https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsArchimedes Plutonium2016-10-24T05:57:49Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CDx6YBCOitg2-JUNO spacecraft Re: students around the world recognizing how dumb MIT math professors and Gabriel are on sine trigonometry2-JUNO spacecraft Re: students around the world recognizing how dumb MIT math professors + Gabriel are on sine trigonometry We know you cannot have success with Juno the spacecraft at Jupiter if you do not know the correct mathematics behind gravity. Likewise, the correct math behind sine as aVirgil2016-10-24T04:00:52Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BvEmmNNutcoRe: The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.Your "works" contain their own destruction. -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)Virgil2016-10-24T03:59:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/At7QJ8IzBQgRe: Stupid academics are the bane of my existence.In article <5c71d2fe-acaa-4b8b-9d28-840234007f7d@googlegroups.com>, Jan <fil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 2:56:57 PM UTC-7, John Gabriel wrote: > > On Sunday, 23 October 2016 14:19:28 UTC-7, Jan wrote: > > > On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 10:20:16 AM UTC-7, JohnVirgil2016-10-24T03:56:42Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/E2Cq655HCWIRe: The BIG STUPID can't even realise the most simple facts.In article <nujj9m$vj5$1...@news.albasani.net>, j4n bur53 <janb...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > John Gabriel schrieb: > > There are no derivatives at points of inflection. The derivative > > is the slope of a tangent line. There is no tangent line at x=0 > > when f(x)=x^3. Outside of JG'sVirgil2016-10-24T03:50:02Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentIn article <f71b1dde-0347-4b8a-b86e-924afcb5ca7c@googlegroups.com>, FredJeffries <FredJe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 7:00:06 PM UTC-7, John Boyce wrote: > > Perhaps you can help me see a flaw in the following argument, which also > > converts a decimal into a naturalVirgil2016-10-24T03:44:28Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentIn article <1780860419.89454.1477273803155.JavaMail.root@sodium.mathforum.org>, John Boyce <john.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps you can help me see a flaw in the following argument, which > also converts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: > > 1. Consider the set A of allArchimedes Plutonium2016-10-24T03:39:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/e-rwmacA-XAwas it freshman? Re: what year in High School do we teach Y= mx +b about lines and line graphing? Re: reTALK CALCULUSOn Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 5:38:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Now my memory is rusty here in that I was teaching math in Australia circa 1976 and perhaps teaching Y = mx + b. > > So where in USA schools is this taught? > > iPhone post > > AP What I was trying to say hereFredJeffries2016-10-24T02:53:59Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentconverts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: > > 1. Consider the set A of all decimal numbers between zero and 1. This set would necessarily include all rationals and irrationals between zero and 1. > > 2. From this set, create another set B as follows: > For eachJohn Gabriel2016-10-24T02:50:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentconverts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: > > 1. Consider the set A of all decimal numbers between zero and 1. This set would necessarily include all rationals and irrationals between zero and 1. > > 2. From this set, create another set B as follows: > For eachMike Terry2016-10-24T02:26:50Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argument"John Boyce" <john.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1780860419.89454.1477273803155.JavaMail.root@sodium.mathforum.org... > Perhaps you can help me see a flaw in the following argument, which also converts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: > > 1. Consider the set A of allArturo Magidin2016-10-24T02:25:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentconverts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: > > 1. Consider the set A of all decimal numbers between zero and 1. This set would necessarily include all rationals and irrationals between zero and 1. > > 2. From this set, create another set B as follows: > For eachJohn Boyce2016-10-24T02:00:06Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Ub743Rt9UBkRe: Need help with proof of Cantor's diagonal argumentPerhaps you can help me see a flaw in the following argument, which also converts a decimal into a natural number in a different way: 1. Consider the set A of all decimal numbers between zero and 1. This set would necessarily include all rationals and irrationals between zero and 1. 2.mathman12016-10-24T01:50:06Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/pE-ASY2gVhkRe: Pythagoras and Fermat's last theoremAs long as x,y,z are real integers the proof is simple. For n=2, all terms are > 0, so sum > 0. For n>2, Fermat's last theorem says no solution exist.Archimedes Plutonium2016-10-24T01:09:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/CDx6YBCOitg1-JUNO spacecraft Re: students around the world recognizing how dumb MIT math professors and Gabriel are on sine trigonometryOn Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 5:08:31 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > How can a student see that sine is truly a semicircle wave while all of MIT math department wrongly seeing it as sinusoidal. > > iPhone post > > AP We know you cannot have success with Juno the spacecraft atJohn Gabriel2016-10-24T00:47:31Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/BvEmmNNutcoRe: JG is a typical Dead Horse exampleThe new troll of sci.math is j4n - an re-incarnation of Dan Christensen.