page25, 3-2, Coulomb's law as EM-gravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Vt375aT6mFo/ePctyHaNBQAJ
Page25, 3-2, Coulomb's law as EM-gravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017 "Universe Today" magazine depicts Sun moving in space with planets following in a helix motion, in video. Alright, as we look at the below videos of the Sun moving inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Vt375aT6mFo
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 20 Oct 2017 17:13:22 UTCRe: looking for Fréchet's 1906 Ph.D. dissertation introducing metric spaces
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/53mZMSpmpzg/vz_XtOuIBQAJ
While helping someone at my university, I found the journal reprint version might be freely available through HathiTrust (or also possibly Google Books) If you're still interested in this publication, try the following link: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.30000098708872?urlappend=%3Bseq=9https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/53mZMSpmpzg
Graham FredrickFri, 20 Oct 2017 15:50:06 UTCFermat's last theorem
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/z0mF2OFh3Yc/OrKZ8Rh_BQAJ
Hey guys, i'm new here and i would like to get some input about a possible proof of fermat's last theorem. I do think i didnt make any mistakes, but i would like to see wether i actually did. Here is it: We have A^n+B^n = C^n --(1) We state that B<A<C<A+B, --(2) gcd(a,b) = gcd(a,c) =https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z0mF2OFh3Yc
Jarno grensonFri, 20 Oct 2017 12:50:06 UTCHow LIGO Conspirators Definitively Killed Physics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/cIHkxN5-y6Q/o4HbBxp9BQAJ
Fundamental physics is dead - there are many hints in this direction: Peter Woit: "If, as seems increasingly all too possible, we're now at an endpoint of fundamental physics, with the field killed off by a pseudo-scientific argument..." http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=9444https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cIHkxN5-y6Q
Pentcho ValevFri, 20 Oct 2017 12:13:31 UTCNPV | Sum of N Geometric Series
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RxFw_X-FTiE/uAqG1IJiBQAJ
Given N geometric series whose tenure ranges from 1 to N, the task is to find a closed-form formula to find the sum of N geometric series PV_1 = A_1 * [ 1 - (1+i)^(-1) ] / i PV_2 = A_2 * [ 1 - (1+i)^(-2) ] / i PV_3 = A_3 * [ 1 - (1+i)^(-3) ] / i ... PV_n = A_n * [ 1 -https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RxFw_X-FTiE
The UntouchableFri, 20 Oct 2017 04:06:15 UTCHelen Bonham Carter debunks the New Calculus! - A capade by William Gelfand.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/i-wYjRLoDIU/qDPDpVpWBQAJ
Well, I don't know whose voice that is in the video, but it could be any of a large number of British women. What I do know is that it was directed by William Gelfand, an enemy of the New Calculus. Chuckle. About the only redeeming qualities are Bonham's photo and the soft intelligent-soundinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/i-wYjRLoDIU
John GabrielFri, 20 Oct 2017 00:23:28 UTC20_ Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/oPPxRf0hXqI/RuHeksNLBQAJ
20. Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below) On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 2:05:28 PM UTC-5, konyberg wrote: > > Does this mean that a function only has derivatives at the corners,... > > KON Konyberg is nothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oPPxRf0hXqI
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 21:09:24 UTC19) Are Princeton's Yong Hou, Tatiana Howard, Wu-Chung Hsiang as dumb as John Gabriel about basic Calculus (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CPE_l7lUj2U/xpKo-aVBBQAJ
19) Are Princeton's Yong Hou, Tatiana Howard, Wu-Chung Hsiang as dumb as John Gabriel about basic Calculus (see below) Some recent banal idiocies coming from loud mouth, John Gabriel who is so dumb in math he thinks the derivative is a tangent line. >All straight lines have slopes, but onlyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CPE_l7lUj2U
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 18:04:02 UTC1- Is Univ Western Ontario's Gordon Sinnamon, Graham Denham as dumb as Dan Christensen-- believes Logical Connector AND has truth table TFFF when it really is TTTF (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wDJRciMbwPo/t5QKf01BBQAJ
14)Is Univ Western Ontario's Dan Christensen, Graham Denham as dumb as Dan Christensen-- believes Logical Connector AND has truth table TFFF when it really is TTTF (see below) On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 10:55:18 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wDJRciMbwPo
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 17:57:42 UTCprePage25, 3-2, Coulomb's law as EM-gravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6ze4jt2pSSA/u22Nwv4_BQAJ
prePage25, 3-2, Coulomb's law as EM-gravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017 "Universe Today" magazine depicts Sun moving in space with planets following in a helix motion, in video Alright, as we look at the below videos of the Sun movinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6ze4jt2pSSA
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 17:33:44 UTCObvious Falsehood of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/C484gKaDj40/3jLom5I_BQAJ
Non-isothermal heat engines - apparently do not violate the second law of thermodynamics: http://readingpenrose.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/rubber-band-engine.gif "All materials react to heat in some way. But this new shape-changing polymer reacts to temperatures as small as the touch of humanhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/C484gKaDj40
Pentcho ValevThu, 19 Oct 2017 17:26:00 UTC16 Are MIT's Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, as dumb as Mike Moroney who thinks a conic section is ellipse, when in truth it is a OVAL (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/oJxUZj1dWWk/0g5hEF04BQAJ
16 Are MIT's Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, as dumb as Mike Moroney who thinks a conic section is ellipse, when in truth it is a OVAL (see below) On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 9:25:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Experiments are not a proof. Mathematics demands formal proofs. >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oJxUZj1dWWk
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 15:13:53 UTC-3-Are Caltech's Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin as dumb as Jan Bielawski when it comes to representing Numbers in Decimal?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xMGZDu08IlE/bqNnqW83BQAJ
-3-Are Caltech's Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin as dumb as Jan Bielawski when it comes to representing Numbers in Decimal? On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 5:54:53 PM UTC-5, Jan wrote: > On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 10:12:00 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Page24, 3-1,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xMGZDu08IlE
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 19 Oct 2017 14:56:53 UTCComprehensive Solution Manual and Test banks
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Kz-uDpXHwB8/NkesfSUuBQAJ
Dear All, We have vast range of test banks and solution manuals of all topics, If you need any solution manual, testbank for testbooks from the list below do contact us anytime, save your time and effort and let you definitely understand what you are studying and get an amazing marks as well.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Kz-uDpXHwB8
getche...@gmail.comThu, 19 Oct 2017 12:04:57 UTCComprehensive solution manuals and test bank for textbooks
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6faG5UDUZmk/52YxrHkuBQAJ
Dear All, We have vast range of test banks and solution manuals of all topics, If you need any solution manual, testbank for testbooks from the list below do contact us anytime, save your time and effort and let you definitely understand what you are studying and get an amazing marks as well.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6faG5UDUZmk
getche...@gmail.comThu, 19 Oct 2017 12:02:38 UTCfor all and for every , how to avoid the subtle contradiction on using qualifiers?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PxCUK0iXmR0/Tv4E6uMkBQAJ
For these two statements, (1). There exists a positive real number ε/2 smaller than every positive real number ε. (2). There is no positive real number smaller than every positive real number ε. Questions : Both statements seems right , but both also seems contradicting with each other ,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PxCUK0iXmR0
Philip LeeThu, 19 Oct 2017 09:17:02 UTCThe Lametta Tree
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OqoiblnJEwc/2EOoE4UaBQAJ
Define a tree T that has the same nodes as the ordinary complete infinite Binary Tree but instead of paths running through the nodes let three paths begin at every node of T without crossing any further nodes. https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Transfinity/Binary%20Tree.png Like lametta. Forhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OqoiblnJEwc
WMThu, 19 Oct 2017 06:07:00 UTCPergaminho Lógico
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mT5nC1yvOUk/Uv5TAaL1BAAJ
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMcQ2PNXUAAyEq8.jpg:large Does anybody know where was Gödel in cathegory history?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mT5nC1yvOUk
Vinicius Claudino FerrazWed, 18 Oct 2017 18:51:02 UTCPage24, 3-1, perspective of Laws versus Forces in Physics; new force definition F = dq/dt; Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Q8Su9bW_Zik/jRX0gzrwBAAJ
Page24, 3-1, perspective of Laws versus Forces in Physics; new force definition F = dq/dt; Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017 I was stuck on this page for what feels to me to be a month now, but probably not really a chronological month. For it appears to be that the Newton classificahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Q8Su9bW_Zik
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 18 Oct 2017 17:12:00 UTCLIGO's Gravitational Waves: Needles in a Haystack or Just Fakes?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gUIFt59G8EI/7aUReQzsBAAJ
"On 18 March 2016, Harald Pfeiffer, Associate Professor at the Canadian Institute for Theoretical Physics, Toronto, will be honoured with a Bessel Award of the Humboldt Foundation. The award will allow him to stay at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gUIFt59G8EI
Pentcho ValevWed, 18 Oct 2017 15:55:24 UTCTrue methods for constructing irrational numbers. New high-order methods.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/c60nwksy9-M/LQAdEjbZBAAJ
New Numerical Methods. The Rational Mean Hope these new methods could be of some interest to you: https://domingogomezmorin.wordpress.com/ From the evidence at hand, these new high-order methods have no precedents in the math literature. YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtu.be/N7VPXywk0qQhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/c60nwksy9-M
ArithmoWed, 18 Oct 2017 10:10:12 UTCEinstein's Empirical Theory of General Relativity
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/z-J9zqqcxng/G_LCCZbPBAAJ
Arthur Eddington: "The statement that in the relativity theory gravitational waves are propagated with the speed of light has, I believe, been based entirely upon the foregoing investigation; but it will be seen that it is only true in a very conventional sense. If coordinates are chosen so ashttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z-J9zqqcxng
Pentcho ValevWed, 18 Oct 2017 07:13:49 UTCcubic curve
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gAsU1K2aOtw/pCeDs1i-BAAJ
I sent this once but it didn't appear. My apologies if you see it twice. I am sorry, I lost the thread of this message. The last author was Miller. The form x^3=y^3+k^3+2xyk is a cubic curve in projective coordinates (x,y,k). Clearly, (r,r,0) is a solution for any rational number r. If wehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gAsU1K2aOtw
Jack FearnleyWed, 18 Oct 2017 01:57:54 UTCbassam king karzeddin and "Phantom Brain" syndrome
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/jQBE5cr5TRE/c0-VBui6BAAJ
A phantom brain is the sensation that an amputated or missing brain is still present in the skull. Approximately 60 to 80% of bassam king karzeddin.s posts to this group exhibit phantom thoughts from his missing brain, and the majority of these messages are meaningless. Although few phantomhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/jQBE5cr5TRE
Timothy RusselWed, 18 Oct 2017 00:54:51 UTCLIGO is fraud and abuse of taxpayer money// the money spent on LIGO could make USA electrical energy independent via GEOTHERMAL
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/pbGkIxMWKSg/-rLVBOWnBAAJ
I do not know exactly how much money is wasted on LIGO, for the construction and payroll must be in the billions of dollars of waste. If instead of LIGO, those billions had been spent on construction of Geothermal electric power plants near Yellowstone, near Arkansas hot springs, in Alaska, inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pbGkIxMWKSg
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 17 Oct 2017 19:06:28 UTCLIGO's recent announcement of neutron stars + gravity waves// LIGO is modern day WitchCraft Physics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/VPYgbB8APNY/y-UZyXqnBAAJ
LIGO's recent announcement of neutron stars + gravity waves// LIGO is modern day WitchCraft Physics Through the years, I learned that when I want to express myself on a subject matter, my first utterances are not my best ones, which seem to form downstream, where they coalesce into the veryhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VPYgbB8APNY
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 17 Oct 2017 18:58:51 UTCprobably need a new force definition in Physics, far removed from Newton's F= ma Re: prePage24, 3-1, perspective of Laws versus forces
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kr2V5oddLXE/2NyWGWinBAAJ
probably need a new force law vice F= ma// probably need F= current Re: prePage24, 3-1, perspective of Laws versus forces in Physics probably need a new force definition in Physics, far removed from Newton's F= ma Re: prePage24, 3-1, perspective of Laws versus forces Page24, 3-1, perspectivehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kr2V5oddLXE
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 17 Oct 2017 18:57:31 UTC16) Are Gottingen's Thomas Schick, Anita Schöbel as dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (4 experiments and 2 proofs listed below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZS_TVzlBG2k/POV-mfKmBAAJ
16) Are Gottingen's Thomas Schick, Anita Schöbel as dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (4 experiments and 2 proofs listed below) On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 6:32:21 PM UTC-5, Me (Franz) I wrote: > > Wrong. Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic sectionshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZS_TVzlBG2k
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 17 Oct 2017 18:49:07 UTC15) Are Princeton's Robert C. Gunning, Jonathan Hanselman, Helmut Hofer, Henry Horton as dumb as John Gabriel about basic Calculus (see below)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mUCxkyeDiDc/rmv8oCGmBAAJ
Some recent banal idiocies coming from loud mouth, John Gabriel who is so dumb in math he thinks the derivative is a tangent line. >All straight lines have slopes, but only tangent line slopes are called "derivative". >3 posts by 3 authors >John Gabriel >Aug 28 > >All straight lines havehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mUCxkyeDiDc
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 17 Oct 2017 18:34:09 UTCSimple geometric proof that sqrt(2) is an incommensurable magnitude, NOT irrational number.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KVk3Bb5y72M/Ac5unS2JCAAJ
Simple geometric proof that sqrt(2) is an incommensurable magnitude, NOT irrational number: https://youtu.be/CF-aanGB2bY Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstreamhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KVk3Bb5y72M
John GabrielTue, 17 Oct 2017 13:55:54 UTCHave All Einsteinians Left the Sinking Ship?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nOUhI9WCkB8/OwJZmZWCCAAJ
Lee Smolin: "Where are the Einsteinians? Special relativity was the result of 10 years of intellectual struggle, yet Einstein had convinced himself it was wrong within two years of publishing it." http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm How did Einstein convince himself specialhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nOUhI9WCkB8
Pentcho ValevTue, 17 Oct 2017 11:55:04 UTCRe: Conjecture - Fermat's Last Theorem Generalization
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xmkoonFPfDw/oXbaNPN9CAAJ
Oct. 17, 2017https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xmkoonFPfDw
bassam king karzeddinTue, 17 Oct 2017 10:30:08 UTCGravitational Wave Conspiracy: LIGO-Fermi Collaboration
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/g32m9DBbB28/-GwemRBLCAAJ
"Two seconds after the gravitational signal, which only the automated "trigger" of the Hanford detector initially noticed, NASA's orbiting Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope picked up a blast of high-energy photons called a gamma ray burst." http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/merging-neutron-shttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/g32m9DBbB28
Pentcho ValevMon, 16 Oct 2017 18:57:39 UTC