https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsJames Redford2015-04-17T23:16:33Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZFSW1LLkQeETheotech: God Is the Ultimate TechnologyA *god* (minuscule G) is an immortal sapient being who is still finite at any given time. Whereas *God* (majuscule G) is the infinite sapient being. As physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler noted, "Any cosmology with unlimited progress will end in God." (See Anthony Liversidge, intmeucat2015-04-17T18:59:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/k6iVyNpHrooWhen Benford´s Law doesn´t applyWhen Benford´s Law doesn´t apply Suppose I pick some book and open it at random. What the probability for first digit page being 1 ? Related problem: walking on street with blinded eyes, what the probability opening eyes and see first digit of random house being 1? I didn´t find response to tDick2015-04-17T17:11:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sl1t3fshVagSkolem's Paradox and UncountabilitySkolem's Paradox is a well established theorem or Mathematical Logic. It appears to state that a countable set can contain an uncountable subset. Since this seems contrary to common sense it is called a paradox. However, it is generally agreed that there is nothing paradoxical about it. I suggesED CONRAD2015-04-17T15:05:57Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z9heHOFuasYGREATEST CONSPIRACY IN THE HISTORY OF HISTORYhttp://sci.skeptic.narkive.com/LRgL0U1s/smithsonian-avoiding-truth-like-the-plagueGuy Barry2015-04-17T06:34:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0BBeS-wZtOYA function and its inverseThe following is a textbook question for an 18-year-old student. Define f(x) = 2x^2 - 3 {x real, x < 0} (a) Find f^-1(x) stating its domain (b) Find the value(s) of a for which f(a) = f^-1(a) (a) is straightforward; the answer is given as f^-1(x) = -sqrt((x+3)/2) {x real, x > -3} The answeArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-17T06:28:53Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/waplOjDBZboArclength in True Calculus; quarter circle & quarter ellipse #139 Correcting Math 4th ed; (58) Uni-text 9thArclength of quarter circle and how easy it is done in New Math. So now, let us do the arclength of the quarter circle, the quarter of the unit circle as Strang has done on page 322 of Strang Calculus, 1991. The function for unit quarter circle is y = sqrt(1-x^2), and here I cannot use the Intmeucat2015-04-17T03:39:17Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6a9-CSVg2XsSeeking info about recursive serie S(n) = S(n-1) + 1/S(n-1)Hello People, I could n´t find any reference to this recurrence series S(n) = S(n-1) + 1/S(n-1) or Sn = Sn-1 + 1/Sn-1 S(0) = 1 S(1) = 1 + 1/1 = 2 S(2) = 2 + 1/2 = 2.5 S(3) = 2.5 + 1/2.5 = 2.9 ... I got to prove this series diverges but was unable to find a function to represent it F(nJames Redford2015-04-16T19:14:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ue7ghfB1W8sQuantum Nonlocality Does Not ExistFor the journal paper with this post's eponymous title, see: Frank J. Tipler, "Quantum nonlocality does not exist", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 111, No. 31 (Aug. 5, 2014), pp. 11281-11286, doi:10.1073/pnas.1324238111, http://www.pnas.orThe Starmaker2015-04-16T17:31:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B5ZA2i5Ve-Ealien race that might want to eat us"I find the concept of humanity being alone in the universe to be much more frightening than the concept of finding an alien race that might want to eat us or import us for display in galactic zoos." http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/search-of-100000-galaxies-finds-no-sign-of-advanced-civilizations/Dr. Jai Maharaj2015-04-16T17:19:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Gu76Ma7W1bcThe Math Question That Went ViralThe Math Question That Went Viral April 14, 2015 [...] Albert and Bernard just became friends with Cheryl, and they want to know when her birthday is. Cheryl marks 10 possible dates: May 15, May 16, May 19, June 17, June 18, July 14, July 16, August 14, August 15, or August 17. Then CheryPaul Arrington2015-04-16T16:31:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_BCTPha4kzQWhat is the significance of dot and cross product of vectors?I've just been taught the dot and cross products of vectors. a . b = |a| x |b| x cos(θ) a x b = |a| x |b| x sin(θ) x n The geometric explanations were given, and I see how the above formulae work for that -- so that the dot product is the "projection" of one vector in the direction of the othED CONRAD2015-04-16T15:40:33Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XhbpMOHEQFsTHE GREATEST CONSPIRACY IN THE HISTORY OF HISTORYhttp://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/1JqmS26Z/high-time-for-major-news-outlets-to-show-some-gutsWM2015-04-16T09:38:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KFuInrw20AsThree kinds of Binary TreesThere are three kinds of Binary Trees. A) The complete infinite Binary Tree of actual infinity. It contains all paths that always do something, for instance always go right or always give the approximations of 1/3 or 1/pi. But they do not contain the limits 1 or 1/3 or 1/pi, respectively, becauWilliam Elliot2015-04-16T09:26:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JEHQ5pPJDUsCompletely ChainedA (partial) order S is chain complete when for all not empty chains C subset S, sup C in S. A not empty set A is directed when for all x,y in A, some a in A with x,y <= a. S is a directed complete partial order, dcpo when for all directed A subset B, sup A in S. ClearPentcho Valev2015-04-16T07:03:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Auf_Vvb_vGoCONFESSIONS THAT EINSTEIN IS WRONGConfession 1: The speed of light is greater for the observer/receiver than for the light source ("four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses"), in violation of Einstein's relativity: http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler Albert Einstein InstituteArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-16T05:27:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MgULRWlz_xcArclength in True Calculus #138 Correcting Math 4th ed; (57) Uni-text 9thAlright, let us do the arclength and finally the Line-Integral and end the Uni-text. The Line Integral is important for the Maxwell Equations and so the Line Integral is a natural spot to end the undergraduate Uni text. Now I have to warn the reader that in Old Math they had a arclength formulaSam Wormley2015-04-16T03:03:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/SZIXuwFpL2YDangerous Knowledge> Dangerous Knowledge is a documentary presented by David Malone, > looking at four brilliant mathematicians - Georg Cantor, Ludwig > Boltzmann, Kurt Godel and Alan Turing - whose genius has profoundly > affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually > led to them all commitunnav...@gmail.com2015-04-15T23:39:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/79MQbqcdKAsmore of the zeta function (this time with the correct notation)consider a the following function(s), g(s)=z(1-s)/z(s) and g(1-s)=z(s)/z(1-s) (z is the Riemann zeta function) g(s) = 1/g(1-s) also let g be such that (which it is in fact), [ g'(s) = f(s)g(s) and -g'(1-s) = h(1-s)g(1-s) ] now, log(g(s)) = -log(g(1-s)) d/ds[log(g(s))] = -d/ds[lArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-15T22:50:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F9yjhW6ymgIStewart's Line Integral 2x on page 1064 Re: Chat on huge errorsStewart develops a good and true Line Integral theory on page 1063, 5th ed, 2003, by showing a shaded blue curtain over a lower red line curve and a upper red line curve. His theory is good, but on next page and throughout, Stewart falters with a Line Integral that has no upper boundary. His ExaArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-15T20:46:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Pn--VK7rb2YChat: huge mistake in Line Integral by Old Math, Stewart's page 1063,1064In yesterday's post below, I hinted of the huge mistake of Line Integral in Old Math, where on page 1063, Stewart outline the theory showing the area in blue shading bounded by lower bound red line and upper bound red line, however when Stewart gets to his Example 2 by showing Int 2x ds that thesomeone2015-04-15T17:51:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UfZE9PuRKtwDoes anyone on here know how to write a formal mathematical systems?Which features of this system couldn't feature in a formal mathematical system: 1> The entities of the system are objects, primitives, functions, axioms and statements. 2> The five primitives are ontologyValues, truthValues and comparisonValues and comparisonTypes, and operatorTypes 3> DescriED CONRAD2015-04-15T16:25:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/smz3SsIaiCAEVOLUTIONISTS HAVE BEEN GIVING TRUTH A ROYAL SCREWINGhttp://rec.arts.tv.narkive.com/IidpEfzf/hang-your-head-in-shame-cnn-ap-reuters-abc-nbc-cbs-etcSimon Roberts2015-04-15T16:08:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uqahT_3lI0cRewritten for a Third Time...please verifyIntend to show d/dx{z(x)/y(x)}|x=a = 0 if z(a)=y(a)=0 g(x) = z(x)/y(x) (1.) let x=a be zeros of z and y. z(a)=y(a)=0 apply L'Hopital's Rule g(x) = z'(x)/y'(x)|x=a (2.) multiply g(x) by y'(x)/y(x) g(x)y'(x)/y(x)|x=a = z'(x)/y(x)|x=a = z'(x)y(x)/[y(x)]^2|x=a (2.a) subtract the RHS fromSimon Roberts2015-04-15T15:11:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/H8wU6p9Ugg4Proof rewritten and can be applied to the RZF...please verifyIf I went wrong I need help finding where. Intend to show d/dx{z(x)/y(x)}|x=a if x(a)=y(a)=0 g(x) = z(x)/y(x) (1.) let x=a zeros of z and y. z(a)=y(a)=0 g(a) = z(a)/y(a) (1.a) apply L'Hopital's Rule g(a) = z'(a)/y'(a) (2.) multiply g(a) by y'(a)/y(a) g(a)y'(a)/y(a) = z'(x)/y(a) = z'Archimedes Plutonium2015-04-15T06:36:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/J5DjulPY6ocChat: Line Integral theory; a total overhaul and rewriting of the theoryAlright, I come to this with a huge errors of Old Math. I was hoping to just increase the ease of doing Line Integrals. I find out that the entire Old Math program and theory on Line Integrals is as rotten as Denmark in Hamlet. There are two major faults that Old Math had with Line Integral: (WM2015-04-15T05:48:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/L9331GjCMNgThe arbitrariness of matheological arguingI asked where the Cauchy-limit of the sequence of digits is applied in the diagonal argument. An anonymous matheologian answered: "It's the final step in constructing a number that isn't on the list." Cantor however applied the original diagonal argument to WM-sequences which have no limit (Cannob...@mailinator.com2015-04-15T05:05:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/hD4DJ5qM7AYHow many answers does this question has?------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- This email was sent via Anonymous email service for free. YOU CAN REMOVE THIS TEXT MESSAGE BY BEING A PAID MEMBER FOR $10/year. <http://bit.ly/k37rpz> CLICK HERE => <http://bit.ly/k37rpz>John Gabriel2015-04-15T04:32:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tam8st7kMdIdullrich, Freda and the tangent...So Freda idiot writes: >Let x=k >And multiply both sides by x then x^2 = kx The baboon is fine up to this step, but she doesn't realise that if x=0, then she has 0 = 0. So the moron effectively made her equation useless. >And if we subtract k^2 from both sides then x^2 - k^2 = kx - k^2 >Biull O'Brien2015-04-14T20:33:21Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/q75k8Bp3fO4ED CONRAD MAY SELL HIS COAL-AGE HUMAN BODY PARTS ON EBAYhttp://sci.astro.narkive.com/g3DG3tnp/petrified-human-brain-might-be-sold-on-ebaySimon Roberts2015-04-14T08:50:46Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/AfT-rI8nUggI need help...concerning a derivation as it pertains to the Riemann Zeta Functiong(x) =: z(x)/z(1-x) (1.) (=:defined as) The following shows g'(x) = 0 when x and 1-x are zeros of z but z is the Riemann Zeta Function and my results don't mesh with the facts. This has been dug up from 2011 and was disregarded by me. If it is wrong can you please tell me where? let x and 1-Archimedes Plutonium2015-04-14T07:57:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/243Ib4fD038Chat: simplifying & reducing the Line Integral to be a Definite Integral is showing elusiveAlright to complete the Uni-text of True Calculus, I need to end with the Line Integral, but that is appearing more difficult than expected. There are few examples, none of them good, for the Line Integral. I reckon this is because the Arclength Formula is false in general and that causes only aSimon Roberts2015-04-14T06:38:19Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PXUwMUTGQ9Amore of the zeta functionThe following can be generalized but here it pertains to the zeta function. You will it checks out (it is probably already well known): Z is the zeta function and Z(s)/Z(1-s) = g(1-s) and Z(1-s)/Z(s) = g(s) also let g be such that, [ g'(s) = f(s)g(s) and g'(1-s) = h(1-s)g(1-s) (Archimedes Plutonium2015-04-14T06:07:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ph4IEDCbtFgChat: Old Math way of doing arclength for y=x^2 in interval 0 to 1 compared to New MathOld Math way of doing arclength for y=x^2 in interval 0 to 1 --- quoting from website --- https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100228141422AAly2DJ Please help!!! arc length of y=x^2 from 0 to 1? i have L= integral from 0 to 1 of sqrt(1 + (2x)^2) whats next? Best Answer: You are doThe Starmaker2015-04-14T03:00:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-p6kYXbghDgi'm going to tell you another secret....“When you sit with a nice girl for two hours you think it’s only a minute, but when you sit on a hot stove for a minute you think it’s two hours. That’s relativity.”--aeArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-14T02:51:47Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IL4gYfRICC4Mueck the Puke Comics, sci.mathWolfgang Mueckenheim, an incurable crank in sci.math. muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de Dog Reporter for 333News: So, Mueck the Puke, you spent 10 years and 17,000 posts to sci.math complaining about infinity. Complain, complain, complain. Will you now set out to solve your complaint of infinity, or agyans...@gmail.com2015-04-13T23:25:07Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rwNiN4PfvLgElement by element division of vectorsWhat is the symbol used?? I know the multiply one - circle with a dot in middle.Archimedes Plutonium2015-04-13T19:55:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cta0pbPRczUChat: can we prove the Arclength Formula is not true in general from the Fundamental TheoremNow I believe we can prove that the Arclength Formula, although useful for a small class of functions is a fakery "in general". As I have indicated in the quarter circle versus quarter ellipse, that the formula breaks down, and why it breaks down is because it is only useful when a function is soWM2015-04-13T18:06:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/At3sMNJ9THkVirgil: But WM's binary trees are not reals complete.On Monday, 13 April 2015 16:18:08 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: I said (when counterfactually assuming actual infinity): "A rationals-complete binary list contains 0.010101... and every binary sequence. The Binary Tree is rationals-complete. This is wrong. The Binary Tree is not rationals-complete. ALee Philip2015-04-13T14:38:47Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gQamNw6Qrwcexplain limit computing resultcannot render formula here, so I posted my question here http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1232713/explain-limit-computing-resultDan Christensen2015-04-13T14:23:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oaCP800cDQAIs our "John Gabriel" an impostor?Think about it. No one can be that stupid. This troll can only be out to defame the real John Gabriel, whoever he may be. No one who cared at all about his reputation would post the following stupidities at this very public forum: "Hitler was a genius and a very talented artist... As from a moModerator2015-04-13T13:30:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/McKKU-v2ol4NOT EVERYONE GIVING TRUTH A GOOD SCREWINGhttp://sci.physics.relativity.narkive.com/r4XNezGX/ed-conrad-gets-a-compliment-every-now-and-then ====== BUT THESE SLEAZEBALLS CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN (Shown here hiding their head in shame) http://www.edconrad.com/pics/TightFit.jpg American Anthropological Association American AssociationArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-13T09:40:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aRfCA0MGYZAArclength of quarter-ellipse and how so easy it is done in New MathAlright, let us do the arclength for quarter ellipse as Strang Calculus 1991, page 322 talks about. Ellipse is y^2 +2x^2 = 2 which rewritten as a function would be y = sqrt(2-2x^2) First we plot the function graph y = sqrt(2-2x^2) using 10 Grid and borrowing up to 1000 Grid: x=0, then y=sqrArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-13T09:37:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pRdnm_fpDkUNew Math doing Arclength far easier than the fakery of the Arclength Formula of Old MathNow the below method to figure out the arclength of quarter-circle is a template to use in figuring out all other arclengths. Sort of like a Spreadsheet on IBM computer and every new function just alters the numbers a bit. So now, let us do the arclength of the quarter circle, the quarter of thjonas.t...@gmail.com2015-04-13T09:11:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FBMCgUhSCToModular arithmetic, bases, digitplaces, place values, operations and Stein's GCD.If we are in base 65535, then following number. 65535,65535,65535 equals 65535^3+65535^2+65535^1 , which in a true base 65535 of course only 3 digits. It decimal it uses 15 digitplaces, if we ignore the place value separators. In binary it uses 48 digitplaces. There is a reason people do notPentcho Valev2015-04-13T08:57:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xPV-UeIzhV8EINSTEIN AND THE END OF PHYSICShttp://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein (1954): "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including thArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-13T07:47:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dv_VznLKy5IDan asks? Re: Univ Michigan math professors: invite Kepler Packing Proof by AP to arxivwrote: > > Now I have two issues going on with arclength. First, in Old Math the Arclength Formula is a fakery... > > This from is a. . . (snipped the demonizing) Canada appears to have two Dan Christensen, both trying to do math, yet one is a professor at Univ Western Ontario and this stalkeJohn Gabriel2015-04-13T05:56:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VOy6VF3yznQMythmaticians getting it consistently wrong for thousands of years - a line does NOT consist of points.By definition, a line is the distance between two points (Bk I, Def. 2 Elements). Book I, Def. 4 states: Ευθεια γραμμη εστιν, ητις εξ ισου τοις εφ εαθτης σημειοις κειται. This was incorrectly translated by Thomas Heath as: "A straight line is a line which lies evenly with the points on itseJohn Smith2015-04-13T04:14:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ho11lYfUgZITangentProve that no tangent line to y = x^2 - 4x passes through the point (2, 1) It's obvious that the curve passes through (0,0) and (4,0) and the slope is 2x - 4 so the minimum is at (2, -4) so the curve obviously never goes near (2, 1) By drawing the graph it's also obvious that no tangent couldMathman2015-04-13T01:11:58Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Qsqo6nUGGiIHausdorff, regular, and normal spacesShow that if product X_a is Hausdorff, regular, or normal then so is X_a. So let x,y in prod(X_a) then since it is Hausdorff we know there is open disjoint U,V in prod(X_a) such that x in U and y in V. But how do I go from (possibly) infinite product space to the X_a? Projection function maybArchimedes Plutonium2015-04-12T19:58:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ruq3_SwmgxQChat: in New Math the arclength is almost as easy as graphing a functionNow I have two issues going on with arclength. First, in Old Math the Arclength Formula is a fakery, the formula that says something along the lines that length equals the integral of square root of 1 add derivative squared, for it is not true in general and true for only a few types of function