sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enMythical math's posters
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/omv-mxRukFk/qjpny7SUCgAJ
It is plainly evident that the most frequent posters on this site are so insecure that they instantly re-post their own stuff whenever anyone may offer some alternative, or even unrelated maths. It could be any topic or rational mathematical subject, but these children cannot comprehend eitherhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/omv-mxRukFk
richard millerSat, 25 Feb 2017 21:30:21 UTCDavid Joyce - a moron like no other! Also the author of the site Euclid's Elements (Clark University).
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/DwUWxX02FIA/hXYJ-iSICgAJ
Orangutan Joyce states in the link below: Sin 1 deg = 0.01745240643728 To get that value, Joyce actually input RADIANS into the sine function, that is, 1 deg = pi/180 = 0.01745329251994329. Thus, sin ( 0.01745329251994329 radians ) = 0.01745240643728 Then the primate divides 0.017452406437https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DwUWxX02FIA
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 17:40:09 UTCLIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/DojBfhaL4NY/idaPsOSHCgAJ
Physics has changed in strange ways. Theoreticians can now do without experimental confirmation while experimentalists find it ethical to work in absolute secrecy. Here is the latest news: "Either way, Advanced LIGO could give us an additional test very soon, and it may have done so already -https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DojBfhaL4NY
Pentcho ValevSat, 25 Feb 2017 17:35:33 UTCWatch my video to find out why the trigonometric functions can only take radians as input (Featuring Prof. Jackie Huizenga)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/C5vDcey31DU/vmki4_uGCgAJ
Watch my video to find out why the trigonometric functions can only take radians as input. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKWWZ9kHjH4 Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/C5vDcey31DU
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 17:18:53 UTCStudents: Beware! Some of your mythmatics professors believe that the derivative of sin x is not always cos x.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/P8exBAgLWyE/wZen9rWGCgAJ
Don't believe me? The trigonometric functions ALL take radians as input, not degrees. When one writes sin x, the x ALWAYS means radians, NEVER degrees. When one writes sin 30 deg, this means sin pi/6. Although the sine function can take any number, sin (30) and sin (pi/6) will never be thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/P8exBAgLWyE
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 17:13:53 UTCNow even 8th grade students can learn calculus - the New Calculus. Thank you John Gabriel!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/fxkuZaq_Ybk/sV_dhZWGCgAJ
Now even 8th grade students can learn calculus - the New Calculus. Thank you John Gabriel! Who knows, maybe even the BIG STUPID may learn... Chuckle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_MUC12H2uE Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/fxkuZaq_Ybk
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 17:11:33 UTCWhy are many equations not solvable by applying only Elementary functions?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ad_V6v_QWUw/1HL-0JKACgAJ
Hallo, why are many equations not solvable by applying only Elementary functions? Elementary functions: Wikipedia - Elementary function: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_function Let us discuss this on the example equation x + e^x = 0, x real. Thanks.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ad_V6v_QWUw
IVSat, 25 Feb 2017 15:21:25 UTCfinite probability distributions with low entropy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/T-gyTjTY0xU/mgxKMuV-CgAJ
hi all i'd like to know how to find finite (arbitrarily-sized) probability distributions with low entropy; thanks if you can help peace stmhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/T-gyTjTY0xU
namenob...@gmail.comSat, 25 Feb 2017 14:50:39 UTCLatest Solutions to 0 = x^n + y^n - z^n + k.x.y.z, up to n=101
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nWoa9GX2gys/7fD1S2Z7CgAJ
The latest update to the theory, algorithms and solutions to the coordinate equation 0 = x^n + y^n - z^n + k.x.y.z is now available at http://www.urmt.org/urmt_numeric_solutions.pdf Solutions are now given for prime exponents n=3 to n=101 - see how k grows rather large, veryhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nWoa9GX2gys
richard millerSat, 25 Feb 2017 13:46:36 UTCFrank Wilczek's Perpetual Motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/73h9eYxuOEM/rpyTPhN0CgAJ
"Back in 2012, Wilczek came up with a tantalising idea. He wondered if, in the same way that a crystal breaks symmetry in space, it would be possible to create a crystal breaking an equivalent symmetry in time. This was the first time the idea of a time crystal was theorised. Such an object wouldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/73h9eYxuOEM
Pentcho ValevSat, 25 Feb 2017 11:32:18 UTC0.333... or 0.3330526315789473684210... ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/snz-7MB_WH0/_v6p5YFxCgAJ
Consider the following series: 3/10 + 3/100 + 3/1000 + 1/20000 + 1/400000 + 1/8000000 + ... = 0.333 + 1/19000 = 0.3330526315789473684210... [A] If we simply took the first three digits of [A] and added an ellipsis, no one would know the difference in the representation of [A] or 0.3+0.03+0https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/snz-7MB_WH0
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 10:45:19 UTC0.333..., my decimal tree and Cantor's mental illness called the "Diagonal (mis) Argument"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/DQTD0Fm8O0Q/r9JLbvtwCgAJ
So the BIG STUPID and their lackeys will say that 0.333... is possible but that the unique identifiers produced in my disproof of Cantor and his idiocy is not possible. For example, 150112... is a unique identifier for pi-3. Watch video to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqTuuhR3https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DQTD0Fm8O0Q
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 10:35:42 UTCQuora and the New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1kj0WsQqDhk/0RyOhw9wCgAJ
Uri Schwartz wrote: "What you’re saying is, if the derivative of f(x) is k, and the derivative of f(x) is [{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)], then k=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)], which isn’t very groundbreaking." Well, the funny thing is this: Uri calls this "not very groundbreaking" and yet in all of humanhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1kj0WsQqDhk
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 10:18:49 UTCIs your engineering or science mistake due to the fact that Old Math has screwed up trigonometry
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/DkM1pMTyW8E/mWHQNNJoCgAJ
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:52:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: The integral, true integral of sine and cosine functions is Y= .78n +C From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 03:52:28 +0000 The integral, true integral of sine andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DkM1pMTyW8E
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 25 Feb 2017 08:06:09 UTCmathematicians in SCIENCE COUNCIL of Paradise Nation-- computing whether Africa or South America
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/b76lYmVysUI/lC6y1VlfCgAJ
Science Council is the formation of a Paradise Nation of US+EU+UK+Canada+Australia +NZ where the scientists rule that Nation. And where the current govt heads become chief of police of their countries, but the Science Council rules the nation. The world needs this huge nation Paradise to avert ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/b76lYmVysUI
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 25 Feb 2017 05:12:36 UTCAlmost all of old math trigonometry was in error, save for a few items
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MU2JrkWYYGY/xYipG5VeCgAJ
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 01:16:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: How could Old Math get it so wrong on Trig?? From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:16:47 +0000 How could Old Math get it so wrong on Trig?? And how could it havehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MU2JrkWYYGY
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 25 Feb 2017 04:58:31 UTCThe integral, true integral of sine and cosine functions is Y= .78n +C
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JAwU0qErs90/RBonp_taCgAJ
A long time ago I drew a quartercircle in the 1 by 1 square, x=0 to 1 with .1, .2, .3 etc inbetween and with a compass drew that quartercircle for sine and for cosine. Then, I added up the .1 by .1 squares, knowing there are 100 of these .1by.1 squares in 1by1. This is what I got for sine:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JAwU0qErs90
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 25 Feb 2017 03:52:33 UTCRe: Putnam 2005
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y_hG7oik3DU/W6-udB5YCgAJ
I have found a simpler and more elegant solution than those that I have come across for the 2005 A5 Putnam Problem. I am in search of people to peer review my work and hopefully confirm it's validity. My the url to my work is https://s32.postimg.org/n0mx59jsl/Putnam_2005_A5.jpghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y_hG7oik3DU
Daniel Allen FournierSat, 25 Feb 2017 03:00:04 UTCFind out why the BIG STUPID hate my disproof of Cantor's Diagonal (Mis) Argument.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/EtPAEwnXZv8/-geO_IRVCgAJ
One of my readers called it torturous. It is an instant bullshitometer. Kronecker was right about Cantor and Cantor did not end up in an institution because he was smart. He became insane from his stupidities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqTuuhR3-4 Your comments are unwelcome shit andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EtPAEwnXZv8
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:12:26 UTCI was the first in human history to prove the mean value theorem constructively and conclusively.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/E2HHYNYqWiI/U4Xnt1FVCgAJ
Using my New Calculus: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLblJNLWJUeGxqV0E Using the bogus calculus and a patch I created to make the proof possible: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLZG1pNlVIX2RTR0E Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is postedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/E2HHYNYqWiI
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:08:43 UTCNo such thing as an instantaneous rate.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X5n7jwl7FPE/52Nsti5VCgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgUB0pILNj8 Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X5n7jwl7FPE
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:06:16 UTCSqrt(2) is not a number. Not even "God" can measure the magnitude sqrt(2)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PWJvBTeRoyg/gwjaDB5VCgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PWJvBTeRoyg
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:05:04 UTCDedekind and Cauchy both tried to define numbers in terms of sets. Both failed.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Tiv7pNYBjuo/CmVSHQlVCgAJ
Both Cauchy and Dedekind attempted a definition in terms of something with which measure is not possible. Both failed because ****A number is the measure of a magnitude.**** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FJVkOoBEsA Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted onhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Tiv7pNYBjuo
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:03:34 UTCMy ancestors who were brilliant beyond belief did not use axioms or postulates, only well-formed definitions.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0N8Elaa11tM/9om8-_hUCgAJ
My ancestors who were brilliant beyond belief did not use axioms or postulates, only well-formed definitions. Well-formed definitions are something the BIG STUPID has never understood. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARzchjd8eZg Read here what it means to be well defined: https://www.linkedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0N8Elaa11tM
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 02:02:25 UTCYou've heard and read the lie thousands of times: "The calculus was made rigorous"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/U0plSGvgVjg/a5XUU8lUCgAJ
Now find out the truth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT0ffnwMf7o Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/U0plSGvgVjg
John GabrielSat, 25 Feb 2017 01:59:00 UTCThe TOP Science Rule
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FH6f55gWjVI/Y_nEagRUCgAJ
http://www.rbduncan.com/toprule.htmhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FH6f55gWjVI
412d...@gmail.comSat, 25 Feb 2017 01:44:54 UTCf(f(x)) = f(x)? any study on this kind of function
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Puwrm1dAaLI/U3P2AOZRCgAJ
I recently encountered some functions that follows f(f(x))= f(x), which means if use the results of function f on x as the input of f again, the new output is almost the same as f(x). x is a vector and f(x) is also a vector, in the same dimension as x. One example of f is a band filter inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Puwrm1dAaLI
Deep learningSat, 25 Feb 2017 01:06:05 UTC2nd forgery by freak Jan Burse-- how many is he allowed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vYMssFHk2Aw/RnrnSkNNCgAJ
X-Received: by 10.107.39.15 with SMTP id n15mr829318ion.45.1487933212106; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:46:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: sci....@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.54.152 with SMTP id h24ls6856776otc.30.gmail; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:46:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.17.117https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vYMssFHk2Aw
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 24 Feb 2017 23:41:08 UTCRe: Why trigonometry was wrong for 300+ years
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bwC36YGz1FQ/dI6YFeZbCgAJ
On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 6:38:12 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 01:16:47 -0800 (PST) > > Subject: How could Old Math get it so wrong on Trig?? > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Febhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bwC36YGz1FQ
Dan ChristensenSat, 25 Feb 2017 04:09:20 UTCThere is no valid construction of real number.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gc1sT2zvvn4/x0X7WPhGCgAJ
Both Cauchy and Dedekind attempted a definition in terms of something with which measure is not possible. Both failed because A number is the measure of a magnitude. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FJVkOoBEsA Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on thishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gc1sT2zvvn4
John GabrielFri, 24 Feb 2017 21:45:49 UTCThe Muon Lifetime Hoax in Einstein's Schizophrenic World
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/psnIw2rtjsU/MjKUswNCCgAJ
According to Brian Greene, if the muon is "sitting in front of you", it will self-destruct very quickly. Muons moving at high speed live longer, as predicted by Divine Albert's Divine Theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE Muons that Einsteinians refer to as "sitting in front ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/psnIw2rtjsU
Pentcho ValevFri, 24 Feb 2017 20:15:00 UTC"...the contention that ACADEMICS can’t think straight was shocking. It isn’t any longer." - New Yorker
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JOjH2ip53mg/oXvfRMw-CgAJ
The Stanford studies became famous. Coming from a group of academics in the nineteen-seventies, the contention that ACADEMICS can’t think straight was shocking. It isn’t any longer. - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds?mbid=gnep&intcid=gnep&google_editorhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JOjH2ip53mg
John GabrielFri, 24 Feb 2017 19:16:04 UTCLoyola's Principle in Einstein's Schizophrenic World
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/92iEW4oULvw/P5QUAiY4CgAJ
In 1887 (prior to FitzGerald and Lorentz advancing the ad hoc length contraction hypothesis) the Michelson-Morley experiment UNEQUIVOCALLY confirmed the variable speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and refuted the constant (independent of the speed of the light source)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/92iEW4oULvw
Pentcho ValevFri, 24 Feb 2017 17:14:12 UTCAre mathematics flat?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kexFIn8YFFg/BBzDTuM0CgAJ
The Earth was believed to be flat.... :) -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://wwwhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kexFIn8YFFg
Mr. Man-wai ChangFri, 24 Feb 2017 16:14:27 UTCResponsability
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/qHFwalatNPo/dxrXze4uCgAJ
Who responsabilizes himself or herself for non-moderating JG? Is this a disgovernated or an ungovernated group? Defending nazism is a heinous crime. E-mail is documentary evidence against him. Where are the lawyers? Witch country? +5531985267474https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/qHFwalatNPo
Vinicius Claudino FerrazFri, 24 Feb 2017 14:25:20 UTC+Proofs that derivative of cosine is tangent and sine is cotangent-- makes sense since dy/dx is derivative
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kL-lMMPytfk/QGZ3EJUuCgAJ
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 01:16:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: How could Old Math get it so wrong on Trig?? From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:16:47 +0000 How could Old Math get it so wrong on Trig?? And how could it havehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kL-lMMPytfk
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 24 Feb 2017 14:18:54 UTCTuring Degrees and the Continuum Hypothesis
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mDrxR2YCXZQ/ibzQ9QwqCgAJ
Turing degrees are a measure of the insoluvility of sets. If, given an oracle for set B (a function that will return true or false depending on whether the argument is in the set) there is a Turing machine that will determine membership in set A then A <=T B. If A <=T B and B <=T A tyhen A and Bhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mDrxR2YCXZQ
DickFri, 24 Feb 2017 12:55:52 UTCRe: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZTiv2itPaaE/RfetBw0nCgAJ
Its good to see that I am wasting your time as you responded, as you are wasting ours time as well, with your spam. Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2017 11:46:52 UTC+1 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > Archimedes Plutonium is an Alzheimer Faggothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZTiv2itPaaE
burs...@gmail.comFri, 24 Feb 2017 12:00:53 UTCdisproofs-- cosine derivative is tangent; derivative of sine is cotangent (2)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/weaGqG5cK_c/VXJE1wIjCgAJ
DERIVATIVE OF COSINE (corrected) Right triangles from center (1,0) sine cosine derivative cosine tangent function per degrees using parallel ruler .1 approx 1 .1 = 6degrees .1 .2 approx 1 .2 = 11degreeshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/weaGqG5cK_c
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 24 Feb 2017 10:46:52 UTCA number is the measure of a magnitude. Nothing more. Nothing less.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Aga05_cnZL4/GrUHfj8eCgAJ
Morons of the BIG STUPID are good at platitudes such as claiming that dictionary definitions are not the same as mathematics, and yet there is no formal definition of number in mythmatics. Chuckle. There is a good reason for this: no one after Euclid and before me had a fucking clue what ithttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Aga05_cnZL4
John GabrielFri, 24 Feb 2017 09:19:35 UTCWhy facts don't change the minds of the BIG STUPID - The New Yorker
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Biz3LRNJRbM/xgBCdxUeCgAJ
While reading this article in the New Yorker, I couldn't help but think of the incorrigibly stupid morons on this site and in the BIG STUPID. In particular, I think of ultra-stupids such as shionoro and jan and jan burse who have been fooled into falsely believing they are more competent thanhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Biz3LRNJRbM
John GabrielFri, 24 Feb 2017 09:16:34 UTCEinstein's Relativity Against Human Rationality
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/8aDyCydRlE8/nNV7SDMdCgAJ
Physics Girl (4:30): "One last question. What's happening to the clocks during the period of acceleration? We still get time dilation, but we have to use a different set of rules from the general relativity. General relativity states that clocks runs slower in accelerated reference frames. Sohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/8aDyCydRlE8
Pentcho ValevFri, 24 Feb 2017 09:00:23 UTCThe impossibility of a supertask on the time axis shows ...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7ASlsqSP-Xs/llanxA4UCgAJ
The impossibility of a supertask on the time axis https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Transfinity/The%20little%20demon.pdf shows the impossibility of a bijection between infinite sets on the spatial real axis. Mathematicians should try to learn about the equivalence between time axis andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7ASlsqSP-Xs
WMFri, 24 Feb 2017 06:12:50 UTCA Clue For What It Means To Be A Number
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/30-Qry7V6zw/DOzqhxYQCgAJ
Any number in any set is a composite of a quantity of space and a quantity of value. Either or, defined or undefined. Or a combination therein.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/30-Qry7V6zw
conwayFri, 24 Feb 2017 05:00:05 UTCproofs-- derivative of sine is cotangent; cosine derivative is tangent
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/HiwD7GLc9DE/v3ynDJYJCgAJ
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:04:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: confirming that derivative of sine is cotangent and derivative of cosine is tangent From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:04:09 +0000 confirming that derivative ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/HiwD7GLc9DE
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 24 Feb 2017 03:00:57 UTCCantor and his Diagonal Mis-argument debunked in just 29 minutes.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BmMVSm8zIoE/Aw19HxcJCgAJ
Students, don't waste another minute of your time on Cantor's delusional bullshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqTuuhR3-4&lc=z13iedixywjjcbvii04cflzbywfnil4o34k.1487903846584284 Your comments are unwelcome shit and will be ignored. This is posted on this newsgroup in the interests ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BmMVSm8zIoE
John GabrielFri, 24 Feb 2017 02:51:51 UTCAlgebra Question
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/TNCbFDJjar4/OdENfAr_CQAJ
Hello: Can someone please show me the Algebraic steps to isolate variable "a" on one side of the following equation? y = ( a / (a + (1/b)*c) ) * (d - e) Thanks! Rhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TNCbFDJjar4
RThu, 23 Feb 2017 23:47:42 UTCWho Wants to Understand the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/9DqtmDLqwZY/Q_4796b8CQAJ
"The attempt to understand the Second Law of thermodynamics occupies a central role in the foundations of physics: not only is it of great importance in and of itself, but it also ramifies into a host of other problems of fundamental physical and philosophical import. [...] Despite this, therehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9DqtmDLqwZY
Pentcho ValevThu, 23 Feb 2017 23:03:56 UTCCranks still unable to accept that Cantor's proof is right
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/We_dR8tcdlg/7deiy7XiCQAJ
Understanding the correctness of Cantor's diagonal proof is very easy. Ask anything about any step of the proof and i will explain it to you.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/We_dR8tcdlg
shio...@googlemail.comThu, 23 Feb 2017 15:08:32 UTCThe BIG STUPID still clinging to fallacies: is it a tangent line? If not, what is it? Chuckle.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/01Mw4cLuhxg/4uQejV_iCQAJ
Grabiner writes: "How then was the tangent to be defined at the point (0,O) for a curve like y =x^3 (FIGUREl), or to a point on a curve with many turning points (FIGURE 2)? " Page 2 of https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/0025570x04690.di021131.02p02223.pdf Grabiner is part of the BIGhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/01Mw4cLuhxg
John GabrielThu, 23 Feb 2017 15:02:21 UTC