https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sci.mathsci.mathMathematical discussions and pursuits.Google GroupsJohn Gabriel2017-10-23T14:20:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbYRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...On Monday, 23 October 2017 08:57:04 UTC-4, John Gabriel wrote: > There is no argument against this you retard! S = Lim S was decreed by Euler. You do not evaluate any infinite sum because there is no such thing. > > The question is "How do you arrive at 0.333...?" Through infinitePentcho Valev2017-10-23T14:16:27Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/DW4MDDTMOFsEinsteinians: Professors of Showbiz and Science FictionAn amazingly correct analysis by a layman: Letters to the Editor: Black holes and showbiz have one connection. I see Brian Cox, professor of showbiz and science fiction is soon to present in Canberra on the cosmos with its "dark energy and black holes," etc. Meanwhile real scientists arenetzweltler2017-10-23T14:15:09Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbYRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...each step > > of the list ('...' involved again). > > Let's assume that your 0.3, 0.33, ... and 0.4, 0.34, ... etc. are real numbers. With other words, that we consider two sequences of real numbers: > > (a_k)_{k e IN} with a_k = SUM_{n=1...k}3/10^n > and > (b_k)_{k e IN} =Me2017-10-23T13:39:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbYRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:16:43 PM UTC+2, netzweltler wrote: >>> 0.3 =< Sally =< 0.4 >>> 0.33 =< Sally =< 0.34 >>> 0.333 =< Sally =< 0.334 >>> ... >>> > You haven't shown that Sally is the limit, if you don't show it for each step > of the listMe2017-10-23T13:29:00Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1tQL4jh214Re: The bogus set concept.On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 3:08:35 PM UTC+2, John Gabriel wrote: > Good thing I read this! You will henceforth be ignored. You mooooroooon!!! Man, you are very ill, you know. Seek for professional help, John. Soon!John Gabriel2017-10-23T13:08:35Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/X1tQL4jh214Re: The bogus set concept.reflects my current level of knowledege and understanding. In other words ZERO understanding and you are a troll. Chuckle. Good thing I read this! You will henceforth be ignored. You mooooroooon!!!bassam king karzeddin2017-10-23T13:06:57Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/tWIQqH3_AIARe: Fiction numbers create fiction angles tookarzeddin: > > On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 10:25:28 AM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 6:27:07 PM UTC+3, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > The horn of a Unicorn is itself an archi- > > > > median spiral, showing the horn-numbers. > > > > > > > >John Gabriel2017-10-23T13:05:55Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/xA3nbm6fQcYRe: The greatest mathematician John Gabriel teaches moronsTrue. But most of the time they don't have a clue what they're teaching. They're just idiots.John Gabriel2017-10-23T13:04:16Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/cbMDjX0m7bYRe: When is 1/2 not equal to 2/4 ?http://www.nctm.org/Research-and-Advocacy/Research-Brief-and-Clips/Ratio-_-Proportion/ > > > > That is FALSE and shows how ignorant and stupid the orangutans are who direct NCTM. In fact a proportion has NOTHING to do with equality and is understood by ONE ratio alone. > > > > When one writesJohn Gabriel2017-10-23T13:03:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/iXei_nyTVIwRe: S = Lim S : LIMIT of the PARTIAL SUMS is the SAME as the LIMIT of the SERIES/SEQUENCESpelling is the least of his worries. He is a complete and utter moron. Niceties do not work on trolls. It's in their nature to be cranks.John Gabriel2017-10-23T13:00:39Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zXoOiOjqTigRe: There are no axioms or postulates in mathematics, only in mythmatics.Correction: He knows nothing, not even manners. How can a troll know anything useful?John Gabriel2017-10-23T12:59:54Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/zXoOiOjqTigRe: There are no axioms or postulates in mathematics, only in mythmatics.keep up with me - not in math (this we knew a long time ago!) and certainly not in debate. > > > > But please try to imitate me properly!! Chuckle. I taught you about projection - you never knew you had this illness. > > > I would never imitate you, I don't want to be a babbling buffoon.John Gabriel2017-10-23T12:57:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbYRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...There is no argument against this you retard! S = Lim S was decreed by Euler. You do not evaluate any infinite sum because there is no such thing. The question is "How do you arrive at 0.333...?" Through infinite divisions? I am not talking about the limit moron! You can define it as theJohn Gabriel2017-10-23T12:53:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/bgU-4JWvHbYRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...It turns out that you are unable and unwilling to answer a question that exposes your ignorance and proves you wrong clearly. Again, how do you arrive at 0.333...? Using infinite division? Chuckle.FromTheRafters2017-10-23T12:38:51Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sci.math/Y_IfotqSLB4Re: True or False? A number plus 4x the number is more likely prime than a number minus 2x a primeI got one, but most posters here use Google Groups and they can't hide trolling posts or refrain from responding to them ... Here "..." means ad infinitum.