sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/VaN_kiqNBQAJ
Peano's > > 5 simple axioms for the successor function. > > Huh?! Peano's axioms won't work without a certain framework. For example he used a "theory of classes" (sort of) to EXPRESS them. > Peano's axioms have evolved over the past century in parallel with the development axiomatic sethttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenThu, 25 May 2017 01:54:42 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/O2O6wzSMBQAJ
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 3:25:05 AM UTC+2, Me wrote: > (Btw. it's strange to see you behave/argue like crank, Dan.) Just to broaden your view you might try to read the first three chapters of Russell's "Mathematical Philosophy": https://people.umass.edu/klement/imp/imp-ebk.pdfhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
MeThu, 25 May 2017 01:37:06 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/hL255YyLBQAJ
> > Quine's NF consists exactly of 1 axiom and 1 axiom schema. > > > IMHO the end result is much more complicated and less intuitive than Peano's > 5 simple axioms for the successor function. Huh?! Peano's axioms won't work without a certain framework. For example he used a "theory ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
MeThu, 25 May 2017 01:25:05 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/_zl5Lg-LBQAJ
utter > > simplicity of Peano's axioms. > > It's rather the other way round, Dan. Quine's NF consist exactly of 1 axiom and 1 axiom schema. IMHO the end result is much more complicated and less intuitive than Peano's 5 simple axioms for the successor function. > *Everything* else can behttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenThu, 25 May 2017 01:16:05 UTCRe: so many mathematicians chose fame, and piss on math truth Re: No mistakes found in Fermat's exp4 of FLT
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ND9AtClm1EY/VT8e92yKBQAJ
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 10:36:13 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Franz for example wants a Wiles, even if he cannot even see Euler failed with > exp3. Keep cool, Archie. There's NOTHING wrong with Euler's proof. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Fermat%27s_Last_Theohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ND9AtClm1EY
MeThu, 25 May 2017 01:04:28 UTCA more correct view of morality
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ksTRCPjKNv0/EWFmIBKKBQAJ
Hello................ A more correct view of morality: Please read my following reasoning carefully.. Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, buthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ksTRCPjKNv0
rami18Thu, 25 May 2017 00:57:58 UTCRe: Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-8rN7YGU5yU/siEHb_2JBQAJ
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:49:36 AM UTC+2, rami18 wrote: > Hello............... You know that this is a math newsgroup?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-8rN7YGU5yU
MeThu, 25 May 2017 00:56:29 UTCImmigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-8rN7YGU5yU/22JzUp2JBQAJ
Hello............... Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI).. I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning... So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is not an exact calculation thathttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-8rN7YGU5yU
rami18Thu, 25 May 2017 00:49:36 UTCRe: What is also the difference between animals and humans ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg/O44xo16JBQAJ
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 12:24:36 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: > > What is also the difference between animals and humans? > > > Humans are animals, only more so. Especially JG. Sure. We ALL are (from a biological point of view). On the other hand, the reference to /morality/ ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg
MeThu, 25 May 2017 00:45:07 UTCRe: Quotes about the Ancient Greeks by many ...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ykb6nRfow34/tuzYgT-JBQAJ
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 1:46:04 AM UTC+2, John Gabriel wrote: > At least 86% of my DNA is Greek. The only undesirable DNA I possess, comes > from my dead father's side of the family. I guess it is Jewish. Lucky you! (Just deal with it, John.)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ykb6nRfow34
MeThu, 25 May 2017 00:42:53 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/scT0LAiJBQAJ
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 12:22:47 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: > Like I said, unnecessarily convoluted, especially when compared to the utter > simplicity of Peano's axioms. It's rather the other way round, Dan. Quine's NF consist exactly of 1 axiom and 1 axiom schema. *Everything*https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
MeThu, 25 May 2017 00:38:56 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/iNzKWmiHBQAJ
wrote: > > > >> Tobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells. > > > >> > > > > > > > > What happened in your case, Troll Boy? Crack? Crystal meth? Solvent abuse? > > > > > > > > > > > >> Ashtray head tried to define number: > > > >> > > > >> "Thus the number 1 ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenThu, 25 May 2017 00:09:10 UTCQuotes about the Ancient Greeks by many ...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ykb6nRfow34/yGfqoiWGBQAJ
At least 86% of my DNA is Greek. The only undesirable DNA I possess, comes from my dead father's side of the family. Had Descartes not done what I did again in the previous century, you wouldn't have had calculus in the way you do today. In fact, the only way to realise true knowledge ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ykb6nRfow34
John GabrielWed, 24 May 2017 23:46:04 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/1x_oE9uFBQAJ
cells. > > >> > > > > > > What happened in your case, Troll Boy? Crack? Crystal meth? Solvent abuse? > > > > > > > > >> Ashtray head tried to define number: > > >> > > >> "Thus the number 1 is to be identified with the class of all unit classes, the number 2 with the class of all two-membehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
John GabrielWed, 24 May 2017 23:40:44 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/-NN1zsOFBQAJ
abuse? > > > > > >> Ashtray head tried to define number: > >> > >> "Thus the number 1 is to be identified with the class of all unit classes, the number 2 with the class of all two-membered classes, and so on." - Bertrand Russell > >> > > > > Does seem a unnecessarily convoluted. Perhapshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
John GabrielWed, 24 May 2017 23:39:04 UTCRe: What is also the difference between animals and humans ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg/J1TDjrOBBQAJ
Humans are animals, only more so. Especially JG.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg
Dan ChristensenWed, 24 May 2017 22:24:36 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/9c6vIpqBBQAJ
Ouch! > @Dan: > > Hint (1): Actually, numbers can be define that way in Quine's set theory "New Foundations" (NF): > > "Frege and Bertrand Russell each proposed defining a natural number n as the collection of all sets with n elements. More formally, a natural number is an equivalencehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenWed, 24 May 2017 22:22:47 UTCHow dependent was Wiles FLT on Euler's so called proof for exp3??
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/_5Xv4cN3Tcc/N7la-yOBBQAJ
wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 9:09:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > Alright, reading the proof given by Fermat for exp4, and he basically makes use of the idea that a area of a right triangle of integer sides cannot be a perfect square. > > > > > > Euler, on the otherhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_5Xv4cN3Tcc
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 24 May 2017 22:14:19 UTCRe: No mistakes found in Fermat's exp4 of FLT, but a huge mistake in Euler's exp3-- which is likely to be found in Wiles FLT
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ND9AtClm1EY/CXgImg2BBQAJ
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 2:54:47 AM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 9:09:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Alright, reading the proof given by Fermat for exp4, and he basically makes use of the idea that a area of a right triangle of integerhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ND9AtClm1EY
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 24 May 2017 22:12:43 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/KaogW1qABQAJ
I have to agree. Dan's comment is ... well ... idiotic. @Dan: Hint (1): Actually, numbers can be define that way in Quine's set theory "New Foundations" (NF): "Frege and Bertrand Russell each proposed defining a natural number n as the collection of all sets with n elements. More formally,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
MeWed, 24 May 2017 21:59:53 UTCAbout compassion and respect
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XMDt_iZT7RI/kzrqARh_BQAJ
Hello......... About compassion and respect An inferior mind will say that compassion and respect are in accordance with the guidance of morality that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and it's in accordance with a priori pure moral, but this is not sufficient, you have to applyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XMDt_iZT7RI
rami18Wed, 24 May 2017 21:36:49 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/RCQlLwN_BQAJ
abuse? > > >> Ashtray head tried to define number: >> >> "Thus the number 1 is to be identified with the class of all unit classes, the number 2 with the class of all two-membered classes, and so on." - Bertrand Russell >> > > Does seem a unnecessarily convoluted. Perhaps Dedekind andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Peter PercivalWed, 24 May 2017 21:35:19 UTCRe: How Einsteinians Win Grants
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE/yOdshYt-BQAJ
"Professor Hermann Nicolai, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), has received one of the prestigious Advanced Grants of the European Research Council (ERC). The ERC is funding Prof. Nicolai's research on a unified theory of quantum gravityhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE
Pentcho ValevWed, 24 May 2017 21:26:45 UTCRe: How Experiments Did Not Confirm Einstein's Relativity
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/r1Aj795a8eg/6ahtgx5-BQAJ
"Does the speed of light depend on the speed of its source? Before formulating his theory of special relativity, Albert Einstein spent a few years trying to formulate a theory in which the speed of light depends on its source, just like all material projectiles. Likewise, Walter Ritz outlinedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/r1Aj795a8eg
Pentcho ValevWed, 24 May 2017 21:18:57 UTCRe: Clueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/P-JIBEZ9BQAJ
abuse? > > > > Ashtray head tried to define number: > > > > "Thus the number 1 is to be identified with the class of all unit classes, the number 2 with the class of all two-membered classes, and so on." - Bertrand Russell > > > > Does seem a unnecessarily convoluted. Perhaps Dedekind andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenWed, 24 May 2017 21:03:27 UTCWhat is also the difference between animals and humans ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg/q8C92sd8BQAJ
Hello................ What is also the difference between animals and humans ? The back-bones of civilization is morality Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than animals and it's being morehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/1fHWTNz9rrg
rami18Wed, 24 May 2017 20:54:25 UTCRe: I CANT SLEEP!! ...LITERALLY! ....... I fall asleep and wake up 5mins later to massive Tooth Ache!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs/6wc6qUF6BQAJ
You should be able to get a free extraction any time of day in any hospital in any civilized country. Danhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs
Dan ChristensenWed, 24 May 2017 20:08:10 UTCClueless John -- Did glue sniffing kill 99.999... % of his brain cells?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/hUzzL-J5BQAJ
What happened in your case, Troll Boy? Crack? Crystal meth? Solvent abuse? > Ashtray head tried to define number: > > "Thus the number 1 is to be identified with the class of all unit classes, the number 2 with the class of all two-membered classes, and so on." - Bertrand Russell > Doeshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
Dan ChristensenWed, 24 May 2017 20:01:20 UTCRe: How Einsteinians Win Grants
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE/kohZYBZ5BQAJ
grant to say whether Einstein was wrong: Ah, here we have Pentcho's Bellyaching Number Two: the fact that physicists are actually paid to do their work. Poor fellow cannot stand that. -- Janhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE
JanWed, 24 May 2017 19:46:45 UTCRe: How Einsteinians Win Grants
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE/I4CLgV5yBQAJ
Lee Smolin promised to replace Einstein's relative time with a real and global time and FQXi gave him a grant: "Smolin wishes to hold on to the reality of time. But to do so, he must overcome a major hurdle: General and special relativity seem to imply the opposite. In the classical Newtonianhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE
Pentcho ValevWed, 24 May 2017 17:43:38 UTCRe: Fermat's Last theorem short proof
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4/0mMA4kpyBQAJ
Stevie Wonder again? LoL RofL Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 17:28:01 UTC+2 schrieb bassam king karzeddin: > On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 4:00:05 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > And > > And ... wonder! > > Was ... wonder! > > And > > or ... wonder! > > But ... for sure > >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 17:42:13 UTCRe: Tobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/SOvoKS1yBQAJ
Thats not true, he made it nearly to an age of 100 years: Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872 - 1970) Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 18:49:56 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel: > Tobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 17:40:06 UTCHow Einsteinians Win Grants
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE/QhDt2gJwBQAJ
Mark Srednicki and Joseph Polchinski were given a $1.32 million dollar grant to say whether Einstein was wrong: http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2013/013823/questioning-einstein "Could Einstein's theory of relativity be wrong? That's among the burning questions being asked by theoretical physicistshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eEP0PcHNyiE
Pentcho ValevWed, 24 May 2017 17:00:25 UTCTobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI/PgjjbHBvBQAJ
Tobacco head Bertrand Russell - smoking killed 98% of his brain cells. Russell's logic: "Like Gottlob Frege, Russell’s basic idea for defending (modern orangutan) logic was that numbers may be identified with classes of classes and that number-theoretic statements may be explained in terms ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/--mGqdoNDSI
John GabrielWed, 24 May 2017 16:49:56 UTCRe: sqrt2 and 2 equally mysterious, or not mysterious at all, and proof that 1 = 0.999...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8/y-92zANvBQAJ
>>> If (-1, 1]\(0, 1] = (-1, 0] is the result of these >>> operations, and so - as I have defined >> >> Sorry, I missed that. What definition have you been using >> that results in (-1,1]/(0,1] ? >> >> It seems unlikely that you could have been referring >> for days (weeks?) to thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8
Jim BurnsWed, 24 May 2017 16:42:10 UTCBorn an idiot and will die thus - Jim Burns.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8/ftYy73ZuBQAJ
I think that's what you were supposed to tell him. In your opinion, it must be 1 since you define 0.999... as 1. > Can it be derived from what you've already said? > I don't think it can, but maybe you can show otherwise. You're right! It can't be derived and that's why 0.999... as anotherhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8
John GabrielWed, 24 May 2017 16:32:05 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/vHtQMwBrBQAJ
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 5:18:58 PM UTC+2, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > Physically the number 2 does also not exist. Of course not. Even if there are, say, 2 atoms (ions) in an ion trap, you won't find _the number_ 2 there (at least not as a physical entity). > So to get the number 2, youhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
MeWed, 24 May 2017 15:28:36 UTCRe: Fermat's Last theorem short proof
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4/yuxLIvhqBQAJ
little theorem in integer numbers, where (and without loss of generality), > (x, y, z) are three positive distinct coprime integers, such that (x < y < z) > > And, p is any odd prime number that doesn’t divide xyz > , then the proof is only one step by Fermat’s little theorem (How?), > Thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4
bassam king karzeddinWed, 24 May 2017 15:28:01 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/04OvIMxqBQAJ
Instead of bob<>anna, there are idealized physical ideas like: "According to the old conception, length appears as something material which fills the straight line between its end points and at the same time prevents another thing from penetrating into its space by its rigidity. In addinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 15:24:53 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/WrvxD4lqBQAJ
Or a set of two line segments of unit length 1, one after the other, which also doesn't exist physically. Its already an idealization... Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 17:18:58 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com: > Physically the number 2 does also not exist. You wont be able > to have a line ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 15:20:04 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/3Uv5l3lqBQAJ
Physically the number 2 does also not exist. You wont be able to have a line of length 2 units. There will be always some atoms too much or too less. So to get the number 2, you already need abstractions, like a set of two people, bob and anna. And then say somthing |{bob,anna}| = 2, which inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 15:18:58 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/nVRDLRtqBQAJ
I wasn't talking about real numbers. I was talking about algebraic numbers. Not all real numbers are algebraic numbers. For example x=2^(1/3) as a solution of x^3-2=0 is an algebraic number. But pi, e, etc.. are not algebraic numbers. Lets stick to the simple case of: - The algebraic closurehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 15:12:13 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/jFYj4mtnBQAJ
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/ultrafilter+theorem#strength_and_weakness_as_a_choice_principle > > But it seems we cannot fully dispense with > some choice principles, at least according to > an old result from Läuchli: > > ZF is not enough to prove the existence of a > unique algebraichttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
bassam king karzeddinWed, 24 May 2017 14:23:01 UTCRe: sqrt2 and 2 equally mysterious, or not mysterious at all, and proof that 1 = 0.999...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8/aqKYh1RnBQAJ
>>> If we want to find 0.999... on the number line we can >>> do that by infinitely many times shifting point 0 >>> (or let's say an object at point 0) to a final position. >>> 1. Shift object at point 0 to point 0.9 >>> 2. Shift object at point 0.9 to point 0.99 >>> 3. Shift object at pointhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8
Jim BurnsWed, 24 May 2017 14:21:20 UTCRe: Amateur Math...ask SCI Guru......Math develop to Crazy Worlds
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/akMPGolTGNo/Q-nQRK9mBQAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตา และความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ ZetaFunction Odd Summations Problem? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=810384089116584&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/akMPGolTGNo
Mr Sawat LayuheemWed, 24 May 2017 14:09:30 UTCRe: I CANT SLEEP!! ...LITERALLY! ....... I fall asleep and wake up 5mins later to massive Tooth Ache!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs/hJ4thQVlBQAJ
How to pull a tigers tooth ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n6l5JP8s3w Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 15:01:13 UTC+2 schrieb graham...@gmail.com: > i cant go 10 meters from my freezer without a bottle of cold water > > > its 11pm...... i have to eat Ice Cream non stop or I will collapse!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 13:39:02 UTCI CANT SLEEP!! ...LITERALLY! ....... I fall asleep and wake up 5mins later to massive Tooth Ache!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs/Q5QjKfViBQAJ
i cant go 10 meters from my freezer without a bottle of cold water its 11pm...... i have to eat Ice Cream non stop or I will collapse!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOahssk5YCs
graham...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 13:01:13 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/kqsUPkRiBQAJ
Also it seems some more general arithmetic/algebra stuff even doesn't need the axiom of choice, only some ultrafilter principle: Strength and weakness as a “choice principle” https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/ultrafilter+theorem#strength_and_weakness_as_a_choice_principle But it seems we cannothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 12:48:33 UTCRe: Amateur Math...ask SCI Guru......Math develop to Crazy Worlds
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/akMPGolTGNo/cOnaWcZhBQAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตา และความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Exponential-Meaning? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=810355742452752&set=gm.1565993253433055&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/akMPGolTGNo
Mr Sawat LayuheemWed, 24 May 2017 12:39:32 UTCRe: I have a direct FLT geometrical proof, no need of Beal Re: Does a proof of FLT exist without having to prove Beal first?? I guess no!!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI/SNIxnr9hBQAJ
What does it mean practically? Well practically we might not construct 2^(1/3) geometrically, but arithmetically, we might very easily compute with x=2^(1/3), by just using everything that follows from x^3-2=0, we don't need infinity for that. The root is related to the root of z^3-1=(z-1)*(zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bpkDjpXjgcI
burs...@gmail.comWed, 24 May 2017 12:39:03 UTC