sci.math
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.math
Mathematical discussions and pursuits.enRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/0zykYJCWAgAJ
In Arabic, we would call you "Taweel u achbal". Chuckle. Tektronix 4010: Did your grandfather give you that because you look like a very young pink man?https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:40:33 UTCRe: there are no negative number in p-adics: but zero minus one is acceptably denoted, even so, in ten-adics e.g
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/zCydo3mWAgAJ
hint to the proof despite it is available for more than quarter a century now? > > > > And more strangely they defend the alleged proof to the limit that makes you think that it is their proof too! > > > > Many more questions could be added to understand this type of people thinkinghttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
bassam king karzeddinMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:38:55 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/kruvylqWAgAJ
If 197.999... is the same as 198, then why a need to "correct"? A Freudian slip. Chuckle.https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:36:43 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/e74TAzKWAgAJ
Corr.: Latest measurement 197.999... cm tall and usually have a tanned skin, Sorry my bad. j4n bur53 schrieb: > 198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
j4n bur53Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:33:48 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/ykg2zBCWAgAJ
Ugggghhh. Difference is that Port563 is a psychopath of class and writes exceptionally good English. Well, he wouldn't be a professor at MIT otherwise... > > > > bassam king karzeddin schrieb: > > > On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:53:52 AM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote: > > >> On Sunday, 22https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:31:25 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/LObVzveVAgAJ
Gee, almost sounds like Port563. The beginning of a new "friendship". Ugggghhh. > > bassam king karzeddin schrieb: > > On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:53:52 AM UTC+3, John Gabriel wrote: > >> On Sunday, 22 January 2017 13:46:52 UTC-8, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> Nah the current listhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:29:38 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/IwJLtLeVAgAJ
least not being able to differentiate between (100%) and (99.999... %), he still considers them the same, which is more than sufficient reason to be described as a real crank, but the real tragedy that he belongs to the majority of the modern mythematickers > > > > > > Bassam karzeddin > >https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:25:02 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/fKXyS6qVAgAJ
least not being able to differentiate between (100%) and (99.999... %), he still considers them the same, which is more than sufficient reason to be described as a real crank, but the real tragedy that he belongs to the majority of the modern mythematickers > > > Bassam karzeddin Burse ishttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
John GabrielMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:24:05 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/kNq3TnqVAgAJ
Yes sure I am a crank. You are completly right. But I am not a little pink crank as JG calls me, since I am actually 198 cm tall and usually have a tanned skin, from the cathode ray tube of my tektronix 4010 bassam king karzeddin schrieb: > On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:53:52 AM UTC+3,https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
j4n bur53Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:20:39 UTCProducing Alternate Facts (Was: A rough estimate)
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ/ppvXtSKVAgAJ
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/369628/what-is-an-alternative-fact j4n bur53 schrieb: > I wouldn't say its not possible to produce alternative > "facts" in mathematic. Just change some axioms in your > theory and you might draw different conclusions. > > This has been done forhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ
j4n bur53Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:14:23 UTCRe: A rough estimate
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ/0akDAA2VAgAJ
I wouldn't say its not possible to produce alternative "facts" in mathematic. Just change some axioms in your theory and you might draw different conclusions. This has been done for example in geometry, and besides the ordinary plane geometry, there are hyperbolic, elliptic I dunno whathttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ
j4n bur53Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:12:49 UTCRe: John Gabriel: are you really homeless, destitute and unemployed?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI/JiiV18aUAgAJ
John Gabriel wrote: > How about real crank Jan Burse? Chuckle. This one Jan Burse, or bursegan, ..., is (99.999... )% crank, for at least not being able to differentiate between (100%) and (99.999... %), he still considers them the same, which is more than sufficient reason to be describedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CjPzq8MjmFI
bassam king karzeddinMon, 23 Jan 2017 12:07:48 UTCRe: A rough estimate
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ/b5ws_FiUAgAJ
Yes and no. First of all a tree with a different shape has different paths, so I doubt that a bound on one tree can be a bound on another tree. What you want to do seems to do the following: 0 / / | \ \ 0 1 2 3 4 ... / \ / \ / \ /https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ
j4n bur53Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:59:56 UTCRe: A rough estimate
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ/HUyRRfeSAgAJ
Now put the nodes of this path side by side on a common level and let start two paths from each node. Then you have made aleph_0 paths from 1 path. Repeat this for the complete infinite Binary Tree. Then you get an upper estimate for the number of possible paths. REgards, WMhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/A5RQaYku5vQ
WMMon, 23 Jan 2017 11:34:37 UTChow much of a sucker's bait role did e^x play on sine function; why it takes to 2016 to find true derivative and integral of sine
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.math/aje95jWd6fA/yrBMW7eQAgAJ
Please help me make a joke or complete a joke of the naivete of math professors. So which came first, the discovery of the derivative and integral of e^x or the sine integral and derivative? Perhaps both were discovered together in the same year? Don Redmond, any history on when derivativehttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aje95jWd6fA
Archimedes PlutoniumMon, 23 Jan 2017 10:53:23 UTC