sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/DIuIWVPkCAAJ
følgende: > > > > > > On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 13:45:10 UTC-8, konyberg wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no formula that generates *all* the digits of sqrt(2) or pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > > > > >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:11:49 UTCRe: So you see something like {} \/ { {} } = ? What does it mean?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc/myAUaEjkCAAJ
wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 02:25:26 UTC+1 schrieb Me: > > > > > > So whenever you have a term (or a variable) in the context of ZFC it denotes > > > (or "refers to") a set. > > > > > Not quite so. > > Yes, exatcly so. > > > Every variable in ZFC, allthough all itshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc
graham...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:11:02 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/s7HX7kDkCAAJ
or pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:10:30 UTCRe: The kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8/Y-1oeSDkCAAJ
morons can't even solve now: > > https://socratic.org/questions/how-do-you-find-the-axis-and-the-direct-fix-of-the-locus-of-mu#269979 > > https://socratic.org/questions/use-de-moirve-s-theorem-to-find-the-three-roots-of-the-equation-z-3-8i-0#268773 > > https://socratic.org/questions/if-the-https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:08:11 UTCHow the sine and cosine functions continue, beyond (0,0) and (1,0)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/FKg_QaN3OuI/vO9mbh3kCAAJ
Alright, I have been held up by this "last insight" for weeks now, and only slowly starting to see the solution for it. This problem has forced me to make the graphing of sine and cosine in the High School Calculus text, saved for last pages. I do not want to graph sine and cosine, until Ihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/FKg_QaN3OuI
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:07:58 UTCRe: Power set of |N, Analyze of Cantor’s theorem
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g/rSin7QPkCAAJ
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 5:42:24 PM UTC-5, graham...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > You haven't proven anything except > > > > > > { n | n !in Sn } !in P(N) > > > > > > > See what I mean, folks? I actually prove by contradiction that there can exist no injective functionhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g
Dan ChristensenWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:06:08 UTCRe: So you see something like {} \/ { {} } = ? What does it mean?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc/F-betwLkCAAJ
have to decide what are the operands. Are they elements or sets? > > > > You might retort that since there is a union operator \/, one should assume sets. > > > > But this does not correspond to the logic 0 \/ 1, where 0 and 1 are elements. Does it? In this case, you must assume that thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:06:03 UTCRe: So you see something like {} \/ { {} } = ? What does it mean?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc/Lx4NVfXjCAAJ
it is > > not even a "primitive term" of this theory. > > > Listen to me stupid. Listen to me. If any one makes definitions, I will be the > one making them. Zermelo and Fraenkel were fucking morons next to me. I guess it's time to take your pills, John. Concerning a definition of /set/ inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc
MeWed, 07 Dec 2016 23:05:05 UTCRe: So you see something like {} \/ { {} } = ? What does it mean?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc/F0B3yJXjCAAJ
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:18:28 AM UTC+1, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 02:25:26 UTC+1 schrieb Me: > > > > So whenever you have a term (or a variable) in the context of ZFC it denotes > > (or "refers to") a set. > > > Not quite so. Yes, exatcly so.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc
MeWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:58:15 UTCRe: Power set of |N, Analyze of Cantor’s theorem
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g/dopYzmjjCAAJ
exist no injective function mapping P(N) into N, i.e. that P(N) is not countable. (A set S is said to be countable iff there exists injective f: S --> N). > > > Dan I do not understand what you say, but it seems that you have created a program to prove that power set of IN is uncountable. Ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g
PengKuan EmWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:55:02 UTCRe: So you see something like {} \/ { {} } = ? What does it mean?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc/qrwzbfniCAAJ
have to decide what are the operands. Are they elements or sets? > > You might retort that since there is a union operator \/, one should assume sets. > > But this does not correspond to the logic 0 \/ 1, where 0 and 1 are elements. Does it? In this case, you must assume that the operator doeshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PqVQbfP6Dtc
graham...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:47:04 UTCRe: Power set of |N, Analyze of Cantor’s theorem
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g/PvHGU7jiCAAJ
exist no injective function mapping P(N) into N, i.e. that P(N) is not countable. (A set S is said to be countable iff there exists injective f: S --> N). LET P(N) = {S1 S2 S3 ...} Most formal theorists rewrite { n | n !in Sn } !in P(N) CANTORS_MISSING_SET !in P(N) into anhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/YHMkv2K3m-g
graham...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:42:24 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/tlaxyI3iCAAJ
WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > That is correct. But this "well-established" limit leads to a contradiction > in case of rows of > 1 > 1, 2 > 1, 2, 3 > ... > The union of rows has not more elements than all natural nunmbers. The limit > however has, according to set theory.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
Carlo XYZWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:39:21 UTCWelcome to New Math Re: Why were math professors for the past 400 years so dumb as to not see that derivative of sine is tangent? Why?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/D4jXBC9_RJk/kd8h44PiCAAJ
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 2:53:34 AM UTC-6, bassam king karzeddin wrote: (snipped) > > Yes, I agree with you on their infinite stupidity for the following main reason > > "The vast majorities of known angles are impossible to exist on a plane" > > but they simply or intuitivelyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/D4jXBC9_RJk
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:38:39 UTCRe: The kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8/d0wIR-ThCAAJ
morons can't even solve now: > I understand that you STILL cannot formally prove that 2+2=4 in your goofy system, Troll Boy. Or even determine the derivative of y=x^3 at the origin. What a moron! Danhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8
Dan ChristensenWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:27:13 UTCRe: WM is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/lFwyZNvhCAAJ
In article <carloxyz-D92D44.23212907122016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> wrote: > WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Real intervals are sets. > > Very true. Another sentence to put up your wall. > > > The general definition is likely tohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:26:35 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/Yo0IDbDhCAAJ
In article <carloxyz-89FC51.20561007122016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> wrote: > Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > > > WM claims that lim {[0,1-1/n): n in |N} should be [0,1] > > I don't know whether he does so. In > > <414a5a1d-3c24-47ed-b16f-1e719https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:23:29 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/HpEBOZXhCAAJ
WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Real intervals are sets. Very true. Another sentence to put up your wall. > The general definition is likely to confuse you. So you claim to have a definition of "the analytical limit" for an arbitrary sequence of arbitrary sets? Where is it?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
Carlo XYZWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:21:34 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/lw0boIfhCAAJ
In article <ca8f52aa-81ae-4ccb-ba87-39075a508ef0@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:56:16 UTC+1 schrieb Carlo XYZ: > > > > <quote> > > (1) > > The union of the sequence of intervals [0, (n-1)/n] is [0, 1). > > The limit of thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:20:35 UTCRe: WM is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/bmYmfjThCAAJ
In article <338b6804-69ce-4380-9cfc-10b0ab3695c9@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:40:44 UTC+1 schrieb Carlo XYZ: > > > > Repeat the following two sentences after me: > > > > "-- I didn't mean sets in general but only closed realhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 22:14:38 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/Hv45xuLeCAAJ
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:56:16 UTC+1 schrieb Carlo XYZ: > <quote> > (1) > The union of the sequence of intervals [0, (n-1)/n] is [0, 1). > The limit of the sequence of intervals [0, (n-1)/n] is [0, 1]. > <unquote> > > What I'm saying is that the last sentence is untrue as far as >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
WMWed, 07 Dec 2016 21:32:08 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/IapDLYzeCAAJ
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:40:44 UTC+1 schrieb Carlo XYZ: > Repeat the following two sentences after me: > > "-- I didn't mean sets in general but only closed real intervals." Real intervals are sets. > "-- Thus, if [a_n,b_n] is a sequence of real intervals and if both > a_n andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
WMWed, 07 Dec 2016 21:25:56 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/Ke8YWI3dCAAJ
Can we boil this down to: Functions exist (for example from reals to reals): f : R -> R But series don't exist (for example of rationals): s : N -> Q Aha, Ok. Great!https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 21:07:42 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/ARpPsw7dCAAJ
sqrt(2) or pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > > > > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells ushttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
konybergWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:58:38 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/ju6-m-HcCAAJ
pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about the measure ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
konybergWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:55:24 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/48SgC6TcCAAJ
Hey JG again loosing your marbles, and not knowing shit, even not the arrow notation and the difference and commonality of functions and series, He He looser. BTW the cheese cake factory is calling you, they want you to make a series of cakes, but they are not sure whether the wip creamhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:51:00 UTCRe: If a tree falls...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4/SomQDpvcCAAJ
Hey JG again loosing your marbles, and not knowing shit, even not the arrow notation and the difference and commonality of functions and series, He He looser. BTW the cheese cake factory is calling you, they want you to make a series of cakes, but they are not sure whether the wip creamhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:50:21 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/e9MaSGzcCAAJ
or pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:47:00 UTCRe: The kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8/Ro9cB2XcCAAJ
Hey JG again loosing your marbles, and not knowing shit, even not the arrow notation and the difference and commonality of functions and series, caveman bird brain jerky beef jeeky, look closely what can be done with arrows, see article below https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/Rwhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:46:29 UTCRe: The kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8/ngFm0EvcCAAJ
morons can't even solve now: > > https://socratic.org/questions/how-do-you-find-the-axis-and-the-direct-fix-of-the-locus-of-mu#269979 > > https://socratic.org/questions/use-de-moirve-s-theorem-to-find-the-three-roots-of-the-equation-z-3-8i-0#268773 > > https://socratic.org/questions/if-the-https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:44:41 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/J992szDcCAAJ
pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about the measure ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
konybergWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:42:44 UTCRe: If a tree falls...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4/Pzt-9S_cCAAJ
of arguments refuting Cantor's diagonal argument, originator of the definition of interceding sets, clarifier of the definition of the the imaginary part of a complex number, and (most relevant) originator of the concept of "analytical limit" of a sequence of sets, has recently come up with yethttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:42:41 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/NnEZsRrcCAAJ
Hey JG again loosing your marbles, and not knowing shit, tell us about the arrow notation and the difference and commonality of functions and series.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:41:10 UTCRe: Mainstream academics learn from me. You are part of the BIG STUPID. Why can't you?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rMrOY4laQb0/jVD-9w3cCAAJ
Hey JG again loosing your marbles, and not knowing shit, even not the arrow notation and the difference and commonality of functions and series, here is an explanation: We tell you JG and WM this over and over again. When you have a sequence: (s_0, s_1, s_2, ...) Then we see indexes,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rMrOY4laQb0
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:40:15 UTCRe: If a tree falls...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4/t_IA18_bCAAJ
When you have a sequence: (s_0, s_1, s_2, ...) Then we see indexes, in the above natural numbers. So we can also write instead s_i the term s(i), for a function as follows: A sequence s of rationals s : N -> Q The thingy before the arrow denotes the domain of the indexes, here N,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4
burs...@gmail.comWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:35:48 UTCMainstream academics learn from me. You are part of the BIG STUPID. Why can't you?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rMrOY4laQb0/YQwYuJPbCAAJ
What is the difference between Mean value theorem, Average value and Intermediate value theorem? https://socratic.org/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-mean-value-theorem-average-value-and-intermediate#267646 The reason you don't learn is that you are incompetent, arrogant, stupidhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rMrOY4laQb0
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:31:30 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/QNqSK2rbCAAJ
pi. Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > > As pi is represented by pi. > > > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about the measure of sqrt(2) justhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:28:32 UTCThe kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8/bm1eLhjbCAAJ
The kind of problems I could solve when I was 8 years old but most of you morons can't even solve now: https://socratic.org/questions/how-do-you-find-the-axis-and-the-direct-fix-of-the-locus-of-mu#269979 https://socratic.org/questions/use-de-moirve-s-theorem-to-find-the-three-roots-of-the-equathttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Rwoayse3eu8
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:22:40 UTCRe: Sqrt(2) =/= 1.41421356237...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II/xwES-DLaCAAJ
Any formula can only generate n digits and that which is generated is never sqrt(2) or pi. > > > That is why we have the symbol sqrt(). Sqrt(2) is well defined as sqrt(2). > > As pi is represented by pi. > > The symbol sqrt(2) tells us NOTHING about the measure of sqrt(2) just as the symbolhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/y9IKI4CW4II
konybergWed, 07 Dec 2016 20:06:15 UTCRe: If a tree falls...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4/53X9MNnZCAAJ
Harry Stoteles is Jan Burse - one and the same idiot. ***PLONK*** All others: The terms of a sequence or series can be represented by a function. Example: S(n) = 1/3 [ 1 - 10^(-n)] 0.3=S(1) 0.33=S(2) etc. I challenge any moron to find a sequence or series that cannot be representedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4
John GabrielWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:59:50 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/tZnDYqfZCAAJ
Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > WM claims that lim {[0,1-1/n): n in |N} should be [0,1] I don't know whether he does so. In <414a5a1d-3c24-47ed-b16f-1e719dd89eae@googlegroups.com> he claims: <quote> (1) The union of the sequence of intervals [0, (n-1)/n] is [0, 1). The limit ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
Carlo XYZWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:56:16 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/QYE7igDZCAAJ
In article <carloxyz-03A0C7.20403907122016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> wrote: > WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > No, it is a matter of reason. > > Of course. But you used the word "opinion", not "reason". > > > Silly definitions yieldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:44:19 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/cb1Vms7YCAAJ
WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > No, it is a matter of reason. Of course. But you used the word "opinion", not "reason". > Silly definitions yield silly "mathematics". Could you put this up your wall? > > And you still did not provide a definition > > of the "analytical limit ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
Carlo XYZWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:40:44 UTCRe: A Possibility for Division by Zero
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OGJci4nxBOo/XlbjdFnYCAAJ
of zero. I have shown an alternative sum for operations involving zero, other than zero, and other than infinity. The "interval" arithmetic that you posed carries a high price. It does not simplify mathematics. In any case you are ignoring my hypothesis. Do you have anything to add regardinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OGJci4nxBOo
Ross A. FinlaysonWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:32:21 UTCRe: WM is very strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/rrEW-0jYCAAJ
In article <2f31e8ef-4111-4dae-9185-7bb4d34d7015@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:20:09 UTC+1 schrieb Virgil: > > In article <512774ec-3f8a-4e67-8923-d631e7b04d4f@googlegroups.com>, > > WM <wolf > > > > Here is a proof ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:31:11 UTCRe: If a tree falls...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4/c-QS5D3YCAAJ
But you are confusing a psrticular series, with a continues function limes. We are not in the domain of function limes: lim x->a f(x) = ? We are in the domain of sequences. Sequences are a little bit more primitive than limes of continous functions. In a sequence a particular way (thinkhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/djf-ZZj84H4
Harry StotelesWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:30:23 UTCRe: Loan formula from | Book of Low Job
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MhKUY3YfkCA/48J3GznYCAAJ
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:20:04 -0800 (PST), "Uncle Tom Jr." <uncle.t...@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > Do I get to receive a loan of $166,791.61 from Abe and Aaron bank in return for 360 end of month payments in amount of $1000 at 0.5% effective rate? That is the answer I calculated. --https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MhKUY3YfkCA
Barry SchwarzWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:30:03 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/IaXq_h3YCAAJ
In article <90333147-74c9-48b8-a02f-bb0a11f93113@googlegroups.com>, WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 20:09:20 UTC+1 schrieb Carlo XYZ: > > WM <wolfgan > > > Mathematics is not a matter of opinion, but (first of all) > > of definitions. > > No, it ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:28:06 UTCRe: WM is very strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/RCf_huLXCAAJ
> > Here is a proof of non-equivalence: No row has aleph_0 elements. Therefore > > the union does not have aleph_0 elements (if aleph_0 is a quantity larger > > than every row). > > Since there is no longest or largest row but for every n in |N there is > a row that long, there must behttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
WMWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:23:51 UTCRe: It is strange ....
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE/qqAMt9XXCAAJ
In article <carloxyz-C47B5D.18565107122016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> wrote: > WM <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > You are missing the point. > > No. > > > But it is not an argument against the analytical limit [0, 1]. > > There is nohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/h6DzK4R-GdE
VirgilWed, 07 Dec 2016 19:22:56 UTC