sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: what is this spin term Re: So the AP Equations of EM are six
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk/PvJ_UGIdAgAJ
Re: making sense of the AP-Maxwell Equations Re: So the AP Equations of EM are six// reviewing them On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 4:02:34 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Now I have the suspicion that these spins caused the Solenoid Valves on JUNO spacecraft at Jupiter, to nothttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vuW47APQ0Wk
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 07:12:41 UTCRe: Catalysts Topple the Second Law of Thermodynamics
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54/xgvMXVgdAgAJ
Heat engines capable of violating the second law of thermodynamics are COMMONPLACE. This would be an obvious fact if misleading education had not diverted the attention from relevant examples: "A necessary component of a heat engine, then, is that two temperatures are involved. At one stage thehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RWPPKGwoO54
Pentcho ValevThu, 24 Aug 2017 07:11:58 UTCwhy each advanced Alien civilization is using a Decimal Number Representation Re: Rationals are too vague
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/UMaoA5wZAgAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 3:11:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) > 20) Now I number this writing for I want to elaborate on many of them, especially this one. When numbers are only Grid Numbers, then numbers like pi or 2.71.... are not classified as anything special, forhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 06:03:31 UTCRe: prime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/A98Sl4kZAgAJ
of > primes, take their absolute difference and see if it equals 2. I agree, that's quite obvious to anyone with any sense. At first I thought Solomon was just an ignorant fool, but after seeing the number of times he didn't comprehend replies (for example, he calls his method a twin primehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
James WaldbyThu, 24 Aug 2017 06:02:12 UTCRe: Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/CyU7Q6kYAgAJ
Rational numbers might not exist, but village idiots oviously do exist, even in reality. Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2017 22:11:13 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
burs...@gmail.comThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:46:08 UTCRe: New Gravitational Wave Hoax
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ/_MZL5r4XAgAJ
"While astronomers are staying silent on whether they are engaged in optical follow-ups to a potential gravitational wave detection..." https://www.newscientist.com/article/2144937-exclusive-we-may-have-detected-a-new-kind-of-gravitational-wave/amp/ Why should astronomers stay silent? Are theyhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A7tXJu446vQ
Pentcho ValevThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:29:22 UTCRe: Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4/R610vJgXAgAJ
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 3:11:13 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Rationals are too vague to exist, Irrationals do not exist, Reals do not exist// Only Grid Numbers exist, and why Decimal is special > > Thank goodness there is day and night, work and sleep on a daily basis. Ahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/eauL92w0mW4
Archimedes PlutoniumThu, 24 Aug 2017 05:26:38 UTCRe: prime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/uGDC1psVAgAJ
Jack, The objective is not to test if candidate primes are twins. Obviously, if given two primes you can check visually if they differ by 2. The objective is to identify ALL twin primes from a range of PRIME numbers. Dividing PRIME numbers by 3; correcting the quotient to the nearest integerhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 04:50:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/HeBP408TAgAJ
You recently, emphasis added: the method will identify twin primes from _any_ list of primes. If the list is in ascending order what not test for the (n+1)-th being two greater than the n-th? -- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
Peter PercivalThu, 24 Aug 2017 04:08:07 UTCNumber Crazy Today?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo/h6ZKbQ8RAgAJ
ความศานติและความเอ็นดูเมตตาและความโปรดปรานของอัลลอฮฺ Number Crazy Today? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=861621080659551&set=pcb.861621130659546&type=3&theaterhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xd9em91uDdo
Mr Sawat LayuheemThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:26:51 UTCprime/twin prime generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o/9rCTq68PAgAJ
I must admit I am baffled by this thread. If you have a candidate pair of primes, take their absolute difference and see if it equals 2. Best regards, Jack Fearnley I am posting out of thread because my attempts to post in thread do not seem to appear.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/ysjwxwEZd2o
Jack FearnleyThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:01:40 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/9JdixZkPAgAJ
HI VINICIUS, Here are the test twin primes 5142649931.00 3.00 1714216644 5142649933.00 3.00 1714216644 & 5142650207.00 3.00 1714216736 5142650209.00 3.00 1714216736 The method was applied as above to extract the twinhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 03:00:06 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/kWHOHfgNAgAJ
Vinícius,, I see from your other posts that you have a very deep knowledge of math. I hope you will take the time to find the answer to your question using the method posted earlier. I just want to know if there is any way it will fail. YOUR QUESTION 5142649931 and 5142649933 5142650207 andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/wXH58fgNAgAJ
I do not claim to find or prove that they are infinite couples. Just that the method will identify twin primes from any list of primes. I work with Excel that cannot handle these large integers except as scientific notation. If you have the means to work with large integers, perhaps you couldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:12 UTCRe: Prime/Twin Prime Generator
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74/ZMOpwvYNAgAJ
Thank you for your list. The method did not fail as you will find from the extract from my worksheet. Unfortunately you included 231 which is not a prime number but a composite. You also jumbled the numbers - I wonder why? Anyway, I formatted the list in ascending order so as to work on it.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vEKvizmmi74
ELI SOLOMONThu, 24 Aug 2017 02:30:06 UTC