sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: How accurate the volume of a sphere of radius (r^n), where (n) represents the number of known digits of (PI), and (r) is any constructible number?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/TN6kT5B71Xw/ubW7eE12BAAJ
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > I think, there isn't any accuracy then!? > > Regards > > Bassam Karzeddin > > Date: 24th, sept. 2016 To simplify my question farther, I would like to restate it as this: 1) How accurate is the volume of ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/TN6kT5B71Xw
bassam king karzeddinMon, 26 Sep 2016 09:48:42 UTCRe: Have solved algorithmic problem about number of arithmetical operations. Can anyone check?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg/GPFwy9N0BAAJ
quasi wrote: >>But I assume that in giving a solution to a problem like >>this one has to support it with some evidence of its validity? > > If requested, yes. This was a genuine question on my part, referring to Paul's original statement of the problem, which was apparently set in somehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/uyWxaBnj8zg
Timothy MurphyMon, 26 Sep 2016 09:21:40 UTCRe: Diophantine equation : x^{2n} + y^{2m} = z^2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/09CVV8u5X00/ZDkKmahzBAAJ
solutions, > >> in Henri Cohen, Number Theory - Volume II: Analytic and Modern Tools. > >> This list does not include all cases where m,n are even and p=2. > > > Found a list(*), from a post here, n=2 and m=3 is alrwady decided > > in favor of the conjecture. Oki Doki. Not used to page inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/09CVV8u5X00
bassam king karzeddinMon, 26 Sep 2016 09:00:15 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/NAcXD_FyBAAJ
Simon Roberts wrote: > JG knows plenty of mathematics. What makes you think that? -- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean. I think I had better not, Duchess. Nowadays to be intelligible is to be found out. -- Oscar Wilde, Ladyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Peter PercivalMon, 26 Sep 2016 08:47:07 UTCRe: Diophantine equation : x^{2n} + y^{2m} = z^2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/09CVV8u5X00/H_tWOcRyBAAJ
All I could see from that Larry Blog is the case "x^{2n} + y^{2n} = z^{2n}", Which is not the same exactly!, I used {z^2} here, or replacement of {2n} by {4n}, but I'm not sure of the case {4n} can be generalised, if so then it would be very interesting! On Sunday, September 25, 2016 athttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/09CVV8u5X00
bassam king karzeddinMon, 26 Sep 2016 08:43:52 UTCProof of zeta(s) = 1. Is there an error in this direct proof?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/764jgkKPcHo/uTAzR5JqBAAJ
General result of proof, E_(m+1)(s) = (1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m +2)^s +...+ 1/(p_(m+1)-1)^s))([p_m]^(s)-1) given, E_m(s) = 1 + 1/(p_m)^s + 1/(p_m + 1)^s + 1/(p_m + 2)^s + ... and The Ordered Set of Primes = {p_1, p_2, p_3,...,p_m,...} = {2, 3, 5, ...}. Specific result ofhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/764jgkKPcHo
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 06:13:44 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/Fj-jfv5oBAAJ
wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:00:27 PM UTC-4, Simon Roberts wrote: > > > > I highly recommend, to myself, the MATH "lectures" of John Gabriel. > > > > > > Jeez, Simon! John Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seemshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 05:44:49 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/HYismtNoBAAJ
wrote: > > On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:00:27 PM UTC-4, Simon Roberts wrote: > > > I highly recommend, to myself, the MATH "lectures" of John Gabriel. > > > > Jeez, Simon! John Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems tohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 05:41:45 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/UIqON55oBAAJ
troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words: God Damn you, Dan, you miss the point every singlehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 05:37:56 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/HXQmSx9oBAAJ
Is this what you see or not? What is your question? Being vague is not your forte.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Simon RobertsMon, 26 Sep 2016 05:28:51 UTCWas Fourier the first graphing of the sine function? Re: sinusoid from rolling oblique cut cylinder, or optical illusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM/BuAxI-ZjBAAJ
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 10:09:12 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Now when math has fakery, there are loads and loads of people who buy into the fakery and help support the fakery. They unwittingly never have a careful eye and seem to "go with the flow" of fakery enhancements.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/OaKQTqAMymM
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 26 Sep 2016 04:11:27 UTCRe: How does one know when a complex number 'c' is in the Mandelbrot set M ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o/MP6_2KViBAAJ
[...] >> Do you trouble over cycles in cycles I guess is roughly my question. > > Are you referring to possibly getting a false positive? Well, that's a problem of precision. When we test points for cycles that are hyper-close to the border, then we need enough precision to get things done.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o
Chris M. ThomassonMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:48:32 UTCRe: How does one know when a complex number 'c' is in the Mandelbrot set M ?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o/KPsR5ShiBAAJ
wrote: >> On 9/24/2016 11:53 AM, Ray Vickson wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 10:01:26 AM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 9/24/2016 8:05 AM, David Bernier wrote: >>>>> The Mandelbrot set is what's not divergent in modulus, under >>>>> a quadratic map parameterized by thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7HYUTLDrq0o
Chris M. ThomassonMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:39:35 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/LwWCdPRgBAAJ
Jeez, Simon! John Gabriel is a crank and the worst kind of internet troll. He knows NOTHING about mathematics, but seems to delight in confusing and misleading students here, "messing with their minds" as he probably thinks of it. What readers should know about Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in hishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:17:30 UTCRe: A change of perspective never hurt anyone.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w/DHSQw7NgBAAJ
In quotes?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/6Si7e9UxS2w
Dan ChristensenMon, 26 Sep 2016 03:12:52 UTC