sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enHow Einsteinians Prove Time Dilation
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/UEJmhBch6WA/Y-WNhcXwAwAJ
"But the fact that you can see cosmic ray muons at all is enough to prove that relativity is real. Think about where these muons are created: high in the upper atmosphere, about 30-to-100 kilometers above Earth's surface. Think about how long a muon lives: about 2.2 microseconds on average. Andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UEJmhBch6WA
Pentcho ValevThu, 27 Apr 2017 17:30:53 UTCHow Einsteinians Rejected Newton's Emission Theory of Light
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Sm7wspYJnN4/JL4jx4_tAwAJ
"There is another obvious possibility, which is called the emitter theory: the light travels at 186,300 miles per second relative to the source of the light. The analogy here is between light emitted by a source and bullets emitted by a machine gun. The bullets come out at a definite speedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Sm7wspYJnN4
Pentcho ValevThu, 27 Apr 2017 16:32:04 UTCWhenever wisdom is dismissed, knowledge becomes ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/IwN-oDX7IbA/RyLSMz_QAwAJ
"All knowledge is questionable". "No knowledge is ever past further investigation". "All knowledge is subject to correction and revision". Whenever that wisdom is dismissed, knowledge becomes religion. Euler was wrong: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eulers-worst-definition-lim-john-gabrielhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IwN-oDX7IbA
John GabrielThu, 27 Apr 2017 07:34:52 UTCThe other solution for the arcosh(x)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/z4aEbVqUu88/bITiL5zNAwAJ
The official solution for the arcosh(x) is listed as ln(x + sqrt(x**2-1) ) but what about the "other" solution ln( x - sqrt(x**2 -1 ) ) ? Because Sqrt is a strictly increasing function, if x is positive then x = sqrt( x**2) so sqrt (x**2) > sqrt(x**2 -1 ) so x - sqrt(x**2 -1) >0 sohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z4aEbVqUu88
Paul ElliottThu, 27 Apr 2017 06:46:33 UTCwhat is e^dx equal to ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/qmpsYLXM4ng/1G1sG1XJAwAJ
e^0.1 = 1.1051709180756477... e^0.01 = 1.010050167084168... e^0.001 = 1.0010005001667084... e^0.0001 = 1.0001000050001667... . . . e^dx = ? What is e^dx equal to ?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/qmpsYLXM4ng
7777777Thu, 27 Apr 2017 05:28:10 UTCFor centuries idiot academics tried to find a rigorous formulation. They failed. Hail the New Calculus!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/cgcPvnfAydI/d3PFbbi4AwAJ
The New Calculus - A formidable first and only rigorous formulation. Find out why more and more math academics are turning to it! The New Calculus is an analytic geometry formulation that ALWAYS works and this is why more and more academics are using it. It has new features not possible usinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cgcPvnfAydI
John GabrielThu, 27 Apr 2017 00:23:44 UTCLebug (lebesgue) - an uncommon moron.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0YB9boRpb0o/LVALsdOvAwAJ
Watch the video to see how this idiot is so quickly undone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmaihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0YB9boRpb0o
John GabrielWed, 26 Apr 2017 21:40:46 UTCRe: Cech cohomology and singular cohomology
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eBe8LeNROYE/uHrzSpyhAwAJ
You don't have to go to such elaborate spaces. Let $X= \{1, 1/2, 1/3, \dots\}\cup \{0\}$, i.e., a sequence with an accumulation point. The singular $H^0(X,Z)$ is the space of all sequences of integers $Z^N$, whereas the Cech cohomology is the space of all eventually constant sequenceshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eBe8LeNROYE
John HuubardWed, 26 Apr 2017 17:20:15 UTCSelectivity in sets and the duality P vs NP
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CEIg02wZeJ4/Emuux3-YAwAJ
Hello, I share with you my thoughts regarding set theory and problem classes P and NP. http://goo.gl/eGAUwU This is a repost of a discussion previously named "Selective incompatibility in sets" the paper had to be renamed and new discussion started. Regards Haroun Boutamanihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CEIg02wZeJ4
Haroun BoutamaniWed, 26 Apr 2017 14:33:17 UTCContinuum Hypothesis - proof attempt
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PnnJ1UL6Hfc/Dap4KxuXAwAJ
Hello all, What follows represents my notes on a proof that the Continuum Hypothesis is false, under the assumption that a particular axiom system which I call "iNBG" is consistent. I.e.: iNBG is consistent --> ~CH Although I have checked the proof over a few times and think that it ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PnnJ1UL6Hfc
xlt...@gmail.comWed, 26 Apr 2017 14:07:45 UTCEinstein's Idiocies: Time Travel into the Future
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/o-5-g9HLWDQ/xcKxyWWPAwAJ
Wikipedia: "The theory of relativity states that the speed of light is invariant for all observers in any frame of reference; that is, it is always the same. Time dilation is a direct consequence of the invariance of the speed of light. Time dilation may be regarded in a limited sense as "timehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/o-5-g9HLWDQ
Pentcho ValevWed, 26 Apr 2017 11:46:30 UTCJealousy - the most stinky cologne.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BXxCcEhA-m0/V5PraT-CAwAJ
It's called jealousy and it's the most stinky cologne. People will read about others' disasters rather than their successes. They will lean to the most pervert, the most hateful, the most corrupt, the most sensational ... because they are rotten to the core and failures themselves. There are thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BXxCcEhA-m0
John GabrielWed, 26 Apr 2017 07:45:31 UTCWORLD's FIRST LOGICAL POEM, at the moment a dirge, but how to transform into a beautiful sonnet, or is logic and poetry a contradictory mix
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xm6qunwA_-k/S8P0uTZ7AwAJ
Making the world's First Logical Poem--Re: St. Martin's Press-- George Witte, Sally Richardson, Thomas Dunne, Jennifer Enderlin Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: science stupidity of Eric Francis, George Witte, St.Martin's Press, Sallyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xm6qunwA_-k
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 26 Apr 2017 05:36:37 UTCThere were never any axioms or postulates in Ancient Greek mathematics.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WuCztJj-OHs/R599Opx4AwAJ
There were never any axioms or postulates in Ancient Greek mathematics: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLRjVxZERCa2R5Tlk Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity fromhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WuCztJj-OHs
John GabrielWed, 26 Apr 2017 04:48:55 UTCA number - the measure of a magnitude.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kfOj7TCGoro/LbD6eol4AwAJ
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-we-got-numbers-john-gabriel-1 Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kfOj7TCGoro
John GabrielWed, 26 Apr 2017 04:47:34 UTC