https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google Groupsstevena...@gmail.com2015-10-09T17:50:15Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_BtGFS-S4v8calculating expenses on soda?I spend $3.00 twice a week on soda each week, how much money am I spending on soda each year? I've already found a way to save $1200Pentcho Valev2015-10-09T16:44:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/hEM5W7BYTG8LE MENSONGE EINSTEINIEN EST TROP FLAGRANThttp://www.einstein-alaplage.com/ Marc Lachièze-Rey, Einstein à la plage: La relativité dans un transat, p. 14 : "La cinématique galiléenne (ou newtonienne) possède une propriété remarquable et familière : les vitesses des objets s'y composent en s'additionnant simplement. Si vous marchez à laJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T10:53:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X77Ao1hFPYs1/0 is not meaningless, it's impossible. Take the QUIZ for morons!1/0 means: [A] By the definition of fraction, a rational "number" where the unit has been partitioned into 0 equal parts. [B] 1 divided by 0. [C] it is exactly equal to infinity. [D] it is undefined. Okay morons, only ONE of those four choices is correct. Chuckle. Follow me on YT:John Gabriel2015-10-09T06:46:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uej3Rdoktw8Wildberger on D. Cuts and the "continuum"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNlEq0ZrTo This comment is not for students but for their baboon teachers. Wildberger teaches mainstream mythmatics, but unlike most of the mainstream morons, he is able to think independently (something students are not taught in today's assembly lineJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T05:12:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dzEzswomwOAGabriel's elementary mathematics for mainstream idiots.The New Limit theorem is entirely geometrical and so easy that even an 8th grader can understand it. It's easy to see it come alive in front of your eyes. Just download the applet, type in any function you like, and watch it perform exactly the same way for any function: https://www.youtube.comWilliam Elliot2015-10-09T05:10:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VVIkAuWSUsAReal Realistic Example? (fwd)How is an infinite dimensional Hilbert space a realistic metric space? For example l_2, square summable sequences. Let a = (0,0,0,...); b = (1,0,0,0,...). d(a,b) = 1. Set r = 1. Consider p = (2,0,0,0,...). d(b,p) = 1; d(a,p) = 2. Also q = (1, a, a^2,...) where a = sqr 1/2; d(b,q) = 1;John Gabriel2015-10-09T05:06:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/T292QCZCvWYCuntor and Lebesgue fueled the syphilitic reasoning so prevalent in today's mythmatics.Lebesgue's laughable definitions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 Cantor's delusions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E4u1RlIp3wJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T05:05:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/otHdjPBjiqQWhy the BIG STUPID cannot admit that 0.999... is a junk concept.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wv44FnfBKIWilliam Elliot2015-10-09T04:53:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/icqZJYz2894A Realistic Hilbert Space?Waldek Hebisch <heb...@anti.uni.wroc.pl> In reply to Waldek Hebisch. How is an infinite dimensional Hilbert space a realistic metric space? For example l_2, square summable sequences. Let a = (0,0,0,...); b = (1,0,0,0,...). d(a,b) = 1. Set r = 1. Consider p = (2,0,0,0,...). d(b,p) = 1;me2015-10-08T19:50:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G8GhefFy9gsWhy no one will pass the turing test in my universe?hello everyone, I finally have idea why computer AI designed by humans will never pass the turing test. You know turing is gay. I don't condone gays. I cannot optimize enemy territory. so, I cannot design computer programs that pass turing test. by the same token, I cannot let anyLudovicus2015-10-08T19:11:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QAn odd property of prime powers of PhiIf we raise Phi to prime powers > 3 it results a dense sequence of prime values Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. Is there a reason for this behavior ?Ross A. Finlayson2015-10-08T15:24:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/R5tDyKPwKIQBrun's constant and prime and twin prime conjectures, Apery (for abu k)On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:20:21 PM UTC-7, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote: > if there were not an infinite# of twinprimes, > Bryn's constant would have been rational > Please start a new thread with such notions, with title along those lines (Brun's constant and prime and twin primePentcho Valev2015-10-08T14:56:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vgZVid3OBHsBRIAN GREENE: WARPED TIME OR WARPED MIND?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TNI0Jr-_rw In this week's installment of "A Moment of Science with Brian Greene," learn about the meaning of "warped time." There is no "warped time". Einsteinians measure the gravitational redshift but inform the gullible world that they have proved gravitatioPort5632015-10-08T13:04:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7p7h8bbW9JoRe: test"WM" <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote in message news:89a1730f-69c1-4a97-b87b-ae5b739d99df@googlegroups.com... > 0 FailedJohn Gabriel2015-10-08T09:08:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RQnpg9lz1ewRead about how I kick mythmatician glutes!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNlEq0ZrTo