| Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
BigWallyFilms |
16/03/11 05:55 |
When I tried to install a nightly build of Firefox (3/16/11 - Windows 32-bit) it calls itself "Minefield"? "You are now installing Minefield", it says and installs it into a folder called Minefield. Very confusing. Are they trying to confuse us?
|
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
Chris Ilias |
16/03/11 06:16 |
During Firefox 2 development, too many people were under the impression that nightlies were end-user releases because they were called "Firefox", so nightlies were re-branded as "Minefield". -- Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca> Mailing list/Newsgroup moderator
|
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
News |
16/03/11 06:56 |
On 3/16/2011 9:16 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 11-03-16 8:55 AM, BigWallyFilms wrote: >> When I tried to install a nightly build of Firefox (3/16/11 - Windows >> 32-bit) it calls itself "Minefield"? "You are now installing >> Minefield", it says and installs it into a folder called Minefield. >> Very confusing. Are they trying to confuse us? > > During Firefox 2 development, too many people were under the impression > that nightlies were end-user releases because they were called > "Firefox", so nightlies were re-branded as "Minefield". > LOL. Very reassuring... Suggestive of impact and performance?
|
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
Ron Hunter |
16/03/11 07:07 |
More to give the impression that this could be a dangerous ground to traverse. Nightlies often fail, catastrophically. Don't try them if you are easily frustrated, mind having your favorite extension crater even though it worked fine yesterday. Just about anything can happen, and does. |
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
WLS |
16/03/11 07:17 |
I would like to see them do the same with SeaMonkey nightlies. I have been known to open the wrong version even though I use separate profiles. -- openSUSE 11.3(x86_64) - Gnome2.30 - SeaMonkey 2.1b3pre
|
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
Chris Ilias |
16/03/11 10:34 |
On 11-03-16 10:07 AM, Ron Hunter wrote: > More to give the impression that this could be a dangerous ground to > traverse. > Nightlies often fail, catastrophically. In the old days, yes. Nowadays, because of improvements to automated testing and the build system, nightlies are much more stable than they used to be. -- Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca> Mailing list/Newsgroup moderator
|
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
Ron Hunter |
16/03/11 12:15 |
On 3/16/2011 12:34 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 11-03-16 10:07 AM, Ron Hunter wrote: >> More to give the impression that this could be a dangerous ground to >> traverse. >> Nightlies often fail, catastrophically. > > In the old days, yes. Nowadays, because of improvements to automated > testing and the build system, nightlies are much more stable than they > used to be. Very true, but I still find some that just won't run now and then. Wait a few days, and such problems are resolved. Generally, nightlies are pretty stable, but users who aren't inclined to be patient about strange failures would do well to avoid them. |
| Re: Firefox nightly builds - Minefield? |
Jeff |
16/03/11 21:23 |
|