sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.
en
- Functions in math require one and only one equal sign; Nonfunctions have more than one equal sign in their equation
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE/mqccivNz8UgJ
Now one beauty of teaching True Calculus to High School students, is that they for the most part never encountered functions with more than one equal sign, that their minds have not yet been polluted. A Nonfunction has more than one equal sign. Such as, for example: y=3 when x is 0 and y=x
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE
Archimedes Plutonium
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 08:10:38 UTC
- Re: sharpening and strengthening the function definition for High School Calculus
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M/VhuwZ8Mjbn0J
For example: A function from set A to set B is a subset of the Cartesian product AxB having for each a in A one and only one member (a,b) with b in B. -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M
Virgil
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:08:13 UTC
- Re: functions can only have one equal sign Re: how to teach lefthanded & righthanded derivatives is dy/dx
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE/RBiQbud4YHcJ
> So that teaching derivatives has to have functions that are one equality > sign only. The function y=x or y = 3 or y=2x + 1 are functions of one > equality sign. [...] 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE
Chris M. Thomasson
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 05:24:50 UTC
- ARE THERE HONEST EINSTEINIANS?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Qc3KH5IuSfI/-rFatYzd3qsJ
Ninety-nine percent of the Einsteinians ("later writers" in John Norton's text below) fraudulently use the Michelson-Morley experiment as support for Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf John Norton: "In addition to his work
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Qc3KH5IuSfI
Pentcho Valev
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 05:09:33 UTC
- Re: how to teach lefthanded & righthanded derivatives is dy/dx
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE/2mA7CmxF5u4J
discovery of Calculus Math, that the derivative is different from dy/dx which requires a left and right derivative. It doesn't. The left- and right-hand derivatives are peculiarities of functions of real variable. Nothing else (functions between Banach spaces, manifolds, even holomorphic
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE
Jan
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:56:22 UTC
- functions can only have one equal sign Re: how to teach lefthanded & righthanded derivatives is dy/dx
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE/qZ2YlgYNCF8J
So that teaching derivatives has to have functions that are one equality sign only. The function y=x or y = 3 or y=2x + 1 are functions of one equality sign. A purported function of y=0 when x is odd and y=10 when x is even is a sawtooth function that looks like this only steeper spikes
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/162aT2nU8DE
Archimedes Plutonium
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:09:09 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/mRI9w2ytVyoJ
increasing lengths arranged in rows and columns as follows: > > 1 > 11 > 111 > 1111 > 11111 > ... > > > Now, Mucke falsely claims without any actual proof that, according to set theory, it can be both proven and disproven that there is no limit to the length these strings, i.e. to the
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Dan Christensen
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 03:26:06 UTC
- Re: Confusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/B_BvdMETKzE/G25R6gij-UYJ
beyond his comprehension? > > Please tell me Juan Taco! Why do you do that? > > ZG My apologies. Is it actually "Juan Del Taco"? ZG
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B_BvdMETKzE
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:56:53 UTC
- Confusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/B_BvdMETKzE/uYgsPrjwLZYJ
I am confused why that **** blathers insults when he read something beyond his comprehension? Please tell me Juan Taco! Why do you do that? ZG
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B_BvdMETKzE
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:55:08 UTC
- Re: A Proof of the Lindelof Hypothesis
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8/n8xN0yIKtssJ
As Gooks or Chinks, or whatever you are usually do. ZG
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:45:46 UTC
- Re: A Proof of the Lindelof Hypothesis
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8/Gne4jdMLSLUJ
Wiki lies. So, you tell us what it is, unless you have NO CLUE. ZG
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:44:27 UTC
- Re: x + y = x^2 + y^2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7Gkkf7qBEPA/EFKNS6HfMuwJ
so, ( a + b ) * ( c + d ) = a * c + b * d ?????? Well, I guess it does for Billie the fool. ZG Don't go away mad, just go away!
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7Gkkf7qBEPA
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:39:48 UTC
- Re: Water on the planets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo/-2xZPnJOSAQJ
Goodbye! Not MATH! Wrong group! Go away! Thanx! > Sincerely > > Dr.Mehran Basti > Bast...@aol.com > > PS: When DNA of mathematics starts to be developed, I am sure you will have your own interpretations of the universe (possibly much different than my own). and, stupid fucking
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:36:53 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/rkm_UoLUz8gJ
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > No, you are an abusive pathetic moron. Umm, no! That's you. YOU shout out and endorse bull-fucking-shit just to get a voice. So? Do you ever actually think? Shit deleted! Go away SPIC! > Julio ZG
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:31:11 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/ptLMHmKIxloJ
ever > >> seen from him... > > > > Then it is a pity that everyone else missed it for it will likely not > > happen again for years! > > Julio is a desperate arrogant and braindead troll... Look at > sci.physics.relativity, the shit he is posting there is even worse > than here... yes, I
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Zeit Geist
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:28:59 UTC
- Re: A Proof of the Lindelof Hypothesis
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8/GLLqi-lq20IJ
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281091876_A_proof_of_the_Lindelof_hypothesis > > P.S. > > I am having fourty nine versions of preprints in a single title > of the Arxiv, and before the fiftieth anniversary, let me comment > on why I have come to reach this count. > > Well, I have
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FhJTFX3KHn8
hisanob...@ymail.com
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:18:10 UTC
- Re: Water on the planets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo/788I9DG_PlkJ
Hello: Voyager 1 left the solar system in Sept. 2013. It traveled one light day in 36 earth years. The nearest star is Alpha Centauri, is about 4.3 light years away. Thus with current technology takes about 57000 to 60000 earth years to reach there. However, I believe developments of DNA
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo
Bast...@aol.com
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:07:05 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/tDSgKSuY1CkJ
ever increasing lengths arranged in rows and columns as follows: > > > > > > > > 1 > > > > 11 > > > > 111 > > > > 1111 > > > > 11111 > > > > ... > > > > > > > > The strings are unary representations of all natural numbers. According to set theory, every natural number is smaller than
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Dan Christensen
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:05:26 UTC
- Re: x + y = x^2 + y^2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7Gkkf7qBEPA/fw6FrsCHDnQJ
> >x and y are held constant. k is the real variable. > >D = D_k = d/dk; d(e^cx)/dx = c.e^x > > > >D(x^k + y^k) = Dx^k + Dy^k > > > > = De^(k.log x) + De^(k.log y) > > > > = (log x)e^(k.log x) + (log y)e^(k.log y) > > > > = (log x)x^k + (log y)y^k > > So you have > > f'(k) =
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7Gkkf7qBEPA
William Elliot
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:36:37 UTC
- Re: Water on the planets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo/g8EVG2DqGGkJ
[...] > Once we get further away from the earth, such as the first star > (which is 60000 years to reach), we may not have that centroid point, and > thus forces are different. I thought the closest star was around 4.2 light years away?
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo
Chris M. Thomasson
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:26:09 UTC
- Re: sharpening and strengthening the function definition for High School Calculus
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M/Nz_rBeFr9C0J
tard
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M
Mike Smith
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:20:16 UTC
- Re: Water on the planets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo/4FRQVv1n6lQJ
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:36:46 -0700, Basti05b wrote: > [Mostly junk.] Congratulations! This post finally puts you firmly with the likes of Archimedes Plutonium, John Gabriel and James Harris. It's no small feat, and certainly a great honor, to reach the same level as such luminaries.
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo
Jens Stuckelberger
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:54:49 UTC
- Re: Answer to another false claim by WM
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg/dQDuMtifpE8J
In article <15aa75b1-6ed2-4749-93d2-cdd9ba34b5d5@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 18:46:39 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Shobe: > > > > You have added aleph_0 digits by adding aleph_0 rows with at least one > > digit each. > > So says set
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:49:36 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/ubvGlcPxehUJ
In article <d4622d74-8409-49a5-b8b5-64d708126e1b@googlegroups.com>, Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 9:07:58 PM UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > In article <69b217d9-fbc2-4499-bb91-65284d6e08cc@googlegroups.com>, > > Julio Di Egidio <j***@diegidio.name>
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:38:39 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/_tb6zqwtovQJ
In article <3efb4d95-4512-4616-a70d-e223baa3170c@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Freitag, 28. August 2015 21:51:46 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil: > > > > > > 1 > > > > 11 > > > > 111 > > > > 1111 > > > > 11111 > > > > ... > > > > No one other than WM himself is
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:34:36 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/da_JQ59YVtMJ
In article <6934e476-4e3b-49f6-9a0a-7a1fd3211e2e@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Freitag, 28. August 2015 21:37:12 UTC+2 schrieb Dan Christensen: > > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 2:59:24 PM UTC-4, WM wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 28. August 2015 19:51:19 UTC+2
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:28:59 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/k-cfcQ2p9cUJ
Don't lie. It's one half of your "contradiction". >>> Looking from the top, all rows merge into one row. According to set theory, >>> it has aleph_0 symbols. >> >> According to common sense as well! > > No. In mathematics the number of digits does not depend on the perspective. Very
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Martin Shobe
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:17:30 UTC
- Re: Answer to another false claim by WM
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg/t_FK8s_8_BsJ
aleph_0 digits although aleph_0 numbers have been added in order to get all n in |N. Therefore every row has less than aleph_0 digits. Set theory says there are aleph_0 digits in a row (where else?) and there is no row with aleph_0 digits. Contradiction. Set theory does not say that there's a
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg
Martin Shobe
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:10:23 UTC
- Re: on Ramanujan's bounds on asymptotics of "generalised superior highly composite numbers for s = 1", a.k.a. colossally abundant numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/_RyuE-EqSE8/8OFeoi6pOe8J
form >>> of a generalized superior highly composite number." >> >> >> Concerning equation (323) on page 132, in Section 62, i.e.: >> >> Sigma_{-s} (N) = Pi_{1} (x_1) Pi_{2} (x_2) Pi_{3} (x_3) {center dot} >> >> I'm now going on the assumption that it should be: >> >> Sigma_{-s} (N) = >>
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_RyuE-EqSE8
David Bernier
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:07:34 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/IWvJXWVPlIsJ
In article <46ecf208-ff07-47b5-879e-e31908c2ce0a@googlegroups.com>, Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 9:07:58 PM UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > In article <69b217d9-fbc2-4499-bb91-65284d6e08cc@googlegroups.com>, > > Julio Di Egidio <j***@diegidio.name>
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:04:04 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/UIOO9gaxP4YJ
ever >>>> seen from him... >>> >>> Then it is a pity that everyone else missed it for it will likely not >>> happen again for years! >> >> Julio is a desperate arrogant and braindead troll... > > No, you are an abusive pathetic moron. > >> Look at >> sci.physics.relativity, the shit he is
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
YBM
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:51:16 UTC
- Water on the planets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo/wzagjf2wII4J
Hello: Water on the planets Hello I have already noted that it is my understanding relative to my own mathematical structures of Riccati equations, as the DNA of Mathematics, the Earth is probably the centroid point of the universe. Roughly speaking the center of mass or centroid of a
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KyZCCP95Muo
Bast...@aol.com
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:36:57 UTC
- Re: Minimization / maximization problem
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/8FOmOPrTn9E/SLhVqP8--Y8J
On 2015-08-28 13:56, quasi wrote: [...] > But I sense that you want a more "statistical" distance concept, > and if so, I probably can't be of much help. Sorry. Yep, Mahalanobis distance de-correlate the data using the covariance matrix. Bhattacharyya is similar, in addition the covariance
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/8FOmOPrTn9E
Piergiorgio Sartor
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:24:48 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/QSOufVqZVjwJ
ever > >> seen from him... > > > > Then it is a pity that everyone else missed it for it will likely not > > happen again for years! > > Julio is a desperate arrogant and braindead troll... No, you are an abusive pathetic moron. > Look at > sci.physics.relativity, the shit he is posting
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Julio Di Egidio
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:24:40 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/Q-uz7bhlizoJ
ever >> seen from him... > > Then it is a pity that everyone else missed it for it will likely not > happen again for years! Julio is a desperate arrogant and braindead troll... Look at sci.physics.relativity, the shit he is posting there is even worse than here...
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
YBM
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:57:57 UTC
- Re: Linear combinations of natural numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM/CkDljIL-YPsJ
You have another error as well. If m,n are not relatively prime, then there is no largest. >As Pubkeybreaker notes, the largest unobtainable number is >m*n - (m + n). (if m,n are relatively prime). quasi
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM
quasi
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:23:30 UTC
- Re: Linear combinations of natural numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM/vcomgy3a898J
Based on your example, it's clear that you intended "largest", not "smallest". As Pubkeybreaker notes, the largest unobtainable number is m*n - (m + n). The proof isn't hard. quasi
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM
quasi
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:07:50 UTC
- Re: Answer to another false claim by WM
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg/TUKisD2C62EJ
Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 18:46:39 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Shobe: > You have added aleph_0 digits by adding aleph_0 rows with at least one > digit each. So says set theory. But it says also: There is no natural number with aleph_0 digits although aleph_0 numbers have been added in order to
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lxQ7NTMJmvg
WM
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:55:30 UTC
- sharpening and strengthening the function definition for High School Calculus
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M/8HxiRL4iJHwJ
Alright, so, I need to make several changes or reversions to the 10 page High School text on True Calculus. I need to teach that the derivative is the rooftop or ceiling in a cell and that the derivative is the same as the graph of the function. Then, I have to teach how computing the
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VAjUBjpLm0M
Archimedes Plutonium
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:36:49 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/NitjAx8xxloJ
increasing lengths arranged in rows and columns as follows: > > > > > > 1 > > > 11 > > > 111 > > > 1111 > > > 11111 > > > ... > > > > > The strings are unary representations of all natural numbers. According to set theory, every natural number is smaller than aleph_0. > > You said
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
WM
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:34:24 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/9dNJcdHuBhgJ
Am Freitag, 28. August 2015 21:51:46 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil: > > > 1 > > > 11 > > > 111 > > > 1111 > > > 11111 > > > ... > No one other than WM himself is claiming any row with aleph_0 digits, > but everyone other than WM knows that there are aleph_0 rows with more > than any given finite
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
WM
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:32:03 UTC
- Google, please give authors the delete key for replies in their thread
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bkUOky_zNL8/jNsgPQz6s48J
It is no wonder Ken Pledger departed sci.math, for with the likes of Dan, Jen, Jan, Port563, sci.math has become a stalkers hate sheet playground. Google, please give authors the ability to delete replies in their threads, so that authors have control over these turd throwers. Let these
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bkUOky_zNL8
Archimedes Plutonium
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:21:58 UTC
- Condensed Rectangles concept Re: --proofs of Beal also FLT/ Princeton Univ--/ arxiv editors
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KduMYnV4ifw/YEL1RHAbsOwJ
Now since the Proof of Beal relates to the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem and since FLT relates to the Pythagorean Theorem we can make a very nice connection to all three: Beal gives FLT FLT says no more Pythagorean Theorem Pythagorean Theorem says solutions are with right triangles The
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KduMYnV4ifw
Archimedes Plutonium
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:12:28 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/hpKaS4ziv2gJ
> > Actually, WM has just managed to provide the first valid proof I have ever > > seen from him... > > Then it is a pity that everyone else missed it for it will likely not > happen again for years! People like you defy reasonability: people like you are the origin of all wars. Fuck
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Julio Di Egidio
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:12:22 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/UMyANmEp4L4J
In article <69b217d9-fbc2-4499-bb91-65284d6e08cc@googlegroups.com>, Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 9:00:25 PM UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > > Actually , WM has never given a VALID proof of anything > > Actually, WM has just managed to provide the
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:07:58 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/eBiLBxoaBIgJ
In article <bbcb5ee2-c01a-4721-b208-01c8a26c8f46@googlegroups.com>, Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 8:51:46 PM UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > > So WM is > > WRONG ! > > AGAIN ! ! > > AS USUAL ! ! ! > > -- > > Virgil > > You too
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:04:47 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/FLRJy3enlToJ
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 9:00:25 PM UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > Actually , WM has never given a VALID proof of anything Actually, WM has just managed to provide the first valid proof I have ever seen from him... You fucking moron and spammer: go fuck yourself! EOD. Julio
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Julio Di Egidio
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:03:44 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/jJ8f0VFulhoJ
In article <d58d290c-8355-4dee-9b35-004c2ea39db8@googlegroups.com>, Julio Di Egidio <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 8:37:12 PM UTC+1, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > You said earlier today that aleph_0 was not a > > meangingful notion. Now, it is? Oh, well. > >
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Virgil
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:00:25 UTC
- Re: Muckenheim (WM) falsely claims to have discovered a contradiction in set theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg/MvYLEmGyCMgJ
to you: at least shut the fuck up... > Your friend doesn't seem to know his a** from a hole in the ground. Maybe you can help him with his proof from set theory that there only a finite number of columns in his diagram. (Hee, hee!) Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproo
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1P2zH7d1Mg
Dan Christensen
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:59:58 UTC
- Re: Linear combinations of natural numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM/deSw8VxUGS4J
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:00:11 +0100, JosÃ© Carlos Santos <jcsa...@fc.up.pt> wrote: >Hi all, > >Given two natural numbers _m_ and _n_ greater than 1, which is the >smallest natural number that cannot be written as a*m + b*n, where _a_ >and _b_ are non-negative integers? For instance, if m = 5
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/atQAjcy0VcM
Barry Schwarz
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:55:14 UTC