https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsJohn Gabriel2016-09-29T18:54:26Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Fpwd0rGCFR0Cauchy - another delusional French idiot!Cauchy didn't only have problems with the derivative, but he had no clue what it means to be a number: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6roMXD4w3RYJohn Gabriel2016-09-29T18:53:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/R6XvGTtGIygLearn about the idiot Henri Lebesgue!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 A more clueless fool is hard to come by. Chuckle. For an index of my videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_APentcho Valev2016-09-29T13:11:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-oEp0vnAN9YLe temps newtonien et le temps einsteinienhttp://blogs.futura-sciences.com/barrau/2016/09/28/gravitation-quantique-on/ Aurélien Barrau: "Cela signifie qu'en physique quantique l'espace et le temps sont très différents. Au contraire, en relativité ils sont essentiellement « la même chose » ! C'est un problème." C'est un problèmeWM2016-09-29T06:51:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aY0vyFqb6dILimits depend on representation?The sequence (n) of natural numbers n has an empty limit 1, 2, 3, ... --> { }. I did not write {n} because numbers n are already sets (like everything in ZFC). The sequence of FISONs has limit |N {1}, {1, 2}, {1, 2, 3}, ... --> |N. The natural numbers can be representedJohn Gabriel2016-09-29T00:53:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0OEHTvF6bC4The New Calculus - now an eighth grade version for professors of mythmatics and mainstream "educators".The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +John Gabriel2016-09-28T20:28:12Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gGkhNkwRMr4About the psycho troll DC.I have pleaded with this vicious troll to stay off my comments and threads. But it is not in the nature of a troll to behave normally. I have often had to repost my comments because the troll marks them as abusive. I refuse to engage the troll in debate because it cannot be reasoned with evendanie...@gmail.com2016-09-28T18:15:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nTurQdVgucoPrimes such that 2p+1 is a prime.Hello there! I'm high school student from Slovakia. I'm clueless about this statement, which is obviously true. There is infinitely many primes p_1, such that p_1 = 2*p_2 + 1 and p_2 is also a prime. Is there any way to prove this? Thanks in advance Daniel HermanJohn Gabriel2016-09-28T17:06:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/buleoutD6ssNCTM - National Council of Teacher Morons and John Saxon.This organisation is to blame for the failed system of education in the USA. It is run by imbeciles from the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia), so no wonder. "For those 15 years as a teacher, author, and publisher, Saxon found himself on the defensive against not only government bureaucrats, butJohn Gabriel2016-09-28T15:25:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DC4jPYbQNXsWe need to fix public education, especially in the USA which is just about last in the PISA ratings.There are several private schools in the USA who are claiming to have found a new formula of success. A couple that come to mind are BASIS Independent and Rancho Solano both from Arizona originally. Neither of these schools has a magic formula. They have simply gone back to the tried and testedMr Sawat Layuheem2016-09-28T13:26:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rvjxqw4752oFunny Math For you! From Crazy man likes me! Anything Fee!https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B2VoseH5Sxw3ZS0zY044RmxjUGcJ.B. Wood2016-09-28T11:52:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FGSAGu7N91cCurious PropertyHello, all. A coworker presented the following property (taken from a math puzzles book): 3^2 = 9, 9^2 = 81, 18^2 = 324, 24^2 = 576 A 9-digit number can be constructed from these products containing the integers 1-9 with none repeated. Is this indicative of some number theory relation(s) orJohn Gabriel2016-09-28T02:05:58Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9h02OlQoGEgAn eighth grade lesson in the New Calculus designed for math professors of the BIG STUPID.The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +John Gabriel2016-09-28T02:04:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mS5RtXEqf2YAnders Kaesorg (MIT math graduate) gets confounded in a debate with John Gabriel.Kaesorg and I debated the Cauchy derivative definition here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLNXFJS0t4MEJydTA The limit definition is circular because L = f'(x) and L is used in the definition. You can't verify L is the limit unless you already know it. Circular reasoning at itsJohn Gabriel2016-09-28T02:03:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4jR1_DH1N4wA Harvard Alumnus (Prof. Jackie Huizenga) comments on my New Calculus.9/21/2016 A Harvard alumnus comments! | The New Calculus Just a few weeks ago, some ignoramus posted a question on that ridiculous site Quora. The question was: “What do people think of John Gabriel’s New Calculus, which claims it is the only rigorous formulation of calculus”. Quora is aJohn Gabriel2016-09-28T02:02:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1rGbFury97QProf. Gilbert Strang - a felon and a member of the MIT math department.November 24, 2015 | John Gabriel You would think that a distinguished professor of mathematics (Gilbert Strang from MIT) would behave in an ethical way, wouldn't you? Well, over the period (June 2014-November 2015), Prof. Strang has accused me, John Gabriel, of being a terrorist, defamed andArchimedes Plutonium2016-09-28T01:31:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G14dwKgJLQECorrecting Sine and Cosine as being truly semicircle Waves and the sinusoidal wave was comic fictionOutline of proof that sine and cosine are semicircle waves or semiellipse waves but never a sinusoid wave Alright, this requires a proof that Sinusoid (sine and cosine) figure is a fiction, a pure slab of imagination but never reality. Now here, what I have drawn are 9 points. A BPentcho Valev2016-09-27T22:51:07Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rm71RTbOwUMSadi Carnot Against the Second Law of ThermodynamicsIn 1824 Sadi Carnot deduced the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics from a postulate that eventually turned out to be false: Carnot's (false) postulate: Heat is an indestructible substance (caloric) that cannot be converted into work by the heat engine. Consequence (prototype of thePengKuan Em2016-09-27T22:12:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/LeN5kr3HvxwContinuity and uncountabilityDiscussion about continuity of line, how continuity is related to uncountability and the continuum hypothesis. The real line is made of real numbers which are points. Points are discrete objects, but lines are continuous objects. How does continuity arise out of discreteness when points makeDan Christensen2016-09-27T19:19:12Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XvExE48o1qoAbout John GabrielJohn Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words:John Gabriel2016-09-27T18:51:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_67qTQ2mrfcCalculus was made rigorous? Not a chance.Modern academics are inherently dishonest, ignorant, morally deficient and disgusting vile reptiles (Gilbert Strang of MIT is a fine example). Limit theory is flawed because no valid formulation of "real" number exists. But there are many more reasons as outlined in this video: https://www.youJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T16:42:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xbyhdEkaFUERemembering the crapaxioms of Peano.Peano was a delusional Italian moron. That his absolute rot consisting of 5 "axioms" has been hailed as the foundations of number theory is truly telling of the intelligence possessed by the BIG STUPID (mainstream academia). Don't allow yourself to be fooled by this nonsense. It is a waste ofJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T16:36:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ppv78CwaJKUHow we got numbers. Reprinted from my article on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-we-got-numbers-john-gabriel?trk=seokp_posts_primary_cluster_res_photoIntroduction: I recently posted a comment at the link: Noura asks a question about understanding fractions, but for some unknown reason, Karim Noura chose not to publish my post. So, I'll explain in this article why there are problems understanding fractions and numbers in general. I'll alsoJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T10:53:26Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CyMHU_tpbWgThe dead end that is mythmatics.The jealous bastards of mainstream academia have riled against my new calculus for many years. What follows are proofs that even high school students can understand and yet somehow morons the likes of Strang, Huizenga and Kaesorg simply can't grasp! =============================================John Gabriel2016-09-27T10:51:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0PvUJY2Eg0sThe 13 fallacies of mythmatics (mainstream mathematics) - why you need to understand.What's kind of sad and also kind of funny is how mainstream academics always ask for sources, usually printed or peer reviewed. The greatest mathematicians never had their work reviewed because they had no peers on their level. It is the same with me. In order for my work to be reviewed, myJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T10:47:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vmqnzMYBIUAStudents: Don't get caught and trolled in Cantor's web of delusions.Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#pJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T10:46:17Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QikB55OSEAcThe New Calculus - the first and only rigorous formulation in human history. Now in 8th grader form.The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +John Gabriel2016-09-27T10:44:29Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6IaBydN7Tw8The BIG STUPID gets it wrong just about ALL the time.The New Calculus handles inflection points correctly. Newton's bogus calculus does not. Straight lines do not have derivatives, but the slope of a straight line is called a derivative if and only if that straight line is tangent to another curve. http://thenewcalculus.weebly.comJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T10:43:03Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WJgxdSe95akRedditThe gathering place on the internet for the world's idiots. I have never seen so many worthless comments all in one place anywhere else besides sci.math. Looking at the IP addresses of their visitors reveals the BIG STUPID. No surprise here.Michael Harrington2016-09-27T10:02:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rc8xEr4MOj8Three Dimensional CompositionsLet us say that in two dimensions you can Composition a drive. Quasi indicated that this is a 2^(x-1) type formula Obviously a Composition with a value of 1 is meaningless in this regards. But I am often accused of not being clear so allow me to be clear here. You have y=10 value, it is goingJohn Gabriel2016-09-27T03:47:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kyuoGkdStcMThere is no derivative at a point of inflection because only a half tangent line can be constructed at a point of inflection.The New Calculus handles inflection points correctly. Newton's bogus calculus does not. Straight lines do not have derivatives, but the slope of a straight line is called a derivative if and only if that straight line is tangent to another curve. http://thenewcalculus.weebly.comJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T21:50:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WYAQpl96iW0At last, there is some intelligent life on earth after all.I have now become unstoppable. Not even death can beat me. Watch how another sentient being defends and emulates me: https://www.reddit.com/user/camacs?count=25&after=t1_d7tx65p Chuckle. Good for you Camacs! You are liberated and able to think for yourself.John Gabriel2016-09-26T16:51:28Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/a3-iL25T-8oThe entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra. 9/26/16The entire single variable new calculus using only 8th grade algebra now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM If f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x +John Gabriel2016-09-26T15:19:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/o8jUhBNWJ1kYes, that time of the year is here again with fall classes - beware the spell of Cantor!Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#pJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T15:17:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uCRnY3_QSN0The New Calculus - a version for those mathematics professors who don't know more than eighth grade algebra, and of course for 8th graders too!The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T13:46:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rD2uC5Jx7j4Students: Beware, this is Cantor season in your college courses.Your moron lecturers have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#pPentcho Valev2016-09-26T12:10:47Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/E8XOuUjBv2wEntropy Is Not a State Function (Thermodynamics Is Not Even Wrong)"Entropy is a state function" is a fundamental theorem in thermodynamics. Clausius deduced it from the assumption that any cycle can be disintegrated into small Carnot cycles, and nowadays this deduction remains the only justification of "Entropy is a state function": http://mutuslab.cs.uwindsoSimon Roberts2016-09-26T06:13:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/764jgkKPcHoProof of zeta(s) = 1. Is there an error in this direct proof?General result of proof, E_(m+1)(s) = (1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m +2)^s +...+ 1/(p_(m+1)-1)^s))([p_m]^(s)-1) given, E_m(s) = 1 + 1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m + 2)^s + ... and The Ordered Set of Primes = {p_1, p_2, p_3,...,p_m,...} = {2, 3, 5, ...}. Specific result ofSimon Roberts2016-09-26T03:00:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2wA change of perspective never hurt anyone.I highly recommend, to myself, the MATH "lectures" of John Gabriel.Dan Christensen2016-09-26T02:26:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXgTop 5 Calculus Help Sites -- Certified Crank FreeStudents should beware of the crank calculus sites on offer here at sci.math. If you are looking for help with calculus, may I suggest instead the following calculus help sites, each certified crank-free: http://www.slader.com/subject/math/calculus/homework-help-and-answers/ http://www.freeJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T02:09:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zFZM6K1k0LIIt's that time of year again for our freshman college students.Your moron lecturer have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#poJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T02:06:16Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RA6ioCVcrVUExposing mainstream ignorance and revealing new knowledge.In line with my goal to deCantorise mythmatics so it can once again become mathematics, I shall occasionally compile a very fine video on a concept that mainstream primates have misunderstood. I share another fine video with you on the second most important concept in mathematics - theJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T02:01:28Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PPoo6JBaouYThe Entire single variable new calculus for eighth graders and mythmatics professors now available.The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelJohn Gabriel2016-09-26T00:13:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X7yx0tfoAPMThe Entire single variable new calculus for eighth graders now available for primate mythmatics professors.The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelJohn Gabriel2016-09-25T21:41:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/giscYyyV2ekNew! Single variable new calculus for grade 8 students in just 2 lessons.Download the applet and see how easy it is to teach your grade 8 students the single variable new calculus: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXMArchimedes Plutonium2016-09-25T19:11:06Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zUXGLLkKoCQHow to handle the dufus front page hog John Gabriel and why he is here; how to handle sci.math robotsNow the poster John Gabriel was set up to try to destroy AP, Archimedes Plutonium, first by trying some years back to get AP to click on his stupid websites and once clicked on, fill my computer with virus. The reason for his obnoxious posts and dwelling on Calculus is because AP is changingJohn Gabriel2016-09-25T16:39:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5XtRQCcPQA0Students: How to spot an idiot professor. 9:38It's easy to spot an idiot professor. Choose any definition you find to be problematic, that is, ill formed. Then ask a professor to explain why it is defined that way. If he knows what he is talking about, he will give you several good reasons. OTH, if he/she is an idiot, the response will be:John Gabriel2016-09-25T16:38:12Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/c5rby40qOfwStudents: The New Calculus Channel - now over 2000 hits per month in under 11 months.I am pleased to report that the New Calculus (NC) channel continues to grow at a brisk pace. Unfortunately, I have not been able to produce more videos in the past week due to time constraints. I am hoping to compile another video in the next few days. The NC channel is neither influenced norJohn Gabriel2016-09-25T16:02:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/An-VVdI0gsYThe BIG STUPID: What MIT and HARVARD morons could not understand, but 8th graders can! 9:02The jealous bastards of mainstream academia have riled against my new calculus for many years. What follows are proofs that even high school students can understand and yet somehow morons the likes of Strang, Huizenga and Kaesorg simply can't grasp! Read about the 13 fallacies in mythmaticsJohn Gabriel2016-09-25T16:01:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0Students: How to spot an idiot professor.It's easy to spot an idiot professor. Choose any definition you find to be problematic, that is, ill formed. Then ask a professor to explain why it is defined that way. If he knows what he is talking about, he will give you several good reasons. OTH, if he/she is an idiot, the response will be:John Gabriel2016-09-25T15:49:46Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/hvYPOtcnwdIThe 13 fallacies of mythmatics (mainstream mathematics).Read all about the fallacies here: http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com More available on my New Calculus channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A