|Glacier||alanp||8/22/12 5:21 AM|
Do you have anything to say regarding Boto support for Glacier?
|Re: [boto-users] Glacier||Mitchell Garnaat||8/22/12 5:39 AM|
Hi Alan -
Support for glacier is definitely on the backlog list. I'm not sure when we will get to it but I've already seen quite a bit of interest so I'm trying to figure out a way to get it done soon.
Is it something you would be interested in using?
|Re: [boto-users] Glacier||Jeff Bauer||8/22/12 6:13 AM|
I think we're likely to see more interest in Glacier than route53.
Though I want to see the slick53 pull request someday accepted
More seriously, if basic Glacier support were part of boto
I think we'd see some interesting boto-based archival tools
|RE: [boto-users] Glacier||alanp||8/22/12 6:18 AM|
Glacier would certainly have some uses for us - it would be nice to get a look at an API (I'm too lazy^H^H^H^Hbusy to dig into the REST documentation at the moment ;^).
|Re: [boto-users] Glacier||Mitchell Garnaat||8/22/12 8:23 AM|
If anyone is particularly motivated and wants to contribute to a glacier module for boto, let me know. I've made a start at one and I'll take as far as I can in the time I have today but there will be lots more work needed to get it complete.
|Re: [boto-users] Glacier||tedder||8/24/12 11:36 PM|
I see it's on github:
What's the roadmap? It certainly needs a connection object and the root __init work, but.. what else?