sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: Fermat's Last theorem short proof
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4/QoFnAi6jBgAJ
Shut up idiot. "bassam king karzeddin" wrote in message news:0082050e-b940-445b-96ec-753820df2195@googlegroups.com... "Idiot stuff"https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/lHUlQizIKt4
Don KnottsTue, 24 Oct 2017 06:02:33 UTCRe: AP -- MeAmI.org Paces Google
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88/_xjBNDaiBgAJ
Bacle, you have at one time lacked the ability to combine language and number without wasting space unnecessarily.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88
4mus...@gmail.comTue, 24 Oct 2017 05:44:49 UTCRe: AP -- MeAmI.org Paces Google
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88/dTPRqwqiBgAJ
David Bernie: the proposed solution will be denied by one-time ignorant loyalists such as David, until they realize a claim of their ignorance was me defending them.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88
4mus...@gmail.comTue, 24 Oct 2017 05:41:42 UTCRe: AP -- MeAmI.org Paces Google
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88/h5Njd-yhBgAJ
Francois, your judgment of strange as relevant in this discussion is for lack of a better word 'strange'. The French have failed me unless you succed me.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88
4mus...@gmail.comTue, 24 Oct 2017 05:39:33 UTCRe: AP -- MeAmI.org Paces Google
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88/H3mg7s-hBgAJ
Bruce C. Baker: what is a "ka" snip? I know you know what I do not and am asking a deep question.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/XYgNxAj2W88
4mus...@gmail.comTue, 24 Oct 2017 05:37:30 UTCRe: The bogus set concept.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/X1tQL4jh214/rSGtaamcBgAJ
wrote: > > > > > Corr.: Damned! > > > > > > {x} u X for x ~e X > > > > Take it easy. Errare humum est. > > > > Actually, I apreciate your contributions to sci.math. Pretty much reflects my current level of knowledege and understanding. > > In other words ZERO understanding and youhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1tQL4jh214
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 04:03:07 UTCRe: -2 Does Stockholm Univ Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger agree with the math failure Zelos Malum-- Calculus needs no geometry picture?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/HtBBPEtGdSA/4OjSu5GcBgAJ
math failure Zelos Malum-- Calculus needs no geometry picture? > > On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 12:57:01 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: > > Den mÃ¥ndag 23 oktober 2017 kl. 00:37:24 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium: > > > Zelos Malum, the Swede that failed Calculus > > > > > > When you arehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/HtBBPEtGdSA
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 04:01:25 UTCRe: getting the electric current A out of a Magnetic Field unit//Chapter 4 ATOM TOTALITY
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/rmz08v9XBjk/9L3EYIecBgAJ
On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 3:57:33 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I thought i had gotten rid of Dirac's magnetic monopoles but then comes along Manetic Field units of kg/ A*s^2 with its bizzare and mysterious current A. > > So, physics needs a magnetic monopole for that A current.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/rmz08v9XBjk
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 24 Oct 2017 04:00:41 UTCRe: What is the real number?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/l7eUXeoWDBo/w0boeXmcBgAJ
They don't, we know what the real numbers are, a dedekind complete totally ordered field. Any such structure is isomorphic to our usual reals.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/l7eUXeoWDBo
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:59:41 UTCRe: Isn't infinity (in mathematics) actually a flawed concept?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/gJS0CkPeSls/ZWgF1mOcBgAJ
wrote: > > Actually this only concept in mathematics needs few minutes to verify its legality of being considered as any real good and useful concept or just a mere big fallacy that is more than meaningless and a kind of madness, wonder! > > > > It is also stranger how it led the mathematiciahttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/gJS0CkPeSls
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:58:08 UTCRe: The Great Math failure John Gabriel with his New Calculus, that has just a derivative, no integral
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/4rdwJOxp_rk/4AXLq0mcBgAJ
On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 7:21:45 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Lots of nutjob spiel by Gabriel about Mean Value Theorem, but nothing for the integral. > > Is Gabriel the one they had in mind when they said:: When he counts his balls, cannot get the same answer twice? Or washttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/4rdwJOxp_rk
Archimedes PlutoniumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:56:16 UTCRe: Fiction numbers create fiction angles too
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/tWIQqH3_AIA/-aSNyUKbBgAJ
mathematics established for so many long centuries There is no global ignorance, there is only your idiocy. >I had really and so long ago produced many proofs that were PUBLISHED here before your eyes, and one can't really bring all his answers with him to convince everyone separately, it ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tWIQqH3_AIA
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:37:27 UTCRe: Dedekind and Cauchy were wrong - there is no valid construction of real number.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/yciGYFUC020/cF_QRwObBgAJ
Sequences as "real" numbers. There are no real numbers. > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU > > Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored. > > Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstreamhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yciGYFUC020
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:32:54 UTCRe: Something is rotten in MathStackExchange
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/D-7uNU2q2ZE/7HqzM_maBgAJ
about the real numbers to complex numbers, and non-Euclidean Geometry, calculus, polynomials roots, invalid cubic root operation and higher prime root operations, wrong angle measurements,...etc I think you confuse "Rotten to the core" with "things I do not understand" >Look you fucking moron,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/D-7uNU2q2ZE
Zelos MalumTue, 24 Oct 2017 03:32:11 UTCRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbY/j0K2HFeYBgAJ
On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 7:24:32 AM UTC-6, John Gabriel wrote: > Now, you may say: "But the arrow passes all those halfway points!" > Correct. But no operation of "addition" is taking place while the arrow flies > through to its destination. So your talk about a mythical infinite sumhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbY
QuadiblocTue, 24 Oct 2017 02:43:55 UTC