sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enprime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/9rCTq68PAgAJ
I must admit I am baffled by this thread. If you have a candidate pair of primes, take their absolute difference and see if it equals 2. Best regards, Jack Fearnley I am posting out of thread because my attempts to post in thread do not seem to appear.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
Jack FearnleyThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:01:40 UTCFake math proofs, due to Multi-Reductio-ad-Absurdum, the Euler Fermat Last Theorem case//Gelfond-Schneider//Wiles
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs/xu-VhogBAgAJ
Now, the single greatest weakness of most math professors, is their lack of Logical abilities. They simply have a difficult time of assembling a logical reasoned argument. And that is what proofs are all about. Now, on the face of it, since math proofs are the application of Logic, one wouldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:42:19 UTCNew Gravitational Wave Hoax
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ/9ND_VE3_AQAJ
LIGO conspirators have not resolved their huge noise-correlation problem (which actually nullifies their "discoveries") but are ready to fool the gullible world again: "Over the weekend, astronomer J. Craig Wheeler of the University of Texas at Austin launched speculation over a potential newhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ
Pentcho ValevWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:01:26 UTCoptimal bias in prediction: what is this technique called?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/oIhG1_vgkLo/ocQ5vWf6AQAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggCRfDHUHp0 In a nutshell, we have a two-dimensional matrix of data values and I want to find ways to introduce bias and write the first column as the linear combination of the other m-1 columns in a way that the correlation is maximized. One can extend thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oIhG1_vgkLo
ten...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:31:42 UTCRationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/JOIzuUn5AQAJ
Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special Thank goodness there is day and night, work and sleep on a daily basis. A time to work, and next day, rework everything. A time to start, and a time to throwhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:11:13 UTCCatalysts Topple the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54/O-YlDA31AQAJ
The false restrictive principle called "Second law of thermodynamics", apart from preventing humankind from understanding fundamental energy conversions in Nature, has produced collateral damages as well. One of its idiotic implications is that, if a catalyst increases the rate of the forwardhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54
Pentcho ValevWed, 23 Aug 2017 18:53:34 UTCRe: Solution Manuals for crackpot formulas Re: Village Idiot show Re: 13Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures-- Archimedes Plutonium
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/badp3N7oAQAJ
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes: >> PLAY THE TV GAME SHOW,,,, >> >> NAME THAT VILLAGE IDIOT....... win all expense paid trip to North Korea's missile test site..... >> >> Hosted by Monty Pythons the 5th' Monty Python: Who is the village idiot who believeshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
Michael MoroneyWed, 23 Aug 2017 15:10:22 UTCWhat maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/gTTB9k3oAQAJ
I believe that transfinite maths is impractical. While I enjoy it as exercise for the mind, and idle philosophical speculation, I feel that everything in the real world is finite. That means that space and time are finite, and not completely divisible. Abhinav Lal Writer & Investorhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
alal...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 15:00:00 UTCHow Einstein's General Relativity Predicts
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/g-y5SkKcEw8/e3vMPinPAQAJ
The "prediction" of the Mercury anomaly is paradigmatic - it was the result of endlessly adjusting and amending the model until "excellent agreement with observation" was reached: Michel Janssen: "But - as we know from a letter to his friend Conrad Habicht of December 24, 1907 - one of thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/g-y5SkKcEw8
Pentcho ValevWed, 23 Aug 2017 07:19:14 UTCMathematical Pondery
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/b7V0j-Iosf4/ZS7sMe-5AQAJ
Can it be suggested that in a binary expression of multiplication "one" of the numbers given does not exist? if say we have ( 2 x 3 )....It for a fact means.... (2 + 2 + 2 )....the number 3 does not exist or it means... (3 + 3 )....the number 2 does not exist no matter which we chosehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/b7V0j-Iosf4
conwayWed, 23 Aug 2017 00:50:15 UTCThere are two irrational classifications-- algebraic, transcendental, but, the Gelfond-Schneider input is a fakery
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nyjJ6Jv_3Kc/sA_H6uqzAQAJ
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: is x_1*x_2 different from C*(1/D) Re: changing COURSE-- there maybe a classification of Transcendental Irrational, after all From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nyjJ6Jv_3Kc
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 22 Aug 2017 23:00:00 UTC----- ----- physical dimension ofa system
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7jvQe6L4ODE/iBAYH_KrAQAJ
A physical system is represented by (1) kd^k = z^(k-1)[cos(kD/cosD] (1) Given: d is a real physical parameter, z is an integer > k, prime k > 5, 0 < D < pi/2 , unit of z is ft. To be dimensionally consistent unit of d must be ft^(k-1)/k It seems the unit of d is ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7jvQe6L4ODE
DeepkdebTue, 22 Aug 2017 20:33:54 UTCSet definition
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/zRD9lT9WvtU/PPc9SAE9AQAJ
Consider surjection: f: N ----> P, where P is the power set of N. Define set D, subset of N, such that for all n, n is element of D iff n is not element of f(n). Questions: a.- Is D a "legal" set within the restrictions of set theory? b.- What is an example of D? Many thanks for any help,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zRD9lT9WvtU
AgapitoTue, 22 Aug 2017 16:37:08 UTCPredicting the next Eclipse
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nPtqylyiE3w/e_y5Ow86AQAJ
Here we describe a rudimentary method, using basic trigonometry, to predict lunar and solar eclipses. The purpose is to get people interested in the mathematics behind these events. We assume here that the Sun, the Earth and the Moon are just points. Thus we do not predict where on Earth eclipseshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nPtqylyiE3w
Vincent GranvilleTue, 22 Aug 2017 15:43:10 UTCSpeed of Light in Einstein's Schizophrenic World
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/IZ1AtFbEIiU/AnBSyIogAQAJ
A nice synopsis of Einstein's hoax: Ethan Siegel: "In the 1880s, Albert A. Michelson constructed a series of ultra-sensitive interferometers set up to exploit exactly this fact. As the interferometer rotated into, perpendicular to, and against the Earth's direction of motion, there should havehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IZ1AtFbEIiU
Pentcho ValevTue, 22 Aug 2017 07:55:33 UTCEinsteinians Mercilessly Brainwash Innocent People
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/EI_rS6gpLE4/xddeAlsdAQAJ
"Einstein was right, as hundreds of visitors to A Time for Science Nature and Science Learning Center in Grifton learned Monday when they descended on the park to view a total solar eclipse that passed over a swath of the U.S., just like the one that proved the famous physicist's theory ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EI_rS6gpLE4
Pentcho ValevTue, 22 Aug 2017 06:57:09 UTCNumber Crazy Today?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo/icXCyesbAQAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Number Crazy Today? Sliding-Exchanges-Number? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860699654085027&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo
Mr Sawat LayuheemTue, 22 Aug 2017 06:30:52 UTCTriangle and Squares????
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/o3Nqx87lk7U/LVup2MgZAQAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Number Crazy Today? Triangle and Squares???? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860689707419355&set=pcb.860689747419351&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/o3Nqx87lk7U
Mr Sawat LayuheemTue, 22 Aug 2017 05:51:43 UTCSliding-Exchanges in Number Theory????????
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FKcDf1UObRM/_ExIcCIYAQAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Sliding-Exchanges in Number Theory???????? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860682947420031&set=pcb.860683030753356&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FKcDf1UObRM
Mr Sawat LayuheemTue, 22 Aug 2017 05:21:29 UTCPlease do not talk with the Failures of Math-- Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Jan Bielawski, Franz (Me)// robots Simon Roberts, Graham
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rHZIGwZrkhM/GUxw1gYIAQAJ
Comes a moment in time when I am bogged down in research, that I have no time to even "spin these kooks" to my advantage. So, I need to warn, and forewarn newcomers, who the Creeps of math are, so as to filter and block them-- the faster the better Dan Christensen, is really dull and dumb inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rHZIGwZrkhM
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 22 Aug 2017 00:26:18 UTCSo the AP Equations of EM are six// reviewing them
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/KUfe-rEDAQAJ
Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: So the AP Equations of EM are six// reviewing them From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:56:16 +0000 So the AP Equations of EM are six// reviewing them So the APhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 21 Aug 2017 23:06:56 UTCchanging coarse-- there maybe a classification of Transcendental Irrational, after all, since no proof is forthcoming,,,,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1_A2X5GXcok/1_1meIMAAQAJ
I left off last night with this nagging nonproof,,, which makes me think I need to investigate the other side-- a transcendental category exists. Let me inject Polynomial theory into the argument:: So we come to the lines in Polynomial theory of x^2 = 2 1 = 2/x*x Now we inject the Axiomhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1_A2X5GXcok
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 21 Aug 2017 22:08:37 UTCSOLUTIONS MANUAL Discrete Mathematics 3rd ED by Goodaire, Parmenter
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/4v3BGu2Hvvo/_cc7tiz-AAAJ
SOLUTIONS MANUAL Discrete Mathematics 3rd ED by Goodaire, Parmenter You can search using Control+F ( by author's names ) to find your own title Then Contact E-mail: cartermath[@]gmail.com You will get a reply promptly with info and instructions to order any solutionshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4v3BGu2Hvvo
carter...@gmail.comMon, 21 Aug 2017 21:25:46 UTCRe: Crackpot convention in Boston starring Archimedes Plutonium Re: 13Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures-- Archimedes Plutonium
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZCiPeHf3ym0/FU1HDaD8AAAJ
Physics and Math failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes: >Tell me, Mike Moroney, can you organize a crackpot conference there in Boston so these crackpots and interact, intermingle and maybe we can get a "breakthrough or breakup of pottery" I guess with you as the #1https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZCiPeHf3ym0
Michael MoroneyMon, 21 Aug 2017 20:57:22 UTCSemi Chaos
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FNlD9cvvOSM/rYUGz9D7AAAJ
Check out a type of semi chaotic system. Post or Email : casagi...@optonline.net for descriptive paper. Library of 512 systems. Interesting and colorful attractors. Software provided.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FNlD9cvvOSM
SteveGGMon, 21 Aug 2017 20:42:32 UTCReeducating mainstream morons: David Hilbert's Fallacies.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MJTOWybR88w/oWaQgYP2AAAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_AIIxG8AFI More links on Cantor's delusions: Cantor's "Countable" Sets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnTS_kIWTlE When ill-formed concepts break derived theory, orangutan academics simply introduce new rules. Watch the fallacy of oo - oo : https://www.yohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MJTOWybR88w
John GabrielMon, 21 Aug 2017 19:05:22 UTCRe: Failure of math -- the notorious crank AP
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OTjydtLLo04/gxGmEyLpAAAJ
So it was too special for me. :/https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OTjydtLLo04
AnyssaMon, 21 Aug 2017 15:00:10 UTC_Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/IUyWnXbUCgAJ
Still getting the Table of Errors up and running. This table of errors is just a small sample of errors in mathematics, but enough of a sample to Warn students of what they are up against with buffoon math education. Would you go to school, college for biology, where they teach Creationism, nothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 21 Aug 2017 04:30:26 UTCCrazy exponential ????
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/3THol6BTZV4/xZXAD9fTCgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Crazy exponential ???? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860174360804223&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3THol6BTZV4
Mr Sawat LayuheemMon, 21 Aug 2017 04:19:01 UTCe^(infinity)^3 =????
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bZ8hr1_sQPE/579wbNjSCgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ e^(infinity)^3 =???? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860171357471190&set=pcb.860171400804519&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bZ8hr1_sQPE
Mr Sawat LayuheemMon, 21 Aug 2017 04:00:47 UTCAlgorithm Slide-Number to Infinity?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/REbP45NPpYo/5z8DZzXSCgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Algorithm Slide-Number to Infinity? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=860168880804771&set=pcb.860168937471432&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/REbP45NPpYo
Mr Sawat LayuheemMon, 21 Aug 2017 03:49:07 UTCthe number 1/3 is really .3333..33(1/3), not .3333.... and 1=.9999..99(3*1/3) not .9999.... Biggest math goofball mistake since year 1202 Fibonacci
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/s_Yzud63Vs4/v3HOhszPCgAJ
Now when I came to sci.math in 1993, August of that year, one topic that seemed to endlessly come up in sci.math was the issue of .9999.... =1. Where math professors the world over adamantly believed and forced the acceptance by all who want to pass mathematics, that .9999.... =1. Thesehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/s_Yzud63Vs4
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 21 Aug 2017 03:04:58 UTC(3 conjectures) separated, edited, and placed here.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Z3kr4xCuP38/KB_Bfs61CgAJ
SECTION 5. THREE CONJECTURES 1, 2, and 3. (version 9) givens. a.) any x0_i in T00 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...,(p-1)/2}. b.) p is an odd prime. c.) (p-1)/2^j is even (p-1)/(2^(j+1)) is odd and j > 0. end givens. Conjectures 1, 2, and 3. 1) (x0_i)^(2^j) = +/-yj_i (modulo p) and yj_i (ifhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Z3kr4xCuP38
Simon RobertsSun, 20 Aug 2017 19:08:39 UTCHere is a culmination of posts, edited. There are five sections in this post.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WEMN9fQNKXw/o3xyJj-1CgAJ
VERSION (1) There are five sections in this post. The first section conatain a proof based on an assumption. The last (fifth) section contains a conjecture. ================== SECTION 1. (version 8) givens. (p-1)/2 odd j is a minimum such that x^j = 1 (mod p) p!| xhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WEMN9fQNKXw
Simon RobertsSun, 20 Aug 2017 18:58:23 UTCIf Entropy Is Not a State Function, What Is It?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nDzWaa2SXxs/whl0oLSlCgAJ
"Entropy was discovered when it was noticed to be a quantity that behaves as a function of state, as a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy It was Clausius who "noticed" that the entropy is a state function, but was he correct? Here is thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nDzWaa2SXxs
Pentcho ValevSun, 20 Aug 2017 14:13:36 UTCx^(2^n - 1) = x^(2^p - 2)/g = +/-1 (mod p).
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/4b59PGPibGk/WglXO_qcCgAJ
(version 7) results: x^(2^n - 1) = x^(2^p - 2)/g = +/-1 (mod p). where n is a minimum n > 0, g a maximum where (2^n -1) = (2^p -2)/g, for a given x and (p-1)/2 odd. if x^(2^n -1) = + 1 (mod p) then j = (2^n -1). if x^(2^n -1) = - 1 (mod p) then j = 2(2^n -1). j is the minimum j suchhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4b59PGPibGk
Simon RobertsSun, 20 Aug 2017 11:33:39 UTCRepresentation for the Rational Numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/GKpbe-HAq6w/eF0sX8GcCgAJ
One way to represent a rational number on a computer would be to use a binary integer for the numerator, and another integer for the denominator. Or one could use a mixed fraction, and go with three integers, so that the approximate magnitude of the number would be more visible. The firsthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/GKpbe-HAq6w
QuadiblocSun, 20 Aug 2017 11:29:35 UTCHow Einstein Unhinged the Speed of Light (Killed Physics)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/UhVgDVrdK3o/6eX08SaaCgAJ
Einstein's assumption that the speed of light is independent of the motion of the source was false but sounded reasonable - it is valid for all waves other than light so assuming that light makes no exception is justifiable. However, combined with the principle of relativity, the assumptionhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UhVgDVrdK3o
Pentcho ValevSun, 20 Aug 2017 10:41:53 UTCReeducating mainstream morons is a thankless job.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/UZq1X8ZCHOU/ssPrEziRCgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N14sCYv2sfc Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD) and...@mit.edu (MIT)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UZq1X8ZCHOU
John GabrielSun, 20 Aug 2017 07:58:11 UTCIs there an explicit formula for pi(x; 3 (mod 4)) - pi(x; 1 (mod 4)) ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-y8WNG5SmGk/Y9k8OBmJCgAJ
What I mean is: pi(x; 3 (mod 4)) = #{ primes p <= x such that x == 3 (mod 4) } and pi(x; 1 (mod 4)) = #{ primes p <= x such that x == 1 (mod 4}. For example, there's a Dirichlet chi character of period 4 which is +1 at 1 (a square mod 4) 0 at 2 -1 at 3 0 at 4 +1 at 4k +1 -1 at 4khttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-y8WNG5SmGk
David BernierSun, 20 Aug 2017 05:29:22 UTCregarding fuzzy sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/UWfLs9LmDSQ/V2zh0I-GCgAJ
Is fuzzy set a subset of the intuitionistic fuzzy set? Is crisp set a subset of fuzzy set?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UWfLs9LmDSQ
Rajeswari NandagopalSun, 20 Aug 2017 04:42:52 UTCTriangle and Exponetials??????
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/t_4KwYdWdLA/C61p9_KACgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Triangle and Exponetials?????? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=859681040853555&set=pcb.859681130853546&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/t_4KwYdWdLA
Mr Sawat LayuheemSun, 20 Aug 2017 03:00:01 UTCExpansion Triangles???
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/YMJWHAn2_1M/M8cSUqd_CgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Expansion Triangles??? Factor Meaning? Surface and Area???? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=859673750854284&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YMJWHAn2_1M
Mr Sawat LayuheemSun, 20 Aug 2017 02:36:17 UTCGreatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/f1zef590CgAJ
Now when I came to sci.math in 1993, August of that year, one topic that seemed to endlessly come up in sci.math was the issue of .9999.... =1. Where math professors the world over adamantly believed and forced the acceptance by all who want to pass mathematics, that .9999.... =1. Thesehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 19 Aug 2017 23:14:09 UTC(tentative proof) that Irrationals come in only one type, one flavor-- Algebraic Irrationals// Transcendental numbers are just illusions by bigots of math
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-Q_9M6yg3HM/iptWfoBxCgAJ
Now the history of Transcendental numbers starts with the theory of polynomials where it was noticed that sqrt2 and other roots were Algebraic Irrationals because they showed up and were present in the polynomial solutions. And it was noticed that no matter how hard a goof ball mathematicianhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-Q_9M6yg3HM
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 19 Aug 2017 22:16:57 UTCThe Silliest Einsteinians
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Wki3Nf5KKL4/5wCSKpZWCgAJ
According to the silliest Einsteinians, even if the speed of light is variable, Divine Albert's Divine Theory "would still be as valid as it's always been": Sabine Hossenfelder: "If photons had a restmass, special relativity would still be as valid as it's always been. The longer answer is thathttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Wki3Nf5KKL4
Pentcho ValevSat, 19 Aug 2017 14:03:43 UTCSimple Test of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mq8yjxzJD3E/fBXyf-RJCgAJ
Here is water placed in an electric field - the vigorous cyclic motion is obviously able to produce work, e.g. by rotating a waterwheel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17UD1goTFhQ "The Formation of the Floating Water Bridge including electric breakdowns" https://www.wetsus.nl/home/wetsus-newhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mq8yjxzJD3E
Pentcho ValevSat, 19 Aug 2017 10:11:06 UTCLogic, Religion and Spiritual Experience
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xxIm_bN-Yh0/FQs51fxDCgAJ
For a very long time I have encountered attitudes such as that religion and spirituality are for idiots, lunatics and conmen. My response to that is that I do not have the luxury of such beliefs. I am in no way a stupid person. I was very precocious as a child, and as a child I developed –https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xxIm_bN-Yh0
ibsh...@gmail.comSat, 19 Aug 2017 08:22:54 UTCCosmological Redshift in a Static Universe
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1NoUlG94sjo/cy97rAI-CgAJ
Not only vacuum friction can slow down light (in a STATIC universe) - the light source can also do so, before photons' journey starts: "Arp argued that the redshift was not due to Hubble expansion or physical movement of the objects, but must have a non-cosmological or "intrinsic" origin."https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1NoUlG94sjo
Pentcho ValevSat, 19 Aug 2017 06:33:22 UTCHand magnifiers have Calif. label-- can cause cancer, anyone know what chemical?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MVGcqxMiYXk/j7U8bwM7CgAJ
I received these in the mail today of hand held magnifiers. I like to keep one in the wallet so in the store, if I don't have glasses with me, I pull out the magnifier. But saw these Califor. warning labels, and tried to find the specific chemical. Is it lead in the glass? Or is it somehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MVGcqxMiYXk
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 19 Aug 2017 05:38:26 UTC