sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/mAb-mczXAwAJ
to commit the blasphemy also to claime that God does not know all numbers. [...] What lunatic would say that? [...] What wretched creatures would we be if we dared to erect barriers limiting the knowledge of God? [Saint Augustine: "City of God", XII 18] > > > > Cantor, who has known this veryhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 13:34:30 UTCThe New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history. It can't be rubbished.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/-pUeol0KHA0/_onu_7nXAwAJ
I am the first human to discover this rigorous calculus. For too long, the flawed definition f'(x)=Lim_{h -> 0} f(x+h)-f(x) / h has been taught and learned by naive students worldwide. It's easy to see the mainstream definition is flawed, for example, try formulating an auxiliary equationhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-pUeol0KHA0
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 13:33:10 UTCRe: trig, number theory
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/k2cZyOhWRAA/ntOcOI_XAwAJ
ok maybe it's finally time for me to give this up. Sorry for misquoting everybody.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/k2cZyOhWRAA
ben northFri, 21 Oct 2016 13:30:06 UTCRe: (x1-a )/ (y1-b)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OS9FLr4f-Ew/VIapUI_XAwAJ
Thanks for everything. can you explain In detailhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OS9FLr4f-Ew
toyancFri, 21 Oct 2016 13:30:06 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/pEHSO1XVAwAJ
Anyone who has studied and learned the new calculus has entered the glorious light and left the abyss that is modern mythmatics.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 12:49:18 UTCRe: I am going to kill psychopath Dan Christensen and do the world a favour.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw/z6E9FkbVAwAJ
It's the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus. > > Can we try it on the following function then: > > f(x)=sin(1/x)/x. It works for any continuous and smooth function and you know it! > > Does your double negation MVT theorem still hold? Still fixated on this junk of "doublehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 12:48:13 UTCRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/XNhYvh7VAwAJ
to commit the blasphemy also to claime that God does not know all numbers. [...] What lunatic would say that? [...] What wretched creatures would we be if we dared to erect barriers limiting the knowledge of God? [Saint Augustine: "City of God", XII 18] > > Cantor, who has known this very well,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 12:45:24 UTCRe: Two Trillion Galaxies,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8/MUraJE3UAwAJ
In article <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>, SteveGG <casagi...@optonline.net> said: > The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to > realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over > there on the other side ?! A really loud party. > Sohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8
William December StarrFri, 21 Oct 2016 12:30:24 UTCRe: Two simple proofs
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/3HN--teY95k/QM0xRmXQAwAJ
Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016 18:51:40 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil: > > Every diagonal number, as far as its digits can be used to > > identify it, is in > > a Cantor-list that contains all rational numbers. > > What is a "diagonal number" in a binary tree? There is none. But that is nothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3HN--teY95k
WMFri, 21 Oct 2016 11:18:49 UTCRe: The shortest proof of finished infinity
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vCf7qeYZtqg/tvgmwSjQAwAJ
segment of > > IN with aleph_0 elements. > > Let's use set theoretic language for considering your claim: > > "If card(IN) = aleph_0, then there is an n e IN such that card({1, ..., n}) = aleph_0." > > Since -in the context of set theory- we actually have card(IN) = aleph_0, > your claimhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vCf7qeYZtqg
WMFri, 21 Oct 2016 11:14:29 UTCRe: I am going to kill psychopath Dan Christensen and do the world a favour.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw/J1L4T5RQBAAJ
> concepts to be well defined. I was shocked at > the alacrity with which they concocted definitions. > "Define X" and then proceed to develop theory on > their definition, regardless of whether it was well > thought out or not. Having studied the Elements in > my early childhood years, Ihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw
j4n bur53Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:30:18 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/ABSjuvZPBAAJ
> irrelevant if it has single or double negation > or even "triple negation". Do you have a similar > construct in your language and is that why you > do not like it? You're afraid of "double negation"? LoL Maybe you are also afraid alone in the dark?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
j4n bur53Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:19:01 UTCThere are at least two methods of manufacturing trigonometry, the altitude method also proves sine is semicircle, not sinusoid
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/jGPNsjdJBAAJ
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 1:21:29 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Looking at my graph of the 5by5 cascade I placed a compass at (0, 2.5) and was able to capture all the altitudes of the right triangles. Telling me that the pattern of cascading altitudes of right triangle is ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 21 Oct 2016 07:15:24 UTCBlasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/KIBAVuZHBAAJ
The one who thinks that infinity would surpass the knowledge of God has to commit the blasphemy also to claime that God does not know all numbers. [...] What lunatic would say that? [...] What wretched creatures would we be if we dared to erect barriers limiting the knowledge of God? [Sainthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
WMFri, 21 Oct 2016 06:51:15 UTCWhat function straightline-curve does the altitudes trace out?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/jEYlm0ZGBAAJ
Looking at my graph of the 5by5 cascade I placed a compass at (0, 2.5) and was able to capture all the altitudes of the right triangles. Telling me that the pattern of cascading altitudes of right triangle is a semicircle. The importance of this fact, is that we can build trigonometry withouthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 21 Oct 2016 06:21:29 UTCGlossary at the end of the textbook Re: New Math Logical GLOSSARY of terms and symbols//TALK
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/U4GZ-GhpBhE/BVTGER1FBAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 4:45:53 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, I could no longer avoid making this glossary. The term that keeps on bugging and bothering me is the term "curve". It is extremely difficult to get away in math without using the term curve. In New Math, nohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/U4GZ-GhpBhE
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 21 Oct 2016 06:00:11 UTCWhat function straightline-curve does the altitudes trace out?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/jv5vj0RDBAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 3:31:08 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright now, I need to know what this special curve is, below in the altitudes of the 5by5 right triangle cascade. > > I need to install a Glossary and I need to once and for all, well name a curve, arc, compilatihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 21 Oct 2016 05:26:22 UTCRe: Non-numeric Pigeonhole Principle -- Formal proof in DCProof format (revised)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc/KqV8yK9ABAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 11:20:58 PM UTC-4, kiwis...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 6:55:24 PM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > Some background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle > > Do you have a proof of the "numeric" version? > > > snippedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc
Dan ChristensenFri, 21 Oct 2016 04:39:04 UTCRe: Non-numeric Pigeonhole Principle -- Formal proof in DCProof format (revised)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc/aKoThWc-BAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 11:20:58 PM UTC-4, kiwis...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 6:55:24 PM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > Some background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle > > Do you have a proof of the "numeric" version? > > > snippedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc
Dan ChristensenFri, 21 Oct 2016 03:57:14 UTCRe: Non-numeric Pigeonhole Principle -- Formal proof in DCProof format (revised)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc/QkjYsmw8BAAJ
Do you have a proof of the "numeric" version? > snippedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc
kiwis...@gmail.comFri, 21 Oct 2016 03:20:58 UTCNon-numeric Pigeonhole Principle -- Formal proof in DCProof format (revised)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc/epQsf8E3BAAJ
Some background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle THEOREM ******* Let P be a non-empty set of pigeons, and H a set of holes. Suppose each pigeon is put in a hole. Suppose further that there are more pigeons than holes, i.e. that no function mapping holes to pigeons ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uj6SHXY0dbc
Dan ChristensenFri, 21 Oct 2016 01:55:24 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/qyvE9SI1BAAJ
Chuckle. Afraid not. My mathematics is very rigorous and requires no mythology. I do not use epsilonics or infinitesimals which are both ill formed.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 01:07:24 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/NrcIGxI1BAAJ
That is not true because there is no such thing as an infinitesimal. You can't even show me one. Please don't even get me started on ultra-filters and subsets which are a load of bullshit. I won't waste my time discussing such crap. You might ask Chapman or Magadin. I'm certain they'll obligehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 01:06:12 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/W0wQe7M0BAAJ
wrote: > > > > > ****************************************************** > > > I hope this was a good lesson for you, you asked for it and truly you deserved it, and do not think that your non native language would save you, because any language stands helpless before the Queen, and stillhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:59:25 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/gPru4mM0BAAJ
what I'm > > > > really talking about, > > > > That sentence is also grammatically not correct. > > It is grammatically quite correct in the USA. > WHere must one be to regard it as incorrect? It's wrong is quite a few ways - not only in the USA but also everywhere else. Chuckle.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:53:44 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/beV7olY0BAAJ
what I'm > > > > > really talking about, > > > > > > That sentence is also grammatically not correct. > > > > It is grammatically quite correct in the USA. > > And I didn't write it, in any case. Liar. Oh yes you did! Chuckle. > > -- > Arturo Magidinhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:52:47 UTCRe: I am going to kill psychopath Dan Christensen and do the world a favour.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw/68ORCkQ0BAAJ
from > > > the so many fictions that had been inherited in your bloods and boons for so > > > many centuries, > > > > > > Indeed, one day someone said that “mathematics is too difficult for > > > mathematicians”, and do you know really who was that philosopher? > > > > > > Consider onlyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:51:27 UTCRe: Trolls among us
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/0W9r3WUzBAAJ
wrote: > > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:23:06 PM UTC+3, George Cornelius wrote: > > > [Next is not my ascii art. Thanks to R A for retrieving it from a > > > well-known site.] > > > > > > > > > +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. > > > | PLEASE DOhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:35:33 UTCDan Christen: A troll and filthy liar who cannot change because it's in his nature to be a troll.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/1PrQq14zBAAJ
On Thursday, 20 October 2016 14:52:05 UTC-7, Troll Dan Christensen wrote: > > > Thank you. > > > > As if you are the honest guard or the coming prophet who is going to save the mathematicians from devils > > > > Mathematicians are not little kids, > > True, but some malicious trollshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 00:35:02 UTCRe: Two Trillion Galaxies,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8/jpPG43IuBAAJ
It's just finite garbage inside your finite head. Don't you see? They invent a better telescope, they see farther. First telescope, bilions. 10^9 stars. Second telescope, trilions. 10^12 stars. Third telescope, exercise. Determine the current year in witch the number of stars stabilizes.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8
Vinicius Claudino FerrazThu, 20 Oct 2016 23:04:51 UTCRe: Trolls among us
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/pJoGZnoqBAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:23:06 PM UTC+3, George Cornelius wrote: > > [Next is not my ascii art. Thanks to R A for retrieving it from a > > well-known site.] > > > > > > +----------------https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
Dan ChristensenThu, 20 Oct 2016 21:52:05 UTCNew Math Logical GLOSSARY of terms and symbols//TALK
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/U4GZ-GhpBhE/3TxnnSMqBAAJ
Alright, I could no longer avoid making this glossary. The term that keeps on bugging and bothering me is the term "curve". It is extremely difficult to get away in math without using the term curve. In New Math, no curves exist. No curves of Old Math exist, not even the circle. What exists inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/U4GZ-GhpBhE
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 20 Oct 2016 21:45:53 UTCRe: I am going to kill psychopath Dan Christensen and do the world a favour.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw/wfhVMHQnBAAJ
In article <eae3d1a9-7a63-4285-a4ab-7ffed86de27c@googlegroups.com>, bassam king karzeddin <sophy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Virgil: you seem to me a very good thinker of your own You don't! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw
VirgilThu, 20 Oct 2016 20:56:40 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/V5ialConBAAJ
In article <ab6132a4-5466-4f40-a9cd-ab6d9def2923@googlegroups.com>, bassam king karzeddin <sophy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 5:40:44 PM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote: > > On Thursday, 20 October 2016 05:30:05 UTC-7, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > > > > ***********https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
VirgilThu, 20 Oct 2016 20:51:24 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/mS-RDOUmBAAJ
In article <1080724109.84155.1476988756972.JavaMail.root@sodium.mathforum.org>, bassam king karzeddin <b.kar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Quasi wrote: > > > (1) The set of integers is an infinite set. > > So at least one integer would be with infinite sequence of digits > "not necessarilyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
VirgilThu, 20 Oct 2016 20:46:25 UTCGlossary, and is the straightlinecurve in right triangle cascade of altitudes related to the function Y=1/x
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/ZoGddw8mBAAJ
Alright now, I need to know what this special curve is, below in the altitudes of the 5by5 right triangle cascade. I need to install a Glossary and I need to once and for all, well name a curve, arc, compilation curve, open-ended polygon, swivel rod, wherein all of them are the same thing. I amhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 20 Oct 2016 20:31:08 UTCRe: Trolls among us
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/RRuoMz0lBAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:23:06 PM UTC+3, George Cornelius wrote: > > [Next is not my ascii art. Thanks to R A for retrieving it from a > > well-known site.] > > > > > > +----------------https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
Dan ChristensenThu, 20 Oct 2016 20:16:05 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/uAHIOVIhBAAJ
wrote: > > > ****************************************************** > > I hope this was a good lesson for you, you asked for it and truly you deserved it, and do not think that your non native language would save you, because any language stands helpless before the Queen, and still therehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
bassam king karzeddinThu, 20 Oct 2016 19:04:15 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/oGxlyDQhBAAJ
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 1:40:06 PM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > >quasi wrote: > > >>bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > >>> > > >>>What should the clever students do to convince the > > world's > > >>>top most Journal and universities (inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
Arturo MagidinThu, 20 Oct 2016 19:02:11 UTCRe: Two Trillion Galaxies,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8/WKSJILUgBAAJ
Asked a valid question. Get garbage for an answer.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8
SteveGGThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:53:02 UTCRe: Two Trillion Galaxies,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8/l55WhiEgBAAJ
On 19/10/2016 06:42 pm, The Starmaker wrote: > They used to say "billions and billions of galaxies", now it's Two trillion???? You're the Starmaker. Didn't you count how many stars and galaxies you made?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8
Robin ChapmanThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:42:28 UTCRe: Trolls among us
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/JI195QQgBAAJ
As if you are the honest guard or the coming prophet who is going to save the mathematicians from devils Mathematicians are not little kids, they can independently think and distinguish the dictator who is giving orders, where he is not better than a troll as the case we are facing herehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
bassam king karzeddinThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:40:26 UTCRe: What should a clever student do?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM/XLFZSQAgBAAJ
Quasi wrote: > (1) The set of integers is an infinite set. So at least one integer would be with infinite sequence of digits "not necessarily being all with zeros digits" Where this is not accepted in mathematics as far as I know (Contradiction in Mathematics) > > (2) As x approacheshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JJbxVEGsZuM
bassam king karzeddinThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:40:06 UTCRe: Poll: Does high dimension space preexist low dimensional space?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KXf8wzU5jTY/0DrtAqQfBAAJ
should start with four spatials, a la Bucky, because it is sui generis > I'm lucky, I had a usual high-level course of > calculus and the college courses in the secondary > and I placed out of the secondary by seventh grade, > and I have a science degree in mathematics, and I > have twentyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KXf8wzU5jTY
abu.ku...@gmail.comThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:33:29 UTCRe: Two Trillion Galaxies,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8/yVrLPhUfBAAJ
Hey, did you study Optics? What happens when you want to see a lepton? what happens when you want to see where is the universe Horizon? microscope, telescope, SpiritScope. that's the same. Paz e alegria, Vinícius twitter.com/mathspiritual I've just remembered X-Weapon, with Cyclop'shttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BEU4uBK6ua8
Vinicius Claudino FerrazThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:23:16 UTCTrolls among us
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc/lpNY0BIfBAAJ
[Next is not my ascii art. Thanks to R A for retrieving it from a well-known site.] +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: |https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mmIQDmKeIxc
George CorneliusThu, 20 Oct 2016 18:23:06 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/jgcYDm8eBAAJ
Oops, try this one: f(x) = sin(1/x)/x j4n bur53 schrieb: > You will end up in the mainstream camp, using > > notions such epsilon neigbourhood or such > > or do you have another idea? > > j4n bur53 schrieb: >> >> Take this function: >> >> f(x) = sin(1/x)*x >> >> It has inflectionhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
j4n bur53Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:11:22 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/gcqNpm4dBAAJ
You will end up in the mainstream camp, using notions such epsilon neigbourhood or such or do you have another idea? j4n bur53 schrieb: > > Take this function: > > f(x) = sin(1/x)*x > > It has inflection points at: > > c = 1/(π n+π) > > I guess the a,b intervals can get pretty small.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
j4n bur53Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:53:01 UTCRe: The BIG STUPID tried to suppress the New Calculus, but it has since grown more popular.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI/gjRmFjsdBAAJ
Take this function: f(x) = sin(1/x)*x It has inflection points at: c = 1/(π n+π) I guess the a,b intervals can get pretty small. You will need some infinitessimal construction to exclude ------------------>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ all a,b intervals and make your "double negation"https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/F3mSrqOsMfI
j4n bur53Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:49:20 UTCRe: I am going to kill psychopath Dan Christensen and do the world a favour.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw/gAb-YSkdBAAJ
from > > the so many fictions that had been inherited in your bloods and boons for so > > many centuries, > > > > Indeed, one day someone said that “mathematics is too difficult for > > mathematicians”, and do you know really who was that philosopher? > > > > Consider only one point ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aIdhnFzl5Aw
bassam king karzeddinThu, 20 Oct 2016 17:48:04 UTC