https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google Groupsres0...@gmail.com2015-10-09T07:07:47Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uej3Rdoktw8Re: Wildberger on D. Cuts and the "continuum"mainstream morons, he is able to think independently (something students are not taught in today's assembly line institutions). > > 1. There is no such thing as infinity. > > Therefore, there is no such thing as an infinite decimal. > > 2. A well-formed concept is defined in terms ofJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T06:46:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Uej3Rdoktw8Wildberger on D. Cuts and the "continuum"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNlEq0ZrTo This comment is not for students but for their baboon teachers. Wildberger teaches mainstream mythmatics, but unlike most of the mainstream morons, he is able to think independently (something students are not taught in today's assembly lineJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T05:12:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dzEzswomwOAGabriel's elementary mathematics for mainstream idiots.The New Limit theorem is entirely geometrical and so easy that even an 8th grader can understand it. It's easy to see it come alive in front of your eyes. Just download the applet, type in any function you like, and watch it perform exactly the same way for any function: https://www.youtube.comWilliam Elliot2015-10-09T05:10:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VVIkAuWSUsAReal Realistic Example? (fwd)How is an infinite dimensional Hilbert space a realistic metric space? For example l_2, square summable sequences. Let a = (0,0,0,...); b = (1,0,0,0,...). d(a,b) = 1. Set r = 1. Consider p = (2,0,0,0,...). d(b,p) = 1; d(a,p) = 2. Also q = (1, a, a^2,...) where a = sqr 1/2; d(b,q) = 1;John Gabriel2015-10-09T05:06:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/T292QCZCvWYCuntor and Lebesgue fueled the syphilitic reasoning so prevalent in today's mythmatics.Lebesgue's laughable definitions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEtfqqcvb_4 Cantor's delusions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E4u1RlIp3wJohn Gabriel2015-10-09T05:05:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/otHdjPBjiqQWhy the BIG STUPID cannot admit that 0.999... is a junk concept.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wv44FnfBKIWilliam Elliot2015-10-09T04:53:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/icqZJYz2894A Realistic Hilbert Space?Waldek Hebisch <heb...@anti.uni.wroc.pl> In reply to Waldek Hebisch. How is an infinite dimensional Hilbert space a realistic metric space? For example l_2, square summable sequences. Let a = (0,0,0,...); b = (1,0,0,0,...). d(a,b) = 1. Set r = 1. Consider p = (2,0,0,0,...). d(b,p) = 1;John Smith2015-10-09T02:42:55Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G8GhefFy9gsRe: Why no one will pass the turing test in my universe?I doubt it. Some people likely have you filtered. > I finally have idea Well that's good to know. Keep it up and one day you might make some sense but it does seem doubtful to me. I think it's more likely that you will never change.Arturo Magidin2015-10-08T21:52:30Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of Phiprime values > > Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. > > Is there a reason for this behavior ? > > Yes, Arturo, If you are replying to me, then you should really reply to *my post*, not to yours. Isluiro...@gmail.com2015-10-08T21:47:58Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of Phivalues > Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. > Is there a reason for this behavior ? Yes, Arturo, I forget to say that we must to take the integer part of the power.\ So: p Phi^pJan2015-10-08T21:33:10Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_EuDl7djilIRe: Do we need a Fundamental Theorem of Functions? but first let us clean out the old fundamentalsOn Monday, October 5, 2015 at 12:37:52 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Mathematics has a poor means of cleaning out its mistakes and fakeries. In some other sciences, they hold conferences to clean up their acts and admissions to the subject. For example, astronomy held such a conferenceJack Fearnley2015-10-08T21:11:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of PhiOn Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:11:07 -0700, Ludovicus wrote: > If we raise Phi to prime powers > 3 it results a dense sequence of prime > values Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the > primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. > Is there a reason for thisArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T20:50:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_EuDl7djilIdiscarding 0 out of polynomials and functions Re: polynomials should be equinumerous with functions that existOn Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 9:32:54 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) > > x= 0 > x= 1 > x/1 = 1 keeping in mind that 0 is avoided at all cost, and only used when no other option exists > 1/x = 1 > > Now we should not discriminate against division, since polynomials havePentcho Valev2015-10-08T20:34:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/mww-64tn7QoRe: ABSURDITY OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITYIf, in order for Divine Albert's Divine Theory to remain true, a rivet shank should become longer than itself, it does become longer than itself: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Relativ/bugrivet.html "In an attempt to squash a bug in a 1 cm deep hole, a rivet is used. But the rivetArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T20:29:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_EuDl7djilIdiscarding 0 along with negative numbers in Polynomial theory Re: polynomials should be equinumerous with functions that existAlright, let me try the Polynomial theory without even 0 as a member, where only positive numbers exist. Remember that in Old Math 0 is neither positive nor negative, so it is on the margin of being positive. So a polynomial such as x^2 -2x -3 is a polynomial because it is x^2 -2x = 3 and weArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T20:10:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ysD2HSLL8ctwo forces forward motion and spin get me closer to sinusoidal curve? Re: so hard to visualize this-- what curve resultsOn Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 9:49:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, I am having a difficult time of visualizing this. > > Suppose our phosphorescent dot is a human standing on the equator with the Earth spinning on axis > and the Earth moving forward in a linear motion andabu.ku...@gmail.com2015-10-08T19:50:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/WzxJK6_iY-cRe: new concept: CircleGon & Conjecture: all circlegons cannot have both a rational number length for arclength and radiushe has at least proved that a computer can hear at least no screamsme2015-10-08T19:50:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/G8GhefFy9gsWhy no one will pass the turing test in my universe?hello everyone, I finally have idea why computer AI designed by humans will never pass the turing test. You know turing is gay. I don't condone gays. I cannot optimize enemy territory. so, I cannot design computer programs that pass turing test. by the same token, I cannot let anyabu.ku...@gmail.com2015-10-08T19:47:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aeA1_sZZVmERe: Mathematical Argument Comment on sci.mathmod 2 is always evaluative, but there are no even numbers per se (ending in two or zero; three is a gOOd on-digit approximant of pi, in any integer base not less than or equal to three > I read about these in the 90's, p-adic integers, then the p-adics per se > might not have "exactly" theArturo Magidin2015-10-08T19:46:15Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of Phivalues > Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. What does that mean? phi^2 = 1-phi, so phi^5 = phi(phi^2)^2 = phi(1-phi)^2 = phi(1-2*phi + phi^2) = phi(1 -2*phi + 1 - phi) = phi(2 - 3*phi)abu.ku...@gmail.com2015-10-08T19:44:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of Phisee Lucas numberS > > Is there a reason for this behavior ? > > Phi being (1 + sqrt 5)/2 ? > > -- > It simply means that kind of empty set isn't the kind of empty > set admissible in reasoning in meta level in the context of FOL > reasoning framework. > > Nam Nguyen in sci.logicJustin Thyme2015-10-08T19:32:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QRe: An odd property of prime powers of Phivalues > Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. > Is there a reason for this behavior ? Phi being (1 + sqrt 5)/2 ? -- It simply means that kind of empty set isn't the kind of empty set admissible inLudovicus2015-10-08T19:11:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/VHNKhUkiW0QAn odd property of prime powers of PhiIf we raise Phi to prime powers > 3 it results a dense sequence of prime values Par example: Excepting for the primes 23, 29 and 41, all the primes from 5 to 53 used as powers of Phi, produces prime values. Is there a reason for this behavior ?Pubkeybreaker2015-10-08T18:39:57Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bsmwofhr19gRe: Python code PROVABLEPRIME Version 1.2 releasedYou are in the wrong newsgroup. Your posts contain no discussion of mathematics. Besides, there are faster methods than Maurer's.Arturo Magidin2015-10-08T16:58:58Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/fRif7_QCSG0Re: Diophantine equationOn Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 9:16:16 AM UTC-5, k_suli...@poczta.onet.pl wrote: > Diophantine equation of higher degrees as: > x^n + aˑy^n = c^n > have integer solutions only when n = 2 and a = 1 (Pythagorean triple 3,4,5; constant parameter a = 1), This is also trivially wrong (that theMok-Kong Shen2015-10-08T16:28:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Bsmwofhr19gRe: Python code PROVABLEPRIME Version 1.2 releasedAm 28.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Mok-Kong Shen: [snip] > I have done a comparison. With my Python codes the mean values of > runtime obtained are as follows, ...... The code for the comparison is in Post #31 of the thread http://s13.zetaboards.com/Crypto/topic/7234475/1/ M. K. ShenPentcho Valev2015-10-08T15:53:05Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/H_KRVRIl8vYRe: EINSTEIN ET LES FÊTEURSEncore un fêteur, incroyablement intelligent : http://www.futura-sciences.com/magazines/matiere/infos/actu/d/espace-temps-fete-science-theorie-relativite-generale-100-ans-59867/ Laurent Sacco : "La théorie de la relativité restreinte d'Einstein prend profondément racine dans la théorieRoss A. Finlayson2015-10-08T15:42:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/aeA1_sZZVmERe: Mathematical Argument Comment on sci.mathOn Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 8:54:33 PM UTC-7, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote: > the thing about odd-adics, like 3-adics, is that > parity is not conserved (numbers ending in 2 or 0 need not be even > > > > 10-adics; there are no negatives per se, although > > > there is also no archimedeanRoss A. Finlayson2015-10-08T15:31:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dbK1B4NqxmgRe: Factorial/Exponential Identity, Infinity 2015On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 9:08:11 PM UTC-7, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote: > what a load of > > > This "space concerns" consideration is not entirely > > unreasonable - space concerns of the space of the > > sequences of the value space, and, the expectation > > space (probabilistic spaceRoss A. Finlayson2015-10-08T15:24:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/R5tDyKPwKIQBrun's constant and prime and twin prime conjectures, Apery (for abu k)On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:20:21 PM UTC-7, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote: > if there were not an infinite# of twinprimes, > Bryn's constant would have been rational > Please start a new thread with such notions, with title along those lines (Brun's constant and prime and twin primePentcho Valev2015-10-08T14:56:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/vgZVid3OBHsBRIAN GREENE: WARPED TIME OR WARPED MIND?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TNI0Jr-_rw In this week's installment of "A Moment of Science with Brian Greene," learn about the meaning of "warped time." There is no "warped time". Einsteinians measure the gravitational redshift but inform the gullible world that they have proved gravitatioArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T14:49:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ysD2HSLL8cso hard to visualize this-- what curve results Re: interesting experimentAlright, I am having a difficult time of visualizing this. Suppose our phosphorescent dot is a human standing on the equator with the Earth spinning on axis and the Earth moving forward in a linear motion and we as observers standing on the north pole. What curve would our "human" etch out?Archimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T14:43:55Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/yWQ8d6zhAog2 more questions Re: +4Math SURVEY: Tom Apostol, Cal Tech, taking the survey on CalculusSorry, the survey has been expanded by two more questions. On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 2:20:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > +4Math SURVEY: Tom Apostol, Cal Tech, taking the survey on Calculus > > 1) The Integral is the interior area of a LINE SEGMENT, and all wielded by aArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T14:32:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/_EuDl7djilIpolynomials should be equinumerous with functions that existOn Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 1:32:31 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 1:31:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > (snipped) > > So, now, taking the fundamental theorem of polynomials (not the hyped name of algebra) with its -- at least one solutionDan Christensen2015-10-08T14:20:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/SB_wGMquwzMRe: JG a pariah...What you should know about the Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words: JG's God Complex: "I am the Creator of this galaxy." -- March 19, 2015 "I am the last word on everything." -- May 6, 2015 "Whatever I imagine is real because whatever I imagine is well defined." -- March 26,Dan Christensen2015-10-08T14:19:36Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RQnpg9lz1ewRe: Read about...What you should know about the Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words: JG's God Complex: "I am the Creator of this galaxy." -- March 19, 2015 "I am the last word on everything." -- May 6, 2015 "Whatever I imagine is real because whatever I imagine is well defined." -- March 26,Dan Christensen2015-10-08T14:19:09Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xuL6Bkfouw0Re: The BIG STUPID JG...What you should know about the Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words: JG's God Complex: "I am the Creator of this galaxy." -- March 19, 2015 "I am the last word on everything." -- May 6, 2015 "Whatever I imagine is real because whatever I imagine is well defined." -- March 26, 2015Dan Christensen2015-10-08T14:17:24Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/49mcr1ACFugRe: Prof...What you should know about the Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words: JG's God Complex: "I am the Creator of this galaxy." -- March 19, 2015 "I am the last word on everything." -- May 6, 2015 "Whatever I imagine is real because whatever I imagine is well defined." -- March 26, 2015Arturo Magidin2015-10-08T14:03:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/fRif7_QCSG0Re: Diophantine equationOn Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 2:24:26 AM UTC-5, k_suli...@poczta.onet.pl wrote: > W dniu środa, 7 października 2015 16:16:16 UTC+2 użytkownik k_suli...@poczta.onet.pl napisał: > > Diophantine equation of higher degrees as: > > x^n + aˑy^n = c^n > > have integer solutions only when n = 2 andArchimedes Plutonium2015-10-08T13:42:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-ysD2HSLL8cinteresting experiment Re: wave produced by cycloid versus human on Earth wave in spaceOn Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 1:05:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) > Now let us ask this question of humans on the surface of Earth and that they etch out with Earth two waves in Space and are of two particles. The two particles are Earth and human on surface, much like thePort5632015-10-08T13:04:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/7p7h8bbW9JoRe: test"WM" <wolfgang.m...@hs-augsburg.de> wrote in message news:89a1730f-69c1-4a97-b87b-ae5b739d99df@googlegroups.com... > 0 FailedPort5632015-10-08T13:03:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/49mcr1ACFugRe: Prof. Wildberger is a crank and an independent thinker."John Gabriel" <thenewc...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:94cb922b-5f15-420c-aae4-f0fd8391f0f9@googlegroups.com... > To see how Wildberger brilliantly exposes the stupidity and > ignorance of mainstream mythmatics, watch the following video: [ video deleted as it is not kiddie-safe ] So,Port5632015-10-08T13:01:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xuL6Bkfouw0Re: The BIG STUPID farts back.Dan, more loon material for you. Date: 8 October 2015 "John Gabriel" <thenewc...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5d5181f1-40ac-45f5-85f9-4683b0893a9d@googlegroups.com... > You might notice that I no longer engage the absolute morons on this site, > because they are intellectual retards.Pentcho Valev2015-10-08T11:07:30Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/H_KRVRIl8vYRe: EINSTEIN ET LES FÊTEURShttp://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0305099v2.pdf George Ellis et Jean-Philippe Uzan : "The next mutation of c arose from the incompatibility of Maxwell's equations with Galilean invariance: either one sticks to Galilean invariance and Maxwell's equations only hold in a preferred frame, so thatPentcho Valev2015-10-08T10:38:25Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/kfmgxQjUAaoRe: SUBTLE LYING IN EINSTEINIANAhttps://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22830420-600-explore-100-years-of-general-relativity/ New Scientist: "Ten years before, in 1905, Einstein had already shown how motion warps space and time. Starting with the assumption baked into James Clerk Maxwell's theory of the electromagnetic force,John Gabriel2015-10-08T09:08:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/RQnpg9lz1ewRead about how I kick mythmatician glutes!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNlEq0ZrToSimon Roberts2015-10-08T08:07:33Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xuL6Bkfouw0Re: The BIG STUPID farts back.site, because they are intellectual retards. However, you are welcome to check out my videos and expand your horizons at: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A > > > > The perverts and pedophiles on this site have syphilis in their brains. You cannot fix the BIGSimon Roberts2015-10-08T08:05:16Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xuL6Bkfouw0Re: The BIG STUPID farts back.site, because they are intellectual retards. However, you are welcome to check out my videos and expand your horizons at: > > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_A > > The perverts and pedophiles on this site have syphilis in their brains. You cannot fix the BIG STUPID withPentcho Valev2015-10-08T07:48:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/EENiM-odwM8Re: NEIL TUROK: PHYSICS NEEDS A REVOLUTIONPhysics needs a resurrection rather than a revolution (Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate killed it): https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730370-600-why-do-we-move-forwards-in-time/ "[George] Ellis is up against one of the most successful theories in physics: specialk_suli...@poczta.onet.pl2015-10-08T07:24:26Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/fRif7_QCSG0Re: Diophantine equationW dniu środa, 7 października 2015 16:16:16 UTC+2 użytkownik k_suli...@poczta.onet.pl napisał: > Diophantine equation of higher degrees as: > x^n + aˑy^n = c^n > have integer solutions only when n = 2 and a = 1 (Pythagorean triple 3,4,5; constant parameter a = 1), and also when > n = 4 and a =