| ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | rsc | 08/12/15 08:38 | We should send out a Go 1.6 beta 1 soon. What's missing that needs fixing to get into that?
Russ |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | Dave Cheney | 08/12/15 15:17 | I would like to try to get an official arm build for 1.6. I played with the release system a few weeks ago and I think getting an arm binary build out of it should be straight forward. While we could try all the permutations, I think something at the GOARM=6 level, if it boots on the RPI, should be sufficient. How does that sound ?
-- |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | Vincent Vanackère | 09/12/15 00:00 | What about issue https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12278 ("go/build:
honour GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT") ? While obviouly not critical, perhaps this should be fixed before a go 1.6 beta (since vendoring will be enabled by default) ? A lot of useful refactoring / code analysis tools are currently (half-)broken with vendoring and having a fix into go/build ready for 1.6 would probably allow to easily fix most of them. Vincent |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | rsc | 09/12/15 07:58 | On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Vincent Vanackere <vincent....@gmail.com> wrote:What about issue https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12278 ("go/build: Yes, that will be fixed. Russ |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | rsc | 15/12/15 12:13 | On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Dave Cheney <da...@cheney.net> wrote: Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't really know. I guess it sounds fine as long as it works with the current buildlet-based release building system. Do you know what that entails or how close we are to that already? It seems like if we have new-style builders for linux/arm (and we do), it should just work. But again I don't really know. Russ |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | Brad Fitzpatrick | 15/12/15 12:14 | It should just work. --You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-dev" group. |
| Re: [golang-dev] ready for go 1.6 beta 1? | rsc | 15/12/15 12:16 | Great. We can try it and see then. :-) I'm thinking about Thursday for cutting beta 1. It won't be perfect (it's a beta) but it should be fairly good and it help us start on the list of bugs we don't know about yet. Russ |