> Dan Christensen, Jan Burse and various alias, John
> Gabriel, are the three worst failures of math at this
> moment.
>

 AP wrote:

> Sci.math is an open forum, and we cannot kick them
> out. The best we can do is totally ignore.
>
> AP

The whole incurable problem is that (failures of math) are not only a few but almost (0.999...) of the mainstream  mathematicians, and this certainly doesn't mean all of them for sure

 BKK

> On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 12:40:06 PM UTC-5,
> bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > Dan Christensen, Jan Burse and various alias,
> John
> > > Gabriel, are the three worst failures of math at
> this
> > > moment.
> > >
> > > Two of the three are just dirty stalkers, and
> math is
> > > besides the point, they need to stalk, as
> nourishment
> > > for daily sustenance.
> > >
> > > The third, Gabriel is a loud mouth obnoxious twit
> who
> > > bad mouthes everyone around. I think the failure
> of
> > > Gabriel is likely linked to his wanting his crap
> > > published and the publisher denying, so here he
> is
> > > filling up sci.math everyday with his mind rot.
> So
> > > retched bad is his New Calculus, that the moron
> does
> > > not know he needs to work with an infinitesimal,
> he
> > > needs to find the infinity borderline to obtain a
> > > infinitesimal 1*10^-604. The fool thinks the
> > > derivative is a parallel line with the Mean Value
> > > theorem, and has not one single change in the
> > > integral. The fool steals from me, but hates to
> have
> > > to reference me. Math is too much for Gabriel,
> and
> > > should be in service industry, not academics.
> > >
> > > Christensen and Burse are obnoxious stalkers. In
> the
> > > early days of Usenet, sci. newsgroups, it was
> > > commonly thought by normal people that cranks and
> > > crackpots would fill up a sci.math. What they
> never
> > > in their life counted on, is that there are so
> many
> > > deranged and flea bitten stalking psychos that
> these
> > > stalkers outnumber the cranks and crackpots by an
> > > order of 10 to 1. For each crank there are some
> 10
> > > stalkers lurking.
> > >
> > > I post this to warn people, and hopefully their
> > > better nature understands that if you talk with
> these
> > > failures, you only keep them sticking around
> longer
> > > and they attract more failures like themselves.
> > >
> >  AP wrote:
> >
> > > Sci.math is an open forum, and we cannot kick
> them
> > > out. The best we can do is totally ignore.
> > >
> > > AP
> >
> > The whole incurable problem is that (failures of
> math) are not only a few but almost (0.999...) of the
> mainstream  mathematicians, and this certainly
> doesn't mean all of them for sure
> >
> >  BKK
>
> Well at the moment I am looking into radioactive
> decay-- trying to insert some logical reasoning into
> errors there-- the gamma ray is probably not a
> photon, but actually some electron mass matter that
> is flying around with huge speed.
>
> But this brings an analogy to all subjects of
> science, including mathematics-- they are radioactive
> studies-- meaning that much is in decay and
> continually being tossed off or tossed out. But much
> remains behind that is "acceptable truth".
>
> But the crumbs of mathematics like Christensen or
> Burse, feel that anything "in print" is guaranteed
> forever. What they display is how bad and awful is a
> mind like theirs doing in math.
>
> BKK, use Google Abuse report and daily-- report them
> as abuse. It is nice to hide from view their posts--
> relaxing to see a "sea of posts hidden from view"
>
> Now, BKK, I have to admit a few days ago, you were
> posting too much and I put you in that sea of abuse.
>
> AP

Well, I believe that this is the only immoderate site for mathematics in the whole world which must continue as a unique distinguished site (from many other moderated sites) for the value of complete freedom, so let people be free as you are free to write whatever you like here

 And everybody knows that nobody would really get anything here even he does the seven miracles in mathematics in sci.math, but it is really more than fun and a real historical record if it is kept permanently for sure

 Regarding personal attacks, which is not about mathematics, I think there are an active a laws for handling those issues, but one should be wise enough not to be dragged to those kinds of personal attacks in order to keep good quality for the this site that offers this unique opportunity so unlike many other moderated sites that tend to suppress immediately any topic written by unknown person if it is opposing their own understanding, where this is really a big tragedy in many cases to real genius people for sure, and this may be out of physic logical incurable and so inherited of many diseases      

 And one must be able to distinguish well enough between the general critics that are not directed to anyone in person but to the whole world communities of mathematics, and sometimes those critics may take a form of challenge to the whole world communities of mathematics with some real puzzles, irrefutable conjectures, rigorous proofs, …etc,  that is not understood by those mainstream professional mathematicians, where then get so much frustrated instead of acting wisely and honestly as a reaction, and many times they try desperately to source illegally any interesting new topics to unrelated old resources just to suppress the OP and force him to leave

 Generally and so, unfortunately, the vast majority of the professional mathematicians feel insulted so badly especially if they cannot face an obvious challenge posted by only a mature or a professional or else, were simply many masked people of them hide under fake meaningless names and so cowardly start diverting and spoiling the content issue to make the poster appear as a crank or troll or imbecile, …etc, whereas their main rule must be the opposite, that is to distinguish from original posts any new meaningful topics and not to hurry up to their secretive researchers or Wikipedia pages and write them as their own discoveries or so  

 And who knows if those peculiar and so revolutionary discussions spreader around the world now days would become the most important issues in the near future, since you know how much joy the public mathematicians get from old sources written by generally dead people, but very rarely when they are alive, since they do respect the dead people even they were merely not any better than big cheaters or big fools  
 And my posts are really too lesser and much shorter than so many here, including you for sure

 And why should my posts reported as abuse, if there isn’t any valid reason, wonder!  

 Regards
 Bassam King Karzeddin
 May 13, 2017