Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:46:27 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 03:46:28 +0000


Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality

Repeated the experiment of the German company that found attract magnetism is 5-10% stronger than repel.

Last time i did this i found 7% stronger. But under poor conditions since i used unequal magnets.

Under better controls i find the attract is 14% stronger, 3/3.5

AP

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 10:55:54 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
attract magnetism 14% stronger repel Re: Is Sun moving in Faraday's law or Ampere's law to Vega?? 8th ed Atom Totality

Repeated the experiment of the German company that found attract magnetism is 5-10% stronger than repel.

Last time i did this i found 7% stronger. But under poor conditions since i used unequal magnets.

Under better controls i find the attract is 14% stronger, 3/3.5

AP

On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:59:24 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality

- show quoted text -
Was looking to see if 85% or 86% comes up again in physics, or its complement 15% or 14% and strangely enough in Bell Inequality.

AP


Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 00:06:38 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed
 Atom Totality
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 07:06:38 +0000

Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality

Holy, holy,holy, smokes, pi is 3.14 and e is 2.71

2.71/3.14 is 86%

So that attraction in EM follows 3.14.... And Repel is Pauli Exclusion Denial of Same Space Occupancy follows 2.71....

What a beautiful law of physics.

AP

One of the world's most important physics experiments-- attract magnetism is 14% stronger than repel. It means gravity is electromagnetism.

Now i forget which one it is Uranus or Neptune-- bet it is Uranus.

So we have Gravity = EM and in EM we have alternating current in that electricity can change motion at the speed of light-- almost instantaneously.

So we have to ask the question, has astronomy ever witnessed something along those lines. I bet so, only so embarrassed that it was not reported.

But now, if tomorrow someone noticed Uranus had "righted itself" of its axis of rotation, an event like that could not be scuttled from being reported.

And then scientists scurrying topsy turvy trying to explain how overnight Uranus righted itself.

Will Mike Brown chime in by saying a 10th planet caused it. Will Lisa Randall chime in saying the dinosaur herd on Neptune caused it? Will Hawking-Green-Tyson chime in saying a cloud of Dark Matter and Black Hole caused it?

Whereas, all i am saying is that when Gravity = EM, huge changes can take place all of a sudden.

Perhaps Uranus is caught in a EM conflicting zone of magnetism from Sun, Jupiter, Saturn making its axis parallel to its orbit path.

AP