https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsJack Campin2017-05-28T00:09:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rugiisFnOGQthis is depressingIn the current batch of messages I got in, discounting the ones I've killfiled, there is ONE with real content (David Bernier's graph theory question, which I can at least understand and see the point of despite having no idea how to answer it). Everyone else is just feeding the egos of a bunchArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T23:27:30Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zd2HS8FZv3UConservation of Proof Principle in Mathematics; what it is and how it is usedAlright, I am having a huge revision of my textbook Correcting Math and I completed the 5th edition some months past. But I am finding this Conservation Principle is a massive overhaul of that textbook. And I have two choices that are good choices. I can either start the 6th edition, or I canArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T22:26:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kJKDHgKGQFg3Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; where I unify all these type of FLT formulaNewsgroups: sci.math Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: standard format so we can compare these formula Re: 2Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 08:58:17 +0000 standard format so weArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T21:17:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ilb5XJHbXsgI proved the theorem and calling it-- AP Condensed-Rectangle FLT// moneygrubs like Beal should not have free advertising in mathI proved Beal Conjecture in 2014, this is now 2017 and still no telephone ring to congratulate my success on Beal proof. Hence forth, let math never again be victim to these amateurs like Beal who offer money, but instead receive huge world wide free advertisement. They are canny money grubsgenm...@gmail.com2017-05-27T20:37:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5O7UQJpe9psEuler did say that S = Lim S 5-27-2017S = 1 - a + aa - aaa + aaaa - ... => S = 1 - a + a^2 - a^3 + ... (-a)^n + ... Lim S = Lim {n \to \infty} (1+a^n)/(1+a) = 1/(1+a) Now Euler says these are equal. So S = 1 - a + a^2 - a^3 + ... (-a)^n + ... = Lim S = 1/(1+a) High school math. There are still morons who don't know thatDan Christensen2017-05-27T19:17:53Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ou-W-NzFf4JG's Euler myth is BUSTED!Here is a photo of Euler's original text in question. http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fs1/object/display/bsb10081749_00151.html?rotate=0&zoom=0.6000000000000001 Contrary to JG's insane lies, and as readers can see for themselves, there is no "S = Lim S". That myth is BUSTED! DanJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T18:31:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A8eLZcQIVMUNot even the gods can measure the incommensurable magnitudes such as pi or sqrt(2).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3AlAil5Crc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYCKd-dQWic Neither pi nor sqrt(2) are described by any number. Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity fromPentcho Valev2017-05-27T14:16:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G6Ykonax-ZMEinstein's Schizophrenic World: Bacchanalians in Utter DespairNeil Turok: "It's the ultimate catastrophe: that theoretical physics has led to this crazy situation where the physicists are utterly confused and seem not to have any predictions at all." http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/09/05/perimeter-institute-and-the-crisis-in-modern-physics/ Peter Woit: "ItDan Christensen2017-05-27T16:26:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QnpsK8-e_a0Re: Getting money-grub hucksters with their free advertisements and never any payout-- out of math// Bealring to congratulate my success on Beal proof. > Sorry to say, but you just may have to publish under a different name. Who hasn't heard about you by now? Try "John Gabriel." (Hee, hee!) DanArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-27T06:22:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/V6XpmH_IXxA2Generalized FLT as AP-FLT Conjecture; what is the difference between Pythagorean and Legendre Three-Square theoremsGeneralizing FLT beyond Beal. And Beal is rather an oddball, a sort of sideroad attraction of not much math overall importance, for keep in mind the Beal conjecture comes from the mind of a amateur of math. Out more to make a spashly name for himself with a money grub reward rather thanJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T02:56:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IMtEDaa7J1IA song by Jew wannabee academics and their lackeys...https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLeW4zd3dzYmZsdUk Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics. gils...@gmail.com (MIT) huiz...@psu.edu (HARVARD)John Gabriel2017-05-27T02:55:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZE-LhWTiT7QWhat the BIG STUPID is desperately trying to hide from you! 5/26/2017My article on "How we got calculus" is very different to anything you have ever seen or read. No one has ever understood calculus as well as I do. In this article, I show you how Newton got his ideas. I also describe the discovery of the Taylor Series from Newton's interpolation polynomial allJohn Gabriel2017-05-27T02:54:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QM0bDZYau9wA proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. 5/26/2017The End of the Discussion: A proof that pi is incommensurable using only simple algebra. I am confident now that the proof is complete. Of course there is no better place to test proofs than among idiots here on sci.math - they don't get dumber. Intelligent people think but ducks go quack,Archimedes Plutonium2017-05-26T22:21:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ufeo6T3J3CQsilly Old Math has .999... = 1, while New Math has .999... is always a tiny bit smaller than 1//proof includedIn New Math, we define Infinity precisely with a borderline, so the stupid argument that .9999... is somehow equal to 1 never passes the test. When you have a border between finite and infinite, you cannot screw the mind in thinking .9999.... somehow, magically turns into 1. NEW MATH uncoversArchimedes Plutonium2017-05-26T22:07:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/M_pj_4mf6YEGeneralizing FLT beyond Beal-- the AP-FLT Conjecture-- give me any two Naturals then a^x+b^y+c^z + d^u = 0Alright, below is a start to a Generalizing FLT beyond Beal-- the AP-FLT Conjecture-- give me any two Naturals then a^x+b^y+c^z + d^u = 0 Where x,y,z,u are greater than 1. The basic idea is that give me two Naturals, and I have to find four Naturals with the two included of a a,b,c,d. Now