https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsDon Redmond2017-06-25T16:11:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PDtnDvuGHlwRe: Pythagorean quadruples - the impossible long diagonalsI'm not sure how much help this will be, but in Sierpinski's number theory text he solves the general sums of squares equals a square problem, that is, he gives the parametric form of the solutions. You can probably find it in Mordell's or Steuding's Diophantine Equations or Grosswald's Sum ofDavid Hilbert2017-06-25T15:59:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/myJVX_Xxt9cRe: Canonical transformation (difficult)Il 6/24/17 9:52 PM, Roland Franzius ha scritto: > > X^2 = X[x, y, px, py, 1/4]^2 > = -48 x^2- 8 y^2 + 576 (py/y)^4 + 576 (py/y)^2 - 192 px (py/y) > Hello I think it should be > = -48 x^2- 8 y^2 + 576 (py/y)^4 + 576 x (py/y)^2 - 192 px (py/y) > > Perhaps the problem would be easierPentcho Valev2017-06-25T15:32:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/dagAl2QvzkYStephen Hawking Wrong. Back to Drawing Board on... Relativity!"According to the Sunday Times, Prof. Turok has now published research suggesting that the basic maths behind Hawking's views is incorrect and it is back to drawing board on the origins of the universe." http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/steven-hawkings-just-got-dissed-his-basic-maths-wrong-says-scientisjmfbahciv2017-06-25T13:51:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/8BAX9NmXCNwRe: The Rule Of 72>> > Well, I wasn't talking about "numerology" beforehand, ...but since You seem >> to recognize it as "numerology" then you >> > are stating it was ...numerology. >> >> But you were doing numerology in the text which has been elided; it was >> a half-assed numerology rendition. > > Iburs...@gmail.com2017-06-25T11:33:38Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9dU1D43zTL0Archimedes Plutonium is an Alzheimer FaggotNice to hear from somebody, who hasn't produced any math for 30 years already, what is math. Cheers. You really qualify for the GWR, the longest internet spam of complete non-sense. Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017 13:29:43 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > Call them truncated functions andArchimedes Plutonium2017-06-25T11:29:43Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/9dU1D43zTL0New Math's Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, basically says All functions of Calculus are PolynomialsCall them truncated functions and truncated polynomials. Only that which is in 1st Quadrant Only is mathematics, and everything in other quadrants is snipped out and discarded. So the parts of the function and polynomials of x^2 + 1 and of x^3 -2x +4 that reside in 1st Quadrant Only areburs...@gmail.com2017-06-25T11:26:18Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/liLGaPB4tXoRe: Archimedes Plutonium is an Alzheimer FaggotYou see, they have a lot of stupidity entries, like your pal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Records#/media/File:Lucky_Diamond_Rich_face.jpg With your endless posts of unmath and untheorems, you should make it easily into GWR. Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017 13:23:45 UTC+2 schriebburs...@gmail.com2017-06-25T11:23:45Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/liLGaPB4tXoArchimedes Plutonium is an Alzheimer FaggotDon't smoke weed all day Archie, your posts are getting more and more absurd. 30 years already counting and not a single bit of math posted on sci.math. Thats a true record for the guiness book (of stupidity). Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017 00:05:06 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium: > Alright,Archimedes Plutonium2017-06-25T09:58:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-zbMMpGOKhM5Burse asks? ETH Zurich to publish AP's features of Infinity Borderline at 1*10^60477.58.43.158 jan burse ETH Zurich Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer, Emmanuel Kowalski, Urs Lang, Rahul Pandharipande, Richard Pink, Tristan Riviere, DietmarArchimedes Plutonium2017-06-25T09:49:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/-gHggPn-Xpkthe logical system for dealing with North Korea missilesNewsgroups: sci.physics Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 02:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Solution to North Korea missiles-- most logical, most effective From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:34:55 +0000 Solution to North Korea missiles-- most logical,burs...@gmail.com2017-06-25T09:29:11Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3dbR5jPctlgRe: Archimedes Putonium is an Alzheimer FaggotEven Edward Sandifer got excited when he saw in Eulers early E-45 a first usage of f(x). So it could be a really exciting time for you AP. Discovering so much bits of math practice, which were hidden to you, the last 30 years. Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017 11:08:34 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com:Peter Percival2017-06-25T09:18:23Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/W121CO_AajsRe: Riding off into the sunset...I didn't believe it when I read it, and it seems my scepticism was justified. > It's been, well... weird. I will continue posting at > MSE or Quora. -- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean. I think I had better not, Duchess.burs...@gmail.com2017-06-25T09:08:34Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/3dbR5jPctlgArchimedes Putonium is an Alzheimer FaggotDont put too much weight on yourself AP. Polynomials obviously seem not to work for you. Maybe try something simpler like 2+2=4. Probably we are here on the level of this user: Using Zeros to Graph Polynomials - Loose Definition Needed for Comprehension https://math.stackexchange.com/q/741330/Archimedes Plutonium2017-06-25T08:55:30Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xyAPitXMCEsI have taken Freedom of Speech for granted, but need to reflect on it now Re: the evolution of Freedom of Speech-- USA particularly importantFreedom of Speech, not knowing whether the USA played some crucial role in that right of law. > > So I did some search and found that the Freedom was around during Pericles in Ancient Greeks, but it did not help Socrates. > > Then it appears that the freedom was extant around the Enlightenmentquasi2017-06-25T07:48:56Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/PDtnDvuGHlwRe: Pythagorean quadruples - the impossible long diagonalsNice question! It's easy to show there is no solution if d = 2^k or d = (2^k)5, where k is a nonnegative integer. It's seems almost certain that for all other positive integer values of d, there _are_ solutions, but while I can support that claim heuristically, I don't see how to prove it.