https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sage-marketingsage-marketingSage Marketing coordinates promotion efforts, information campaigns and related materials about the open-source mathematics software system Sage - <a href="http://www.sagemath.org/">http://www.sagemath.org/</a> Google GroupsWilliam Stein2015-11-19T06:28:32Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/1CLQx4XS9bIvideo about sage days 70https://vimeo.com/146207495 -- William (http://wstein.org)JC2015-09-30T18:50:08Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/5mvQJVP9l9URe: [sage-marketing] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sources of funding - perhaps computer manufacturers?On 30 September 2015 at 19:25, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Bill Hart <goodwi...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > What analysis has been done of the weak spots of Sage? > [...] > > Question: what is Sage's strategy[...]? > It sounds me Prof Stein has anWilliam Stein2015-09-30T18:26:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/5mvQJVP9l9URe: [sage-devel] Re: Sources of funding - perhaps computer manufacturers?On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Bill Hart <goodwi...@googlemail.com> wrote: > What analysis has been done of the weak spots of Sage? [...] > Question: what is Sage's strategy[...]? Here is Sage's strategy, or at least what my strategy toward Sage has been for the last 5 years. 1. DiagnoseSamuel Lelievre2015-06-06T20:43:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/iEVH8PfRCNERe: [sage-marketing] Fwd: Jobs involving SageMathYou are right. Thanks for opening https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/51Harald Schilly2015-06-06T20:03:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/iEVH8PfRCNERe: [sage-marketing] Fwd: Jobs involving SageMathOn Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Samuel Lelievre <samuel....@gmail.com> wrote: > Who is maintaining this LinkedIn profile? > Could they also add a link to the wiki jobs page > from the LinkedIn jobs page? posting a 30-day job position ad cost about $150. I don't think this makes any sense.Samuel Lelievre2015-06-06T19:53:44Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/iEVH8PfRCNEFwd: Jobs involving SageMathHarald Schilly2015-02-02T19:41:20Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/PxK7FV9pnPkRe: Sage 10thI think spreadshirt.com could be a good place to sell this. Does anyone have any experience with them? -- Hkcrisman2015-01-24T17:23:04Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/PxK7FV9pnPkRe: Sage 10th2) Get shirts. Yes. We really really need a place to sell swag. I really think you would be surprised by how much cash would flow to Sage Foundation from that source - not huge, but probably pretty consistent. For instance, they would make great gifts to hand out for Math Clubs...Stefan Reiterer2014-12-25T20:20:37Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/m29U-xN3rmcRe: crazy semantics in The Wolfram LanguageSorry for replying agein, but I saw that in one of the comments from your link it seems that Maxima makes the same mistake. - Stefan On Friday, December 19, 2014 4:17:41 PM UTC+1, Dan Drake wrote: > > See the screenshot at > https://plus.google.com/+DanPiponi/posts/fF9xHcxo9Ze . > > Quite aStefan Reiterer2014-12-25T20:15:22Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/m29U-xN3rmcRe: crazy semantics in The Wolfram LanguageActually from what is shown, it's not a problem with the principle of least suprise, it's simply wrong: the sequence f is defined by f[0] = 1, f[n] = n for n > 0, thus summation over n =0,…,m gives Σ f[n] = ½ m(m+1) *+ 1* It appears that the symbolic summation ignores the special definition ofDan Drake2014-12-19T15:17:41Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/m29U-xN3rmccrazy semantics in The Wolfram LanguageSee the screenshot at https://plus.google.com/+DanPiponi/posts/fF9xHcxo9Ze . Quite a violation of the principle of least surprise... Dan -- --- Dan Drake ----- www.math.wisc.edu/~ddrake/ -------Stefan Reiterer2014-12-06T13:55:13Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/-Hrv0wJ1hOkRe: [sage-marketing] User SurveyBut I'm seriously thinking what I can do and what I can't do to improve Sage. What I can't do is to do much surveying. Since my Graduation I have a full time job at a company, and currently don't do teaching any more. So I don't have access to students with whom I could work with. What IWilliam Stein2014-12-05T23:34:03Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/-Hrv0wJ1hOkRe: [sage-marketing] User SurveyIt's stuck in nowhere. Why don't we try to get some people -- a small group of maybe 10 -- to try it, and see how it works, and then get way more people to try it? > Ok, I already thought that there are attempts, but I couldn't find any > information till now. > > What about FacebookStefan Reiterer2014-12-05T23:02:16Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/-Hrv0wJ1hOkRe: [sage-marketing] User Surveyinformation till now. What about Facebook surveys? If they are public from the beginning, there are maybe less concerns, especially since FB isn't taken that seriously by the most people. The result is of course not that scientific, as the data from a professional survey, but could already quiteHarald Schilly2014-12-05T21:28:40Zhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-marketing/-Hrv0wJ1hOkRe: [sage-marketing] User SurveyI second that ;-) > Are there any serious attempts to analyze standard user needs more systematically? > (And I don't talk about bug reports) I didn't find any except for a survey from 2009. I did several surveys, and well, some aggregated data was published here -- too long ago to be of