sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enEducating Prof. Gilbert Strang (alias Port563) - there is no such thing as an instantaneous rate - it's a fallacy.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6ftv_mr9cdk/q_Cjyx_oAgAJ
There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgUB0pILNj8https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6ftv_mr9cdk
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 15:39:02 UTCWhat exactly is a well-formed concept?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Gah1riVU9qc/BCrbWNHnAgAJ
Here are my four essential requirements for any concept to be well defined: In order to be well defined, a concept 1. Must be reifiable either intangibly or tangibly. 2. Must be defined in terms of attributes which it possesses, not those it lacks. 3. Must not lead to any logical contradichttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Gah1riVU9qc
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 15:33:25 UTCFirst and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/EZjFFMa4rZ8/Z0AIL7vnAgAJ
Learn all about it here: http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com Download the applet that 8th graders use to learn calculus: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM Ask questions and make comments here: https://sites.google.com/site/thenewcalculus/questions-and-answershttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EZjFFMa4rZ8
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 15:31:50 UTCWatch how theory is built on really bad ideas because the BIG STUPID cannot be fixed.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PUkOJVSDzN4/epStRJ7nAgAJ
Complex number theory is built on the garbage described in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-GP-pAoIVohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PUkOJVSDzN4
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 15:29:46 UTCThe new calculus - the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history. 10/1/2016
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/GGamdjsOLRA/2qf4gQnnAgAJ
Learn all about it here: http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com Download the applet that 8th graders use to learn calculus: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM Ask questions and make comments here: https://sites.google.com/site/thenewcalculus/questions-and-answershttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/GGamdjsOLRA
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 15:19:07 UTCYou can't understand mathematics until you have debunked the 13 fallacies of mythmatics.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/pO1kqNQzUDU/aM03QVPkAgAJ
The druids of the BIG STUPID have woven such a web of ignorance that can only be unraveled by knowing what these 13 fallacies are: http://thenewcalculus.weebly.comhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pO1kqNQzUDU
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 14:29:25 UTCThe hypocrisy of the BIG STUPID is nothing new.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Nl50dubIDe8/9vguuTnkAgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wv44FnfBKIhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Nl50dubIDe8
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 14:27:36 UTCLebesgue was an idiot, but he was not alone in the BIG STUPID.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gXSW5643xho/0PswXPjjAgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 A more clueless fool is hard to come by. Chuckle. For an index of my videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A Learn about Cauchy's blond moments: Cauchy didn't only have problems with the derivative, but he had no cluehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gXSW5643xho
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 14:22:55 UTCGravitational waves don't exist, LIGO conspirators fight for money
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aCyKwwOH9W8/eFtXP9LdAgAJ
http://www.universetoday.com/131128/2016-nobel-prize-physics-complicated/ "Little wonder then why some scientists think the Nobel Prize should be split four-ways, awarding the three scientists who conceived of LIGO and the one scientist who made it happen. And as Barish himself was quoted ashttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aCyKwwOH9W8
Pentcho ValevSat, 01 Oct 2016 12:30:14 UTCInevitable Return to Newton's Absolute Time
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wLq4K4W5Uno/orpEIg_QAgAJ
Ethan Siegel believes that, according to special relativity, the traveler will see his own (traveling) clock running SLOWER than the clock at rest: http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/09/30/how-do-photons-experience-time/ Ethan Siegel: "In 1905, Einstein put forth his theory ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wLq4K4W5Uno
Pentcho ValevSat, 01 Oct 2016 08:18:02 UTCThe continuum of the BIG STUPID?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gMtTVsO3L_4/FFVlCAC4AgAJ
According to the BIG STUPID, the continuum is full of points (or infinitesimals as the idiot Ross Finlayson wrote about). In light of this "definition", it follows that the BIG STUPID cannot be continuous because it is full of assholes. But you may respond, "those are like points". To which Ihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gMtTVsO3L_4
John GabrielSat, 01 Oct 2016 00:57:09 UTCLearn about how I teach even the most simple concepts: the arithmetic mean.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ukit92gUAQc/vhz3yAKhAgAJ
In the following video I explain what it means to be an arithmetic mean. It's a concept second in importance only to the concept of number. Without the arithmetic mean, there would be no calculus, no technology, no science whatsoever. If it's so important, don't you think that you should athttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ukit92gUAQc
John GabrielFri, 30 Sep 2016 17:55:52 UTCRe: Math is an Invention, not a Discovery...arguement solved.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/qfK91dGKT7E/QGnzFSWUAgAJ
Have you seen this post about Accidental Invention? http://www.wordsiseek.com/accidental-inventions/https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/qfK91dGKT7E
Juanita SilveraFri, 30 Sep 2016 14:00:06 UTCName That Constant !
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/9GBb_T-EEYI/e41IpOKTAgAJ
271828 60221409 314159 1618028https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9GBb_T-EEYI
SteveGGFri, 30 Sep 2016 13:55:21 UTCThe BIG STUPID (mainstream academia) is a religion. If you don't believe then you are excommunicated.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/N0CQGldn3-U/aOD9i9dmAgAJ
The jealous bastards of mainstream academia have riled against my new calculus for many years. What follows are proofs that even high school students can understand and yet somehow morons the likes of Strang, Huizenga and Kaesorg simply can't grasp! =============================================https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/N0CQGldn3-U
John GabrielFri, 30 Sep 2016 00:09:55 UTCMorons of the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia) say the darndest things.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/fd8XXY_8Nhk/SBSxh3pmAgAJ
They've never understood what is a tangent line. They imagine that tangent lines are defined by the derivative, but that's understandable because the morons have always wiped their arses before defecating. There would be no derivative were it not for the tangent line. The dullest and mosthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/fd8XXY_8Nhk
John GabrielFri, 30 Sep 2016 00:03:15 UTCCauchy - another delusional French idiot!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Fpwd0rGCFR0/sT1bTaBVAgAJ
Cauchy didn't only have problems with the derivative, but he had no clue what it means to be a number: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6roMXD4w3RYhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Fpwd0rGCFR0
John GabrielThu, 29 Sep 2016 18:54:26 UTCLearn about the idiot Henri Lebesgue!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/R6XvGTtGIyg/pXISU5JVAgAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 A more clueless fool is hard to come by. Chuckle. For an index of my videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_Ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/R6XvGTtGIyg
John GabrielThu, 29 Sep 2016 18:53:24 UTCLe temps newtonien et le temps einsteinien
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-oEp0vnAN9Y/88JSv-NCAgAJ
http://blogs.futura-sciences.com/barrau/2016/09/28/gravitation-quantique-on/ Aurélien Barrau: "Cela signifie qu'en physique quantique l'espace et le temps sont très différents. Au contraire, en relativité ils sont essentiellement « la même chose » ! C'est un problème." C'est un problèmehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-oEp0vnAN9Y
Pentcho ValevThu, 29 Sep 2016 13:11:05 UTCLimits depend on representation?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aY0vyFqb6dI/Om9P_DEuAgAJ
The sequence (n) of natural numbers n has an empty limit 1, 2, 3, ... --> { }. I did not write {n} because numbers n are already sets (like everything in ZFC). The sequence of FISONs has limit |N {1}, {1, 2}, {1, 2, 3}, ... --> |N. The natural numbers can be representedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aY0vyFqb6dI
WMThu, 29 Sep 2016 06:51:51 UTCThe New Calculus - now an eighth grade version for professors of mythmatics and mainstream "educators".
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0OEHTvF6bC4/pJ616ZwaAgAJ
The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0OEHTvF6bC4
John GabrielThu, 29 Sep 2016 00:53:00 UTCAbout the psycho troll DC.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gGkhNkwRMr4/HvHuT1w2BQAJ
I have pleaded with this vicious troll to stay off my comments and threads. But it is not in the nature of a troll to behave normally. I have often had to repost my comments because the troll marks them as abusive. I refuse to engage the troll in debate because it cannot be reasoned with evenhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gGkhNkwRMr4
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 20:28:12 UTCPrimes such that 2p+1 is a prime.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/nTurQdVguco/0TIizBkvBQAJ
Hello there! I'm high school student from Slovakia. I'm clueless about this statement, which is obviously true. There is infinitely many primes p_1, such that p_1 = 2*p_2 + 1 and p_2 is also a prime. Is there any way to prove this? Thanks in advance Daniel Hermanhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nTurQdVguco
danie...@gmail.comWed, 28 Sep 2016 18:15:10 UTCNCTM - National Council of Teacher Morons and John Saxon.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/buleoutD6ss/yp_UR1krBQAJ
This organisation is to blame for the failed system of education in the USA. It is run by imbeciles from the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia), so no wonder. "For those 15 years as a teacher, author, and publisher, Saxon found himself on the defensive against not only government bureaucrats, buthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/buleoutD6ss
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 17:06:25 UTCWe need to fix public education, especially in the USA which is just about last in the PISA ratings.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/DC4jPYbQNXs/ZlAFMdklBQAJ
There are several private schools in the USA who are claiming to have found a new formula of success. A couple that come to mind are BASIS Independent and Rancho Solano both from Arizona originally. Neither of these schools has a magic formula. They have simply gone back to the tried and testedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DC4jPYbQNXs
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 15:25:37 UTCCurious Property
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FGSAGu7N91c/ONSNOzsaBQAJ
Hello, all. A coworker presented the following property (taken from a math puzzles book): 3^2 = 9, 9^2 = 81, 18^2 = 324, 24^2 = 576 A 9-digit number can be constructed from these products containing the integers 1-9 with none repeated. Is this indicative of some number theory relation(s) orhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FGSAGu7N91c
J.B. WoodWed, 28 Sep 2016 11:52:44 UTCAn eighth grade lesson in the New Calculus designed for math professors of the BIG STUPID.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/9h02OlQoGEg/eTEZQjb6BAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9h02OlQoGEg
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 02:05:58 UTCAnders Kaesorg (MIT math graduate) gets confounded in a debate with John Gabriel.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mS5RtXEqf2Y/jIxL9B76BAAJ
Kaesorg and I debated the Cauchy derivative definition here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLNXFJS0t4MEJydTA The limit definition is circular because L = f'(x) and L is used in the definition. You can't verify L is the limit unless you already know it. Circular reasoning at itshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mS5RtXEqf2Y
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 02:04:18 UTCA Harvard Alumnus (Prof. Jackie Huizenga) comments on my New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/4jR1_DH1N4w/wflAMxL6BAAJ
9/21/2016 A Harvard alumnus comments! | The New Calculus Just a few weeks ago, some ignoramus posted a question on that ridiculous site Quora. The question was: “What do people think of John Gabriel’s New Calculus, which claims it is the only rigorous formulation of calculus”. Quora is ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4jR1_DH1N4w
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 02:03:23 UTCProf. Gilbert Strang - a felon and a member of the MIT math department.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1rGbFury97Q/kAkaqwf6BAAJ
November 24, 2015 | John Gabriel You would think that a distinguished professor of mathematics (Gilbert Strang from MIT) would behave in an ethical way, wouldn't you? Well, over the period (June 2014-November 2015), Prof. Strang has accused me, John Gabriel, of being a terrorist, defamed andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1rGbFury97Q
John GabrielWed, 28 Sep 2016 02:02:38 UTCCorrecting Sine and Cosine as being truly semicircle Waves and the sinusoidal wave was comic fiction
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/G14dwKgJLQE/AOziTFr4BAAJ
Outline of proof that sine and cosine are semicircle waves or semiellipse waves but never a sinusoid wave Alright, this requires a proof that Sinusoid (sine and cosine) figure is a fiction, a pure slab of imagination but never reality. Now here, what I have drawn are 9 points. A Bhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G14dwKgJLQE
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 28 Sep 2016 01:31:54 UTCSadi Carnot Against the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rm71RTbOwUM/yj_AOJTvBAAJ
In 1824 Sadi Carnot deduced the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics from a postulate that eventually turned out to be false: Carnot's (false) postulate: Heat is an indestructible substance (caloric) that cannot be converted into work by the heat engine. Consequence (prototype of thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rm71RTbOwUM
Pentcho ValevTue, 27 Sep 2016 22:51:07 UTCContinuity and uncountability
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/LeN5kr3Hvxw/73ASC3ftBAAJ
Discussion about continuity of line, how continuity is related to uncountability and the continuum hypothesis. The real line is made of real numbers which are points. Points are discrete objects, but lines are continuous objects. How does continuity arise out of discreteness when points makehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/LeN5kr3Hvxw
PengKuan EmTue, 27 Sep 2016 22:12:23 UTCAbout John Gabriel
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XvExE48o1qo/3X05rwPkBAAJ
John Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XvExE48o1qo
Dan ChristensenTue, 27 Sep 2016 19:19:12 UTCCalculus was made rigorous? Not a chance.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/_67qTQ2mrfc/y43EI3ziBAAJ
Modern academics are inherently dishonest, ignorant, morally deficient and disgusting vile reptiles (Gilbert Strang of MIT is a fine example). Limit theory is flawed because no valid formulation of "real" number exists. But there are many more reasons as outlined in this video: https://www.youhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_67qTQ2mrfc
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 18:51:10 UTCRemembering the crapaxioms of Peano.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xbyhdEkaFUE/oCanfHHbBAAJ
Peano was a delusional Italian moron. That his absolute rot consisting of 5 "axioms" has been hailed as the foundations of number theory is truly telling of the intelligence possessed by the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia). Don't allow yourself to be fooled by this nonsense. It is a waste ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xbyhdEkaFUE
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 16:42:08 UTCHow we got numbers. Reprinted from my article on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-we-got-numbers-john-gabriel?trk=seokp_posts_primary_cluster_res_photo
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Ppv78CwaJKU/nuXzLSXbBAAJ
Introduction: I recently posted a comment at the link: Noura asks a question about understanding fractions, but for some unknown reason, Karim Noura chose not to publish my post. So, I'll explain in this article why there are problems understanding fractions and numbers in general. I'll alsohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ppv78CwaJKU
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 16:36:40 UTCThe dead end that is mythmatics.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CyMHU_tpbWg/DCY3aWrIBAAJ
The jealous bastards of mainstream academia have riled against my new calculus for many years. What follows are proofs that even high school students can understand and yet somehow morons the likes of Strang, Huizenga and Kaesorg simply can't grasp! =============================================https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CyMHU_tpbWg
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:53:26 UTCThe 13 fallacies of mythmatics (mainstream mathematics) - why you need to understand.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0PvUJY2Eg0s/Ji1uEErIBAAJ
What's kind of sad and also kind of funny is how mainstream academics always ask for sources, usually printed or peer reviewed. The greatest mathematicians never had their work reviewed because they had no peers on their level. It is the same with me. In order for my work to be reviewed, myhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0PvUJY2Eg0s
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:51:08 UTCStudents: Don't get caught and trolled in Cantor's web of delusions.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vmqnzMYBIUA/2dm4IBbIBAAJ
Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#phttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vmqnzMYBIUA
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:47:24 UTCThe New Calculus - the first and only rigorous formulation in human history. Now in 8th grader form.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/QikB55OSEAc/U0dCggbIBAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QikB55OSEAc
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:46:17 UTCThe BIG STUPID gets it wrong just about ALL the time.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6IaBydN7Tw8/ScUMNu3HBAAJ
The New Calculus handles inflection points correctly. Newton's bogus calculus does not. Straight lines do not have derivatives, but the slope of a straight line is called a derivative if and only if that straight line is tangent to another curve. http://thenewcalculus.weebly.comhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6IaBydN7Tw8
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:44:29 UTCReddit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WJgxdSe95ak/XKnZNdnHBAAJ
The gathering place on the internet for the world's idiots. I have never seen so many worthless comments all in one place anywhere else besides sci.math. Looking at the IP addresses of their visitors reveals the BIG STUPID. No surprise here.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WJgxdSe95ak
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:43:03 UTCThree Dimensional Compositions
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rc8xEr4MOj8/Bfvw3KXFBAAJ
Let us say that in two dimensions you can Composition a drive. Quasi indicated that this is a 2^(x-1) type formula Obviously a Composition with a value of 1 is meaningless in this regards. But I am often accused of not being clear so allow me to be clear here. You have y=10 value, it is goinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rc8xEr4MOj8
Michael HarringtonTue, 27 Sep 2016 10:02:43 UTCThere is no derivative at a point of inflection because only a half tangent line can be constructed at a point of inflection.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kyuoGkdStcM/goLICCWxBAAJ
The New Calculus handles inflection points correctly. Newton's bogus calculus does not. Straight lines do not have derivatives, but the slope of a straight line is called a derivative if and only if that straight line is tangent to another curve. http://thenewcalculus.weebly.comhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kyuoGkdStcM
John GabrielTue, 27 Sep 2016 03:47:00 UTCAt last, there is some intelligent life on earth after all.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WYAQpl96iW0/A-SFR6-dBAAJ
I have now become unstoppable. Not even death can beat me. Watch how another sentient being defends and emulates me: https://www.reddit.com/user/camacs?count=25&after=t1_d7tx65p Chuckle. Good for you Camacs! You are liberated and able to think for yourself.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WYAQpl96iW0
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 21:50:23 UTCThe entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra. 9/26/16
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/a3-iL25T-8o/J0mVe1-NBAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/a3-iL25T-8o
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 16:51:28 UTCYes, that time of the year is here again with fall classes - beware the spell of Cantor!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/o8jUhBNWJ1k/73lAZ1iIBAAJ
Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#phttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/o8jUhBNWJ1k
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 15:19:20 UTCThe New Calculus - a version for those mathematics professors who don't know more than eighth grade algebra, and of course for 8th graders too!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uCRnY3_QSN0/-Z6LUkOIBAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uCRnY3_QSN0
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 15:17:50 UTCStudents: Beware, this is Cantor season in your college courses.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rD2uC5Jx7j4/v5RaGEmDBAAJ
Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#phttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rD2uC5Jx7j4
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 13:46:37 UTC