sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: 9 to 14 year olds Grade School -- Exist and Every quantifier of Logic //edits of Teaching True Mathematics, textbook
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Al7mHf0Qnuc/8Cbe_EZOAwAJ
Grade School, now, not to scare these very young students, we tone it down so they understand what is going on. > > Some will question why this textbook is so heavy, heavy heavy on Logic. And the simple answer is-- in the course of a week time by human adults, we perhaps use our math educationhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Al7mHf0Qnuc
VolneyWed, 25 Apr 2018 19:35:35 UTC9 to 14 year olds Grade School -- Exist and Every quantifier of Logic //edits of Teaching True Mathematics, textbook
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Al7mHf0Qnuc/OWCr4FRNAwAJ
Massive, massive editing and why I am pushing to have this book completed by end of 2019 not 2018. I am finding myself having to correct way too much of Old Math-- that disease crippled science. There was nothing in Old Math that makes for -- self correcting science--. For even its awards andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Al7mHf0Qnuc
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 19:18:15 UTCwhy math professors never clean up their mistakes Re: we teach this to 14 year olds so math professors cannot pollute them Re: what is wrong with the Ancient Greek proof that sqrt2 is irrational
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes/tcy9uEdLAwAJ
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 1:01:34 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, in the textbook Teaching True Mathematics, our first proof we encounter is that we prove Decimals are special number system over all other number systems, and we prove it by noticing that the specialhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:40:40 UTCRe: we teach this to 14 year olds so math professors cannot pollute them Re: what is wrong with the Ancient Greek proof that sqrt2 is irrational
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes/y2jczG9KAwAJ
encounter is that we prove Decimals are special number system over all other number systems, and we prove it by noticing that the special sequence > > etc .001, .01, .1, 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, etc etc that special sequence of what I call Scale Numbers that has only one single 1 digit and canhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes
VolneyWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:25:12 UTCRe: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/jNe0nd9qygQ/OAgAPDpKAwAJ
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 12:46:22 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: snip the daily ad hominem by the insane stalker Moroney > On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... > > > > 13 points. Danhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/jNe0nd9qygQ
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:21:22 UTCRe: Is ZFC allowed to abuse axioms?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bPlAqFcsydM/b1WzNSBKAwAJ
is larger than all its elements (not every, but all which are assumed to exist) is nonsense > > If you mean "larger" as in the cardinality sense then yes, N is larger than every one of its elements. If it is larger than *all* naturals, then there must exist some unnatural that blows it up. >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bPlAqFcsydM
WMWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:19:30 UTCRe: Yves Meyer fails the lifelong Math test-- A Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/hUvc-t8pkuw/Yj1xrhlKAwAJ
snip the two insane stalker crap > On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake... > > > > 13 points. Dan Christensen writes: 8:30 AM (4 hours ago) > Math failure Archie Pu scored 0/4 on this easy littlehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/hUvc-t8pkuw
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:19:02 UTCwe teach this to 14 year olds so math professors cannot pollute them Re: what is wrong with the Ancient Greek proof that sqrt2 is irrational
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes/yAFerCVJAwAJ
Alright, in the textbook Teaching True Mathematics, our first proof we encounter is that we prove Decimals are special number system over all other number systems, and we prove it by noticing that the special sequence etc .001, .01, .1, 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, etc etc that special sequence ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 18:01:34 UTCRe: Why is John Stillwell such a numbskull on Irrational numbers-- his book Mathematics and its History
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes/QQDkNwBJAwAJ
Anthyphairesis > > --- quoting Stillwell --- > It follows that similar steps will recur forever, which is another proof that sqrt2 is irrational, incidentally. > --- end quote --- > > Now the trouble with Stillwell is the trouble with 99% of math professors, they have a mind of 99% memoryhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Cpauqrhghes
JanWed, 25 Apr 2018 17:58:53 UTCRe: Is WM allowed to teach math
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw/Ybh3OkFIAwAJ
Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2018 19:29:34 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com: > which rational number is not bijected? Every rational number is indexed. This can have two explanations: In actual infinity, there are all rationals but also all naturals. All rationals are indexed. But for allhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw
WMWed, 25 Apr 2018 17:45:13 UTCRe: Geometry has intrinsic spin, and is found in the Toto Space Product of set theory // Teaching True Mathematics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/grhmlNB1Dqg/Dsu0PtJHAwAJ
Alright, enough talk, and I have to go back and teach Existential and Universal quantifier in a prior chapter-- just to get them acquanted. Keep in mind, that all of mathematics is used by most people, just on occasion during a week. But, all of Logic is used in every thought by every human,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/grhmlNB1Dqg
Archimedes PlutoniumWed, 25 Apr 2018 17:37:16 UTCRe: Is WM allowed to teach math
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw/OV2_eGZHAwAJ
you cannot percent fraction from a finity when the whole is infinite. i guess you are total out of your mind WM. one bijection f : N+ -> Q+ is for example, no rational number will be missing: the function f(n) = r: r = 1; while (n <> 1) { if (n mod 2 == 0) { r = r/(r+1); } elsehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw
burs...@gmail.comWed, 25 Apr 2018 17:29:34 UTCRe: Is WM allowed to teach math
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw/bdxozmxFAwAJ
Which n makes a first S_n empty? > > there are no centered integral intervals with > unenumerated rational numbers. alread the > rational number 1/2 is enumerated. THe first interval s_1 has most hits, about half of all hits, alas for every n in |N, less than 0.000000000000000000000000000000https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw
WMWed, 25 Apr 2018 16:53:22 UTCRe: Is WM allowed to teach math
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw/s7Sf5mxFAwAJ
delusions. > > No one has to surpress anything because it is wholy irrelevant. The fact that if you go like an algorithm and stop and has done finite steps is in no way relevant to set theory because it isn't doing thigns in a step by step fashion. Not after having revealed the fallacieshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vaaSPV27PTw
WMWed, 25 Apr 2018 16:53:22 UTCMacroeconomics 9th Edition by Andrew B. Abel solution manual
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/kwXi-h4Ptz0/Ut22-M48AwAJ
solution manual for Macroeconomics 9th Edition by Andrew B. Abel name：solution manual for Macroeconomics 9th Edition by Andrew B. Abel Edition：9th Edition author：by Andrew B. Abel,Ben Bernanke , Dean Croushore ISBN：978-0134167398 ISBN-10: 0134167392 type：solution manual/课后习题答案 format：word/zihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kwXi-h4Ptz0
tomato helloWed, 25 Apr 2018 14:15:28 UTC