sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.endid one mathematician of the past realize sine was semicircle? Re: There are at least two methods of manufacturing trigonometry,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/u-wGGSQRBAAJ
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 2:15:24 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 1:21:29 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Looking at my graph of the 5by5 cascade I placed a compass at (0, 2.5) and was able to capture all the altitudes of the right triangleshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 22 Oct 2016 07:05:18 UTCRe: How we really define the natural numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/q-KI9nM78Vc/BjrWwKAIBAAJ
Oooops! Should be: "For all subsets P of N: [0 in P & Forall x in P: [S(x) in P] => P=N]" Thanks! This is the induction axiom. Danhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/q-KI9nM78Vc
Dan ChristensenSat, 22 Oct 2016 04:29:17 UTCRe: If anyone can show me the auxiliary equation using the bogus mainstream calculus, I'll quit this forum. Seriously.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY/xtSMtlUFBAAJ
call it the same as what I am doing, because it is not the same. In more simple terms, you are not doing calculations with my m and n. Rather you are writing irrelevant nonsense with m and n, and then falsely claiming that you have used my m and n.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY
John GabrielSat, 22 Oct 2016 03:28:56 UTCRe: If anyone can show me the auxiliary equation using the bogus mainstream calculus, I'll quit this forum. Seriously.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY/5_i2kSwFBAAJ
Chuckle. It means that you can do whatever the hell you want, but don't call it the same as what I am doing, because it is not the same.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY
John GabrielSat, 22 Oct 2016 03:26:00 UTCBernardo Bolzano (1781-1848) (Was: Blasphemy)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/JycEd4s4cPc/fTP_GAgBBAAJ
Anyway, it was not so much Georg Cantor (1845-1918) who introduced the notion of infinity, but rather Bernardo Bolzano (1781-1848), many years before, who early on sorted some things out, https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=J9jJX6-N3QkC (Free E-Book, on page 66 there is somehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/JycEd4s4cPc
Jan BurseSat, 22 Oct 2016 02:10:05 UTCRe: How we really define the natural numbers
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/q-KI9nM78Vc/BlykMQgBBAAJ
Axiom 5 looks garbled. Clarify?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/q-KI9nM78Vc
mathman1Sat, 22 Oct 2016 02:10:05 UTCRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/6ReA_KsABAAJ
On 10/21/2016 2:51 AM, WM wrote: > The one who thinks that infinity would surpass the > knowledge of God has to commit the blasphemy also to > claime that God does not know all numbers. [...] What > lunatic would say that? [...] What wretched creatures > would we be if we daredhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
Jim BurnsSat, 22 Oct 2016 02:03:30 UTC+Oslo,NTNU Univ failures in sine trigonometry// STONETHROWING THEORY, Apes have 24 chromosomes, Humans 23//page20
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/9EhP4lECNgg/l3yhD9z-AwAJ
Univ Oslo math dept. failures of trigonometry with their belief sin(2)=0 with sin(3.14..)=0; sine is not sinusoid but semicircle Omulf Borgan, Hans Brodersen, Robert Bruner, Erik Bolviken, Jan Christophersen, Geir Ellingsrud, Erik Fenstad, Michael Floater, Kim Froyshov, Bjorn Gjevik NTNUhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9EhP4lECNgg
Archimedes PlutoniumSat, 22 Oct 2016 01:30:17 UTCRe: MIT math dept, and JG, failures of trigonometry since sine is a semicircle wave// STONETHROWING THEORY page19
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xJrbY1OdWbs/6d1JOFD9AwAJ
In 2005, you semm to have tried other stuff, like ATT snd dx=w/n, who knows what. And you were pretty eager already in that time in insulting people: >No idiot! It is not. And I shit on you and Rudin!! [...] >Rudin is an idiot because he has helped produce idiots the likes of >you!! >Ihttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xJrbY1OdWbs
j4n bur53Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:01:57 UTCRe: If anyone can show me the auxiliary equation using the bogus mainstream calculus, I'll quit this forum. Seriously.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY/0DHAyHb7AwAJ
> to the m and n I am referring to. What part of that don't > you get? You dumb fuckwad! You mean I am not allowed to do some calculstions with your m and n, is it that these m and n are private to you? Since the following is anyway an identity: (n^2-(-m)^2) = (n+(-m))*(n-(-m)) It holdshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/KlAmeebOtVY
j4n bur53Sat, 22 Oct 2016 00:28:03 UTCRe: There are at least two methods of manufacturing trigonometry, the altitude method also proves sine is semicircle, not sinusoid
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ/TJuw_Nb6AwAJ
wrote: > > Looking at my graph of the 5by5 cascade I placed a compass at (0, 2.5) and was able to capture all the altitudes of the right triangles. Telling me that the pattern of cascading altitudes of right triangle is a semicircle. > > > > The importance of this fact, is that we can buildhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/du_V7mEJ1WQ
konybergSat, 22 Oct 2016 00:16:37 UTCRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/UjJGP4j6AwAJ
understand why you think storage has any importance to the existence of a number. > >>>> > >>>> This is the reason: If a "number" cannot be stored, expressed, used in monologue, dialogue, mathematical discourse: then it is not an element of mathematics that I would call a number. > >>> > >>>https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
John GabrielSat, 22 Oct 2016 00:10:59 UTCRe: MIT math dept, and JG, failures of trigonometry since sine is a semicircle wave// STONETHROWING THEORY page19
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xJrbY1OdWbs/EjXXonH6AwAJ
wrote: > > > <batshit delusion erased> > > > > > > Laughing my arse off. You know what AP? ... Yep. Even those who hate me the most here will know that nothing could be plagiarised from the rot you spew out here so often. > > > > > > Most of the time, you're not even wrong. Just plainhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xJrbY1OdWbs
konybergSat, 22 Oct 2016 00:09:22 UTCRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/lxsiOWD6AwAJ
understand why you think storage has any importance to the existence of a number. >>>> >>>> This is the reason: If a "number" cannot be stored, expressed, used in monologue, dialogue, mathematical discourse: then it is not an element of mathematics that I would call a number. >>> >>> But inhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
Chris M. ThomassonSat, 22 Oct 2016 00:08:07 UTCRe: Blasphemy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE/Toqp4pT5AwAJ
You're watching the only real mathematicians on this forum. Yes, that must seem strange to you because you've never seen a real mathematician before. Chuckle.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/On3wMtl30UE
John GabrielFri, 21 Oct 2016 23:53:34 UTC