https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsPentcho Valev2015-10-04T10:30:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nF9_nmLHtokNATHALIE DERUELLE CONTRE THIBAULT DAMOURhttp://www-cosmosaf.iap.fr/RELATIVIT%C3%89%20par%20DAMOUR%20Thibault.htm Thibault Damour: "Considérons deux observateurs, chacun instantanément au repos par rapport à la Terre, l'un à la surface de la Terre, l'autre à l'altitude h. Une onde lumineuse est émise vers le haut et sa fréquence estWM2015-10-04T10:11:29Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3UOD546P2rkTwo similar conclusions with dissimilar resultsFor a Cantor-list we find: For all n in |N: Row number n does not contain the anti-diagonal. ==> The set of all rows does not contain the antidiagonal. For the triangular matrix 1 11 111 ... we get For all n in |N: Row number n does not cover aleph_0 columns. ==> The set of all rowsPentcho Valev2015-10-04T07:57:12Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/iJcZqnlTZBIFRAUDULENT TESTS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITYhttp://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.130001 Clifford Will in Physical Review Letters: "Einstein and his general theory became celebrities in November 1919, when newspapers worldwide proclaimed "Einstein's theory triumphs." The occasion was the report by BritishJohn Gabriel2015-10-04T04:40:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rH9IAqxGRxs0.9999... is not equal to -1 in this universe or any other.It's not equal to 1 or anything else. :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWUHgoUJFGMArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T23:25:55Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pIXjDW0PGzwCornell Univ math professors: invite Infinity Borderline Proofs by AP to arxivBORDERLINE BETWEEN FINITE AND INFINITE proofs The part-Algebra proof relies on the idea that a Galois Field requires closure to multiplication-- any two numbers in the Field produce another number in the Field. The Geometry proof relies on an old theorem of Huygens about tractrix area. AArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T22:57:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yclApnkOhx4Revised Definition Function & do we need a Fundamental Theorem of FunctionAlright, I have an opportunity to save the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but it requires a wholescale revision of the definition of function, and this topic has prompted me to review all the Fundamental Theorems of mathematics. Now that is likely to be a huge pile of illogical mess, where inJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T19:07:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/t-LPurEcPaoThe idiot frog that was - Henri Lebug (lebesgue)http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-1343.html#post48398John Gabriel2015-10-03T19:06:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ifnD8XSLg0YEuler Ooachbar!!!!number = Lim (sequence) In the case of 1/4, the limit is the sum. (RULE 1) In the case of 1/3, the limit is not the sum. (RULE 2) However, in the case of pi and sqrt(2), no one has a clue what the fuck the limit is, except that it's some symbol or its partial sums can be approximated by someJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T19:05:21Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3awItp8-BeEDon't miss the videos exposing the BIG STUPID - academic ignorance and stupidity - 3 PARTS!PART 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKWWZ9kHjH4 PART 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxQ4iZGnZPI PART 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp2qHW48YawJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T19:02:53Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cplhC82RvqAThe New Calculus Channel - where myths are exposed and truth is revealed.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_AJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T19:01:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/t37JAoHLxGcTaylor who? Gabriel's polynomial far superior to Taylor Series.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H00rfrKw3wsJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T19:00:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B7o8aZ36LeQCuntor delusional then and still delusional now.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E4u1RlIp3wJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T18:59:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/2VKU3eqQjm80.999.. not equal to 0 in this galaxy or any other.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWUHgoUJFGMRoss A. Finlayson2015-10-03T16:10:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aeA1_sZZVmEMathematical Argument Comment on sci.mathHi, Is there any argument here? I don't accept any fallacies so I mean specifically the mathematical argument. You can consider that as personal or to you. "All the time in calculus and all of mathematics, I am using _these_ real numbers." If there's not argument I'm happy, for theVirgil2015-10-03T15:41:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0QwmlZdSNXgRe: Cantor's diagonal arguments are VALID EVERYWHERE OUTSIDE OF WM's witless worthless wacky world of WMytheologyIn article <80f16055-c3c5-469f-b173-14dd672d5398@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2015 08:37:19 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil: > > > > > > So there are no rationals left unindexed! > > > > > > Then the result of set theory > > > Lim{n--> oo}Pentcho Valev2015-10-03T12:28:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/g6RKei1AMJ0E. KLEIN NE FÊTE PAS EINSTEINLe grand savant français E. Klein fête la lumière mais ne fête pas Einstein : http://future.arte.tv/fr/avatars-de-lumiere "L'UNESCO a décrété 2015 Année Internationale de la Lumière ! La lumière est une grande source de nouvelles innovations technologiques. Au gré des dix épisodes de notreJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T08:02:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rBEqPqRWgnUThe Auxiliary Equation explained in this YT video.https://youtu.be/4kdRhnY-SNMArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T07:51:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QXIqb_0cylIHow Physics is affected when the light-wave is shaped like inverted UUUUUNow I wish the keyboard had a upside down U so I can make a UUUU for that is what the sine and cosine function graphs look like when you dismiss negative lengths in trigonometry. We usually think of the sine and cosine graph as ^v^v^v in 1st and 4th quadrants. But when we dismiss the sillyArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T07:20:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yWQ8d6zhAog+4Math SURVEY: Tom Apostol, Cal Tech, taking the survey on Calculus+4Math SURVEY: Tom Apostol, Cal Tech, taking the survey on Calculus 1) The Integral is the interior area of a LINE SEGMENT, and all wielded by a limit concept. Is that what you think and teach? 2) The Derivative is a tangent slope to the endpoint of this line-segment-integral. So, how can aArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T07:13:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pWs6rBzisCA+3Math SURVEY: Thomas Hales, Univ Pitts. taking the survey on Calculus+3Math SURVEY: Thomas Hales, Univ Pitts. taking the survey on Calculus 1) The Integral is the interior area of a LINE SEGMENT, and all wielded by a limit concept. Is that what you think and teach? 2) The Derivative is a tangent slope to the endpoint of this line-segment-integral. So, how canArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T07:07:33Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/d8scetxfxXQ+2Math SURVEY: Andrew Wiles, Oxford taking the survey on Calculus+2Math SURVEY: Andrew Wiles, Oxford taking the survey on Calculus 1) The Integral is the interior area of a LINE SEGMENT, and all wielded by a limit concept. Is that what you think and teach? 2) The Derivative is a tangent slope to the endpoint of this line-segment-integral. So, how can aArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T07:05:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wMO4KLqh6Eg+1Math SURVEY: Terence Tao, UCLA taking the survey on calculus+1Math SURVEY: Terence Tao, UCLA taking the survey 1) The Integral is the interior area of a LINE SEGMENT, and all wielded by a limit concept. Is that what you think and teach? 2) The Derivative is a tangent slope to the endpoint of this line-segment-integral. So, how can a tangent exteriorJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T06:33:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Kruz7J4h8qkAcademic turds caught in the fishnet of mythmatics remind me of Jihadists!Euler Oagbar!!!!! Euler Oagbar!!!!! Euler Oagbar!!!!! Euler Oagbar!!!!! https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLOEt0Rm1LRDNXQlk Let's see: number = Lim (sequence) In the case of 1/4, the limit is the sum. (RULE 1) In the case of 1/3, the limit is not the sum. (RULE 2) However, inJohn Gabriel2015-10-03T06:16:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/UINRt7MGjbkThe moron frog that was - Henri Lebug (Lebesgue)http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-1339.html#post48358John Gabriel2015-10-03T05:14:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RT9NoWKZfIgGeorg Cuntor's infinite delusions.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E4u1RlIp3wArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T04:41:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ufl2kjs3WUk-SCI.MATH FAQT LIST of CRANKS; updated weeklySCI.MATH FAQT LIST of CRANKS; updated weekly __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__ unknown The following list is that of currentArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-03T02:02:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Jlbxx_R-jZ8SCI.MATH FAQT LIST of current CRANKS; updated weeklyThe following list is that of current Cranks that you should avoid in sci.math, or if you like amusement, read them only for amusement for they are worthless to science, physics, math. CRANKS of HATRED : What is called Ad Hominem-- attacking people. And this list is of failures of math, yetArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-02T22:29:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tNaYbmbVQcWhat is the integrals of sine and cosine when they are really ^^^^^ and not ^v^vAlright, I seem to have left this topic in some sort of limbo with my y = .64x solving for area on increments of pi/2 and where -- between those increments -- we use sine for cosine and we use cosine for sine to compute the extra area for any given arbitrary x value for area under the graph.Archimedes Plutonium2015-10-02T22:01:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xo0f3BG3btchistoric day for me & physics-- light waves are sine waves shaped like this ^^^^, not this ^v^vhistoric day for me & physics-- light waves are sine waves shaped like this ^^^^, not this ^v^v Now sorry in the title picture for I wish I had a U and upside down U to depict the sine wave, so instead the ^ and v have to do. What I am saying in this post, is that the light wave of physics isArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-02T21:20:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TDoZI909JGgWarning to students and readers about Dan Christensen, sci.math abuserIs Dan insane? Is stalking insanity-- end of story. __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__ unknown Dan seems to have lost sight thatDan Christensen2015-10-02T19:08:17Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VU5PGcq0BMUPlease Ignore the Trolls: John Gabriel, WM, Archimedes Plutonium, Pentcho Valev 10-02There is no moderator here at sci.math. The upside to that is anyone can participate in open-ended, free-wheeling, often lengthy discussions that might be frowned on in other more tightly moderated forums. I myself have found these discussions to be invaluable in my own mathematical developmenJohn Gabriel2015-10-02T09:51:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kcp1tbcQZRIAcademic ignorance and stupidity - PART 3https://youtu.be/rp2qHW48YawPaul2015-10-02T08:51:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/l9TejHwlAAQAnomalous answer to maths puzzleI have been working on a problem from https://www.interviewbit.com/courses/programming/topics/puzzles/problems/puzzle6/ The exact text is copy-pasted below. My answer is "insufficient information". However, I'm suspicious of it, because nothing in the text acknowledges that possibility.Pentcho Valev2015-10-02T06:39:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/43guKRWZt2IWHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANTEinsteinians teach that, for all kinds of waves (light waves included), the wavefronts bunch up (the wavelength decreases) in front of a wave source which starts moving towards the observer: http://www.einstein-online.info/images/spotlights/doppler/doppler_static.gif (stationary source)Archimedes Plutonium2015-10-02T03:23:07Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/teQoBfusf5Ihave to get rid of negative length also (negative area) and sine is ^^^^^ not ^v^v^perhaps the FTC is preserved afterall Re: 2Math SURVEY: Can Jan Bielawski, CA, Alright, I see that I prematurely launched into this Survey of y = .64x. I see that I was only 1/2 way there with my No Negative Area. The half that I missed was No Negative Length. And that would mean changingPentcho Valev2015-10-01T22:21:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZKZMw4d6LdwDEDUCTIVE GENERAL RELATIVITYPostulate 1: If the top of a tower of height h emits light with frequency f (as measured by the emitter), an observer on the ground will measure the frequency to be f'=f(1+gh/c^2) (confirmed by the Pound-Rebka experiment). Postulate 2: There is gravitational time dilation as proposed by EinsteinArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-01T21:27:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cVkaBXjEcqs6Math SURVEY: Can Tom Apostol, Cal Tech. explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC?Math SURVEY: Can Tom Apostol, Cal Tech, explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC? Can Apostol explain it or is his mind far too polluted with Old Math, Limit, negative-area, integral is area inside a line segment, and derivative is theArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-01T21:23:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/hcWC3nycD6Y5Math SURVEY: Can Andrew Wiles, Oxford, explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC?Math SURVEY: Can Andrew Wiles, Oxford, explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC? Can Wiles explain it or is his mind far too polluted with Old Math, Limit, negative-area, integral is area inside a line segment, and derivative is theArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-01T18:25:47Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F200JCtZuZ84Math SURVEY: Can Thomas Hales, Uni.Pitt. explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC?Math SURVEY: Can Thomas Hales, Univ. Pittsburgh explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC? Can Hales explain it or is his mind far too polluted with Old Math, Limit, negative-area, integral is area inside a line segment, and derivative isArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-01T18:09:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EcScQEpPsAg1Math SURVEY: Can Terence Tao, UCLA explain why integral y = (cos(x)) + 1 is y = .64x and not a form of sine function? Violating FTC?Can Tao explain it or is his mind far too polluted with Old Math, Limit, negative-area, integral is area inside a line segment, and derivative is the tangent to the endpoint of this line-segment which bears no information on the dy/dx of the function graph. So, is Terry polluted of fake math, orJohn Gabriel2015-10-01T17:28:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eXM_xy6KvIADon't miss my YT vids on academic ignorance and stupidity. Part 1 and part 2 now available!Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKWWZ9kHjH4 Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxQ4iZGnZPI And plenty more at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_AFredJeffries2015-10-01T15:01:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mEw7tRIcGAINew posthumous publication of work by Ed NelsonInconsistency of Primitive Recursive Arithmetic The aim of this work is to show that contemporary mathematics, including Peano arithmetic, is inconsistent, to construct firm foundations for mathematics, and to begin building on these foundations. With an introduction by Sarah Jones Nelson, anJohn Gabriel2015-10-01T08:49:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dvBjDUDAf20New Calculus for Dummies YT video.https://youtu.be/D1IMsZlqkkAArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-01T08:32:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_ExrCsQo0A8Maxwell theory as axioms over all of math (10) HS-Textbook 9th ed.: TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept Correcting Math 4th ed.Maxwell theory and axioms of math (10) HS-Textbook 9th ed.: TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept Correcting Math 4th ed. Page 10 Alright, these ten pages of this Calculus textbook is designed for the High School student to learn True Calculus, and the second textbook, the Uni-TextboPentcho Valev2015-10-01T08:16:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/izkBbfDdo-wLE MENSONGE ORIGINAL D'EINSTEINhttp://classiques.uqac.ca/collection_sciences_nature/einstein_albert/Electrodynamique/Electrodynamique.pdf Albert Einstein 1905 : "De ceci découlent des conséquences remarquables. Supposons qu'en deux points A et B de K, lorsqu'observées depuis le système stationnaire, se trouvent deux horlogesJohn Gabriel2015-10-01T04:29:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_jvCPmxzElUThe 9-Applet New Calculus course now on YT!The 9 elementary lessons can be covered in less than 2 hours: Lesson 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hinFG-4V3I Lesson 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEjLW50FyL4 Lesson 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8npqjyiJxM Lesson 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUWhbYu5TBsJohn Gabriel2015-10-01T04:23:06Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YQWP4jX31uYEngineers, scientists, software developers and intelligent mathematics educators are learning the New CalculusThe Official New Calculus site: http://johngabrie1.wix.com/newcalculus http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com Visit my New Calculus site in Chinese: http://thenewcalculuscn.weebly.com And also in German: http://hanspeterguettinger.weebly.com Shouldn't you be learning the New Calculus?John Gabriel2015-10-01T04:11:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/8wWdYIIuuwAMy most hated YT video!The proof most mythmaticians hate most because it makes them look more stupid than they actually are: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM06iz7yFmY Pretty close to second place is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWUHgoUJFGM A link to my YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVRoss A. Finlayson2015-09-30T22:17:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/2ZsmvyWzGH4About "Infinity Properads and Infinity Wheeled Properads""Infinity Properads and Infinity Wheeled Properads" Are not these properads also of the box/circle notation (Scott's)? This is also Homotopy Type Theory and Finlayson's Continuous Function.Archimedes Plutonium2015-09-30T22:11:17Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/huPZTfVBsq8Chat: trying to see if a step function can be integrated in New Math, when these do not existNow in New Math, step functions do not exist because they require more equality signs to describe them, than the 1 permissible equality sign. A sine function exists because y = opposite/hypotenuse that describes sine throughout all of x-axis. A step function like this: y=0 when x goes from 0