sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enFree PDF : Pythagorean Sextuplets as Quarks and Related Invariants
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/o47PRxLXVQQ/ESAKz-86BAAJ
Just what the number-theorists ordered... http://www.urmt.org/urmt_quark_paper.pdf Conclusions From the results presented, it is evident that an integer representation of the quark flavour model can be derived purely from number theory, with no recourse to the foundations of classicalhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/o47PRxLXVQQ
richard millerFri, 28 Apr 2017 16:09:59 UTCRe: Students: Read the fascinating story of how I discovered the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0/CicdWOk6BAAJ
hereafter) circa 2005 in online forums. In fact, I discovered the NC a lot earlier than that. > > Initially most academics who read about it, rejected it outright because they did not like or could not understand it, or both. I would communicate with them on a much higher level than say a layhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0
konybergFri, 28 Apr 2017 16:09:31 UTCIs St. Martin's desirous of Goose stepping crazy? Dartmouth crazy is just too mild Re: WORLD's FIRST LOGICAL POEM,
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/xm6qunwA_-k/EZBeay06BAAJ
Yes, i mean, there George Witte and Eric Francis, why limit yourself in painting AP as bolts loose or tight, when MIT goes into crackpot and incest, and so much more. Hard to tell if Francis was after a book on murders or after a visit to an asylum-- but then again that is probably what one canhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xm6qunwA_-k
Archimedes PlutoniumFri, 28 Apr 2017 15:56:04 UTCRe: sqrt2 and 2 equally mysterious, or not mysterious at all, and proof that 1 = 0.999...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8/wulblSU2BAAJ
>>> What *I* mean by "represent" is: >>> 1 can be represented by the length of the interval [0, 1]. >> >> What is a "length" allowed to be? Is it a real number? >> If yes, what is a real number? >> >> Or, just generally speaking, what can you say about "length"? > > The distance between twohttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tC1AjI3kDm8
Jim BurnsFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:42:12 UTCRe: Students: Read the fascinating story of how I discovered the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0/TAcnARc2BAAJ
This is a record breaking article, the density of nonsense is quite high! Here have a banana Mr apeman gaga: The Bananas Song | Counting Bananas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr-L6q4vbWU Am Freitag, 28. April 2017 16:39:39 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel: > I first revealed my discoverieshttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0
burs...@gmail.comFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:41:10 UTCRe: Students: Don't be swayed by the multitude of cranks on this site. Study my New Calculus. You won't be sorry!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/SuvMXt_-Zgc/UbvVhwg2BAAJ
You are a Geogebra monkey Mr apeman gaga. None of your videos or articles show the development of a derivative, where you havent been informed by the mainstream or where you don't use auto diff of Geogebra in your demos to "compute" your m,n joke. You just twizzle together Derivative() andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/SuvMXt_-Zgc
j4n bur53Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:40:07 UTCStudents: Read the fascinating story of how I discovered the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0/jpD13wE2BAAJ
I first revealed my discoveries concerning the New Calculus (NC hereafter) circa 2005 in online forums. In fact, I discovered the NC a lot earlier than that. Initially most academics who read about it, rejected it outright because they did not like or could not understand it, or both. I wouldhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/B49Ijij2bP0
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:39:39 UTCRe: How to tell a crank on sci.math...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo/kcg62gA2BAAJ
You are a Geogebra monkey Mr apeman gaga. None of your videos or articles show the development of a derivative, where you havent been informed by the mainstream or where you don't use auto diff of Geogebra in your demos to "compute" your m,n joke. You just twizzle together Derivative() andhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo
j4n bur53Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:39:35 UTCStudents: Don't be swayed by the multitude of cranks on this site. Study my New Calculus. You won't be sorry!
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/SuvMXt_-Zgc/61SeZO41BAAJ
The New Calculus - A formidable first and only rigorous formulation. Find out why more and more math academics are turning to it! The New Calculus is an analytic geometry formulation that ALWAYS works and this is why more and more academics are using it. It has new features not possible usinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/SuvMXt_-Zgc
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:38:15 UTCRe: How to tell a crank on sci.math...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo/7_SXFtE1BAAJ
comments religiously on all your threads. > > Top cranks in sci.math in order of priority: > > 1. Dan Christensen (has multiple aliases) > 2. Jean Pierre Messager (aliases YBM/Python and Me) > 3. Ross Finlayson (flaming homosexual) > 4. Jan Burse (has many aliases...) > 5. The sci.mathhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:36:09 UTCRe: How to tell a crank on sci.math...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo/6qay-cI1BAAJ
comments religiously on all your threads. > > Top cranks in sci.math in order of priority: > > 1. Dan Christensen (has multiple aliases) > 2. Jean Pierre Messager (aliases YBM/Python and Me) > 3. Ross Finlayson (flaming homosexual) > 4. Jan Burse (has many aliases...) > 5. The sci.mathhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:35:09 UTCHow to tell a crank on sci.math...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo/3V6rMLI1BAAJ
You never respond to them or even read their comments yet they post comments religiously on all your threads. Top cranks in sci.math in order of priority: 1. Dan Christensen (has multiple aliases) 2. Jean Pierre Messager (aliases YBM/Python and Me) 3. Ross Finlayson (flaming homosexual) 4.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bvc7ueVkPeo
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 14:33:57 UTCRe: A tribute to one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century - Nikola Tesla
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MohP-S6NaSI/-OygmU01BAAJ
Tesla invented/realized at least 112 patents in the U.S. according to this PDF: Complete List of Nikola Tesla's 112 United States Patents http://www.happyabout.com/OvercomingInventoritis-NikolaTeslaPatents.pdf Lets take a sample, this one is funny: Tesla Bifilar Pancake Coil - TESLA PATENThttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MohP-S6NaSI
j4n bur53Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:26:45 UTCRe: A tribute to one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century - Nikola Tesla
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/MohP-S6NaSI/pBAhcoMzBAAJ
idea, I start at once building it up in my imagination, and make improvements and operate the device in my mind, When I have gone so far as to embody everything in my invention, every possible improvement I can think of, and when I see no fault anywhere, I put into concrete form the finalhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/MohP-S6NaSI
John GabrielFri, 28 Apr 2017 13:53:57 UTCJG's Wacky New Calclueless a dead end
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/cgcPvnfAydI/rvWqvegwBAAJ
When it comes to calculus, JG is absolutely clueless. His Wacky New "Calclueless" is a joke, a very BAD joke. In his goofy system, Clueless John cannot even determine the derivative of functions as simple as y=x. Rather than fix his definition, he simply declares these derivatives to behttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cgcPvnfAydI
Dan ChristensenFri, 28 Apr 2017 13:06:13 UTC