|Fwd: TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sigurd Magnusson||5/4/12 2:47 PM|
Might be worth upgrading for ss3 beta 3?
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] Fwd: TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sam Minnée||5/4/12 2:51 PM|
How much work is an upgrade? Did we fork the TinyMCE code at all to get it working for our needs?
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Ingo Schommer||5/7/12 12:01 AM|
Very lightly, so an upgrade should be simple: http://open.silverstripe.org/ticket/7290
(not assigned to any milestone yet)
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sean Harvey||5/7/12 9:36 PM|
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sigurd Magnusson||5/7/12 10:08 PM|
Well done :)
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sigurd Magnusson||5/17/12 6:32 PM|
Having a play today and the new TinyMCE does seem a lot better. It's hard to pinpoint, as there's tiny subtle things going on with rich text editing. But as one example, if I 'unbullet' a full list of bullets, I used to end up with "empty" <ul></ul> markup whereas now it seems to delete that, which is good. This was on Firefox on Mac Lion so would be good to know if people on various versions of Windows find it better or worse.
On 8 May 2012 16:36, Sean Harvey <hal...@gmail.com> wrote:
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sam Minnée||5/17/12 6:33 PM|
Do you happen to know if this is unique to SilverStripe's implementation of TinyMCE, or do these issues also occur on TinyMCE's own demos?
|Re: [silverstripe-dev] TinyMCE Update 3.5||Sigurd Magnusson||5/17/12 6:36 PM|
No idea, sorry, but my point was that the <ul></ul> behavior is fixed now, in my limited testing…
If I do spot a problem I'll see if it also see if it occurs in the main demo of the moxiecode site.