sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: what is this spin term Re: So the AP Equations of EM are six
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/PvJ_UGIdAgAJ
Re: making sense of the AP-Maxwell Equations Re: So the AP Equations of EM are six// reviewing them On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 4:02:34 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Now I have the suspicion that these spins caused the Solenoid Valves on JUNO spacecraft at Jupiter, to nothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 07:12:41 UTCRe: Catalysts Topple the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54/xgvMXVgdAgAJ
Heat engines capable of violating the second law of thermodynamics are COMMONPLACE. This would be an obvious fact if misleading education had not diverted the attention from relevant examples: "A necessary component of a heat engine, then, is that two temperatures are involved. At one stage thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54
Pentcho ValevThu, 24 Aug 2017 07:11:58 UTCwhy each advanced Alien civilization is using a Decimal Number Representation Re: Rationals are too vague
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/UMaoA5wZAgAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 3:11:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) > 20) Now I number this writing for I want to elaborate on many of them, especially this one. When numbers are only Grid Numbers, then numbers like pi or 2.71.... are not classified as anything special, forhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 06:03:31 UTCRe: prime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/A98Sl4kZAgAJ
of > primes, take their absolute difference and see if it equals 2. I agree, that's quite obvious to anyone with any sense. At first I thought Solomon was just an ignorant fool, but after seeing the number of times he didn't comprehend replies (for example, he calls his method a twin primehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
James WaldbyThu, 24 Aug 2017 06:02:12 UTCRe: Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/CyU7Q6kYAgAJ
Rational numbers might not exist, but village idiots oviously do exist, even in reality. Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2017 22:11:13 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
burs...@gmail.comThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:46:08 UTCRe: New Gravitational Wave Hoax
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ/_MZL5r4XAgAJ
"While astronomers are staying silent on whether they are engaged in optical follow-ups to a potential gravitational wave detection..." https://www.newscientist.com/article/2144937-exclusive-we-may-have-detected-a-new-kind-of-gravitational-wave/amp/ Why should astronomers stay silent? Are theyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ
Pentcho ValevThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:29:22 UTCRe: Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/R610vJgXAgAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 3:11:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special > > Thank goodness there is day and night, work and sleep on a daily basis. Ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:26:38 UTCRe: prime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/uGDC1psVAgAJ
Jack, The objective is not to test if candidate primes are twins. Obviously, if given two primes you can check visually if they differ by 2. The objective is to identify ALL twin primes from a range of PRIME numbers. Dividing PRIME numbers by 3; correcting the quotient to the nearest integerhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 04:50:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/HeBP408TAgAJ
You recently, emphasis added: the method will identify twin primes from _any_ list of primes. If the list is in ascending order what not test for the (n+1)-th being two greater than the n-th? -- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
Peter PercivalThu, 24 Aug 2017 04:08:07 UTCNumber Crazy Today?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo/h6ZKbQ8RAgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Number Crazy Today? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=861621080659551&set=pcb.861621130659546&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo
Mr Sawat LayuheemThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:26:51 UTCprime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/9rCTq68PAgAJ
I must admit I am baffled by this thread. If you have a candidate pair of primes, take their absolute difference and see if it equals 2. Best regards, Jack Fearnley I am posting out of thread because my attempts to post in thread do not seem to appear.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
Jack FearnleyThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:01:40 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/9JdixZkPAgAJ
HI VINICIUS, Here are the test twin primes 5142649931.00 3.00 1714216644 5142649933.00 3.00 1714216644 & 5142650207.00 3.00 1714216736 5142650209.00 3.00 1714216736 The method was applied as above to extract the twinhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:00:06 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/kWHOHfgNAgAJ
Vinícius,, I see from your other posts that you have a very deep knowledge of math. I hope you will take the time to find the answer to your question using the method posted earlier. I just want to know if there is any way it will fail. YOUR QUESTION 5142649931 and 5142649933 5142650207 andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/wXH58fgNAgAJ
I do not claim to find or prove that they are infinite couples. Just that the method will identify twin primes from any list of primes. I work with Excel that cannot handle these large integers except as scientific notation. If you have the means to work with large integers, perhaps you couldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/iG8uSvgNAgAJ
Thank you for your input. Methinks I am being skewered for the wrong reasons. All I need answered is will this method find twin primes from a list of PRIME numbers. I never claimed it was the best method or the fastest method. What I would like to establish is whether it is a new methodhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/RPKNM_gNAgAJ
I posted a reply to this. It will hopefully appear soon. Await for your comments.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/ZMOpwvYNAgAJ
Thank you for your list. The method did not fail as you will find from the extract from my worksheet. Unfortunately you included 231 which is not a prime number but a composite. You also jumbled the numbers - I wonder why? Anyway, I formatted the list in ascending order so as to work on it.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:06 UTCRe: Archimedes Plutonium fails yet again!!! (was Tufts, was Boston College, Newton Massachusetts...)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/CaH5VnYNAgAJ
writes: > >> Mike asks why Tufts University? Perhaps wanting no math failures. > > So now you're guessing? Mention enough universities and sooner or later > you'll get the right one? What a stalking failure! > >> Hey Mike, Mike Moroney, had a tough time with math in college? eh > > Nope!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
Serg ioThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:20:55 UTCRe: What maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/_C7olksNAgAJ
> > Applications of mathematical transfinite need not be restricted to (meta)physical infinite: comparing strengths of proofs, computer program debugging, game theory, ... > > I studied computer engineering and never came across applications of transfinite numbers in computer program debugginghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
FredJeffriesThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:17:51 UTCRe: Fake math proofs, due to Multi-Reductio-ad-Absurdum, the Euler Fermat Last Theorem case//Gelfond-Schneider//Wiles
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs/ad8pmfIKAgAJ
You sign your spam with a picture of your a**hole? This makes indeed a lot of sense... Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2017 00:42:19 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > . \ . . | . /. > . . \. . .|. . /. . > ..\....|.../... > ::\:::|::/:: >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs
burs...@gmail.comThu, 24 Aug 2017 01:34:50 UTCRe: Plutonium Fails Yet Again (was Boston College, Newton Massachusetts...)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/1EFEGxgHAgAJ
wrote: > >>> Monty Python: Who is the village idiot who believes the frozen permafrost= >>> of the Arctic is caused by the geothermal heat of the Earth? > > No Answer, Archie Poo? I want to hear how permafrost is formed by geothermal > heat!!! > >> Mike Moroney asks why Boston College,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
benjThu, 24 Aug 2017 00:24:13 UTCRe: Archimedes Plutonium fails yet again!!! (was Tufts, was Boston College, Newton Massachusetts...)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/TxUYRA8HAgAJ
Physics and Math failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes: >Mike asks why Tufts University? Perhaps wanting no math failures. So now you're guessing? Mention enough universities and sooner or later you'll get the right one? What a stalking failure! >Hey Mike, Mikehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
Michael MoroneyThu, 24 Aug 2017 00:23:35 UTCRe: What maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/1veEeQgGAgAJ
wrote: > > > Even the computer, that the bank uses, can only store some large finite number. > > You are confusing mathematical transfinite with metaphysical infinite. > > Computers are perfectly capable of calculating with mathematical transfinite ordinals and cardinals. But they can'thttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
alal...@gmail.comThu, 24 Aug 2017 00:04:47 UTCEuclid Infinitude of Primes proof challenge Re: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/qDzC81QFAgAJ
is either a prime or composite. All composites are product of primes. > > > > > > > > Take your product, from a previous version of this screed, P = 2*3*5*...*11*13 + 1. > > > > If this is a prime, then its bigger than 13, and so not on our list. If it is composite, then it is divisible by somehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:51:55 UTCRe: Greatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/6FeUKiIFAgAJ
>> Why do we have to count them all? We (and you) know >> they go on and on an on ... > > in order to know if they can be trusted when they begin > to talk about ALL the natural numbers. So how they can be > trusted if they did not even count them ALL? I'm guessing that you think that therehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
Jim BurnsWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:48:17 UTCRe: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/mZmiGxsEAgAJ
either a prime or composite. All composites are product of primes. > > > > > > Take your product, from a previous version of this screed, P = 2*3*5*...*11*13 + 1. > > > If this is a prime, then its bigger than 13, and so not on our list. If it is composite, then it is divisible by some prime,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
FredJeffriesWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:29:28 UTCRe: Fake math proofs, due to Multi-Reductio-ad-Absurdum, the Euler Fermat Last Theorem case//Gelfond-Schneider//Wiles
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs/ozee7PcDAgAJ
I agree. Proof by contradiction is not illuminating.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs
ten...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:26:56 UTCcan Don Redmond do valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes? Re: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/h_dpM_MDAgAJ
either a prime or composite. All composites are product of primes. > > > > > > Take your product, from a previous version of this screed, P = 2*3*5*...*11*13 + 1. > > > If this is a prime, then its bigger than 13, and so not on our list. If it is composite, then it is divisible by some prime,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:26:36 UTCTufts University , student guide to math department Re: (was Boston College, Newton Massachusetts...)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/-6XmKecCAgAJ
Mike asks why Tufts University? Perhaps wanting no math failures. ------ Hey Mike, Mike Moroney, had a tough time with math in college? eh Archimedes Plutonium's Student Guide of Math Education Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics Still getting the Table of Errors up andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 23:07:25 UTCFake math proofs, due to Multi-Reductio-ad-Absurdum, the Euler Fermat Last Theorem case//Gelfond-Schneider//Wiles
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs/xu-VhogBAgAJ
Now, the single greatest weakness of most math professors, is their lack of Logical abilities. They simply have a difficult time of assembling a logical reasoned argument. And that is what proofs are all about. Now, on the face of it, since math proofs are the application of Logic, one wouldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/wqrgiRQzyKs
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:42:19 UTCPlutonium Fails Yet Again (was Boston College, Newton Massachusetts...)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw/PlAXiDMBAgAJ
Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes: >On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:10:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Monty Python: Who is the village idiot who believes the frozen permafrost= >> of the Arctic is caused by the geothermal heat of the Earth? Nohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0tX4cNVWEVw
Michael MoroneyWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:36:14 UTCRe: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/bNCp6xcBAgAJ
either a prime or composite. All composites are product of primes. > > > > Take your product, from a previous version of this screed, P = 2*3*5*...*11*13 + 1. > > If this is a prime, then its bigger than 13, and so not on our list. If it is composite, then it is divisible by some prime, say q.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
Don RedmondWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:34:15 UTCNew Gravitational Wave Hoax
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ/9ND_VE3_AQAJ
LIGO conspirators have not resolved their huge noise-correlation problem (which actually nullifies their "discoveries") but are ready to fool the gullible world again: "Over the weekend, astronomer J. Craig Wheeler of the University of Texas at Austin launched speculation over a potential newhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ
Pentcho ValevWed, 23 Aug 2017 22:01:26 UTCRe: What maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/5hWjohP_AQAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 12:50:04 PM UTC-7, alal...@gmail.com wrote: > Even the computer, that the bank uses, can only store some large finite number. You are confusing mathematical transfinite with metaphysical infinite. Computers are perfectly capable of calculating withhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
FredJeffriesWed, 23 Aug 2017 21:57:18 UTCRe: Greatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/_W2-jQT9AQAJ
On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 7:14:09 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Where math professors the world over adamantly believed and forced the acceptance by all who want to pass mathematics, that .9999.... =1. > Is that why you failed math, Archie? And you spent the rest of your lifehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
Dan ChristensenWed, 23 Aug 2017 21:19:34 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/Oo4tYtL8AQAJ
Of course not, but being trivial would quickly earn it that label. [...]https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
FromTheRaftersWed, 23 Aug 2017 21:15:59 UTCRe: Greatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/Xim6g0z8AQAJ
0.999... is an ambiguous expression. Depending on what it is, it may be either equal to or not equal to 1. 0.999... may be equal to 0.(9) or 0.(9)(9) Thus, 0.999... = 1 is not an absolute truth. > What does 1 mean? 1 means 0.(9)(9) > > Depending on the pet definitions you harbor abouthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
7777777Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:06:24 UTCRe: What maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/DbzG4iH8AQAJ
wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 11:00:00 AM UTC-4, alal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I believe that transfinite maths is impractical. While I enjoy it as exercise for the mind, and idle philosophical speculation, I feel that everything in the real world is finite. That means thathttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
Dan ChristensenWed, 23 Aug 2017 21:03:21 UTCRe: University of California, San Diego// Jan Bielawski asks
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/AwnP3Pb7AQAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:31:44 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Still getting the Table of Errors up and running. This table of errors is just a small sample of errors in mathematics, Your "table of errors" is total nonsense from start to finish. > In the same manner thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
JanWed, 23 Aug 2017 21:00:16 UTCRe: Greatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/zomCY9D7AQAJ
keskiviikko 23. elokuuta 2017 21.27.39 UTC+3 konyberg kirjoitti: > Why do we have to count them all? We (and you) know they go on and on an on ... in order to know if they can be trusted when they begin to talk about ALL the natural numbers. So how they can be trusted if they did not evenhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
7777777Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:57:30 UTCRe: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/QicPxpn7AQAJ
følgende: > > > On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-5, Don Redmond wrote: > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 11:30:26 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > > Still getting the Table of Errors up and running. This table of errors is just a small sample of errors in mathematichttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
konybergWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:53:36 UTCRe: University of California, San Diego// Jan Bielawski asks
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/W_IW2Vz7AQAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:31:44 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:58:36 PM UTC-5, Jan wrote: > > > > > Complete,,,,,,,, > > > > -- > > Jan > > Jan Bielawski asks why University of California, San Diego? > > ----- > Hey Jan, yea you Janhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
JanWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:49:14 UTCRe: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/72jk0TP7AQAJ
følgende: > > > On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-5, Don Redmond wrote: > > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 11:30:26 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > > Still getting the Table of Errors up and running. This table of errors is just a small sample of errors in mathematichttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
konybergWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:46:18 UTCRe: _Student Guide for Colleges to avoid in mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w/k-EpGQf7AQAJ
følgende: > > On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-5, Don Redmond wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 11:30:26 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > Still getting the Table of Errors up and running. This table of errors is just a small sample of errors in mathematics, buthttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/sX4oJ2Vfu2w
konybergWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:43:06 UTCRe: Greatest mistake missed in math Decimal Number Representation, and why .9999... =1 was math professors downfall
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys/vGAwaK36AQAJ
What does 0.999... mean to you? What does comparing them with = mean? What does 1 mean? Depending on the pet definitions you harbor about what these expressions mean, you might be right: in your system the two expressions are not equal. Axioms are merely antecedents. Yours are not better orhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/0E-T2oBk5ys
ten...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:36:41 UTCRe: Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/kWmvmnD6AQAJ
Rational numbers...hmm, try wikipedia.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
ten...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:32:20 UTCUniversity of California, San Diego// Jan Bielawski asks
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/vmPTYWj6AQAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 1:58:36 PM UTC-5, Jan wrote: > > Complete,,,,,,,, > > -- > Jan Jan Bielawski asks why University of California, San Diego? ----- Hey Jan, yea you Jan Bielawski-- is this you in the 1990s j...@iris8.msi.com (Jan Bielawski) the ever insane stalker. I mean,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:31:44 UTCoptimal bias in prediction: what is this technique called?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/oIhG1_vgkLo/ocQ5vWf6AQAJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggCRfDHUHp0 In a nutshell, we have a two-dimensional matrix of data values and I want to find ways to introduce bias and write the first column as the linear combination of the other m-1 columns in a way that the correlation is maximized. One can extend thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/oIhG1_vgkLo
ten...@gmail.comWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:31:42 UTCRe: What maths has, and is expected to never have any practical applications?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0/Oq5g-HH5AQAJ
The Dirac delta function solves its problems by not being a function. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_%28mathematics%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_function -- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean. I think Ihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ZEsUfcGeZs0
Peter PercivalWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:14:06 UTCRationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/JOIzuUn5AQAJ
Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special Thank goodness there is day and night, work and sleep on a daily basis. A time to work, and next day, rework everything. A time to start, and a time to throwhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 23 Aug 2017 20:11:13 UTC