https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsJohn Gabriel2017-03-22T14:48:48Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/SWzSAF-qrMgMultiplying f(x) by (x-k)/(x-k) DOES NOT undefine f(k).The BIG STUPID think they can just "undefine" a function when it is already defined... If you are wondering why the BIG STUPID needs this 'feature', it is due to the fact that without it, all of limit theory fails and by the domino effect so does the faux calculus. The CRISIS in the BIG STUPIDPentcho Valev2017-03-22T10:01:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/iJe50hWjG8kThe GPS Hoax: Last Refuge of EinsteiniansAlex Filippenko: "The clocks in the satellites up in space, these satellites communicate with your device in your car, they run at a slightly faster speed than the clocks here on earth. And if that difference in the rate of passage of time had not been taken into account by the physicist andPopping mad2017-03-22T09:55:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WijPF4Z3RnMlooking for a trig proofρ = x cosθ + y sinθ Has anyone seen the proof for this for a line. I ran across it in the Hough Transform as a parameterized version for the definition of a linej4n bur532017-03-22T07:57:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3j01VAMwErMWhat is a Real? Testing Geniuses such as JG and BKKHow many fractions in terms of transmission ratios can there be in cars? Is it all gear shifting? From an ideal viewpoint can there be a 2:pi or a 1:sqrt(2) transmission ratios? 1951 CHEVROLET AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlbplGhPTJcMathman2017-03-22T02:30:09Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eihxWAJbdrcdominating vertices and domination elimination scheme/orderingsA graph G is a domination graph iff every nontrivial induced subgraph H of G has a dominated vertex of H. A vertex u is dominated by a vertex v in G if N[u] subset N[v]. (N[u] = neighborhood of u) a. Define a domination elimination scheme. A domination elimination scheme (DES) is an orderingJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T19:22:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZcfFQN0g-YsThe BIG STUPID think they can just undefine a function when it is already defined...The BIG STUPID think they can just "undefine" a function when it is already defined... The CRISIS in the BIG STUPID explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdD9v502hPk Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and toJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T16:09:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/p5RiK5HoXPgMy teaching approach.https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-teaching-approach-john-gabriel Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)Halal Soor, Halal Sood2017-03-21T09:46:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0iqT1lAh_y0Geometric Series | Infinite equations for it's sumUp the ante, and challenge the mentally challenged for a head-on collision in demonstrating there are an infinite number of Cubic, Quartic, Quintic, Sextic and higher order equations that produce the sum of Geometric Series. Such a work of wonders and miracles will be published by us soonPentcho Valev2017-03-21T08:19:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QO1SwTfgOvgBridging the Gap between Idiocy and Truth in Einstein's Schizophrenic World"But no one can deny that there are some serious holes in our current understanding of the Universe, not least of which is the fact that gravity and other aspects of general relativity don't gel with quantum mechanics, which has led researchers to seek out a new 'theory of everything' thatJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T07:06:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JNBbchOyrek14 year olds can learn the New Calculus, but not the BEEEEG STUPID (mainstream academia).We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x + p, then f'(x)={f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n). Proof: Let t(x)=kx+b be the equation of the tangent line to the function f(x). Then a parallel secant line isPublication_b IAENG2017-03-21T04:20:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/jex-92_XMSQCall for Papers: World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science WCECS 2017Call for Papers: World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science WCECS 2017 Draft Paper Submission Deadline: 2 July, 2017 Camera-Ready Papers Due & Registration Deadline: 30 July, 2017 WCECS 2017: San Francisco, USA, 25-27 October, 2017 http://www.iaeng.org/WCECS2017 The 25th WorldJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T02:49:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7mxSv3ldyowJames Grime - the face of the BIG STUPID.From How Pi was nearly changed to 3.2 by James Grime: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjA9LOPsg Grime is an absolute moron who knows shit about mathematics. To square the circle originally means to construct a square with the same area as a given circle using a compass and ruler. He thenJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T01:03:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Juoob_2yy4EI discovered the New Calculus. Well-formed knowledge is never invented, only discovered.Well-formed knowledge is never invented, only discovered. I do not own the New Calculus but I was the first to realise it in the history of humans. This is a mega accomplishment given it is the first and only rigorous formulation. Read about the 13 fallacies here: http://thenewcalculus.weeblJohn Gabriel2017-03-21T00:47:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/H0dgfS_pjioThe New Calculus - even 8th grade students can learn it, but moron professors can't.We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x + p, then f'(x)={f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n). Proof: Let t(x)=kx+b be the equation of the tangent line to the function f(x). Then a parallel secant line isRobert Delaney2017-03-20T23:58:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WqHRMnvV0hcsolveNonLinEqsMy free solveNonLinEqs uses the generalized Newton's Method to solve a set of linear or non-linear equations over the Reals. It is easy to use. When you open the application the Equations TextArea contains f(0) = x(0)^3 - 2*x(1)^2 + 3*x(2) - 2 f(1) = x(1)^3 + 4*x(2)^2 - 7*x(0) - 23 f(2) =John Gabriel2017-03-20T22:25:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/D7n7YQyDJTwThere are no axioms or postulates in real mathematics, only in the cult of mythmatics (mainstream math).There are no axioms or postulates in real mathematics, only in the cult of mythmatics (mainstream math). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARzchjd8eZg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzcVmXVpk-g Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of publicJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T22:23:46Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FJPu_Y3S7Kg"Real" analysis is really just "Unreal" analysis.Real Analysis is that topic about a non-existent object called a "real number". The video throws shit on the faces of two well known morons: Cauchy and Dedekind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FJVkOoBEsA Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in thePentcho Valev2017-03-20T17:33:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OoWDarIVHcMTime Crystals Are Perpetual-Motion Machines of the Second KindPhilip Ball explains why Frank Wilczek's time crystals are bogus: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blogs/philip-ball/time-crystals-could-they-exist-science-physics "But to make that happen, the researchers must deliver kicks to the spins, provided by a laser or pulses of microwaves, to keeprichard miller2017-03-20T15:53:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1zJcxLJv2n4Quarks and number theoryUnity Root Matrix Theory A Quark Flavour Model https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unity-Root-Matrix-Theory-Flavour-x/dp/1787192121 Quarks, integers, Pythagoras, SU(N), unitarity This book presents an integer-based representation of the quark flavour model using the mathematics of Unity Root MatrixJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T14:29:21Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TawZfsgdD_cStudents: Job security is important in the hallways of Orangutan Academia.Read the following article to see how obfuscation wastes years of your time and your money: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLMDAtai1rcE9jV1E You will keep suffering as long as you remain lethargic. The first course of action is for you to expel Cantor from all mathematicsJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T14:25:15Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZSljSzUH9V0The stupidity of mainstream orangutans is indeed infinite. Fake calculus...So, the BIG STUPID will still insist that if f(x)=x^2, then f'(x)=lim {h -> 0} 2x+h. They will say that f'(x) = 2x. BUT this is only possible if h=0. However, you won't find a single orangutan who will agree that h is ever equal to 0. In fact, they will insist that it is not. Even WM who is moreJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T14:12:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/99JXyyrw4XMI would punish Newton the most for his fake "infinite" series.On page 4 of this comment I reveal Newton's stupidity: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLLUU0RUc5ZGNHcVk/view And in this video I expose some of Newton's blond moments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSEN3PsiBcI Newton's fake "infinite" series: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T13:52:19Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sZ2ZfPRax8c0.333... and anything with an ellipsis following it, is shorthand for stupidity.My comment here at STATU addresses every attempt by the BIG STUPID to justify their ignorance and incompetence. It is a damning comment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLLUU0RUc5ZGNHcVk/view Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests ofJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T13:49:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yeIze-QUbao"Real" analysis - that topic about an unreal object: the "real number".Real Analysis is that topic about a non-existent object called a "real number". The video throws shit on the faces of two well known morons: Cauchy and Dedekind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FJVkOoBEsA Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in theJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T13:48:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oEIU1bDMU4IYou should never argue because you want to win an argument, but always to arrive at the true knowledge.Oiler (Euler) might be your hero and I don't like to piss and shit on heroes, but you must remember that Oiler used to shit also, and had to clean his arse each time (I hope!). Same with Newton, Leibniz and even the Great Archimedes who never made a mistake that we know of. These men all hadPentcho Valev2017-03-20T09:49:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/j_sMKdqTAiYWho Makes America Stupid: Donald Trump or Neil deGrasse Tyson?"Trump will make America stupid, tweet-rages DeGrasse Tyson." Neil deGrasse Tyson: "The fastest way to Make America Stupid: Cut funds to programs that support education. The very best way to support and feed your delusions: Surround yourself with people whose world views match yours exactly."John Gabriel2017-03-20T00:37:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/15B7yjMAsg8There is no valid construction of real number. Real Analysis is a load of bullshit.Real Analysis is that topic about a non-existent object called a "real number". The video throws shit on the faces of two well known morons: Cauchy and Dedekind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FJVkOoBEsA Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in theJohn Gabriel2017-03-20T00:33:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X4e_AUboCnoOiler's S = Lim S and the BIG STUPID's three top arguments easily debunked.1. Debunking 10x bowel movement: x = 0.999... 10x = 10 x 0.999... 9x = 9.999... x = 1 x = 1(idiot) 10x = 10(idiot) 9x = 9(idiot) x = 1(idiot) If 0.999... is a constant, then according to the algorithm, it should never change. What you put in, is what you MUST get out. It doesn't evenBenjamin Liker2017-03-20T00:10:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/05yNTADoEbcProve/Disprove Conjecture?So far, I have not found a counterexample to this: sec^2[cos^-1(1/(a^0.5))-cos^-1(1/(b^0.5))]-ab cannot =1 when a and b are separate nonzero whole numbers. Can anyone find a counterexample/proof of?John Gabriel2017-03-20T00:07:21Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4dE1hvdfNqIGuiseppe was more than just an idiot, he was a cancer to mathematics.Do not waste your time on the bullshit of Peano. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAD-pfSNdSs Guiseppe ate too much spaghetti. All that starch accumulated in his skull And also in his bowel Causing constipation and making him dull. In dire straits, he asked Betrand for advice And was toldJohn Gabriel2017-03-19T16:23:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4HFbAV4uVlsFor the KONYBERGS of the world... sqrt(2) is NOT a number!Tell me, how would you know about sqrt(2) if you did not try to measure it with one of the legs? You can draw any similar right angled isosceles triangle and call the legs one unit, but the hypotenuse of any of these triangles by itself, tells you nothing about sqrt(2). It is when you try toJohn Gabriel2017-03-19T16:12:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tBGz15dVFYQIt is idiotic to define 0.333... =1/3 or 0.999... = 1 or 1/7 = 0.142857...Euler pooped very badly by defining S = Lim S and I am now holding the proverbial bag with thousands of morons believing this is a good definition. Euler was not only wrong, he was insane to make such a definition. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eulers-worst-definition-lim-john-gabrielHalal Soor, Halal Sood2017-03-19T10:39:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xcaedyh88mQAbel's Impossibility Theorem"In general, polynomial equations higher than fourth degree are incapable of algebraic solution in terms of a finite number of additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions, and root extractions. This was also shown by Ruffini in 1813 (Wells 1986, p. 59)." http://mathworld.wolfraPentcho Valev2017-03-19T10:29:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zHzefSwqXgoEinstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Idiocy: How Long Yet?"We show that "twisted" light pulses exhibit subluminal velocities in vacuum, being 0.1% slowed relative to c. This work does not challenge relativity theory..." https://www.osapublishing.org/optica/fulltext.cfm?uri=optica-3-4-351&id=338449 In Einstein's schizophrenic world publishing anythingJohn Gabriel2017-03-19T01:17:48Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gGMVEWD20Ucpi and sqrt(2) are proof that: ****A number is the measure of a magnitude.****You can take any sized circle you like and the only way you realise anything about the value of pi, is by attempting to measure the circumference using the diameter. You can take any right angled isosceles triangle and the only way you realise anything about the value of sqrt(2), is byJohn Gabriel2017-03-19T00:19:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/GaZdr6D4U40A definition means everything...Definitions are vitally important in teaching mathematics. For this reason, I have dismissed ill-formed definitions and introduced definitions that are well formed. Time permitting, I shall continue to dismiss bad concepts and you will all get used to it or face being left behind. I, JohnDavid Bernier2017-03-18T23:18:57Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3BxEh6i4c80Coloring graphs, and the Hadwiger-Nelson problem: computer experimentationsThe Hadwiger-Nelson problem asks how many colors are needed to color the Euclidean plane, if any two points a unit distance apart must be colored with distinct colors? It's known that at least 4 colors are necessary, and it's known that 7 colors suffice to color the whole plane. So the answerPentcho Valev2017-03-18T19:17:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/NdBKrmXwa-MObvious Violations of the Second Law of ThermodynamicsAt 4:24 in the following video the experimentalist just switches the field on and off (no work done on the system), but the liquid (e.g. water) cyclically rises and can lift floating weights in the process, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACDxurruben safir2017-03-18T18:50:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YfGOY6vfJucParametershttps://www.cis.rit.edu/class/simg782/lectures/lecture_10/lec782_05_10.pdf I've looking over the Circle Hough Transform and struggling with the idea of a parameter. It says If the radius is not known, then the locus of points in parameter space will fall on the surface of a cone. EachJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T15:55:46Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FR-eGz7kLEoOne definition for ALL differential equations - FIRST in history.I, John Gabriel, define ANY differential equation as follows: An equation in which a dependent variable is not described solely in terms of one independent variable. x, y, y', y'', etc are all variables. Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interestsJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T15:51:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gWjZE1qM7SsThe heart and soul of mathematics: What is a number? The measure of a magnitude.Webster: "the abstract science of number, quantity, and space. Mathematics may be studied in its own right ( pure mathematics ), or as it is applied to other disciplines such as physics and engineering ( applied mathematics )" Before I came along, there was no definition of number. LearnJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T15:43:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/V8xFOhXz-ioThe New Calculus and the end of dumb recipes for differential equations.Any ODE can be solved using the New Calculus. All one needs is a closed form Gabriel Polynomial and the method of non-linear regression. Since the most interesting DEs have no solution, the fit using this method is far superior to any other numeric integration techniques. https://youtu.be/4dzKJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T13:17:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vt1n2uoqXTwSome articles I wrote while still in high school but most wouldn't write in a lifetime.I first read about the Newton-Cotes integral derivation in my 14th year in the encyclopedia Britannica. Proving it was a challenge for me, but I prevailed: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLZEVpcHVxclNXZk0 At the time I was still trying to make sense of the flawed calculus andJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T12:59:21Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B55vQgwIuHkThe New Calculus: How to solve all ODEs sans thousands of dumb recipes.Any ODE can be solved using the New Calculus. All one needs is a closed form Gabriel Polynomial and the method of non-linear regression. Since the most interesting DEs have no solution, the fit using this method is far superior to any other numeric integration techniques. https://youtu.be/4dzKalal...@gmail.com2017-03-18T10:35:29Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vazauH5SKR0Mathematics and TruthMathematics is the closest we can come to truth in this world. But, according to Gödel's incompleteness theorem, there are true statements that cannot be proven to be true. Science builds models of the world; if they work they may said to be true. However scientific theories must be falsifiabDan Christensen2017-03-18T03:50:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YmHrJvtWudMI may be offline for a whileMy replies may take several days. So long for now. DanJohn Gabriel2017-03-18T01:45:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F6EXdzzscjUNew Video: A foretaste of solving ODEs using the New Calculus.Any ODE can be solved using the New Calculus. All one needs is a closed form Gabriel Polynomial and the method of non-linear regression. Since the most interesting DEs have no solution, the fit using this method is far superior to any other numeric integration techniques. https://youtu.be/4dzKArchimedes Plutonium2017-03-17T21:39:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kpLzlotPhCo_T-shirt Diplomacy 1 and 2 is 3;; never 1 or 2 is 3;; causes Math and Logic schools to change for the betterNewsgroups: sci.math Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: T-shirt Diplomacy 1 and 2 is 3;; never 1 or 2 is 3;; causes Math and Logic schools to change for the better From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:34:06 +0000Dan Christensen2017-03-17T21:21:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6fm6JcPD64MRe: T-shirt Diplomacy 1 and 2 is 3;; never 1 or 2 is 3;; causes Math and Logic schools to change for the betterI know you wish it weren't so, but logic and reason actually works, Archie. They help rule out idiocies like your 10^666 being an "infinite number" and the entire universe being one gigantic plutonium atom. (Archie really believes that shit!) Do you really think that the computer you areko chun wai2017-03-17T20:10:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TaQATEGo9G0liner algebraplease help me to solve this question, please 1 -1 p = 4 p -1 p^2-2 = 8 -2 3-p^2 p^2+p = q where p and q are constants. Use elementary row operations to find all the value(s) of p and q, if any, such that