https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsHannu Poropudas2017-04-25T08:26:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mNJTbTlb9VEQuestions of one special case of The First Algerbra Family of mineOne special case of The First Algebra Family of mine (published in sci.math.research /Hannu Poropudas spring 2014) Multiplication table for unit base vectors * e1 e2 e3 e1 e1 e2 e3 e2 e2 -e1+e3 e3 e3 e3 e3Archimedes Plutonium2017-04-25T07:54:48Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rkK_5_6fm_MPage111, 12-28//lousy, crumby terms and terminology, and symbols used in science that are not-science// Correcting Math 5th edPage111, 12-28//lousy, crumby terms and terminology, and symbols used in science that are not-science// Correcting Math 5th ed Random Pick Any, rather than lazy corrupt "random" Re: Concept of "random" is not math but touchy feely nonsense Pick Any Number, rather than lazy corrupt "random"Archimedes Plutonium2017-04-25T07:46:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/s4LlUGBtsacPage110, 12-27//Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and then geometry axioms via Pythagorean theorem Correcting Math 5th edPage110, 12-27//Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and then geometry axioms via Pythagorean theorem Correcting Math 5th ed PART 2: AXIOMS AS JUST DETAILS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM: Alright, I am going to condense both sets of axioms, and by condense, what I mean is that, just as we areArchimedes Plutonium2017-04-25T07:40:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z1YpWJzFxWIPage109, 12-26//Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and then geometry axioms via Pythagorean theorem Correcting Math 5th edPage109, 12-26//Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and then geometry axioms via Pythagorean theorem Correcting Math 5th ed PART 1: Editing and commentary corner: So when the Maxwell Theory, carried by mostly the 4 equations produces all of Physics using the theory as axioms, then theJohn Gabriel2017-04-25T00:09:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0DScIfDZn3kFoundations of mathematics were laid by the Ancient Greeks.No imbecile of the last 2300 years even got close to realising that the foundations were complete. Instead, they were derailed by orangutans such as Cantor, Hilbert, Frege, Zermelo and the like. All these arseholes didn't even possess one hundredth of my intelligence. Their sheep or mythmaticsPentcho Valev2017-04-24T23:27:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/t6stZGeSEbMHypocritical March for Science"On Earth Day, tens of thousands turned out for the March for Science in Washington, D.C., despite the rain, celebrating ideas, facts, and empirical data..." https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/04/23/march-science-organizer-titans-einstein-galileo-carson-engaged-politics Actually the oppositeArchimedes Plutonium2017-04-24T21:30:14Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/M_hEda6M7wgPage108, 12-25// Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations//Correcting Math 5th edPage108, 12-25// Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations//Correcting Math 5th ed DERIVING DIRAC & SCHRODINGER EQUATIONS FROM JUST MAXWELL EQUATIONS Note to Readers:: I actually revised the Maxwell Equations, so the New Math, New Physics alters both the MaxwellArchimedes Plutonium2017-04-24T21:25:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EKXc9pIzOVwPage107, 12-24// CONIC SECTIONS ERRORS and Unification with Regular Polyhedra//Correcting Math 5th ed.Page107, 12-24// CONIC SECTIONS ERRORS and Unification with Regular Polyhedra//Correcting Math 5th ed. by Archimedes Plutonium Also in my research, I have discovered that the Conic Sections are really 6 sections in full, not 5. 1) two lines, either intersecting (cones) or parallel (cylinderArchimedes Plutonium2017-04-24T21:05:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/QBGsFXYOeVsPage106, 12-23// Part 3 of 3//Error in Definition of Parallel and Parallel Axiom//Correcting Math 5th edPage106, 12-23// Part 3 of 3//Error in Definition of Parallel and Parallel Axiom//Correcting Math 5th ed I need to cover loose ends, errors in Old Math. In Old Math, they had no precision definition of infinity. To be precise about infinity you need a borderline that separates finite fromArchimedes Plutonium2017-04-24T21:02:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tPuiCgtE6bkPage105, 12-22// Part 2 of 3//Error in Modeling NonEuclidean geometry//Correcting Math 5th edPage105, 12-22// Part 2 of 3//Error in Modeling NonEuclidean geometry//Correcting Math 5th ed Until recently, the very best I could do on models of Elliptic and Hyperbolic was the sphere surface for Elliptic and the saddle shaped surface or the trumpet music instrument surface for Hyperbolic.John Gabriel2017-04-24T18:33:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9ys6x3bvWwBIG STUPID breaks more than already broken mainstream calculus formulation.Mainstream academics go to extreme lengths to convince naive students their calculus is rigorous. f(x)=( g(x) * (x-k) )/ (x-k) is the same as f:x -> g(x) Do you think the mapping of f cares at all whether k is in the domain or not? Please ask yourself the following questions: 1. Can youJohn Gabriel2017-04-24T17:39:19Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pB0qAMuA-e4Augustin Cashew (Cauchy): mathématicien ou homme de mythe?Augustin Cashew (Cauchy) était un nincompoop. Elements Book V, Prop 12 est une preuve si simple, une personne de sept ans peut comprendre. L'un de mes théorèmes préférés provient du Elements Book V, Prop. 12. Cette proposition établit non seulement TOUT la théorie des fractions et leursJohn Gabriel2017-04-24T14:53:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/z3yQiL2Oud4Number is the most important concept in mathematics. Isn't it strange that it took over 2300 years to well define it?Read the intriguing true story of how we got number by one of the most brilliant minds of the twentieth century (John Gabriel). Don't dismiss this as delusional you weak minded wimp! Read it and be surprised! I am not a crank. No one I know can think with the clarity of thought I exercise. YouSteveGG2017-04-24T11:42:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6ovc1pnxVmENEW CHAOS !Great free software to handle a new type of chaos. Descriptine Word document available. Post or Email if interested : casagi...@optonline.netJohn Gabriel2017-04-24T10:35:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uVN2ubbFVZMThe true story of how we got number: A NUMBER IS THE MEASURE OF A MAGNITUDE.Read the intriguing true story of how we got number by one of the most brilliant minds of the twentieth century (John Gabriel). Don't dismiss this as delusional you weak minded wimp! Read it and be surprised! I am not a crank. No one I know can think with the clarity of thought I exercise. You