https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsED CONRAD2015-06-02T16:39:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TEVB-pXJbwgPSEUDO-SCIENTISTS' NUMBER MAY FINALLY BE UPHONEST TESTING OF "THE OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND" DISCOVERED BETWEEN ANTHRACITE VEINS (PROVING MAN INDEED AS OLD AS COAL) http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/cmon_files/krogwskull.jpg "The Oldest Human Skull Ever Found." HONEST TESTING OF "THE OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOjenswa...@gmail.com2015-06-02T14:51:15Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VYzMP4VD1kssimple example where epsilon-delta definition is beter than infinitesimal def. of limitI am looking for a simple example for which the epsilon-delta approach for defining the limit of a function gives the right solution whereas the infinitesimal approach does not or does not work. regards, jensPentcho Valev2015-06-02T08:48:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7nX0BYuihy8HERBERT DINGLE'S DILEMMAhttp://worldnpa.org/abstracts/abstracts_215.pdf Herbert Dingle: "Either there is an absolute standard of rest - call it the ether as with Maxwell, or the universe as with Mach, or absolute space as with Newton, or what you will or else all motion, including that with the speed of light, is relatimmy17292015-06-01T21:18:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5nJ5XvMA5q8Kepler packing is optimalKepler is optimal because 1) it is optimal for any small amount 2) it is part of a symmetric tesselation 3) lower local density cannot be compensated by local larger densiteit 4) it is fractal If these 4 conditions are satisfied a packing is ALWAYS optimal. --- The converse is not always ttimmy17292015-06-01T20:41:55Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5Q0BUN6ekloBobby Fischer the heroRobert James Fischer https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=xFHvH9FtACg Regards Tommy1729Victor Porton2015-06-01T18:57:15Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/nMrFp4wAVUkGeneralizations of categoriesBinary relations are a category (strictly speaking, them are morphisms of the category Rel). What are n-ary relations? In my book they are a category with star-morphisms (an enriched category over Rel). But I wonder, if I am the first person who defined category with star- morphisms. Seetimmy17292015-06-01T18:51:53Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eE8MkQ0ZrxwNo big bangThere was no big bang. The universe is infinitely old. Relativity DOES NOT prove the big bang, nor does it prove limited past, mass , energy or space. Relativity IS CORRECT , but the interpretation and lies of it are not. The big bang theory is the MOST ADJUSTED theory of all *time* and thereallsolutio...@gmail.com2015-06-01T18:14:14Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/d1a102hnJGoTest bank Operations Management & Principles of Operations Management, 11/E Heizer & Render is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact us to buy this today : testbanksbiz[at]gmail.com. replace [at] with @ in the email addresTest bank Operations Management & Principles of Operations Management, 11/E Heizer & Render is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact us to buy this today : testbanksbiz[at]http://gmail.com. replace [at] with @ in the email addressArchimedes Plutonium2015-06-01T17:08:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A68yrHIX7JUChat: exposing Parallel Postulate equivalent to Math-Induction; blessing of ease-- Saccheri quadrilateralAll of a sudden my difficult task of unifying the Peano Axioms with the Euclid-Hilbert axioms is made very much easier by the Saccheri quadrilaterals. Now, one of the greatest banes, at least one of the top ten horrible mistakes of Old Math was their forever silly error of thinking that a smootimmy17292015-06-01T16:54:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/iSeAkNqf4Y0Prime PatternsTommy prime constellation criterion This a stronger condition then the prime Patterns conjecture. Consider a constellation of length L. With p primes. If this constellation ACTUALLY occurs (L+1)^(p-1) times then we have a valid prime constellation. Related : master1729-littlewood conjecturDan Christensen2015-06-01T16:36:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6XaTUbSY4QQWolfgang Muckenheim (WM): On Number TheoryIt soon became obvious to all but himself that his new Mueckenheim's Axioms were a dead end... "In my system, two different numbers can have the same value." -- WM, 2014/10/16 "1+2 and 2+1 are different numbers." -- WM, 2014/10/20 To hell with it... "Axioms are rubbish!" -- WM, 2014/11/TRUTH, Inc.2015-06-01T14:27:16Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lseh-WhpT2gTHERE'S NO DENYING MAN AS OLD AS COALTHERE'S NO DENYING MAN AS OLD AS COAL (Click on photos to enlarge them.) http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/SkMOrr42/the-world-s-oldest-man-made-tool-or-weaponalbert...@gmail.com2015-06-01T07:58:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/2qE5QxDSuBACondition on sumHi! For which natural numbers a,b,c,d results a/b + c/d = (a+c)/(b+d) ? Thank you very much for every suggestion. Albalbert...@gmail.com2015-06-01T07:53:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4yqJgCowbe8Condition on greatest common divisor and least common multipleHi! given three natural numbers a, b, c can you suggest me conditions on a,b,c for which a*b*c = [a,b,c] * (a,b,c) ? [a,b,c] stands for the least common multiple (a,b,c) stands for the greatest common divisor between a, b and c. Thank you, Alb