In article <3ht65k$2...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, Blamby <bla...@aol.com> wrote:

>Such marriages are definitely not viable. As we all know,
>it is impossible for people of different races to understand
>each other, and the physical differences make it almost
>impossible for them to successfully copulate. It has been
>shown in studies that interacial couples who are foolish
>enough to even attempt such a union face a lifetime of
>loneliness, strife, and sexual frustration. It has also been
>shown in recent studies that 99.6% of such couples can
>not agree on what to eat for breakfast. And should nature
>be kind enough to allow an intersection of sexual apparatus,
>their offspring - while cute - are genetically disadvantaged.
>Some interacial marriage partners have had painful and
>embarrassing surgery in order to maintain even a sham
>of a marital relationship.
>(How "I'm doing research project on..." postings do we
>get in week?  Anybody else's patience wearing thin?
>I'm beginning to feel like a rat in a laboratory.)

On a serious note, has there been any studies done on gender ratios
of the offspring of interracial marriages?  It seems that 60% or more of
Eurasians I have met to date were female, and I'm wondering if there is
in fact a biochemical reason for this.  Or is it that for whatever
reasons Eurasian males are more difficult to notice?
A net-friend named Linda Absher talked about this when I met her for lunch.