sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/LwWCdPRgBAAJ
Jeez, Simon! John Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in hishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:17:30 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/DHSQw7NgBAAJ
In quotes?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:12:52 UTCRe: Top 5 Calculus Help Sites -- Certified Crank Free
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg/zrZdLZZgBAAJ
wrote: > > Students should beware of the crank calculus sites on offer here at sci.math. If you are looking for help with calculus, may I suggest instead the following calculus help sites, each certified crank-free: > > > > http://www.slader.com/subject/math/calculus/homework-help-and-answershttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:10:45 UTCsinusoid from rolling oblique cut cylinder, or optical illusion Re: We recognize Sine as a Semicircle Wave and not the fictional sinusoidal
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM/pgo2i4BgBAAJ
Now when math has fakery, there are loads and loads of people who buy into the fakery and help support the fakery. They unwittingly never have a careful eye and seem to "go with the flow" of fakery enhancements. They do this not to shed light on the subject but to gain acceptance into the crowdhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:09:12 UTCRe: How does one know when a complex number 'c' is in the Mandelbrot set M ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o/xfaqdCVgBAAJ
wrote: >> On 9/24/2016 8:05 AM, David Bernier wrote: >>> The Mandelbrot set is what's not divergent in modulus, under >>> a quadratic map parameterized by the input, say >>> >>> f_c : z |-> z^2 + c >>> >>> with the complex number c being the parameter. >>> >>> It goes something like this:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o
David BernierMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:02:41 UTCA change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/B4RXVAZgBAAJ
I highly recommend, to myself, the MATH "lectures" of John Gabriel.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:00:27 UTCRe: Top 5 Calculus Help Sites -- Certified Crank Free
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg/uacVvsZfBAAJ
sci.math. If you are looking for help with calculus, may I suggest instead the following calculus help sites, each certified crank-free: > > http://www.slader.com/subject/math/calculus/homework-help-and-answers/ > > http://www.freemathhelp.com/calculus-help.html > > http://www.math.com/hohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:55:54 UTCRe: function for generating, the m-th prime.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/2QtcTxdrvVg/FXohWK9fBAAJ
Rewrite: DERIVATION: 1)E_m(s) = 1 + 1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m + 2)^s + 1/(p_m + 3)^s + ... 1.1) E_1(s) = Euler zeta = 1 + 1/(2)^s + 1/(3)^s + 1/(4)^s + 1/(5)^s + ... 2) (1/[p_(m)]^s)E_m(s) = 1/(p_m)^s + sum of all other terms OF E_m(s) each with the algebraic factorhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/2QtcTxdrvVg
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:54:14 UTCRe: Soifer Graph
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/IROa7_EQuxM/JKJVo4xfBAAJ
It is a graph named for me: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SoiferGraph.html Soiferhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/IROa7_EQuxM
letra...@gmail.comMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:51:45 UTCRe: What MIT and HARVARD morons had to say about my New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RizGN5qR200/5VAUnW9eBAAJ
Which guarantees that you are both wrong! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RizGN5qR200
VirgilMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:31:21 UTCTop 5 Calculus Help Sites -- Certified Crank Free
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg/7iROGypeBAAJ
Students should beware of the crank calculus sites on offer here at sci.math. If you are looking for help with calculus, may I suggest instead the following calculus help sites, each certified crank-free: http://www.slader.com/subject/math/calculus/homework-help-and-answers/ http://www.freehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/K5OxFhu-PXg
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:26:22 UTCMore juvenile hate spam from JG -- Students beware!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/zFZM6K1k0LI/VuNgD-BdBAAJ
Students, beware! John Gabriel is the worst kind of troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zFZM6K1k0LI
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:21:04 UTCRe: Question. zeta(s)? . Why ask, why not do? I am lazy (idle or unmotivated) or incompetent (unskilled or ignorant) or was "TOLD" (insulted or admonished).
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA/PbnlitxdBAAJ
+ ... > > 1.1) E_1(s) = Euler zeta = 1 + 1/(2)^s + 1/(3)^s + 1/(4)^s + 1/(5)^s + ... > > 2) (1/[p_(m)]^s)E_m(s) = > > 1/(p_m)^s + sum of all other terms OF E_m(s) with the algebraic factor 1/(p_m)^s. > > 3) [E_m(s)](1 - 1/[p_(m)]^s) = 1 + sum of all other terms of E_m(s),https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:20:49 UTCRe: Question. zeta(s)? . Why ask, why not do? I am lazy (idle or unmotivated) or incompetent (unskilled or ignorant) or was "TOLD" (insulted or admonished).
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA/pWX8boNdBAAJ
Rewrite: DERIVATION: 1)E_m(s) = 1 + 1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m + 2)^s + 1/(p_m + 3)^s + ... 1.1) E_1(s) = Euler zeta = 1 + 1/(2)^s + 1/(3)^s + 1/(4)^s + 1/(5)^s + ... 2) (1/[p_(m)]^s)E_m(s) = 1/(p_m)^s + sum of all other terms OF E_m(s) with the algebraic factor 1/(p_m)^shttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:14:26 UTCIt's that time of year again for our freshman college students.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/zFZM6K1k0LI/g46ovzhdBAAJ
Your moron lecturer have no doubt bombarded you with the rot of Georg Cantor. To help you understand and not be brainwashed by the bullshit they throw at you, I offer the following 5 part series on Cantor's delusions: http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-758.html#pohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zFZM6K1k0LI
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:09:05 UTCExposing mainstream ignorance and revealing new knowledge.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RA6ioCVcrVU/DnluVBFdBAAJ
In line with my goal to deCantorise mythmatics so it can once again become mathematics, I shall occasionally compile a very fine video on a concept that mainstream primates have misunderstood. I share another fine video with you on the second most important concept in mathematics - thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RA6ioCVcrVU
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:06:16 UTCThe Entire single variable new calculus for eighth graders and mythmatics professors now available.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PPoo6JBaouY/_J3wRs5cBAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PPoo6JBaouY
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:01:28 UTCRe: Question. zeta(s)? . Why ask, why not do? I am lazy (idle or unmotivated) or incompetent (unskilled or ignorant) or was "TOLD" (insulted or admonished).
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA/diuiFcVcBAAJ
(p_i)^(-s))]} = 1 > >> > > >> >Would it or could it be instead, > >> > > >> >{lim_{n->oo}[SUM_{m = 1 to n}(1/m^s)]}* > >> > > >> >{lim_{k->oo}PRODUCT_{i = 1 to k}[(1 - (p_i)^(-s))]} = 1 > >> > > >> >p_i is prime, > >> > > >> >p_1 =2, p_2 = 3, p_3 = 5, p_4 = 7, and so on. > >> > >> Therehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xOibdWnI_JA
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 02:00:49 UTCRe: The Entire single variable new calculus for eighth graders now available for primate mythmatics professors.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X7yx0tfoAPM/GNCdFwpbBAAJ
t(x)=kx+b > and a parallel secant line equation s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x + p, > then f'(x)={f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n). > > Proof: > > Let t(x)=kx+b be the equation of the tangent line to the function f(x). > > Then a parallel secant line is given by s(x)=[{f(x+n)-f(x-m)}/(m+n)] x + p >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X7yx0tfoAPM
PythonMon, 26 Sep 2016 01:29:06 UTCRe: What MIT and HARVARD morons had to say about my New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RizGN5qR200/o4TptdtaBAAJ
ah ah ah ah ah!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RizGN5qR200
PythonMon, 26 Sep 2016 01:25:47 UTCRe: New! Single variable new calculus for grade 8 students in just 2 lessons.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek/shG6gslXBAAJ
Calculus,” he proposes a new but thoroughly unworkable “definition” of the derivative of function. Problems with it include it being undefined for every real number in the domain of ANY linear function (e.g. f(x)=x+3) and at ANY points of inflexion (e.g. on f(x)=x^3 at x=0). He won't deny it. Inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:29:30 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/T5Bj54FXBAAJ
unexpected surprising result with infinite sets , maybe wrong result from my perspective , > > > > You can think of it as a problem. Or you can think of it as an opportunity. > > Er, no. He can only think of it as pure nonsense. Chuckle. > > > > > > > > like all positive integers and itshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:24:23 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/UnG8MlxXBAAJ
unexpected surprising result with infinite sets , maybe wrong result from my perspective , > > You can think of it as a problem. Or you can think of it as an opportunity. Er, no. He can only think of it as pure nonsense. Chuckle. > > > > like all positive integers and its subset allhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:21:41 UTCThe Entire single variable new calculus for eighth graders now available for primate mythmatics professors.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X7yx0tfoAPM/ZeeAq-xWBAAJ
The entire single variable new calculus now available in this one applet: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXM ************** Using only 8th grade algebra *************** We can prove that if f(x) is a function with tangent line equation t(x)=kx+b and a parallelhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X7yx0tfoAPM
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:13:42 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/wr2Dd8dWBAAJ
unexpected surprising result with infinite sets , maybe wrong result from my perspective , You can think of it as a problem. Or you can think of it as an opportunity. > like all positive integers and its subset all positive odd numbers have the same cardinality, the same size(or the samehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
FredJeffriesMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:11:02 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/i_97-o9WBAAJ
whether two finite sets have the same size , while a lot of mathematical rules become invalid in the world of infinite , so > > (1).how Cantor make it sure that bijection of two **infinite** sets can also ensure the two **infinite** sets have the same size(or the same number of elements) ? >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
John GabrielMon, 26 Sep 2016 00:07:03 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/_n8O2JFTBAAJ
In article <516aed91-36ed-40e3-8492-197b66eefd5e@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Samstag, 24. September 2016 17:05:19 UTC+2 schrieb Philip Lee: > > I know little about theory, so the following maybe a stupid question . > > > > "one-to-one correspondence"(bijhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
VirgilSun, 25 Sep 2016 23:12:13 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/RbHC0idSBAAJ
If requested, yes. As posted, it was offered just as a claim. >I think a formal proof depends on the lemma that > >if one gives N in binary form > N = a_0 + a_1 2 + ... + a_r 2^r (a_i = 0 or 1) >then the smallest number of powers of 2 that add up to N >is just the number of non-zero a_i.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
quasiSun, 25 Sep 2016 22:46:18 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/-nlMQUlQBAAJ
two finite sets have the same size , while a lot of mathematical rules become invalid in the world of infinite , so > (1).how Cantor make it sure that bijection of two **infinite** sets can also ensure the two **infinite** sets have the same size(or the same number of elements) ? He definedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
WMSun, 25 Sep 2016 22:12:01 UTCRe: New! Single variable new calculus for grade 8 students in just 2 lessons.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek/hPk-dedOBAAJ
Don't bother. JG knows nothing about calculus. In his goofy “New Calculus,” he proposes a new but thoroughly unworkable “definition” of the derivative of function. Problems with it include it being undefined for every real number in the domain of any linear function (e.g. f(x)=x+3) and at anyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek
Dan ChristensenSun, 25 Sep 2016 21:46:43 UTCNew! Single variable new calculus for grade 8 students in just 2 lessons.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek/Df35MppOBAAJ
Download the applet and see how easy it is to teach your grade 8 students the single variable new calculus: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLYkZjZlFSVjFWNXMhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/giscYyyV2ek
John GabrielSun, 25 Sep 2016 21:41:11 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/VXGlcoJMBAAJ
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 5:05:19 PM UTC+2, Philip Lee wrote: > (1) How Cantor make it sure that bijection of two **infinite** sets can > also ensure the two **infinite** sets have the same size [...]? He just considered "equinumerosity" to be THE measure for set size, even if thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
MeSun, 25 Sep 2016 21:02:50 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/7HLk5_pLBAAJ
If you do decide to try the test suggested above, you may need to use a larger value of n than n = 1000, else with C++, all reasonable implementations will complete almost instantly. Perhaps try n = 10^5. quasihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
quasiSun, 25 Sep 2016 20:53:08 UTCRe: Students: How to spot an idiot professor.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0/ooVJohdJBAAJ
Chuckle. > I will count the Chuckles, Chucky.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0
j4n bur53Sun, 25 Sep 2016 20:00:13 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/lr7AQnRIBAAJ
Corrected version: tst:=proc(n) local s,x,y; s:=0; for x from 1 to n do for y from 1 to n do s:=s+f(x,y) od; od; print(s); NULL; end: > StringTools[FormatTime]("%H:%M:%S"); > tst(1000); >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
quasiSun, 25 Sep 2016 19:48:31 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/2cqCHw1IBAAJ
I don't know whether or not they'll be faster, but I am a little curious. To benchmark f,g, or your function, you could use a C++ analog of the following Maple program which tests f ... tst:=proc(y_max) local s,x,y; s:=0: for x from 1 to 1000 do for y from 1 tohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
quasiSun, 25 Sep 2016 19:41:08 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/eQlfbb9GBAAJ
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:05:22 -0400, quasi wrote: ... > #---------------------------------------------------------------- > # h(x,y) -- consistency criterion for f > #---------------------------------------------------------------- > h:=proc(x,y) > if x>=y then > x-y > elifhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
James WaldbySun, 25 Sep 2016 19:17:15 UTCRe: Students: How to spot an idiot professor.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0/aHCv6I1GBAAJ
Get used to it moron. I'll be kicking your arse for a long, long time. Chuckle. > > Needs a lot of creativity. Putting together > new ideas of hate, from his "Zettelkasten".https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0
John GabrielSun, 25 Sep 2016 19:13:42 UTCRe: What MIT and HARVARD morons had to say about my New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RizGN5qR200/N2jCtnxGBAAJ
are > >> > to be regarded as the limits of sequences of rational numbers. Since > >> > a limit is defined as a number to which the terms of the sequence > >> > approach in such a way that ultimately the difference between this > >> > number and the terms of the sequence can be made less than anyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RizGN5qR200
John GabrielSun, 25 Sep 2016 19:12:29 UTCHow to handle the dufus front page hog John Gabriel and why he is here; how to handle sci.math robots
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/zUXGLLkKoCQ/IjuNfGlGBAAJ
Now the poster John Gabriel was set up to try to destroy AP, Archimedes Plutonium, first by trying some years back to get AP to click on his stupid websites and once clicked on, fill my computer with virus. The reason for his obnoxious posts and dwelling on Calculus is because AP is changinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zUXGLLkKoCQ
Archimedes PlutoniumSun, 25 Sep 2016 19:11:06 UTCWe recognize Sine as a Semicircle Wave and not the fictional sinusoidal Re: sine and cosine are semicircle waves, what is sec, csc?? Re: sinusoidal is not a shape of physics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM/65RfMTZFBAAJ
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:05:10 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, the curves I was trying to remember were secant and cosecant graphs which look like ellipses. > > So, tell me, if the sine and cosine are really semicircles not sinusoids, then what does that make secanthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM
Archimedes PlutoniumSun, 25 Sep 2016 18:49:06 UTCRe: The ray is more fundamental than the line
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sIr6k6CP73o/TZ5JVApEBAAJ
søndag 25. september 2016 18.44.44 UTC+2 skrev Tim Golden BandTech.com følgende: > On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 6:31:11 PM UTC-4, mitch wrote: > > On 09/21/2016 10:54 PM, Tim Golden BandTech.com wrote: > > > On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 9:27:37 PM UTC-4, Ross A. Finlayson > > > wrote:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sIr6k6CP73o
konybergSun, 25 Sep 2016 18:27:38 UTCRe: Students: How to spot an idiot professor. 9:38
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/5XtRQCcPQA0/1pKfgkRDBAAJ
be problematic, that is, ill formed. Then ask a professor to explain why it is defined that way. If he knows what he is talking about, he will give you several good reasons. OTH, if he/she is an idiot, the response will be: > > 1. "That's just how it is defined." > > OR > > 2. "You have tohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/5XtRQCcPQA0
konybergSun, 25 Sep 2016 18:13:29 UTCRe: What set theorists (have to) believe
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WTjFvB0ugkI/N0leLpFCBAAJ
In article <18670ee4-0669-4b8d-9989-b73c8e7ff20e@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Sonntag, 25. September 2016 05:15:18 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil: > > > > > The infinite union > > > {1, 2, 3, ..., n-1} U {n} = {1, 2, 3, ..., n} > > > > That is not one infinitehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WTjFvB0ugkI
VirgilSun, 25 Sep 2016 18:00:38 UTCRe: More juvenile hate spam from JG
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MeRSv7W2uH8/MmPOmy1CBAAJ
“definition” of the derivative of function. Problems with it include that it is undefined for every real number in the domain of any linear function (e.g. f(x)=x+3) and at any points of inflexion (e.g. on f(x)=x^3 at x=0). He won't deny it. In the real world, however, derivatives are defined athttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MeRSv7W2uH8
Dan ChristensenSun, 25 Sep 2016 17:53:31 UTCRe: Students: How to spot an idiot professor.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0/Yk5Z2uxBBAAJ
He is currently eating his salad with "Bwaaaa haaaaa haaaaaa" and "Chuckle". You know, this is very hard work. From 15:00 to around 18:00 posting hate spam. Needs a lot of creativity. Putting together new ideas of hate, from his "Zettelkasten".https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0
j4n bur53Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:48:53 UTCRe: What set theorists (have to) believe
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/WTjFvB0ugkI/abfTTNtBBAAJ
In article <c24fc3ea-5333-493f-8033-33f5addb2eac@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > For convergent sequences to have limits we don't need set theory. > What they don't have is the completeness of terms claimed by set theory. But > for doing mathematics andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WTjFvB0ugkI
VirgilSun, 25 Sep 2016 17:47:37 UTCRe: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two infinite sets
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE/sP47mMpBBAAJ
you'll believe anything and quite frankly you deserve it Peter Lee. Whats "Bwaaaa haaaaa haaaaaa", another salad dressing?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gcT3guHFYYE
j4n bur53Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:46:26 UTCRe: Students: How to spot an idiot professor.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0/MaSrqrpBBAAJ
be problematic, that is, ill formed. > > > Troll Boy (JG) just got burned on his own ill formed definition of a derivative in his goofy "New Calculus." Problems with it include that it is undefined for every real number in the domain of any linear function (e.g. f(x)=x+3) and at any points ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lj1eUaNO3n0
Dan ChristensenSun, 25 Sep 2016 17:45:17 UTCRe: What MIT and HARVARD morons had to say about my New Calculus.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RizGN5qR200/FOowuJpBBAAJ
JG, you chuckle like this? https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2014-10/23/6/enhanced/webdr09/anigif_enhanced-buzz-11432-1414061356-14.gif From Celebs on Crack: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdYmDnmCMAAY6Y2.jpg j4n bur53 schrieb: > John Gabriel schrieb: >> As usual, your commenthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RizGN5qR200
j4n bur53Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:43:00 UTC