https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-29T06:32:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7hZM7u4Wlu4Using Conservation Proof Principle of Math to prove 1 is the only Odd Perfect NumberLet me spend a whole entire thread, ironing out the proof of 1 is the only Odd Perfect Number in the Math Array of the Conservation Principle. The below is a tiny slice of the math array and the symbols such as S signify statements. We focus on four statements below, and especially the 1 is theF. Russell2017-05-29T05:00:07Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zLRy7GqemxkQuestion on sin(x)/x and its power seriesThe function sin(x)/x, and similar functions, are always said to be undefined at x = 0. But the power series for sin(x)/x: 2 4 x x 1 - -- + --- + . . . 6 120 is NOT undefined at x = 0. In fact the value of the power series at x = 0 isJohn Gabriel2017-05-29T02:31:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lDtgrWeDXJAIt is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333... (5/28/2017)S = Lim S in this case, contradicts the fact that 1/3 has no representation in base 10. However, it also leads to even more absurd definitions, that is, pi=3.14159... when in fact it is known that pi has NO measure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hulvl3GgGk https://www.youtube.com/watch?John Gabriel2017-05-29T01:36:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xRWGGpWmSqoA proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. 5/28/2017The End of the Discussion: A proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. I am confident now that the proof is complete. Of course there is no better place to test proofs than among idiots here on sci.math - they don't get dumber. Intelligent people think but ducks go quack,John Gabriel2017-05-29T01:35:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dzmvI6ISM10What the BIG STUPID is desperately trying to hide from you! 5/28/2017My article on "How we got calculus" is very different to anything you have ever seen or read. No one has ever understood calculus as well as I do. In this article, I show you how Newton got his ideas. I also describe the discovery of the Taylor Series from Newton's interpolation polynomial allJohn Gabriel2017-05-29T01:34:30Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Vts6ARVY9WQThere are no axioms or postulates in Greek mathematics. (5/28/2017)https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-1-axioms-postulates-mathematics-john-gabriel https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-2-axioms-postulates-mathematics-john-gabriel https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-3-axioms-postulates-mathematics-john-gabriel https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-4-axioms-postulHerb2017-05-29T01:09:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YT5yx2FQ8KkProbability density function QuestionHi, If X be a random variable that follows a normal distribution N(m,s^2) , Then {X-m}/s follows a standard normal distribution N(0,1) ________________________________________________________________________ I understand E {{X-m}/s} = 0, V{{X-m}/s} = 1 But I can't understand why {X-m}/sDavid Bernier2017-05-29T01:08:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EgJ2OrUoQ08Ch. Haros, inventor of Farey SeriesSome of what is known about his biography is at: < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Haros > . I was always curious about the Ch. : Googling Jacques Ozanam, Ch Haros, Jacques Audierne we find an improved and updated edition of Ozanam's surveying book, printed around 1803, by Ch HarosPentcho Valev2017-05-28T22:36:03Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dIW7ogK7tfAExperimental Refutation of Einstein's Constant Speed of LightExperiments and observations have unequivocally shown that both subluminal motion of light in a vacuum and superluminal motion are possible but the scientific community cannot react properly because Einsteinians paralyze it by bombarding it with contradictory and confusing explanations, oftendiscou...@gmail.com2017-05-28T18:35:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OKDfUI9brQ4Latest Stock for Instructor manual, Solutions Manual and Test Bank at cheap price, discount Price, contact us only at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)comHello Students, You can now get solution manuals and test banks at very Charming Discount and Cheap Price, just for students. Solutions manual and test bank will be yours quickly. CONTACT US AT: discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com visit our blog for latest stock list http://discountsmtSteveGG2017-05-28T13:07:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/V_ffsGvm1QwChaos vs. DeterminismThere is only one unique future. Wait around and see ! Logic dictates that if you set everything back exactly as it was an hour ago, then the hour will repeat exactly. No ? So nothing is trully random. Yes, even thought processes ! There goes guilt, innocence, true, false, etc. Nothing left toArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-28T10:57:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Y5EArj1n860infinitude primes and no odd perfect proofs//Conservation of Proof Principle in Mathematics;; what it is and how it worksAlright, the best two proofs other than Pythagorean Theorem to demonstrate on the Conservation Principle is the infinitude of primes proof and the no odd perfect proof. There statements are but a sentence. The proof should be a sentence long also. After we cut out the fat and larder of proofs,William Elliot2017-05-28T10:08:26Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yhwz7hRt59Ysqr(1 - x)Are these correct? 1 + sum(n=0,oo) 1*3*5*..*(2n - 1)(-x/2)^n /n! = 1 - x/2 + 3x^2/8 - 5x^3/16 + ... uniformly converges to sqr(1 - x) for all x in [-1,1]. 1*3*5..*(2n - 1) = (2n - 1)! / 2^(n-1)*(n - 1)! for all n in N.Pentcho Valev2017-05-28T08:45:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tT1pjrx6ovYCompatibility of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity: Impossible A Priori"Professor Hermann Nicolai, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), has received one of the prestigious Advanced Grants of the European Research Council (ERC). The ERC is funding Prof. Nicolai's research on a unified theory of quantum gravityJack Campin2017-05-28T00:09:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rugiisFnOGQthis is depressingIn the current batch of messages I got in, discounting the ones I've killfiled, there is ONE with real content (David Bernier's graph theory question, which I can at least understand and see the point of despite having no idea how to answer it). Everyone else is just feeding the egos of a bunchMarkus Klyver2017-05-28T09:12:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zd2HS8FZv3UChapter 12 of Correcting Math 5th ed Re: Conservation of Proof Principle in Mathematics; what it is and how it is usedSo "if the proof is longer than the theorem, then the theorem is false"? Lol.Archimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T22:26:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kJKDHgKGQFg3Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; where I unify all these type of FLT formulaNewsgroups: sci.math Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: standard format so we can compare these formula Re: 2Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 08:58:17 +0000 standard format so weArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T21:17:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ilb5XJHbXsgI proved the theorem and calling it-- AP Condensed-Rectangle FLT// moneygrubs like Beal should not have free advertising in mathI proved Beal Conjecture in 2014, this is now 2017 and still no telephone ring to congratulate my success on Beal proof. Hence forth, let math never again be victim to these amateurs like Beal who offer money, but instead receive huge world wide free advertisement. They are canny money grubsgenm...@gmail.com2017-05-27T20:37:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5O7UQJpe9psEuler did say that S = Lim S 5-27-2017S = 1 - a + aa - aaa + aaaa - ... => S = 1 - a + a^2 - a^3 + ... (-a)^n + ... Lim S = Lim {n \to \infty} (1+a^n)/(1+a) = 1/(1+a) Now Euler says these are equal. So S = 1 - a + a^2 - a^3 + ... (-a)^n + ... = Lim S = 1/(1+a) High school math. There are still morons who don't know thatDan Christensen2017-05-27T19:17:53Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ou-W-NzFf4JG's Euler myth is BUSTED!Here is a photo of Euler's original text in question. http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fs1/object/display/bsb10081749_00151.html?rotate=0&zoom=0.6000000000000001 Contrary to JG's insane lies, and as readers can see for themselves, there is no "S = Lim S". That myth is BUSTED! DanJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T18:31:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A8eLZcQIVMUNot even the gods can measure the incommensurable magnitudes such as pi or sqrt(2).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYCKd-dQWic Neither pi nor sqrt(2) are described by any number. Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity fromPentcho Valev2017-05-27T14:16:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G6Ykonax-ZMEinstein's Schizophrenic World: Bacchanalians in Utter DespairNeil Turok: "It's the ultimate catastrophe: that theoretical physics has led to this crazy situation where the physicists are utterly confused and seem not to have any predictions at all." http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/09/05/perimeter-institute-and-the-crisis-in-modern-physics/ Peter Woit: "ItDan Christensen2017-05-27T16:26:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QnpsK8-e_a0Re: Getting money-grub hucksters with their free advertisements and never any payout-- out of math// Bealring to congratulate my success on Beal proof. > Sorry to say, but you just may have to publish under a different name. Who hasn't heard about you by now? Try "John Gabriel." (Hee, hee!) DanArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T06:22:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/V6XpmH_IXxA2Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; what is the difference between Pythagorean and Legendre Three-Square theoremsGeneralizing FLT beyond Beal. And Beal is rather an oddball, a sort of sideroad attraction of not much math overall importance, for keep in mind the Beal conjecture comes from the mind of a amateur of math. Out more to make a spashly name for himself with a money grub reward rather thanJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T02:56:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IMtEDaa7J1IA song by Jew wannabee academics and their lackeys...https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLeW4zd3dzYmZsdUk Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)John Gabriel2017-05-27T02:55:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZE-LhWTiT7QWhat the BIG STUPID is desperately trying to hide from you! 5/26/2017My article on "How we got calculus" is very different to anything you have ever seen or read. No one has ever understood calculus as well as I do. In this article, I show you how Newton got his ideas. I also describe the discovery of the Taylor Series from Newton's interpolation polynomial allJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T02:54:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QM0bDZYau9wA proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. 5/26/2017The End of the Discussion: A proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. I am confident now that the proof is complete. Of course there is no better place to test proofs than among idiots here on sci.math - they don't get dumber. Intelligent people think but ducks go quack,Archimedes Plutonium2017-05-26T22:21:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ufeo6T3J3CQsilly Old Math has .999... = 1, while New Math has .999... is always a tiny bit smaller than 1//proof includedIn New Math, we define Infinity precisely with a borderline, so the stupid argument that .9999... is somehow equal to 1 never passes the test. When you have a border between finite and infinite, you cannot screw the mind in thinking .9999.... somehow, magically turns into 1. NEW MATH uncoversArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-26T22:07:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/M_pj_4mf6YEGeneralizing FLT beyond Beal-- the AP-FLT Conjecture-- give me any two Naturals then a^x+b^y+c^z + d^u = 0Alright, below is a start to a Generalizing FLT beyond Beal-- the AP-FLT Conjecture-- give me any two Naturals then a^x+b^y+c^z + d^u = 0 Where x,y,z,u are greater than 1. The basic idea is that give me two Naturals, and I have to find four Naturals with the two included of a a,b,c,d. NowDan Christensen2017-05-26T21:58:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QuraWXuX-F8Archie's "New Math" blows up with .999... always being a tiny bit smaller than 1stupid argument that .9999... is somehow equal to 1 never passes the test.... Have you considered that it may be your silly "infinity borderline" theory that is failing the test, Archie? Any workable system of mathematics must have 0.999... = 1. Otherwise it will simply gather dust on the shelfJohn Gabriel2017-05-26T18:04:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Cebg8m7sJaMYes, Euler did say S = Lim S.There are still morons who don't know that Euler claimed S = Lim S. The proof is here: 298. Daher ist unser Bruch 1/(1+a) gleich dieser unendlichen Reihe: 1 - a + aa - aaa + aaaa - ... Hence the fraction 1 / (1 + a) {Lim S} is equal to this infinite series: 1 - a + aa - aaa + aaaa - ...William Elliot2017-05-26T07:59:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mAWACo24dUMsqr(1 - x^2)What polynomial series uniformly converges to sqr(1 - x^2)?Peter Percival2017-05-26T11:55:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uJb31WmUXOsRe: .4545454545... = 5 proven by Burse, Christensen, Gabriel, and Jr.proved without a shadow of advice: > >> 0.999... = 1 > > Multiply by 5 > > 0.45454545... = 5 0.999... x 5 = 4.999... >> At first, sum of n terms of asymmetric series >> >> PVC = A * x^(-1) + A * x^(-2) + A * x^(-3) + A * x^(-4) + ... + A * x^(-n) >> >> pv = A * [ x^(-1) + x^(-2) +James Buster Douglas Jr.2017-05-26T04:15:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lKxStM__Ays0.999... = 10.999... = 1 At first, sum of n terms of geometric series pv = A * x^(-1) + A * x^(-2) + A * x^(-3) + A * x^(-4) + ... + A * x^(-n) pv = A * [ x^(-1) + x^(-2) + x^(-3) + x^(-4) + ... + x^(-n) ] pv = A * [ 1 - x^(-n) ] / [ x - 1 ] When n -> 00 pv = A * [ x^(-1) + x^(-2) + x^(-3) +John Gabriel2017-05-26T00:23:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/j6IWkRbx8twA song by wannabee Jew academics and their lackeys!https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLeW4zd3dzYmZsdUk Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)burs...@gmail.com2017-05-26T12:32:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BYnOZmHLZNEArchimedes Plutonion has Problems with Space TimeVery easy to move into higher dimensions... except if you dont pass the time space section of standard IQ test. Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2017 14:29:44 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com: > I guess you mean the volume, and not the solid itself? > > Here are some algebraic forms: > Circle Solid:Harold Johanssen2017-05-25T19:20:48Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gOGr5GhsomwSum_n = 0^Inf n = -1/12Are there rigorous proofs of the result (apparently so dear to string theorists) Sum_n = 0^Inf n = -1/12 I have seen Youtube videos where the result is derived on the basis of tricks on alternating series, but they do not seem to be very rigorous.bassam king karzeddin2017-05-25T18:20:06Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Vdv_R5p9Fh8What is (e/pi) in modern mathematics? wonder!Big Hint: remove both decimals notations from (e & pi) to estimate (e/pi) to avoid any confusions Have more fun with the new resultant number for sure Regards Bassam King Karzeddin May 25, 2017Salvatore Fazia2017-05-25T15:20:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IhzifYUxpcESeriesHello, I'm curious to know how to define this series: 1/(10-1)+1/(10^2-1)+1/(10^3-1)+ ... +1/(10^n-1) +... It is neither an arithmetic nor a geometric series. What is it? ThanksArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-25T06:20:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_X7JuxXXPvcI found the flaw of Wiles's FLT, his modularity argumentDigging into this subject, is daunting because it is so remote of mathematics, and so much into detailed weeds-- in the weeds as we would say. I found the flaw and had to know what is meant by Modular and NonModular. That is key. For the first time in math history, we are pelted by so calledArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-25T04:50:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/q1sOYfofZJs#1 De-Wiles conversation on NOBA tv over Fermat's Last Theoremon TV with Franz interview of de-Wiles ..... ..... Caution some flash photography ..... ...... Franz;; now I understand the equation you are working with is the cubic curve y^2 = x(x-a^n)(x+b^n) and that if a^n +b^n = c^n had a solution, would be impossible since theyrami182017-05-25T00:57:58Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ksTRCPjKNv0A more correct view of moralityHello................ A more correct view of morality: Please read my following reasoning carefully.. Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, butrami182017-05-25T00:49:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-8rN7YGU5yUImmigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..Hello............... Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI).. I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning... So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is not an exact calculation thatJohn Gabriel2017-05-24T23:46:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ykb6nRfow34Quotes about the Ancient Greeks by many ...At least 86% of my DNA is Greek. The only undesirable DNA I possess, comes from my dead father's side of the family. Had Descartes not done what I did again in the previous century, you wouldn't have had calculus in the way you do today. In fact, the only way to realise true knowledge isArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-24T22:14:19Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_5Xv4cN3TccHow dependent was Wiles FLT on Euler's so called proof for exp3??wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 9:09:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > Alright, reading the proof given by Fermat for exp4, and he basically makes use of the idea that a area of a right triangle of integer sides cannot be a perfect square. > > > > > > Euler, on the otherrami182017-05-24T21:36:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XMDt_iZT7RIAbout compassion and respectHello......... About compassion and respect An inferior mind will say that compassion and respect are in accordance with the guidance of morality that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and it's in accordance with a priori pure moral, but this is not sufficient, you have to applyrami182017-05-24T20:54:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrgWhat is also the difference between animals and humans ?Hello................ What is also the difference between animals and humans ? The back-bones of civilization is morality Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than animals and it's being morePentcho Valev2017-05-24T17:00:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiEHow Einsteinians Win GrantsMark Srednicki and Joseph Polchinski were given a $1.32 million dollar grant to say whether Einstein was wrong: http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2013/013823/questioning-einstein "Could Einstein's theory of relativity be wrong? That's among the burning questions being asked by theoretical physicistsJohn Gabriel2017-05-24T16:49:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSITobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells.Tobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells. Russell's logic: "Like Gottlob Frege, Russellâ€™s basic idea for defending (modern orangutan) logic was that numbers may be identified with classes of classes and that number-theoretic statements may be explained in terms ofgraham...@gmail.com2017-05-24T13:01:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOahssk5YCsI CANT SLEEP!! ...LITERALLY! ....... I fall asleep and wake up 5mins later to massive Tooth Ache!!i cant go 10 meters from my freezer without a bottle of cold water its 11pm...... i have to eat Ice Cream non stop or I will collapse!